Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?

Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we clas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta neurochirurgica 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14
Hauptverfasser: Kaestner, Stefanie, Poetschke, Manuela, Kehler, Uwe, Antes, Sebastian, Krause, Matthias, Deinsberger, Wolfgang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Acta neurochirurgica
container_volume 162
creator Kaestner, Stefanie
Poetschke, Manuela
Kehler, Uwe
Antes, Sebastian
Krause, Matthias
Deinsberger, Wolfgang
description Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients. Methods In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data. Results Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery. Conclusion Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310712842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2332282737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AQ8S8OKlmmTSJvUisrgqiIIf55C2iXbpNpq0u-y_N9pVwYOXScI88054EDqg5IQSIk5DLIQmhOYJ4URCQjbQDsk5S2Ihm_FOYjtjmRyh3RBm8cUEh200ApplIpV0B909mEUdatfi0PsX41fYuqZxy7p9wZPHKQ6vfdvhug3Gd5E6w69uiZ3tTItL1zcVrjtcGKwXrq5Mdb6Htqxugtlfn2P0PL18mlwnt_dXN5OL26QEkXYJkFJXoEGnnIOElNscbAkVNQVJeaUFFVBmOueFMEWZWyqYTWkldSG0lVLCGB0PuW_evfcmdGpeh9I0jW6N64NiQImgTHIW0aM_6Mz1vo2_ixQwJpkAESk2UKV3IXhj1Zuv59qvFCXq07YabKtoW33ZViQOHa6j-2Juqp-Rb70RgAEIsdVGvb-7_4n9AIiiiUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2332282737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients. Methods In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data. Results Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery. Conclusion Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0942-0940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31667581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid ; CSF Circulation ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article - CSF Circulation ; Patients ; Revisions ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Acta neurochirurgica, 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Acta Neurochirurgica is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetschke, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antes, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><title>Acta neurochirurgica</title><addtitle>Acta Neurochir</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><description>Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients. Methods In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data. Results Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery. Conclusion Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</description><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>CSF Circulation</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article - CSF Circulation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0001-6268</issn><issn>0942-0940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AQ8S8OKlmmTSJvUisrgqiIIf55C2iXbpNpq0u-y_N9pVwYOXScI88054EDqg5IQSIk5DLIQmhOYJ4URCQjbQDsk5S2Ihm_FOYjtjmRyh3RBm8cUEh200ApplIpV0B909mEUdatfi0PsX41fYuqZxy7p9wZPHKQ6vfdvhug3Gd5E6w69uiZ3tTItL1zcVrjtcGKwXrq5Mdb6Htqxugtlfn2P0PL18mlwnt_dXN5OL26QEkXYJkFJXoEGnnIOElNscbAkVNQVJeaUFFVBmOueFMEWZWyqYTWkldSG0lVLCGB0PuW_evfcmdGpeh9I0jW6N64NiQImgTHIW0aM_6Mz1vo2_ixQwJpkAESk2UKV3IXhj1Zuv59qvFCXq07YabKtoW33ZViQOHa6j-2Juqp-Rb70RgAEIsdVGvb-7_4n9AIiiiUk</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Kaestner, Stefanie</creator><creator>Poetschke, Manuela</creator><creator>Kehler, Uwe</creator><creator>Antes, Sebastian</creator><creator>Krause, Matthias</creator><creator>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><author>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>CSF Circulation</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article - CSF Circulation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetschke, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antes, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaestner, Stefanie</au><au>Poetschke, Manuela</au><au>Kehler, Uwe</au><au>Antes, Sebastian</au><au>Krause, Matthias</au><au>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</atitle><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Neurochir</stitle><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>9-14</pages><issn>0001-6268</issn><eissn>0942-0940</eissn><abstract>Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients. Methods In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data. Results Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery. Conclusion Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>31667581</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6268
ispartof Acta neurochirurgica, 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14
issn 0001-6268
0942-0940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310712842
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Cerebrospinal fluid
CSF Circulation
Interventional Radiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Neurology
Neuroradiology
Neurosurgery
Original Article - CSF Circulation
Patients
Revisions
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
title Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20surgery%20following%20CSF%20shunt%20insertion:%20how%20often%20could%20it%20be%20avoided?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20neurochirurgica&rft.au=Kaestner,%20Stefanie&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=9-14&rft.issn=0001-6268&rft.eissn=0942-0940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332282737%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2332282737&rft_id=info:pmid/31667581&rfr_iscdi=true