Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images
Research has shown that memory predictions are higher for emotional words, pictures, and facial expressions, relative to neutral stimuli, with recognition memory performance often not following the same pattern as predictions. Memory predictions for negative emotional images have not yet been examin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition and emotion 2020-06, Vol.34 (4), p.771-782 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 782 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 771 |
| container_title | Cognition and emotion |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Hourihan, Kathleen L. |
| description | Research has shown that memory predictions are higher for emotional words, pictures, and facial expressions, relative to neutral stimuli, with recognition memory performance often not following the same pattern as predictions. Memory predictions for negative emotional images have not yet been examined. The current study examined how memory predictions and recognition memory for negative and positive emotional images differed from neutral images. Participants studied a mixed list of positive, negative, and neutral images and predicted future recognition by providing judgements of learning (JOLs). JOLs were highest for negative images, followed by positive images and then neutral images. However, recognition accuracy showed the opposite pattern: neutral images were recognised most accurately and negative images were the most poorly recognised. Participants incorporate beliefs and subjective experience in predicting recognition of emotional images, but fail to account for the influences of study and test conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02699931.2019.1682972 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2307738381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416759676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5828e7c617d13fbb93ec1d6aeb4953671c267f74c01ad4f5d0b651ec7175fc9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu3CAURVHVqpmk_YRWlrrpxlMwGExWiaImqZSqm2SNMDwsRjZMwU6Uvy_uTLrIoiuE3rmXhw5CnwjeEtzhb7jhUkpKtg0mckt410jRvEEbwjirMcf4LdqsTL1CJ-g05x3GmFGG36MTSjgVshUbNP30eQRtfRgqmOLsY8jn1W6xwwRhzlV0VRmnsM7jIyTIs5_0DFUCE4fg18AKBRj07B-h0sFW-5j938uxUY9VCQ2QP6B3To8ZPh7PM_Rw_f3-6ra--3Xz4-ryrjZUsrluu6YDYTgRllDX95KCIZZr6JlsKRfENFw4wQwm2jLXWtzzloARRLTOSEfP0NdD7z7F30vZWU0-GxhHHSAuWTUUC0E72pGCfnmF7uKSysqFYoSLVnLBC9UeKJNizgmc2qfypfSsCFarD_XiQ60-1NFHyX0-ti_9BPZf6kVAAS4OgA8upkk_xTRaNevnMSaXdDA-F_i_b_wB3u-biQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416759676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><description>Research has shown that memory predictions are higher for emotional words, pictures, and facial expressions, relative to neutral stimuli, with recognition memory performance often not following the same pattern as predictions. Memory predictions for negative emotional images have not yet been examined. The current study examined how memory predictions and recognition memory for negative and positive emotional images differed from neutral images. Participants studied a mixed list of positive, negative, and neutral images and predicted future recognition by providing judgements of learning (JOLs). JOLs were highest for negative images, followed by positive images and then neutral images. However, recognition accuracy showed the opposite pattern: neutral images were recognised most accurately and negative images were the most poorly recognised. Participants incorporate beliefs and subjective experience in predicting recognition of emotional images, but fail to account for the influences of study and test conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1682972</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31637957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Acknowledgment ; Cognition ; Court decisions ; Emotion ; Emotion recognition ; emotional images ; Emotional words ; Emotions ; Facial Expression ; Facial expressions ; Humans ; judgements of learning ; Judgment ; Learning ; Memory ; metamemory ; Predictions ; Recognition memory ; Recognition, Psychology</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2020-06, Vol.34 (4), p.771-782</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5828e7c617d13fbb93ec1d6aeb4953671c267f74c01ad4f5d0b651ec7175fc9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5828e7c617d13fbb93ec1d6aeb4953671c267f74c01ad4f5d0b651ec7175fc9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><title>Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>Research has shown that memory predictions are higher for emotional words, pictures, and facial expressions, relative to neutral stimuli, with recognition memory performance often not following the same pattern as predictions. Memory predictions for negative emotional images have not yet been examined. The current study examined how memory predictions and recognition memory for negative and positive emotional images differed from neutral images. Participants studied a mixed list of positive, negative, and neutral images and predicted future recognition by providing judgements of learning (JOLs). JOLs were highest for negative images, followed by positive images and then neutral images. However, recognition accuracy showed the opposite pattern: neutral images were recognised most accurately and negative images were the most poorly recognised. Participants incorporate beliefs and subjective experience in predicting recognition of emotional images, but fail to account for the influences of study and test conditions.