The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio

•Mixtures of a mother, father, child trio are examined using the software STRmix™.•Parent/child allele sharing often results in artificially high or low LRs.•User-informed mixture proportions and an assumed donor parent assists interpretation.•The distribution of LRs for true and false donors is rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forensic science international : genetics 2020-01, Vol.44, p.102175-102175, Article 102175
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Meng-Han, Bright, Jo-Anne, Pugh, Simone N., Buckleton, John S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102175
container_issue
container_start_page 102175
container_title Forensic science international : genetics
container_volume 44
creator Lin, Meng-Han
Bright, Jo-Anne
Pugh, Simone N.
Buckleton, John S.
description •Mixtures of a mother, father, child trio are examined using the software STRmix™.•Parent/child allele sharing often results in artificially high or low LRs.•User-informed mixture proportions and an assumed donor parent assists interpretation.•The distribution of LRs for true and false donors is reported. We report the interpretation of three-person mixed DNA profiles constructed from DNA from one mother, father, and child trio using the probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™. A total of 40 mixtures were examined, with varying total template and mixture proportions of the three contributors. In addition, mixtures were artificially degraded at four different rates to test the effects of degradation on the interpretation of mother, father and child trios. A total of 560 STRmix™ analyses were undertaken, examining four different interpretation strategies. Reasonable results were only achieved by conditioning on one parent as an assumed donor and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. For each of the 40 amplified mixtures, 10,000 non-donors were compared, conditioning on one parent and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. This leads to 800,000 non-donor tests.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1872497319303229</els_id><sourcerecordid>2308520029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ad3c242b8d924ce3208b6f9f306a586139f077ddcae1f495a310ecf32d3051063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EomX5Bwj5yIEUL4kTX5BQWaWqXMrZcu0xdZXExU4R_HtSAhw5vdHovVk-hM4omVBCxdV64pJ_hXbCCJV9i9Gy2ENjWpVVRjgT-981y3JZ8hE6SmlNSCFLWhyiEaciz6XIx2i-WAH2bQdxE6HTnQ8tDg43_gMsvp3f4E0MzteQsIuhwRo3oVtBvMROD6pbi83K1xZ30YcTdOB0neD0R4_Ry_3dYvqYzZ4fnqY3s8xwwbpMW25YzpaVlSw3wBmplsJJx4nQRSUol46UpbVGA3W5LDSnBIzjzHJSUCL4MboY5vbnvW0hdarxyUBd6xbCNinGSVUwQpjsrflgNTGkFMGpTfSNjp-KErUjqdZqIKl2JNVAso-d_2zYLhuwf6FfdL3hejBA_-e7h6iS8dAasD6C6ZQN_v8NX4dDhOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2308520029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lin, Meng-Han ; Bright, Jo-Anne ; Pugh, Simone N. ; Buckleton, John S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Meng-Han ; Bright, Jo-Anne ; Pugh, Simone N. ; Buckleton, John S.</creatorcontrib><description>•Mixtures of a mother, father, child trio are examined using the software STRmix™.•Parent/child allele sharing often results in artificially high or low LRs.•User-informed mixture proportions and an assumed donor parent assists interpretation.•The distribution of LRs for true and false donors is reported. We report the interpretation of three-person mixed DNA profiles constructed from DNA from one mother, father, and child trio using the probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™. A total of 40 mixtures were examined, with varying total template and mixture proportions of the three contributors. In addition, mixtures were artificially degraded at four different rates to test the effects of degradation on the interpretation of mother, father and child trios. A total of 560 STRmix™ analyses were undertaken, examining four different interpretation strategies. Reasonable results were only achieved by conditioning on one parent as an assumed donor and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. For each of the 40 amplified mixtures, 10,000 non-donors were compared, conditioning on one parent and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. This leads to 800,000 non-donor tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31644964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Child ; DNA - genetics ; DNA Fingerprinting - methods ; Fathers ; Female ; Forensic Genetics - methods ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Male ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Mothers ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Software</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international : genetics, 2020-01, Vol.44, p.102175-102175, Article 102175</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ad3c242b8d924ce3208b6f9f306a586139f077ddcae1f495a310ecf32d3051063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ad3c242b8d924ce3208b6f9f306a586139f077ddcae1f495a310ecf32d3051063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31644964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Meng-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, Jo-Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Simone N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckleton, John S.</creatorcontrib><title>The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio</title><title>Forensic science international : genetics</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int Genet</addtitle><description>•Mixtures of a mother, father, child trio are examined using the software STRmix™.