Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey
Introduction Social egg freezing enhances reproductive autonomy by empowering women with the capacity to delay their childbearing years, while preserving the opportunity to maintain biological relation with subsequent offspring. However, age‐related obstetric complications, economic implications and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.324-332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 324 |
container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Jones, Benjamin P. Kasaven, Lorraine L'Heveder, Ariadne Jalmbrant, Maria Green, Joy Makki, Mahmoud Odia, Rabi Norris, Guy Bracewell Milnes, Timothy Saso, Srdjan Serhal, Paul Ben Nagi, Jara |
description | Introduction
Social egg freezing enhances reproductive autonomy by empowering women with the capacity to delay their childbearing years, while preserving the opportunity to maintain biological relation with subsequent offspring. However, age‐related obstetric complications, economic implications and the risk of unsuccessful future treatment make it a controversial option. Despite the upward trend in women electively cryopreserving their eggs, there is limited data about the women’s perceptions, having undergone the process. The aim of this study was to investigate the motivations of women who have undergone social egg freezing, identify their perceptions following treatment, and assess potential feelings of regret.
Material and methods
This cross‐sectional survey, based at a fertility clinic in the UK, used an electronic questionnaire to assess the motivations and perceptions of women who underwent social egg freezing between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Results
One hundred questionnaires were distributed, and 85 women responded (85% response rate). The most frequent reason for freezing oocytes was not having a partner with 56 (70%) women saying it “definitely” influenced their decision. The majority of women (83%; n = 68) knew there was a chance of treatment failure in the future and that a live birth could not be guaranteed. More than half (n = 39; 51%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that the 10‐year UK storage limit is fair. One‐third of respondents (n = 17; 33%) felt the storage time should be indefinite and 29% (n = 15) believed it should be up to the age of 50. Twenty percent (n = 15) of the women who underwent social egg freezing have successfully had a baby or are currently pregnant, half (n = 8; 53%) of whom conceived spontaneously and a quarter (n = 4; 26%) used their stored oocytes. In all, 91% (n = 73) had no regrets over their decision to undergo social egg freezing.
Conclusions
We demonstrate herein important and novel insights into the motivations and perceptions of women from a UK population who have undergone social egg freezing. Despite potential physical, psychological, and financial burdens, only a small minority of women experience regret after social egg freezing. We also highlight clear discontent with the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority storage limit among social egg freezers in the UK. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.13763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310711804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310711804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-522f2c0121ea0eababb8b62e9c10df9df8613723a0f474304eba82edca2f1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouq5efAAJeBGxmkm6bRdPIrqKgoLruaTppFa6zZq0LuvJR_AZfRLT3dWDB3OZzPDxMfMTsgfsBPw7laZwJyDiSKyRHkSMBSwEvk56jDEIIhEOt8i2cy--43GYbJItAVEUJ5z1CD6gVThtSlO7Y2raRpkJ-p-sc2qxsNhQbarKzMq6oM6oUlYUi4Jqi_jezcqaNs9In27PqKTKGue-Pj4dqs7oWdfaN5zvkA0tK4e7q9on46vL8cV1cHc_urk4vwuUGAoRDDjXXPktASVDmcksS7KI41ABy_Uw10nkz-RCMh3GoWAhZjLhmCvJNeRK9MnhUju15rVF16ST0imsKlmjaV3KBbAYIGGhRw_-oC-mtX7jjhokIAZsAJ46WlKLwyzqdGrLibTzFFjaZZ922aeL7D28v1K22QTzX_QnbA_AEpiVFc7_UaXn96PHpfQbQm6QBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358135051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Jones, Benjamin P. ; Kasaven, Lorraine ; L'Heveder, Ariadne ; Jalmbrant, Maria ; Green, Joy ; Makki, Mahmoud ; Odia, Rabi ; Norris, Guy ; Bracewell Milnes, Timothy ; Saso, Srdjan ; Serhal, Paul ; Ben Nagi, Jara</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Benjamin P. ; Kasaven, Lorraine ; L'Heveder, Ariadne ; Jalmbrant, Maria ; Green, Joy ; Makki, Mahmoud ; Odia, Rabi ; Norris, Guy ; Bracewell Milnes, Timothy ; Saso, Srdjan ; Serhal, Paul ; Ben Nagi, Jara</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Social egg freezing enhances reproductive autonomy by empowering women with the capacity to delay their childbearing years, while preserving the opportunity to maintain biological relation with subsequent offspring. However, age‐related obstetric complications, economic implications and the risk of unsuccessful future treatment make it a controversial option. Despite the upward trend in women electively cryopreserving their eggs, there is limited data about the women’s perceptions, having undergone the process. The aim of this study was to investigate the motivations of women who have undergone social egg freezing, identify their perceptions following treatment, and assess potential feelings of regret.
