Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken

The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical animal health and production 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012
Hauptverfasser: Adegbeye, Moyosore J., Asaniyan, Emmanuel K., Igbalajobi, Olabisi A., Oyedele, Damilola S., Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y., Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M., Falade, Temilola T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1012
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1005
container_title Tropical animal health and production
container_volume 52
creator Adegbeye, Moyosore J.
Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.
Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.
Oyedele, Damilola S.
Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.
Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.
Falade, Temilola T.
description The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed ( Brassica juncea ) significantly ( P  = 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher ( P  = 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest ( P  = 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly ( P  = 0.018) and ( P  = 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2396092571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIkvgBSiQJRqKHbj-W8-UKOInUiQaqC2vfU0mzNiLPZMoNS_ODRtAoqCyLH_fubYPY88FvBYA9k0TQhroQAwdSBhkd_OAbYSxqrNa9Q_ZBkAPnbbanrAnrV0BkNbvHrMTJXZ6p0W_YT_Oc5pWzAF5SbzhhGHByA-TzwttMTZeMl8ukR-wplJnT-iWB1-Db42HS189GXVsyxjalpTcSr3leO2n1S9jyVvuc-QYSi4zIXdj9rWME1ayx_AN81P2KPmp4bP79ZR9ef_u89nH7uLTh_OztxddUNYsnZEJ5SAtDNH7qGKwAnz0weKAxu6tBm-80AOiNBhT8miVhZT6CHYfQatT9uqYe6jl-4ptcfPYAk70Vixrc1JBbySBitCX_6BXZa2ZbkfUsKPPNlYQJY9UqKW1iskd6jj7eusEuLuK3LEiRxW5XxW5G5Je3Eev-xnjH-V3JwSoI9DoKH_F-nf2f2J_At-anzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396092571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><description>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed ( Brassica juncea ) significantly ( P  = 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher ( P  = 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest ( P  = 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly ( P  = 0.018) and ( P  = 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31646418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Asimina ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Body weight ; Body weight gain ; Brassica ; Chickens - growth &amp; development ; Chicks ; Conversion ratio ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Supplements - analysis ; Feed additives ; Feed conversion ; Feeding trials ; Food additives ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Meat ; Meat - analysis ; Meat - standards ; Mustard ; Mustard Plant ; Nigella sativa ; Performance evaluation ; Poultry ; Regular Articles ; Seeds ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory properties ; Variance analysis ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Weight Gain ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed ( Brassica juncea ) significantly ( P  = 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher ( P  = 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest ( P  = 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly ( P  = 0.018) and ( P  = 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Asimina</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Body weight gain</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Chickens - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Conversion ratio</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - analysis</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Feeding trials</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat - analysis</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Mustard</subject><subject>Mustard Plant</subject><subject>Nigella sativa</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIkvgBSiQJRqKHbj-W8-UKOInUiQaqC2vfU0mzNiLPZMoNS_ODRtAoqCyLH_fubYPY88FvBYA9k0TQhroQAwdSBhkd_OAbYSxqrNa9Q_ZBkAPnbbanrAnrV0BkNbvHrMTJXZ6p0W_YT_Oc5pWzAF5SbzhhGHByA-TzwttMTZeMl8ukR-wplJnT-iWB1-Db42HS189GXVsyxjalpTcSr3leO2n1S9jyVvuc-QYSi4zIXdj9rWME1ayx_AN81P2KPmp4bP79ZR9ef_u89nH7uLTh_OztxddUNYsnZEJ5SAtDNH7qGKwAnz0weKAxu6tBm-80AOiNBhT8miVhZT6CHYfQatT9uqYe6jl-4ptcfPYAk70Vixrc1JBbySBitCX_6BXZa2ZbkfUsKPPNlYQJY9UqKW1iskd6jj7eusEuLuK3LEiRxW5XxW5G5Je3Eev-xnjH-V3JwSoI9DoKH_F-nf2f2J_At-anzs</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creator><creator>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creator><creator>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creator><creator>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creator><creator>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creator><creator>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creator><creator>Falade, Temilola T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><author>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Asimina</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Body weight gain</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Chickens - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Conversion ratio</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - analysis</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Feeding trials</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat - analysis</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Mustard</topic><topic>Mustard Plant</topic><topic>Nigella sativa</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</au><au>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</au><au>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</au><au>Oyedele, Damilola S.</au><au>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</au><au>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</au><au>Falade, Temilola T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1012</epage><pages>1005-1012</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed ( Brassica juncea ) significantly ( P  = 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher ( P  = 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest ( P  = 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly ( P  = 0.018) and ( P  = 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31646418</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4747
ispartof Tropical animal health and production, 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012
issn 0049-4747
1573-7438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520433
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal Feed - analysis
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animals
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Asimina
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Body weight
Body weight gain
Brassica
Chickens - growth & development
Chicks
Conversion ratio
Diet
Diet - veterinary
Dietary Supplements - analysis
Feed additives
Feed conversion
Feeding trials
Food additives
Life Sciences
Livestock
Meat
Meat - analysis
Meat - standards
Mustard
Mustard Plant
Nigella sativa
Performance evaluation
Poultry
Regular Articles
Seeds
Sensory evaluation
Sensory properties
Variance analysis
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Weight Gain
Zoology
title Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20selected%20plant%20seeds%20on%20the%20performance,%20carcass%20characteristics,%20sensory%20evaluation,%20and%20economics%20of%20broiler%20chicken&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Adegbeye,%20Moyosore%20J.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1012&rft.pages=1005-1012&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2396092571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396092571&rft_id=info:pmid/31646418&rfr_iscdi=true