Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism

Relational Frame Theory posits that complex language develops through arbitrarily applicable relational networks, with potential implications for individuals with autism. Responding relationally based on comparison occurs when participants respond to any number of comparative properties, such as “bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied behavior analysis 2020-04, Vol.53 (2), p.938-955
Hauptverfasser: Belisle, Jordan, Stanley, Caleb R., Schmick, Ayla, Dixon, Mark R., Alholail, Amani, Galliford, Megan E., Ellenberger, Lindsey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 955
container_issue 2
container_start_page 938
container_title Journal of applied behavior analysis
container_volume 53
creator Belisle, Jordan
Stanley, Caleb R.
Schmick, Ayla
Dixon, Mark R.
Alholail, Amani
Galliford, Megan E.
Ellenberger, Lindsey
description Relational Frame Theory posits that complex language develops through arbitrarily applicable relational networks, with potential implications for individuals with autism. Responding relationally based on comparison occurs when participants respond to any number of comparative properties, such as “bigger” or “faster.” Experiment 1 established two 3‐member comparative networks, in which a stimulus A was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus B, and the stimulus B was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus C in 2 children with autism. Both participants met the mastery criterion for the trained relations and demonstrated the emergence of the untrained combinatorially entailed A–C and C–A relations. The participants could also match the arbitrary A stimuli with larger or faster objects and the C stimuli with smaller or slower objects. The results were replicated in Experiment 2 with the same participants, where a 5‐member relational network was established for the bigger/smaller relation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jaba.655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2309485851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309485851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3206b78622b631f51369e7455efde2dfde6b58ac9cceaad2ec80300c828ae79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVtLwzAUx4Mobk7BTyABX3zpzGVp08c55o2BL_pc0vTUZfQyk2Zj4Ic3ZVNBEEIuJz9-HM4foUtKxpQQdrtSuRrHQhyhIU25jHhC-DEahi8aSSnEAJ05tyKEMhKLUzTgNBZE8GSIPueuU3ll3NI071jZ3HRW2R3Wbb1WVnVmA9hCFS5t47BqivAqwULTGVXhwDaubG19-G9L7DpT-8o7XPpG91Vs-lWYjSm8qhzemm6Jle-Mq8_RSRlKcHE4R-jtfv46e4wWLw9Ps-ki0nySioiHrvNExozlMaeloDxOIZkIAWUBrAhbnAupdKo1KFUw0JJwQrRkUkGSAh-hm713bdsPD67LauM0VJVqoPUuY5ykEylkMI_Q9R901XrbhO4ClbJEkIROfoXats6FiWRra-owt4ySrE8k6xPJQiIBvToIfV5D8QN-RxCAaA9sTQW7f0XZ8_Ru2gu_AAc7mEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2392750714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Belisle, Jordan ; Stanley, Caleb R. ; Schmick, Ayla ; Dixon, Mark R. ; Alholail, Amani ; Galliford, Megan E. ; Ellenberger, Lindsey</creator><creatorcontrib>Belisle, Jordan ; Stanley, Caleb R. ; Schmick, Ayla ; Dixon, Mark R. ; Alholail, Amani ; Galliford, Megan E. ; Ellenberger, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><description>Relational Frame Theory posits that complex language develops through arbitrarily applicable relational networks, with potential implications for individuals with autism. Responding relationally based on comparison occurs when participants respond to any number of comparative properties, such as “bigger” or “faster.” Experiment 1 established two 3‐member comparative networks, in which a stimulus A was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus B, and the stimulus B was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus C in 2 children with autism. Both participants met the mastery criterion for the trained relations and demonstrated the emergence of the untrained combinatorially entailed A–C and C–A relations. The participants could also match the arbitrary A stimuli with larger or faster objects and the C stimuli with smaller or slower objects. The results were replicated in Experiment 2 with the same participants, where a 5‐member relational network was established for the bigger/smaller relation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jaba.655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31650537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Autism ; comparison ; relational frame theory ; transformation</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2020-04, Vol.53 (2), p.938-955</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2019 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3206b78622b631f51369e7455efde2dfde6b58ac9cceaad2ec80300c828ae79e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3206b78622b631f51369e7455efde2dfde6b58ac9cceaad2ec80300c828ae79e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjaba.655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjaba.655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belisle, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Caleb R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmick, Ayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alholail, Amani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliford, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellenberger, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism</title><title>Journal of