Assessment of the Opening Minds Scale for use with nursing students

Purpose Evaluate the validity of the Opening Minds Scale (OMS) for nursing students via Rasch models and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Design and methods Undergraduate nursing student responses to OMS (n = 423). Validity was evaluated via CFA and Rasch analysis. Findings CFA results were stron...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives in psychiatric care 2019-10, Vol.55 (4), p.661-666
Hauptverfasser: Happell, Brenda, Platania‐Phung, Chris, Scholz, Brett, Bocking, Julia, Horgan, Aine, Manning, Fionnuala, Doody, Rory, Hals, Elisabeth, Granerud, Arild, Jan van der Vaart, Kornelis, Allon, Jerry, Lahti, Mari, Pulli, Jarmo, Vatula, Annaliina, Ellilä, Heikki, Griffin, Martha, Russell, Siobhan, MacGabhann, Liam, Bjornsson, Einar, Biering, Pall
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Evaluate the validity of the Opening Minds Scale (OMS) for nursing students via Rasch models and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Design and methods Undergraduate nursing student responses to OMS (n = 423). Validity was evaluated via CFA and Rasch analysis. Findings CFA results were strongest for a three‐factor 13‐item version of OMS. Rasch modeling supported sound properties for two of three scales. Internal reliabilities ranged between 0.6 and 0.7. Practice implications OMS has potential as a valid measure for stigma research and antistigma program evaluation. Rasch analysis suggest it is inappropriate to use a total OMS score for nursing student populations.
ISSN:0031-5990
1744-6163
DOI:10.1111/ppc.12393