Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia
Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 973 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 966 |
container_title | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Okuyama, Hiroomi Saka, Ryuta Takama, Yuichi Nomura, Motonari Ueno, Takehisa Tazuke, Yuko |
description | Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305794940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2305794940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5gyIiTD9Su2R1TxkiqxlNlyHLtNldbBtx3496SEmeHqLN850v0IuWXwwAD0IwIoqygwO54xktozMmNS1JQbJs7JDKxklHHLLskV4haASwMwI_erTS4-ZAx56EJV4uC7UuVURczDxq-j7yt_KBE7f00uku8x3vzlnHy-PK8Wb3T58fq-eFrSIKQ5UGO0b0BF7S3zXCchW9CQ2mBrNYZMjVRtbCwHZTQ3tg5JaBGUSq0SRlgxJ3fT7lDy1zHiwe06DLHv_T7mIzouQGkrrYQR5RMaSkYsMbmhdDtfvh0DdxLjJjFuFON-xbjTvphKOML7dSxum49lP770X-sHYwBk3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305794940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><description>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-1291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Review Article ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saka, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><title>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</title><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><description>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0941-1291</issn><issn>1436-2813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5gyIiTD9Su2R1TxkiqxlNlyHLtNldbBtx3496SEmeHqLN850v0IuWXwwAD0IwIoqygwO54xktozMmNS1JQbJs7JDKxklHHLLskV4haASwMwI_erTS4-ZAx56EJV4uC7UuVURczDxq-j7yt_KBE7f00uku8x3vzlnHy-PK8Wb3T58fq-eFrSIKQ5UGO0b0BF7S3zXCchW9CQ2mBrNYZMjVRtbCwHZTQ3tg5JaBGUSq0SRlgxJ3fT7lDy1zHiwe06DLHv_T7mIzouQGkrrYQR5RMaSkYsMbmhdDtfvh0DdxLjJjFuFON-xbjTvphKOML7dSxum49lP770X-sHYwBk3g</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creator><creator>Saka, Ryuta</creator><creator>Takama, Yuichi</creator><creator>Nomura, Motonari</creator><creator>Ueno, Takehisa</creator><creator>Tazuke, Yuko</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><author>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saka, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okuyama, Hiroomi</au><au>Saka, Ryuta</au><au>Takama, Yuichi</au><au>Nomura, Motonari</au><au>Ueno, Takehisa</au><au>Tazuke, Yuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</atitle><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Today</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>966</spage><epage>973</epage><pages>966-973</pages><issn>0941-1291</issn><eissn>1436-2813</eissn><abstract>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-1291 |
ispartof | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973 |
issn | 0941-1291 1436-2813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305794940 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Medicine Medicine & Public Health Review Article Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoracoscopic%20repair%20of%20esophageal%20atresia&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20today%20(Tokyo,%20Japan)&rft.au=Okuyama,%20Hiroomi&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=966&rft.epage=973&rft.pages=966-973&rft.issn=0941-1291&rft.eissn=1436-2813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2305794940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305794940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |