Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973
Hauptverfasser: Okuyama, Hiroomi, Saka, Ryuta, Takama, Yuichi, Nomura, Motonari, Ueno, Takehisa, Tazuke, Yuko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 973
container_issue 9
container_start_page 966
container_title Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)
container_volume 50
creator Okuyama, Hiroomi
Saka, Ryuta
Takama, Yuichi
Nomura, Motonari
Ueno, Takehisa
Tazuke, Yuko
description Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305794940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2305794940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5gyIiTD9Su2R1TxkiqxlNlyHLtNldbBtx3496SEmeHqLN850v0IuWXwwAD0IwIoqygwO54xktozMmNS1JQbJs7JDKxklHHLLskV4haASwMwI_erTS4-ZAx56EJV4uC7UuVURczDxq-j7yt_KBE7f00uku8x3vzlnHy-PK8Wb3T58fq-eFrSIKQ5UGO0b0BF7S3zXCchW9CQ2mBrNYZMjVRtbCwHZTQ3tg5JaBGUSq0SRlgxJ3fT7lDy1zHiwe06DLHv_T7mIzouQGkrrYQR5RMaSkYsMbmhdDtfvh0DdxLjJjFuFON-xbjTvphKOML7dSxum49lP770X-sHYwBk3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305794940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><description>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-1291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Review Article ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saka, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><title>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</title><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><description>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0941-1291</issn><issn>1436-2813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5gyIiTD9Su2R1TxkiqxlNlyHLtNldbBtx3496SEmeHqLN850v0IuWXwwAD0IwIoqygwO54xktozMmNS1JQbJs7JDKxklHHLLskV4haASwMwI_erTS4-ZAx56EJV4uC7UuVURczDxq-j7yt_KBE7f00uku8x3vzlnHy-PK8Wb3T58fq-eFrSIKQ5UGO0b0BF7S3zXCchW9CQ2mBrNYZMjVRtbCwHZTQ3tg5JaBGUSq0SRlgxJ3fT7lDy1zHiwe06DLHv_T7mIzouQGkrrYQR5RMaSkYsMbmhdDtfvh0DdxLjJjFuFON-xbjTvphKOML7dSxum49lP770X-sHYwBk3g</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creator><creator>Saka, Ryuta</creator><creator>Takama, Yuichi</creator><creator>Nomura, Motonari</creator><creator>Ueno, Takehisa</creator><creator>Tazuke, Yuko</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</title><author>Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Saka, Ryuta ; Takama, Yuichi ; Nomura, Motonari ; Ueno, Takehisa ; Tazuke, Yuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-887ab05e7a91a27f34d070fdc9650fd4fb45deb9205872896cf373c55fd538393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saka, Ryuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Takehisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tazuke, Yuko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okuyama, Hiroomi</au><au>Saka, Ryuta</au><au>Takama, Yuichi</au><au>Nomura, Motonari</au><au>Ueno, Takehisa</au><au>Tazuke, Yuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia</atitle><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Today</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>966</spage><epage>973</epage><pages>966-973</pages><issn>0941-1291</issn><eissn>1436-2813</eissn><abstract>Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10–20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-1291
ispartof Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2020-09, Vol.50 (9), p.966-973
issn 0941-1291
1436-2813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305794940
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Review Article
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
title Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoracoscopic%20repair%20of%20esophageal%20atresia&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20today%20(Tokyo,%20Japan)&rft.au=Okuyama,%20Hiroomi&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=966&rft.epage=973&rft.pages=966-973&rft.issn=0941-1291&rft.eissn=1436-2813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2305794940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305794940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true