A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients
Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1949 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1941 |
container_title | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Trinh, Emilie Hanley, James A Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire Perl, Jeffrey Chan, Christopher T |
description | Abstract
Background
High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD.
Methods
Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure.
Results
Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%).
Conclusions
In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ndt/gfz075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ndt/gfz075</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2311923417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGyF0GE2P3IZrtHKX5BwYuew3QzsSvJbswmhfrrjaT26GmYdx5ehoeQS87uODNy7otu_lF-M62OyJSnGUuEXKhjMh2OPGGKmQk5i_GTMWaE1qdkIrkUxigxJXBPbagbaF0MnoaSdmg33n31SGPfbt0WKuo8XYKHwoGnDbauCx6HeNirXXSRgi_oJtRIN1iHQ9pA59B38ZyclFBFvNjPGXl_fHhbPier16eX5f0qsVLJLpEMS70uGaTK6mwhMr6wAFaINFsUWqrUKrCp0VmBGjQKDpZrlGgBC1NKI2fkZuxt2jC8H7u8dtFiVYHH0MdcSM6NkCnXA3o7orYNMbZY5k3ramh3OWf5r9J8UJqPSgf4at_br2ssDuifwwG4HoHQN_8V_QC5ToFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311923417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</creator><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD.
Methods
Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure.
Results
Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%).
Conclusions
In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31329952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hemodialysis, Home - methods ; Hemodialysis, Home - mortality ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Dialysis - methods ; Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perl, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD.
Methods
Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure.
Results
Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%).
Conclusions
In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodialysis, Home - methods</subject><subject>Hemodialysis, Home - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGyF0GE2P3IZrtHKX5BwYuew3QzsSvJbswmhfrrjaT26GmYdx5ehoeQS87uODNy7otu_lF-M62OyJSnGUuEXKhjMh2OPGGKmQk5i_GTMWaE1qdkIrkUxigxJXBPbagbaF0MnoaSdmg33n31SGPfbt0WKuo8XYKHwoGnDbauCx6HeNirXXSRgi_oJtRIN1iHQ9pA59B38ZyclFBFvNjPGXl_fHhbPier16eX5f0qsVLJLpEMS70uGaTK6mwhMr6wAFaINFsUWqrUKrCp0VmBGjQKDpZrlGgBC1NKI2fkZuxt2jC8H7u8dtFiVYHH0MdcSM6NkCnXA3o7orYNMbZY5k3ramh3OWf5r9J8UJqPSgf4at_br2ssDuifwwG4HoHQN_8V_QC5ToFQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Trinh, Emilie</creator><creator>Hanley, James A</creator><creator>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creator><creator>Perl, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Chan, Christopher T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><author>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodialysis, Home - methods</topic><topic>Hemodialysis, Home - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perl, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trinh, Emilie</au><au>Hanley, James A</au><au>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</au><au>Perl, Jeffrey</au><au>Chan, Christopher T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1941</spage><epage>1949</epage><pages>1941-1949</pages><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD.
Methods
Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure.
Results
Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%).
Conclusions
In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31329952</pmid><doi>10.1093/ndt/gfz075</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-0509 |
ispartof | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949 |
issn | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923417 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Canada Cohort Studies Female Hemodialysis, Home - methods Hemodialysis, Home - mortality Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Male Middle Aged Peritoneal Dialysis - methods Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality Risk Factors Treatment Failure |
title | A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20technique%20survival%20in%20Canadian%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20and%20home%20hemodialysis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Trinh,%20Emilie&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1941&rft.epage=1949&rft.pages=1941-1949&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/gfz075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311923417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311923417&rft_id=info:pmid/31329952&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ndt/gfz075&rfr_iscdi=true |