applied behavior analysis</title><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><description>Relational Frame Theory posits that complex language develops through arbitrarily applicable relational networks, with potential implications for individuals with autism. Responding relationally based on comparison occurs when participants respond to any number of comparative properties, such as “bigger” or “faster.” Experiment 1 established two 3‐member comparative networks, in which a stimulus A was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus B, and the stimulus B was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus C in 2 children with autism. Both participants met the mastery criterion for the trained relations and demonstrated the emergence of the untrained combinatorially entailed A–C and C–A relations. The participants could also match the arbitrary A stimuli with larger or faster objects and the C stimuli with smaller or slower objects. The results were replicated in Experiment 2 with the same participants, where a 5‐member relational network was established for the bigger/smaller relation.</description><subject>Autism</subject><subject>comparison</subject><subject>relational frame theory</subject><subject>transformation</subject><issn>0021-8855</issn><issn>1938-3703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kVtLwzAUx4Mobk7BTyABX3zpzGVp08c55o2BL_pc0vTUZfQyk2Zj4Ic3ZVNBEEIuJz9-HM4foUtKxpQQdrtSuRrHQhyhIU25jHhC-DEahi8aSSnEAJ05tyKEMhKLUzTgNBZE8GSIPueuU3ll3NI071jZ3HRW2R3Wbb1WVnVmA9hCFS5t47BqivAqwULTGVXhwDaubG19-G9L7DpT-8o7XPpG91Vs-lWYjSm8qhzemm6Jle-Mq8_RSRlKcHE4R-jtfv46e4wWLw9Ps-ki0nySioiHrvNExozlMaeloDxOIZkIAWUBrAhbnAupdKo1KFUw0JJwQrRkUkGSAh-hm713bdsPD67LauM0VJVqoPUuY5ykEylkMI_Q9R901XrbhO4ClbJEkIROfoXats6FiWRra-owt4ySrE8k6xPJQiIBvToIfV5D8QN-RxCAaA9sTQW7f0XZ8_Ru2gu_AAc7mEM</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Belisle, Jordan</creator><creator>Stanley, Caleb R.</creator><creator>Schmick, Ayla</creator><creator>Dixon, Mark R.</creator><creator>Alholail, Amani</creator><creator>Galliford, Megan E.</creator><creator>Ellenberger, Lindsey</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism</title><author>Belisle, Jordan ; Stanley, Caleb R. ; Schmick, Ayla ; Dixon, Mark R. ; Alholail, Amani ; Galliford, Megan E. ; Ellenberger, Lindsey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3206b78622b631f51369e7455efde2dfde6b58ac9cceaad2ec80300c828ae79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Autism</topic><topic>comparison</topic><topic>relational frame theory</topic><topic>transformation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belisle, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Caleb R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmick, Ayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alholail, Amani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliford, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellenberger, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belisle, Jordan</au><au>Stanley, Caleb R.</au><au>Schmick, Ayla</au><au>Dixon, Mark R.</au><au>Alholail, Amani</au><au>Galliford, Megan E.</au><au>Ellenberger, Lindsey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>938</spage><epage>955</epage><pages>938-955</pages><issn>0021-8855</issn><eissn>1938-3703</eissn><abstract>Relational Frame Theory posits that complex language develops through arbitrarily applicable relational networks, with potential implications for individuals with autism. Responding relationally based on comparison occurs when participants respond to any number of comparative properties, such as “bigger” or “faster.” Experiment 1 established two 3‐member comparative networks, in which a stimulus A was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus B, and the stimulus B was conditioned as “bigger” or “faster” than a stimulus C in 2 children with autism. Both participants met the mastery criterion for the trained relations and demonstrated the emergence of the untrained combinatorially entailed A–C and C–A relations. The participants could also match the arbitrary A stimuli with larger or faster objects and the C stimuli with smaller or slower objects. The results were replicated in Experiment 2 with the same participants, where a 5‐member relational network was established for the bigger/smaller relation.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31650537</pmid><doi>10.1002/jaba.655</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8855
ispartof Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2020-04, Vol.53 (2), p.938-955
issn 0021-8855
1938-3703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2309485851
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Autism
comparison
relational frame theory
transformation
title Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20arbitrary%20comparative%20relations%20and%20referential%20transformations%20of%20stimulus%20function%20in%20individuals%20with%20autism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20behavior%20analysis&rft.au=Belisle,%20Jordan&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=938&rft.epage=955&rft.pages=938-955&rft.issn=0021-8855&rft.eissn=1938-3703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jaba.655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309485851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2392750714&rft_id=info:pmid/31650537&rfr_iscdi=true