Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives
SUMMARY Objectives To assess a multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage. Background Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low‐cost inte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2019-12, Vol.29 (6), p.389-393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Levin, J. H. Collins, L. Adekunle, O. Jackson, H. T. Vaziri, K. Schroeder, M. Davison, D. |
description | SUMMARY
Objectives
To assess a multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage.
Background
Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low‐cost interventions to reduce blood product wastage, but few have evaluated improvements in communication between the blood bank and providers. We undertook a prospective quality improvement project focusing on improving communication to reduce blood product wastage.
Methods
We conducted a prospective quality improvement project over the first quarter of 2017, identifying patients with issued but unused blood products. Each service overseeing the care of patients identified on the unit status report was contacted through two possible methods: (i) phone or (ii) proprietary Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant digital messaging application. Collected variables included reserved blood product type and participant time spent. Outcomes included the rate of blood product release and changes in wastage compared with historical data tracked by the blood bank.
Results
Eight hundred and forty products were reserved during the study period, of which 436 (52%) were released. Average participant times ranged from 2 ± 1 min to 15 ± 4 min with no significant differences in time spent between participants (P = 0·194). Compared with the average product wastage 10 months prior to project initiation, there were significant reductions in the average wastage for platelets (5·3 ± 2·5 units vs 2·5 ± 1·5 units, P = 0·05), RBCs (6·1 ± 3·7 units vs 0 ± 0 units, P = 0·01) and overall wastage (58·3 ± 14·9 units vs 40 ± 15·7 units, P = 0·05).
Conclusion
Efforts focusing on improving provider‐to‐provider communication can reduce blood product wastage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tme.12640 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310657731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310657731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-e5562676a5f4ddc2328ab3f8fbf61fd5d9c6706cb8228baaf7439b077c5716173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOxCAUhonR6HhZ-AKmS03sDJcC7VIn4yXRuNF1QylVDJSxUCfduXHvM_okoh3dyeJwOHx8CT8AhwhOUVyzYNUUYZbBDTBBhNGUoCzfBBNY0DzllOc7YNf7ZwgRwQXeBjsEMUZQwSfg_dw4VyfLztW9DMlK-CAeVdKp76N2bVINSR-00V63j4lxq8-3D-l8OF332i5FfGd7E7R1tTDJ8mnwWmrRxtvgYvkbJNJZ27daih-zbnXQsX1Vfh9sNcJ4dbDe98DDxeJ-fpXe3F1ez89uUkkwhamilGHGmaBNVtcSE5yLijR5UzUMNTWtC8k4ZLLKMc4rIRqekaKCnEvKEUOc7IHj0Rv_-9IrH0qrvVTGiFa53peYIMgo5wRF9GREZee871RTLjttRTeUCJbfqZcx9fIn9cgerbV9ZVX9R_7GHIHZCKy0UcP_pvL-djEqvwAXRZOL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310657731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Levin, J. H. ; Collins, L. ; Adekunle, O. ; Jackson, H. T. ; Vaziri, K. ; Schroeder, M. ; Davison, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levin, J. H. ; Collins, L. ; Adekunle, O. ; Jackson, H. T. ; Vaziri, K. ; Schroeder, M. ; Davison, D.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
Objectives
To assess a multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage.
Background
Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low‐cost interventions to reduce blood product wastage, but few have evaluated improvements in communication between the blood bank and providers. We undertook a prospective quality improvement project focusing on improving communication to reduce blood product wastage.
Methods
We conducted a prospective quality improvement project over the first quarter of 2017, identifying patients with issued but unused blood products. Each service overseeing the care of patients identified on the unit status report was contacted through two possible methods: (i) phone or (ii) proprietary Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant digital messaging application. Collected variables included reserved blood product type and participant time spent. Outcomes included the rate of blood product release and changes in wastage compared with historical data tracked by the blood bank.
Results
Eight hundred and forty products were reserved during the study period, of which 436 (52%) were released. Average participant times ranged from 2 ± 1 min to 15 ± 4 min with no significant differences in time spent between participants (P = 0·194). Compared with the average product wastage 10 months prior to project initiation, there were significant reductions in the average wastage for platelets (5·3 ± 2·5 units vs 2·5 ± 1·5 units, P = 0·05), RBCs (6·1 ± 3·7 units vs 0 ± 0 units, P = 0·01) and overall wastage (58·3 ± 14·9 units vs 40 ± 15·7 units, P = 0·05).
Conclusion
Efforts focusing on improving provider‐to‐provider communication can reduce blood product wastage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12640</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31663197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood Banks - economics ; blood product wastage ; communication ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medical Waste Disposal - economics ; Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; transfusion</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2019-12, Vol.29 (6), p.389-393</ispartof><rights>2019 British Blood Transfusion Society</rights><rights>2019 British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-e5562676a5f4ddc2328ab3f8fbf61fd5d9c6706cb8228baaf7439b077c5716173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-e5562676a5f4ddc2328ab3f8fbf61fd5d9c6706cb8228baaf7439b077c5716173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0296-5036</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12640$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12640$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levin, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adekunle, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><description>SUMMARY
Objectives
To assess a multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage.
Background
Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low‐cost interventions to reduce blood product wastage, but few have evaluated improvements in communication between the blood bank and providers. We undertook a prospective quality improvement project focusing on improving communication to reduce blood product wastage.