</description><subject>Acknowledgment</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Emotion</subject><subject>Emotion recognition</subject><subject>emotional images</subject><subject>Emotional words</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial expressions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>judgements of learning</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>metamemory</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Recognition memory</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu3CAURVHVqpmk_YRWlrrpxlMwGExWiaImqZSqm2SNMDwsRjZMwU6Uvy_uTLrIoiuE3rmXhw5CnwjeEtzhb7jhUkpKtg0mckt410jRvEEbwjirMcf4LdqsTL1CJ-g05x3GmFGG36MTSjgVshUbNP30eQRtfRgqmOLsY8jn1W6xwwRhzlV0VRmnsM7jIyTIs5_0DFUCE4fg18AKBRj07B-h0sFW-5j938uxUY9VCQ2QP6B3To8ZPh7PM_Rw_f3-6ra--3Xz4-ryrjZUsrluu6YDYTgRllDX95KCIZZr6JlsKRfENFw4wQwm2jLXWtzzloARRLTOSEfP0NdD7z7F30vZWU0-GxhHHSAuWTUUC0E72pGCfnmF7uKSysqFYoSLVnLBC9UeKJNizgmc2qfypfSsCFarD_XiQ60-1NFHyX0-ti_9BPZf6kVAAS4OgA8upkk_xTRaNevnMSaXdDA-F_i_b_wB3u-biQ</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images</title><author>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5828e7c617d13fbb93ec1d6aeb4953671c267f74c01ad4f5d0b651ec7175fc9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acknowledgment</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Emotion</topic><topic>Emotion recognition</topic><topic>emotional images</topic><topic>Emotional words</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial expressions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>judgements of learning</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>metamemory</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Recognition memory</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hourihan, Kathleen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>782</epage><pages>771-782</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><abstract>Research has shown that memory predictions are higher for emotional words, pictures, and facial expressions, relative to neutral stimuli, with recognition memory performance often not following the same pattern as predictions. Memory predictions for negative emotional images have not yet been examined. The current study examined how memory predictions and recognition memory for negative and positive emotional images differed from neutral images. Participants studied a mixed list of positive, negative, and neutral images and predicted future recognition by providing judgements of learning (JOLs). JOLs were highest for negative images, followed by positive images and then neutral images. However, recognition accuracy showed the opposite pattern: neutral images were recognised most accurately and negative images were the most poorly recognised. Participants incorporate beliefs and subjective experience in predicting recognition of emotional images, but fail to account for the influences of study and test conditions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>31637957</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2019.1682972</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-9931 |
| ispartof | Cognition and emotion, 2020-06, Vol.34 (4), p.771-782 |
| issn | 0269-9931 1464-0600 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2307738381 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Acknowledgment Cognition Court decisions Emotion Emotion recognition emotional images Emotional words Emotions Facial Expression Facial expressions Humans judgements of learning Judgment Learning Memory metamemory Predictions Recognition memory Recognition, Psychology |
| title | Misleading emotions: judgments of learning overestimate recognition of negative and positive emotional images |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misleading%20emotions:%20judgments%20of%20learning%20overestimate%20recognition%20of%20negative%20and%20positive%20emotional%20images&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Hourihan,%20Kathleen%20L.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=782&rft.pages=771-782&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2019.1682972&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2416759676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416759676&rft_id=info:pmid/31637957&rfr_iscdi=true |