Material and methods
This cross‐sectional survey, based at a fertility clinic in the UK, used an electronic questionnaire to assess the motivations and perceptions of women who underwent social egg freezing between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Results
One hundred questionnaires were distributed, and 85 women responded (85% response rate). The most frequent reason for freezing oocytes was not having a partner with 56 (70%) women saying it “definitely” influenced their decision. The majority of women (83%; n = 68) knew there was a chance of treatment failure in the future and that a live birth could not be guaranteed. More than half (n = 39; 51%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that the 10‐year UK storage limit is fair. One‐third of respondents (n = 17; 33%) felt the storage time should be indefinite and 29% (n = 15) believed it should be up to the age of 50. Twenty percent (n = 15) of the women who underwent social egg freezing have successfully had a baby or are currently pregnant, half (n = 8; 53%) of whom conceived spontaneously and a quarter (n = 4; 26%) used their stored oocytes. In all, 91% (n = 73) had no regrets over their decision to undergo social egg freezing.
Conclusions
We demonstrate herein important and novel insights into the motivations and perceptions of women from a UK population who have undergone social egg freezing. Despite potential physical, psychological, and financial burdens, only a small minority of women experience regret after social egg freezing. We also highlight clear discontent with the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority storage limit among social egg freezers in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31667820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Cross-sectional studies ; Cryopreservation ; Fertility ; fertility preservation ; infertility ; Middle age ; oocyte cryopreservation ; perceptions ; social egg freezing ; vitrification ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.324-332</ispartof><rights>2019 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2019 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-522f2c0121ea0eababb8b62e9c10df9df8613723a0f474304eba82edca2f1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-522f2c0121ea0eababb8b62e9c10df9df8613723a0f474304eba82edca2f1dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0391-0443 ; 0000-0002-5652-7384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.13763$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.13763$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31667820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Benjamin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasaven, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L'Heveder, Ariadne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalmbrant, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makki, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odia, Rabi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bracewell Milnes, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saso, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serhal, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Nagi, Jara</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
Social egg freezing enhances reproductive autonomy by empowering women with the capacity to delay their childbearing years, while preserving the opportunity to maintain biological relation with subsequent offspring. However, age‐related obstetric complications, economic implications and the risk of unsuccessful future treatment make it a controversial option. Despite the upward trend in women electively cryopreserving their eggs, there is limited data about the women’s perceptions, having undergone the process. The aim of this study was to investigate the motivations of women who have undergone social egg freezing, identify their perceptions following treatment, and assess potential feelings of regret.
Material and methods
This cross‐sectional survey, based at a fertility clinic in the UK, used an electronic questionnaire to assess the motivations and perceptions of women who underwent social egg freezing between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Results
One hundred questionnaires were distributed, and 85 women responded (85% response rate). The most frequent reason for freezing oocytes was not having a partner with 56 (70%) women saying it “definitely” influenced their decision. The majority of women (83%; n = 68) knew there was a chance of treatment failure in the future and that a live birth could not be guaranteed. More than half (n = 39; 51%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that the 10‐year UK storage limit is fair. One‐third of respondents (n = 17; 33%) felt the storage time should be indefinite and 29% (n = 15) believed it should be up to the age of 50. Twenty percent (n = 15) of the women who underwent social egg freezing have successfully had a baby or are currently pregnant, half (n = 8; 53%) of whom conceived spontaneously and a quarter (n = 4; 26%) used their stored oocytes. In all, 91% (n = 73) had no regrets over their decision to undergo social egg freezing.
