Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken
The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical animal health and production 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1012 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1005 |
container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Adegbeye, Moyosore J. Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. Oyedele, Damilola S. Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. Falade, Temilola T. |
description | The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed (
Brassica juncea
) significantly (
P
= 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher (
P
= 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest (
P
= 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly (
P
= 0.018) and (
P
= 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2396092571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIkvgBSiQJRqKHbj-W8-UKOInUiQaqC2vfU0mzNiLPZMoNS_ODRtAoqCyLH_fubYPY88FvBYA9k0TQhroQAwdSBhkd_OAbYSxqrNa9Q_ZBkAPnbbanrAnrV0BkNbvHrMTJXZ6p0W_YT_Oc5pWzAF5SbzhhGHByA-TzwttMTZeMl8ukR-wplJnT-iWB1-Db42HS189GXVsyxjalpTcSr3leO2n1S9jyVvuc-QYSi4zIXdj9rWME1ayx_AN81P2KPmp4bP79ZR9ef_u89nH7uLTh_OztxddUNYsnZEJ5SAtDNH7qGKwAnz0weKAxu6tBm-80AOiNBhT8miVhZT6CHYfQatT9uqYe6jl-4ptcfPYAk70Vixrc1JBbySBitCX_6BXZa2ZbkfUsKPPNlYQJY9UqKW1iskd6jj7eusEuLuK3LEiRxW5XxW5G5Je3Eev-xnjH-V3JwSoI9DoKH_F-nf2f2J_At-anzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2396092571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><description>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed (
Brassica juncea
) significantly (
P
= 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher (
P
= 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest (
P
= 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly (
P
= 0.018) and (
P
= 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31646418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Asimina ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Body weight ; Body weight gain ; Brassica ; Chickens - growth & development ; Chicks ; Conversion ratio ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Supplements - analysis ; Feed additives ; Feed conversion ; Feeding trials ; Food additives ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Meat ; Meat - analysis ; Meat - standards ; Mustard ; Mustard Plant ; Nigella sativa ; Performance evaluation ; Poultry ; Regular Articles ; Seeds ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory properties ; Variance analysis ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Weight Gain ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31646418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed (
Brassica juncea
) significantly (
P
= 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher (
P
= 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest (
P
= 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly (
P
= 0.018) and (
P
= 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Asimina</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Body weight gain</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Chickens - growth & development</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Conversion ratio</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements - analysis</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Feeding trials</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat - analysis</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Mustard</subject><subject>Mustard Plant</subject><subject>Nigella sativa</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIkvgBSiQJRqKHbj-W8-UKOInUiQaqC2vfU0mzNiLPZMoNS_ODRtAoqCyLH_fubYPY88FvBYA9k0TQhroQAwdSBhkd_OAbYSxqrNa9Q_ZBkAPnbbanrAnrV0BkNbvHrMTJXZ6p0W_YT_Oc5pWzAF5SbzhhGHByA-TzwttMTZeMl8ukR-wplJnT-iWB1-Db42HS189GXVsyxjalpTcSr3leO2n1S9jyVvuc-QYSi4zIXdj9rWME1ayx_AN81P2KPmp4bP79ZR9ef_u89nH7uLTh_OztxddUNYsnZEJ5SAtDNH7qGKwAnz0weKAxu6tBm-80AOiNBhT8miVhZT6CHYfQatT9uqYe6jl-4ptcfPYAk70Vixrc1JBbySBitCX_6BXZa2ZbkfUsKPPNlYQJY9UqKW1iskd6jj7eusEuLuK3LEiRxW5XxW5G5Je3Eev-xnjH-V3JwSoI9DoKH_F-nf2f2J_At-anzs</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creator><creator>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creator><creator>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creator><creator>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creator><creator>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creator><creator>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creator><creator>Falade, Temilola T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</title><author>Adegbeye, Moyosore J. ; Asaniyan, Emmanuel K. ; Igbalajobi, Olabisi A. ; Oyedele, Damilola S. ; Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y. ; Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M. ; Falade, Temilola T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-52fe292709daad3dc710adac7e9e57b740a5a149ee25edffae7370ff8d07bd043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Asimina</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Body weight gain</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Chickens - growth & development</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Conversion ratio</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements - analysis</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Feeding trials</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat - analysis</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Mustard</topic><topic>Mustard Plant</topic><topic>Nigella sativa</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Damilola S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Temilola T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adegbeye, Moyosore J.</au><au>Asaniyan, Emmanuel K.</au><au>Igbalajobi, Olabisi A.</au><au>Oyedele, Damilola S.</au><au>Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.</au><au>Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.</au><au>Falade, Temilola T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1012</epage><pages>1005-1012</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>The immergence of antibiotic resistance, in livestock especially poultry, led to the ban of antibiotics as a growth promoter in some part of the world. This brought about the investigations into the development of various alternatives to antibiotics that will not compromise the integrity of poultry products for safe consumption. Therefore, this study examined the possible impacts of selected plants seeds (pawpaw, mustard, and black cumin) as feed additives on the performance, carcass characteristics, and sensory evaluation of broilers. A total of 180 day-old Arbor Acre Plus chicks were randomly assigned to five treatments of four replicates in a completely randomized design. The five treatments were three plant seed additives: pawpaw (PPS), mustard (MUS), and black cumin (BCS), treatment without additives (CON, i.e., no plants seeds/medications), and treatment with medications and antibiotics (ANT). During the feeding trials that lasted for 8 weeks, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were considered performance data. At the end of the feeding trials, two birds per replicate were slaughtered for carcass parameters and sensory evaluation. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance. Mustard seed (
Brassica juncea
) significantly (
P
= 0.018) supported carcass growth. Further, the highest feed intake was obtained in MUS while the lowest was obtained in CON birds. The PPS had higher (
P
= 0.013) BWG than in other treatments while the lowest was obtained in CON. Values of FCR were lowest (
P
= 0.15) in PPS while the highest in CON birds. Furthermore, MUS and PPS had significantly (
P
= 0.018) and (
P
= 0.03) higher live weight than CON and ANT, while MUS had higher dressed weight percentage than CON and ANT birds. Broiler meat under diet supplemented with black cumin was relatively found to be most acceptable while meat under mustard seed was the least acceptable. In contrast, the average cost realized per bird was obtained in PPS while the lowest was in CON and ANT. However, broiler diet supplemented with BCS brings about a corresponding decrease in percentage feeding cost reduction among plant supplements.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31646418</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-4170</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2020-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1005-1012 |
issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520433 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animals Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Asimina Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Body weight Body weight gain Brassica Chickens - growth & development Chicks Conversion ratio Diet Diet - veterinary Dietary Supplements - analysis Feed additives Feed conversion Feeding trials Food additives Life Sciences Livestock Meat Meat - analysis Meat - standards Mustard Mustard Plant Nigella sativa Performance evaluation Poultry Regular Articles Seeds Sensory evaluation Sensory properties Variance analysis Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Weight Gain Zoology |
title | Influence of selected plant seeds on the performance, carcass characteristics, sensory evaluation, and economics of broiler chicken |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20selected%20plant%20seeds%20on%20the%20performance,%20carcass%20characteristics,%20sensory%20evaluation,%20and%20economics%20of%20broiler%20chicken&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Adegbeye,%20Moyosore%20J.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1012&rft.pages=1005-1012&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-019-02092-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2396092571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2396092571&rft_id=info:pmid/31646418&rfr_iscdi=true |