Methods
We conducted a prospective quality improvement project over the first quarter of 2017, identifying patients with issued but unused blood products. Each service overseeing the care of patients identified on the unit status report was contacted through two possible methods: (i) phone or (ii) proprietary Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant digital messaging application. Collected variables included reserved blood product type and participant time spent. Outcomes included the rate of blood product release and changes in wastage compared with historical data tracked by the blood bank.
Results
Eight hundred and forty products were reserved during the study period, of which 436 (52%) were released. Average participant times ranged from 2 ± 1 min to 15 ± 4 min with no significant differences in time spent between participants (P = 0·194). Compared with the average product wastage 10 months prior to project initiation, there were significant reductions in the average wastage for platelets (5·3 ± 2·5 units vs 2·5 ± 1·5 units, P = 0·05), RBCs (6·1 ± 3·7 units vs 0 ± 0 units, P = 0·01) and overall wastage (58·3 ± 14·9 units vs 40 ± 15·7 units, P = 0·05).
Conclusion
Efforts focusing on improving provider‐to‐provider communication can reduce blood product wastage.</description><subject>Blood Banks - economics</subject><subject>blood product wastage</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Waste Disposal - economics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>transfusion</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOxCAUhonR6HhZ-AKmS03sDJcC7VIn4yXRuNF1QylVDJSxUCfduXHvM_okoh3dyeJwOHx8CT8AhwhOUVyzYNUUYZbBDTBBhNGUoCzfBBNY0DzllOc7YNf7ZwgRwQXeBjsEMUZQwSfg_dw4VyfLztW9DMlK-CAeVdKp76N2bVINSR-00V63j4lxq8-3D-l8OF332i5FfGd7E7R1tTDJ8mnwWmrRxtvgYvkbJNJZ27daih-zbnXQsX1Vfh9sNcJ4dbDe98DDxeJ-fpXe3F1ez89uUkkwhamilGHGmaBNVtcSE5yLijR5UzUMNTWtC8k4ZLLKMc4rIRqekaKCnEvKEUOc7IHj0Rv_-9IrH0qrvVTGiFa53peYIMgo5wRF9GREZee871RTLjttRTeUCJbfqZcx9fIn9cgerbV9ZVX9R_7GHIHZCKy0UcP_pvL-djEqvwAXRZOL</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Levin, J. H.</creator><creator>Collins, L.</creator><creator>Adekunle, O.</creator><creator>Jackson, H. T.</creator><creator>Vaziri, K.</creator><creator>Schroeder, M.</creator><creator>Davison, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-5036</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives</title><author>Levin, J. H. ; Collins, L. ; Adekunle, O. ; Jackson, H. T. ; Vaziri, K. ; Schroeder, M. ; Davison, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-e5562676a5f4ddc2328ab3f8fbf61fd5d9c6706cb8228baaf7439b077c5716173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Blood Banks - economics</topic><topic>blood product wastage</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Waste Disposal - economics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levin, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adekunle, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levin, J. H.</au><au>Collins, L.</au><au>Adekunle, O.</au><au>Jackson, H. T.</au><au>Vaziri, K.</au><au>Schroeder, M.</au><au>Davison, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>389-393</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY
Objectives
To assess a multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage.
Background
Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low‐cost interventions to reduce blood product wastage, but few have evaluated improvements in communication between the blood bank and providers. We undertook a prospective quality improvement project focusing on improving communication to reduce blood product wastage.
Methods
We conducted a prospective quality improvement project over the first quarter of 2017, identifying patients with issued but unused blood products. Each service overseeing the care of patients identified on the unit status report was contacted through two possible methods: (i) phone or (ii) proprietary Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant digital messaging application. Collected variables included reserved blood product type and participant time spent. Outcomes included the rate of blood product release and changes in wastage compared with historical data tracked by the blood bank.
Results
Eight hundred and forty products were reserved during the study period, of which 436 (52%) were released. Average participant times ranged from 2 ± 1 min to 15 ± 4 min with no significant differences in time spent between participants (P = 0·194). Compared with the average product wastage 10 months prior to project initiation, there were significant reductions in the average wastage for platelets (5·3 ± 2·5 units vs 2·5 ± 1·5 units, P = 0·05), RBCs (6·1 ± 3·7 units vs 0 ± 0 units, P = 0·01) and overall wastage (58·3 ± 14·9 units vs 40 ± 15·7 units, P = 0·05).
Conclusion
Efforts focusing on improving provider‐to‐provider communication can reduce blood product wastage.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31663197</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12640</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-5036</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-7578 |
ispartof | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2019-12, Vol.29 (6), p.389-393 |
issn | 0958-7578 1365-3148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2310657731 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Blood Banks - economics blood product wastage communication Hospitals Humans Medical Waste Disposal - economics Physicians Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies transfusion |
title | Blood product wastage reduction by utilising low‐cost, low‐impact multimodal physician‐to‐physician communication initiatives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20product%20wastage%20reduction%20by%20utilising%20low%E2%80%90cost,%20low%E2%80%90impact%20multimodal%20physician%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90physician%20communication%20initiatives&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Levin,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=389-393&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310657731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310657731&rft_id=info:pmid/31663197&rfr_iscdi=true |