Medical physics aspects of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy practice in Malaysia

•An IMRT survey with 79% response rate was successfully conducted.•Patient-specific IMRT QA is implemented in all participating radiotherapy centres.•QA method is homogenous, with some variations.•Malaysian physicists in general spend longer time for IMRT treatment planning compared to those in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2019-11, Vol.67, p.34-39
Hauptverfasser: Hizam, Nur Diyana Afrina, Ung, Ngie Min, Jong, Wei Loong, Zin, Hafiz Mohd, Rahman, Ahmad Taufek Abdul, Loh, Jasmin Pei Yuin, Ng, Kwan Hoong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•An IMRT survey with 79% response rate was successfully conducted.•Patient-specific IMRT QA is implemented in all participating radiotherapy centres.•QA method is homogenous, with some variations.•Malaysian physicists in general spend longer time for IMRT treatment planning compared to those in the UK. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) has changed the practice of radiotherapy since its implementation in the 1990s. The purpose of this study is to review current practice of IMRT in Malaysia. A survey on medical physics aspects of IMRT is conducted on radiotherapy departments across Malaysia to assess the usage, experience and QA in IMRT, which is done for the first time in this country. A set of questionnaires was designed and sent to the physicist in charge for their responses. The questionnaire consisted of four sections; (i) Experience and qualification of medical physicists, (ii) CT simulation techniques (iii) Treatment planning and treatment unit, (iv) IMRT process, delivery and QA procedure. A total of 26 responses were collected, representing 26 departments out of 33 radiotherapy departments in operation across Malaysia (79% response rate). Results showed that the medical physics aspects of IMRT practice in Malaysia are homogenous, with some variations in certain areas of practices. Thirteen centres (52%) performed measurement-based QA using 2D array detector and analysed using gamma index criteria of 3%, 3 mm with variation confidence range. In relation to the IMRT delivery, 44% of Malaysia’s physicist takes more than 8 h to plan a head and neck case compared to the UK study possibly due to the lack of professional training. This survey provides a picture of medical physics aspects of IMRT in Malaysia where the results/data can be used by radiotherapy departments to benchmark their local policies and practice.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.023