Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair

Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2019-11, Vol.47 (13), p.3141-3147
Hauptverfasser: Okoroha, Kelechi R., Beck, Edward C., Nwachukwu, Benedict U., Kunze, Kyle N., Nho, Shane J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3147
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3141
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 47
creator Okoroha, Kelechi R.
Beck, Edward C.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Kunze, Kyle N.
Nho, Shane J.
description Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair and (2) determine correlations between preoperative patient characteristics and achievement of MCID/PASS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and February 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data collected included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, preoperative clinical function scores, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Paired t tests were used to compare the differences in 2-year PROs. The MCID and PASS for each PRO were calculated and Spearman coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between MCID, PASS, and preoperative variables. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.7%), with an average age and body mass index of 57.9 ± 9.91 years and 27.6 ± 6.1, respectively. The MCIDs of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport-Specific (SS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were calculated to be 15.02, 14.53, and 14.13, respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were calculated to be 81.32, 67.71, and 77.5, respectively. In addition, 76.7% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 77.8% and 69.0% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, and 48.3% achieving both MCID and PASS. Smoking had a negative and weak association with achieving PASS (r = −0.271; P = .039). No other patient characteristic variables were found to correlate with achieving MCID or PASS. Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defined MCID and PASS for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS outcome scores. A large percentage of patients (76.7%) achieved meaningful clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0363546519877179
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2306494769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0363546519877179</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2306494769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e3bf41662ac1b8777820f3fba24c804a5ad6c5cbd4e34f4d61e37f40183d510d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv3CAQhVHVqNmmvfdUIfXSixvGYPAeV5s0XSlRqyY5WxiGyBE2LuDD_oD877LatJUi9fSA-ebB8Aj5AOwLgFLnjEveCNnAulUK1PoVWUHT1BXnsnlNVodydaifkrcpPTLGQMn2DTnlIKFlUq7I0wW6YRqmB3pTZNSebn1ZGO39nu7GOcSsp0wvBucw4mSQ6snSHzoPWI43xuCcde-R3u7HOYeR3madkW5cxkh3Kfiys_RysiGZMA-GXvkl45LoDdqhyE-c9RDfkROnfcL3z3pG7r9e3m2_Vdffr3bbzXVlykC5Qt47AVLW2kBfJlZtzRx3va6FaZnQjbbSNKa3ArlwwkpArpxg0HLbALP8jHw--s4x_Fow5W4ckkHv9YRhSV3NmRRroeS6oJ9eoI9hiVN5XaEAalbXAIViR8rEkFJE182x_GLcd8C6Q0Tdy4hKy8dn46Uf0f5t-JNJAaojkPQD_rv1v4a_Ad8kmWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311202211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Okoroha, Kelechi R. ; Beck, Edward C. ; Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ; Kunze, Kyle N. ; Nho, Shane J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Okoroha, Kelechi R. ; Beck, Edward C. ; Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ; Kunze, Kyle N. ; Nho, Shane J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair and (2) determine correlations between preoperative patient characteristics and achievement of MCID/PASS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and February 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data collected included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, preoperative clinical function scores, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Paired t tests were used to compare the differences in 2-year PROs. The MCID and PASS for each PRO were calculated and Spearman coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between MCID, PASS, and preoperative variables. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.7%), with an average age and body mass index of 57.9 ± 9.91 years and 27.6 ± 6.1, respectively. The MCIDs of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport-Specific (SS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were calculated to be 15.02, 14.53, and 14.13, respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were calculated to be 81.32, 67.71, and 77.5, respectively. In addition, 76.7% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 77.8% and 69.0% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, and 48.3% achieving both MCID and PASS. Smoking had a negative and weak association with achieving PASS (r = −0.271; P = .039). No other patient characteristic variables were found to correlate with achieving MCID or PASS. Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defined MCID and PASS for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS outcome scores. A large percentage of patients (76.7%) achieved meaningful clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0363546519877179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31618066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Clinical outcomes ; Endoscopy ; Patients ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2019-11, Vol.47 (13), p.3141-3147</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e3bf41662ac1b8777820f3fba24c804a5ad6c5cbd4e34f4d61e37f40183d510d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e3bf41662ac1b8777820f3fba24c804a5ad6c5cbd4e34f4d61e37f40183d510d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0363546519877179$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363546519877179$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okoroha, Kelechi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwachukwu, Benedict U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunze, Kyle N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nho, Shane J.