A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients

Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949
Hauptverfasser: Trinh, Emilie, Hanley, James A, Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire, Perl, Jeffrey, Chan, Christopher T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1949
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1941
container_title Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
container_volume 34
creator Trinh, Emilie
Hanley, James A
Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire
Perl, Jeffrey
Chan, Christopher T
description Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure. Results Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%). Conclusions In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ndt/gfz075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ndt/gfz075</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2311923417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGyF0GE2P3IZrtHKX5BwYuew3QzsSvJbswmhfrrjaT26GmYdx5ehoeQS87uODNy7otu_lF-M62OyJSnGUuEXKhjMh2OPGGKmQk5i_GTMWaE1qdkIrkUxigxJXBPbagbaF0MnoaSdmg33n31SGPfbt0WKuo8XYKHwoGnDbauCx6HeNirXXSRgi_oJtRIN1iHQ9pA59B38ZyclFBFvNjPGXl_fHhbPier16eX5f0qsVLJLpEMS70uGaTK6mwhMr6wAFaINFsUWqrUKrCp0VmBGjQKDpZrlGgBC1NKI2fkZuxt2jC8H7u8dtFiVYHH0MdcSM6NkCnXA3o7orYNMbZY5k3ramh3OWf5r9J8UJqPSgf4at_br2ssDuifwwG4HoHQN_8V_QC5ToFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311923417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</creator><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure. Results Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%). Conclusions In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31329952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hemodialysis, Home - methods ; Hemodialysis, Home - mortality ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Dialysis - methods ; Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perl, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><description>Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure. Results Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%). Conclusions In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodialysis, Home - methods</subject><subject>Hemodialysis, Home - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGyF0GE2P3IZrtHKX5BwYuew3QzsSvJbswmhfrrjaT26GmYdx5ehoeQS87uODNy7otu_lF-M62OyJSnGUuEXKhjMh2OPGGKmQk5i_GTMWaE1qdkIrkUxigxJXBPbagbaF0MnoaSdmg33n31SGPfbt0WKuo8XYKHwoGnDbauCx6HeNirXXSRgi_oJtRIN1iHQ9pA59B38ZyclFBFvNjPGXl_fHhbPier16eX5f0qsVLJLpEMS70uGaTK6mwhMr6wAFaINFsUWqrUKrCp0VmBGjQKDpZrlGgBC1NKI2fkZuxt2jC8H7u8dtFiVYHH0MdcSM6NkCnXA3o7orYNMbZY5k3ramh3OWf5r9J8UJqPSgf4at_br2ssDuifwwG4HoHQN_8V_QC5ToFQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Trinh, Emilie</creator><creator>Hanley, James A</creator><creator>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creator><creator>Perl, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Chan, Christopher T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</title><author>Trinh, Emilie ; Hanley, James A ; Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire ; Perl, Jeffrey ; Chan, Christopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-30ef7bf0a45c7682618caac22468d7354c5ac4976de7a7e21ac17e3ecaed9f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodialysis, Home - methods</topic><topic>Hemodialysis, Home - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perl, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trinh, Emilie</au><au>Hanley, James A</au><au>Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire</au><au>Perl, Jeffrey</au><au>Chan, Christopher T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1941</spage><epage>1949</epage><pages>1941-1949</pages><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background High discontinuation rates remain a challenge for home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We compared technique failure risks among Canadian patients receiving HHD and PD. Methods Using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, we studied adult patients who initiated HHD or PD within 1 year of beginning dialysis between 2000 and 2012, with follow-up until 31 December 2013. Technique failure was defined as a transfer to any alternative modality for a period of ≥60 days. Technique survival between HHD and PD was compared using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. We also examined the time dependence of technique survival, the association of patient characteristics with technique failure and causes of technique failure. Results Between 2000 and 2012, 15 314 patients were treated with a home dialysis modality within 1 year of dialysis initiation: 14 461 on PD and 853 on HHD. Crude technique failure rates were highest during the first year of therapy for both home modalities. During the entire period of follow-up, technique failure was lower with HHD compared with PD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.69–0.90). However, the relative technique failure risk was not proportional over time and the beneficial association with HHD was only apparent after the first year of dialysis. Comparisons also varied among subgroups and the superior technique survival associated with HHD relative to PD was less pronounced in more recent years and among older patients. Predictors of technique failure also differed between modalities. While obesity, smoking and small facility size were associated with higher technique failure in both PD and HHD, the association with age and gender differed. Furthermore, the majority of discontinuation occurred for medical reasons in PD (38%), while the majority of HHD patients experienced technique failure due to social reasons or inadequate resources (50%). Conclusions In this Canadian study of home dialysis patients, HHD was associated with better technique survival compared with PD. However, patterns of technique failure differed significantly among these modalities. Strategies to improve patient retention across all home dialysis modalities are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31329952</pmid><doi>10.1093/ndt/gfz075</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-0509
ispartof Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.34 (11), p.1941-1949
issn 0931-0509
1460-2385
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923417
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Canada
Cohort Studies
Female
Hemodialysis, Home - methods
Hemodialysis, Home - mortality
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - mortality
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Peritoneal Dialysis - methods
Peritoneal Dialysis - mortality
Risk Factors
Treatment Failure
title A comparison of technique survival in Canadian peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20technique%20survival%20in%20Canadian%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20and%20home%20hemodialysis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Trinh,%20Emilie&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1941&rft.epage=1949&rft.pages=1941-1949&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/gfz075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311923417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311923417&rft_id=info:pmid/31329952&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ndt/gfz075&rfr_iscdi=true