•Parent/child allele sharing often results in artificially high or low LRs.•User-informed mixture proportions and an assumed donor parent assists interpretation.•The distribution of LRs for true and false donors is reported. We report the interpretation of three-person mixed DNA profiles constructed from DNA from one mother, father, and child trio using the probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™. A total of 40 mixtures were examined, with varying total template and mixture proportions of the three contributors. In addition, mixtures were artificially degraded at four different rates to test the effects of degradation on the interpretation of mother, father and child trios. A total of 560 STRmix™ analyses were undertaken, examining four different interpretation strategies. Reasonable results were only achieved by conditioning on one parent as an assumed donor and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. For each of the 40 amplified mixtures, 10,000 non-donors were compared, conditioning on one parent and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. This leads to 800,000 non-donor tests.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting - methods</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forensic Genetics - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1872-4973</issn><issn>1878-0326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EomX5Bwj5yIEUL4kTX5BQWaWqXMrZcu0xdZXExU4R_HtSAhw5vdHovVk-hM4omVBCxdV64pJ_hXbCCJV9i9Gy2ENjWpVVRjgT-981y3JZ8hE6SmlNSCFLWhyiEaciz6XIx2i-WAH2bQdxE6HTnQ8tDg43_gMsvp3f4E0MzteQsIuhwRo3oVtBvMROD6pbi83K1xZ30YcTdOB0neD0R4_Ry_3dYvqYzZ4fnqY3s8xwwbpMW25YzpaVlSw3wBmplsJJx4nQRSUol46UpbVGA3W5LDSnBIzjzHJSUCL4MboY5vbnvW0hdarxyUBd6xbCNinGSVUwQpjsrflgNTGkFMGpTfSNjp-KErUjqdZqIKl2JNVAso-d_2zYLhuwf6FfdL3hejBA_-e7h6iS8dAasD6C6ZQN_v8NX4dDhOE</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Lin, Meng-Han</creator><creator>Bright, Jo-Anne</creator><creator>Pugh, Simone N.</creator><creator>Buckleton, John S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio</title><author>Lin, Meng-Han ; Bright, Jo-Anne ; Pugh, Simone N. ; Buckleton, John S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ad3c242b8d924ce3208b6f9f306a586139f077ddcae1f495a310ecf32d3051063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting - methods</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forensic Genetics - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Meng-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, Jo-Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugh, Simone N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckleton, John S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international : genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Meng-Han</au><au>Bright, Jo-Anne</au><au>Pugh, Simone N.</au><au>Buckleton, John S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international : genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int Genet</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>102175</spage><epage>102175</epage><pages>102175-102175</pages><artnum>102175</artnum><issn>1872-4973</issn><eissn>1878-0326</eissn><abstract>•Mixtures of a mother, father, child trio are examined using the software STRmix™.•Parent/child allele sharing often results in artificially high or low LRs.•User-informed mixture proportions and an assumed donor parent assists interpretation.•The distribution of LRs for true and false donors is reported. We report the interpretation of three-person mixed DNA profiles constructed from DNA from one mother, father, and child trio using the probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™. A total of 40 mixtures were examined, with varying total template and mixture proportions of the three contributors. In addition, mixtures were artificially degraded at four different rates to test the effects of degradation on the interpretation of mother, father and child trios. A total of 560 STRmix™ analyses were undertaken, examining four different interpretation strategies. Reasonable results were only achieved by conditioning on one parent as an assumed donor and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. For each of the 40 amplified mixtures, 10,000 non-donors were compared, conditioning on one parent and applying a user-informed prior to the mixture proportion of both parents. This leads to 800,000 non-donor tests.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31644964</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1872-4973
ispartof Forensic science international : genetics, 2020-01, Vol.44, p.102175-102175, Article 102175
issn 1872-4973
1878-0326
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2308520029
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Child
DNA - genetics
DNA Fingerprinting - methods
Fathers
Female
Forensic Genetics - methods
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Male
Microsatellite Repeats
Mothers
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Software
title The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interpretation%20of%20mixed%20DNA%20profiles%20from%20a%20mother,%20father,%20and%20child%20trio&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international%20:%20genetics&rft.au=Lin,%20Meng-Han&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=102175&rft.epage=102175&rft.pages=102175-102175&rft.artnum=102175&rft.issn=1872-4973&rft.eissn=1878-0326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2308520029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2308520029&rft_id=info:pmid/31644964&rft_els_id=S1872497319303229&rfr_iscdi=true