Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?
Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we clas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta neurochirurgica 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Acta neurochirurgica |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Kaestner, Stefanie Poetschke, Manuela Kehler, Uwe Antes, Sebastian Krause, Matthias Deinsberger, Wolfgang |
description | Background
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.
Methods
In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.
Results
Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.
Conclusion
Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310712842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2332282737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AQ8S8OKlmmTSJvUisrgqiIIf55C2iXbpNpq0u-y_N9pVwYOXScI88054EDqg5IQSIk5DLIQmhOYJ4URCQjbQDsk5S2Ihm_FOYjtjmRyh3RBm8cUEh200ApplIpV0B909mEUdatfi0PsX41fYuqZxy7p9wZPHKQ6vfdvhug3Gd5E6w69uiZ3tTItL1zcVrjtcGKwXrq5Mdb6Htqxugtlfn2P0PL18mlwnt_dXN5OL26QEkXYJkFJXoEGnnIOElNscbAkVNQVJeaUFFVBmOueFMEWZWyqYTWkldSG0lVLCGB0PuW_evfcmdGpeh9I0jW6N64NiQImgTHIW0aM_6Mz1vo2_ixQwJpkAESk2UKV3IXhj1Zuv59qvFCXq07YabKtoW33ZViQOHa6j-2Juqp-Rb70RgAEIsdVGvb-7_4n9AIiiiUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2332282737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.
Methods
In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.
Results
Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.
Conclusion
Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0942-0940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31667581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid ; CSF Circulation ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article - CSF Circulation ; Patients ; Revisions ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Acta neurochirurgica, 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Acta Neurochirurgica is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetschke, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antes, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><title>Acta neurochirurgica</title><addtitle>Acta Neurochir</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><description>Background
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.
Methods
In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.
Results
Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.
Conclusion
Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</description><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>CSF Circulation</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article - CSF Circulation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0001-6268</issn><issn>0942-0940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-AQ8S8OKlmmTSJvUisrgqiIIf55C2iXbpNpq0u-y_N9pVwYOXScI88054EDqg5IQSIk5DLIQmhOYJ4URCQjbQDsk5S2Ihm_FOYjtjmRyh3RBm8cUEh200ApplIpV0B909mEUdatfi0PsX41fYuqZxy7p9wZPHKQ6vfdvhug3Gd5E6w69uiZ3tTItL1zcVrjtcGKwXrq5Mdb6Htqxugtlfn2P0PL18mlwnt_dXN5OL26QEkXYJkFJXoEGnnIOElNscbAkVNQVJeaUFFVBmOueFMEWZWyqYTWkldSG0lVLCGB0PuW_evfcmdGpeh9I0jW6N64NiQImgTHIW0aM_6Mz1vo2_ixQwJpkAESk2UKV3IXhj1Zuv59qvFCXq07YabKtoW33ZViQOHa6j-2Juqp-Rb70RgAEIsdVGvb-7_4n9AIiiiUk</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Kaestner, Stefanie</creator><creator>Poetschke, Manuela</creator><creator>Kehler, Uwe</creator><creator>Antes, Sebastian</creator><creator>Krause, Matthias</creator><creator>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</title><author>Kaestner, Stefanie ; Poetschke, Manuela ; Kehler, Uwe ; Antes, Sebastian ; Krause, Matthias ; Deinsberger, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30cad3a3a54438354f93fc3d1eb054da7173c6a94b7ebc9f172f51d8ab7af8883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>CSF Circulation</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article - CSF Circulation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaestner, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetschke, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antes, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaestner, Stefanie</au><au>Poetschke, Manuela</au><au>Kehler, Uwe</au><au>Antes, Sebastian</au><au>Krause, Matthias</au><au>Deinsberger, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided?</atitle><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Neurochir</stitle><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>9-14</pages><issn>0001-6268</issn><eissn>0942-0940</eissn><abstract>Background
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision surgery represents a huge social and economic burden. Few studies, however, have evaluated shunt revision surgeries in the context of their avoidability, and existing data are from paediatric populations. Using ratings from an expert panel, we classified avoidable and unavoidable shunt revisions in a mixed cohort of CSF-shunt patients.
Methods
In a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-centre database, we identified all shunt systems implanted for the first time over a 10-year period (2007–2016) and all subsequent revision surgeries with a follow-up of at least 1 year. A panel of five expert shunt surgeons classified each revision surgery as avoidable or unavoidable. Rates of each were calculated and correlated with clinical data.
Results
Of 210 revision surgeries (314 patients, mean age, 49.9 years; mean follow-up, 4.2 years), the panel judged 114 as unavoidable (54.3%) and 96 (45.7%) as avoidable. Level of surgeon education correlated with these rates, but even in the most experienced hands, 12.5% of revisions were classified as avoidable. Avoidable revisions occurred significantly earlier than unavoidable interventions (mean; 112 and 448 days, respectively) after the index surgery.
Conclusion
Rates of avoidable shunt revision surgery are alarmingly high, even in experienced hands. Avoidable revisions occur significantly earlier, predominantly within the first 3 months after the index surgery.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>31667581</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-5219</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6268 |
ispartof | Acta neurochirurgica, 2020, Vol.162 (1), p.9-14 |
issn | 0001-6268 0942-0940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310712842 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Cerebrospinal fluid CSF Circulation Interventional Radiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Neurology Neuroradiology Neurosurgery Original Article - CSF Circulation Patients Revisions Surgeons Surgery Surgical Orthopedics |
title | Revision surgery following CSF shunt insertion: how often could it be avoided? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20surgery%20following%20CSF%20shunt%20insertion:%20how%20often%20could%20it%20be%20avoided?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20neurochirurgica&rft.au=Kaestner,%20Stefanie&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=9-14&rft.issn=0001-6268&rft.eissn=0942-0940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00701-019-04083-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332282737%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2332282737&rft_id=info:pmid/31667581&rfr_iscdi=true |