Conclusions
We demonstrate herein important and novel insights into the motivations and perceptions of women from a UK population who have undergone social egg freezing. Despite potential physical, psychological, and financial burdens, only a small minority of women experience regret after social egg freezing. We also highlight clear discontent with the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority storage limit among social egg freezers in the UK.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>fertility preservation</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Middle age</subject><subject>oocyte cryopreservation</subject><subject>perceptions</subject><subject>social egg freezing</subject><subject>vitrification</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouq5efAAJeBGxmkm6bRdPIrqKgoLruaTppFa6zZq0LuvJR_AZfRLT3dWDB3OZzPDxMfMTsgfsBPw7laZwJyDiSKyRHkSMBSwEvk56jDEIIhEOt8i2cy--43GYbJItAVEUJ5z1CD6gVThtSlO7Y2raRpkJ-p-sc2qxsNhQbarKzMq6oM6oUlYUi4Jqi_jezcqaNs9In27PqKTKGue-Pj4dqs7oWdfaN5zvkA0tK4e7q9on46vL8cV1cHc_urk4vwuUGAoRDDjXXPktASVDmcksS7KI41ABy_Uw10nkz-RCMh3GoWAhZjLhmCvJNeRK9MnhUju15rVF16ST0imsKlmjaV3KBbAYIGGhRw_-oC-mtX7jjhokIAZsAJ46WlKLwyzqdGrLibTzFFjaZZ922aeL7D28v1K22QTzX_QnbA_AEpiVFc7_UaXn96PHpfQbQm6QBw</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Jones, Benjamin P.</creator><creator>Kasaven, Lorraine</creator><creator>L'Heveder, Ariadne</creator><creator>Jalmbrant, Maria</creator><creator>Green, Joy</creator><creator>Makki, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Odia, Rabi</creator><creator>Norris, Guy</creator><creator>Bracewell Milnes, Timothy</creator><creator>Saso, Srdjan</creator><creator>Serhal, Paul</creator><creator>Ben Nagi, Jara</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-7384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey</title><author>Jones, Benjamin P. ; Kasaven, Lorraine ; L'Heveder, Ariadne ; Jalmbrant, Maria ; Green, Joy ; Makki, Mahmoud ; Odia, Rabi ; Norris, Guy ; Bracewell Milnes, Timothy ; Saso, Srdjan ; Serhal, Paul ; Ben Nagi, Jara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-522f2c0121ea0eababb8b62e9c10df9df8613723a0f474304eba82edca2f1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>fertility preservation</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Middle age</topic><topic>oocyte cryopreservation</topic><topic>perceptions</topic><topic>social egg freezing</topic><topic>vitrification</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Benjamin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasaven, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L'Heveder, Ariadne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalmbrant, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makki, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odia, Rabi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bracewell Milnes, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saso, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serhal, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Nagi, Jara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Benjamin P.</au><au>Kasaven, Lorraine</au><au>L'Heveder, Ariadne</au><au>Jalmbrant, Maria</au><au>Green, Joy</au><au>Makki, Mahmoud</au><au>Odia, Rabi</au><au>Norris, Guy</au><au>Bracewell Milnes, Timothy</au><au>Saso, Srdjan</au><au>Serhal, Paul</au><au>Ben Nagi, Jara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>324-332</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Social egg freezing enhances reproductive autonomy by empowering women with the capacity to delay their childbearing years, while preserving the opportunity to maintain biological relation with subsequent offspring. However, age‐related obstetric complications, economic implications and the risk of unsuccessful future treatment make it a controversial option. Despite the upward trend in women electively cryopreserving their eggs, there is limited data about the women’s perceptions, having undergone the process. The aim of this study was to investigate the motivations of women who have undergone social egg freezing, identify their perceptions following treatment, and assess potential feelings of regret.
Material and methods
This cross‐sectional survey, based at a fertility clinic in the UK, used an electronic questionnaire to assess the motivations and perceptions of women who underwent social egg freezing between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Results
One hundred questionnaires were distributed, and 85 women responded (85% response rate). The most frequent reason for freezing oocytes was not having a partner with 56 (70%) women saying it “definitely” influenced their decision. The majority of women (83%; n = 68) knew there was a chance of treatment failure in the future and that a live birth could not be guaranteed. More than half (n = 39; 51%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that the 10‐year UK storage limit is fair. One‐third of respondents (n = 17; 33%) felt the storage time should be indefinite and 29% (n = 15) believed it should be up to the age of 50. Twenty percent (n = 15) of the women who underwent social egg freezing have successfully had a baby or are currently pregnant, half (n = 8; 53%) of whom conceived spontaneously and a quarter (n = 4; 26%) used their stored oocytes. In all, 91% (n = 73) had no regrets over their decision to undergo social egg freezing.
Conclusions
We demonstrate herein important and novel insights into the motivations and perceptions of women from a UK population who have undergone social egg freezing. Despite potential physical, psychological, and financial burdens, only a small minority of women experience regret after social egg freezing. We also highlight clear discontent with the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority storage limit among social egg freezers in the UK.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31667820</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.13763</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-7384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.324-332 |
issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310711804 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Clinical outcomes Cross-sectional studies Cryopreservation Fertility fertility preservation infertility Middle age oocyte cryopreservation perceptions social egg freezing vitrification Womens health |
title | Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions,%20outcomes,%20and%20regret%20following%20social%20egg%20freezing%20in%20the%20UK;%20a%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Jones,%20Benjamin%20P.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=324-332&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.13763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310711804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358135051&rft_id=info:pmid/31667820&rfr_iscdi=true |