</creatorcontrib><title>Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair and (2) determine correlations between preoperative patient characteristics and achievement of MCID/PASS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and February 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data collected included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, preoperative clinical function scores, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Paired t tests were used to compare the differences in 2-year PROs. The MCID and PASS for each PRO were calculated and Spearman coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between MCID, PASS, and preoperative variables. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.7%), with an average age and body mass index of 57.9 ± 9.91 years and 27.6 ± 6.1, respectively. The MCIDs of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport-Specific (SS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were calculated to be 15.02, 14.53, and 14.13, respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were calculated to be 81.32, 67.71, and 77.5, respectively. In addition, 76.7% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 77.8% and 69.0% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, and 48.3% achieving both MCID and PASS. Smoking had a negative and weak association with achieving PASS (r = −0.271; P = .039). No other patient characteristic variables were found to correlate with achieving MCID or PASS. Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defined MCID and PASS for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS outcome scores. A large percentage of patients (76.7%) achieved meaningful clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFv3CAQhVHVqNmmvfdUIfXSixvGYPAeV5s0XSlRqyY5WxiGyBE2LuDD_oD877LatJUi9fSA-ebB8Aj5AOwLgFLnjEveCNnAulUK1PoVWUHT1BXnsnlNVodydaifkrcpPTLGQMn2DTnlIKFlUq7I0wW6YRqmB3pTZNSebn1ZGO39nu7GOcSsp0wvBucw4mSQ6snSHzoPWI43xuCcde-R3u7HOYeR3madkW5cxkh3Kfiys_RysiGZMA-GXvkl45LoDdqhyE-c9RDfkROnfcL3z3pG7r9e3m2_Vdffr3bbzXVlykC5Qt47AVLW2kBfJlZtzRx3va6FaZnQjbbSNKa3ArlwwkpArpxg0HLbALP8jHw--s4x_Fow5W4ckkHv9YRhSV3NmRRroeS6oJ9eoI9hiVN5XaEAalbXAIViR8rEkFJE182x_GLcd8C6Q0Tdy4hKy8dn46Uf0f5t-JNJAaojkPQD_rv1v4a_Ad8kmWE</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Okoroha, Kelechi R.</creator><creator>Beck, Edward C.</creator><creator>Nwachukwu, Benedict U.</creator><creator>Kunze, Kyle N.</creator><creator>Nho, Shane J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair</title><author>Okoroha, Kelechi R. ; Beck, Edward C. ; Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ; Kunze, Kyle N. ; Nho, Shane J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e3bf41662ac1b8777820f3fba24c804a5ad6c5cbd4e34f4d61e37f40183d510d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okoroha, Kelechi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Edward C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwachukwu, Benedict U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunze, Kyle N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nho, Shane J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okoroha, Kelechi R.</au><au>Beck, Edward C.</au><au>Nwachukwu, Benedict U.</au><au>Kunze, Kyle N.</au><au>Nho, Shane J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3141</spage><epage>3147</epage><pages>3141-3147</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair and (2) determine correlations between preoperative patient characteristics and achievement of MCID/PASS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and February 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data collected included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, preoperative clinical function scores, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Paired t tests were used to compare the differences in 2-year PROs. The MCID and PASS for each PRO were calculated and Spearman coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between MCID, PASS, and preoperative variables. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.7%), with an average age and body mass index of 57.9 ± 9.91 years and 27.6 ± 6.1, respectively. The MCIDs of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport-Specific (SS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were calculated to be 15.02, 14.53, and 14.13, respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were calculated to be 81.32, 67.71, and 77.5, respectively. In addition, 76.7% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 77.8% and 69.0% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, and 48.3% achieving both MCID and PASS. Smoking had a negative and weak association with achieving PASS (r = −0.271; P = .039). No other patient characteristic variables were found to correlate with achieving MCID or PASS. Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defined MCID and PASS for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS outcome scores. A large percentage of patients (76.7%) achieved meaningful clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31618066</pmid><doi>10.1177/0363546519877179</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2019-11, Vol.47 (13), p.3141-3147
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2306494769
source Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Activities of daily living
Clinical outcomes
Endoscopy
Patients
Sports medicine
title Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A11%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20Minimal%20Clinically%20Important%20Difference%20and%20Patient%20Acceptable%20Symptom%20State%20After%20Isolated%20Endoscopic%20Gluteus%20Medius%20Repair&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Okoroha,%20Kelechi%20R.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3141&rft.epage=3147&rft.pages=3141-3147&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0363546519877179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2306494769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311202211&rft_id=info:pmid/31618066&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0363546519877179&rfr_iscdi=true