Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis
•A large cohort study did not show increased risk of pediatric cancer after ART.•Meta analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 450,183 women exposed to ART and 1, 912,192 unexposed controls did not reveal increased risk of pediatric cancers.•Based on large numbers of ART in general and IVF in p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology 2019-12, Vol.63, p.101613-101613, Article 101613 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 101613 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 101613 |
| container_title | Cancer epidemiology |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Gilboa, Daniella Koren, Gideon Barer, Yael Katz, Rachel Rotem, Ram Lunenfeld, Eitan Shalev, Varda |
| description | •A large cohort study did not show increased risk of pediatric cancer after ART.•Meta analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 450,183 women exposed to ART and 1, 912,192 unexposed controls did not reveal increased risk of pediatric cancers.•Based on large numbers of ART in general and IVF in particular are not associated with overall risk of pediatric cancer.
There is controversy whether exposure to assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with increased risk of pediatric cancer.
We aimed at calculating the overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART in a large cohort of exposed women; and to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of cohort studies examining overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART.
All children born in Israel who were members of Maccabi Health Services (MHS) between 1999 and 2016 after ART, were linked to the Israeli Registry of Childhood Cancer (IGS) to identify those with cancer diagnosed before 16 years of age. In parallel we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies with more than 5000 ART- exposed cases that measured pediatric cancer after ART.
In the cohort study, the risk ratio for pediatric cancer after ART in general was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76–1.19). The RR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.79–1.48) for IVF treatments. Meta- analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 750,138 women exposed to ART (with 1152 pediatric cancers) and 214,008,000 unexposed controls (with 30,458 pediatric cancers) did not reveal increased risk for pediatric cancers (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85–1.15).
Based on very large numbers, ART in general, and IVF in particular, are not associated with overall increased risk of pediatric cancer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101613 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305472877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877782119301249</els_id><sourcerecordid>2318627004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5ec2d7feebcbdb2e566cb5b16cd99c5a13af2b286a365d6d3885197d1d4723d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIiHwBUjIEhs2M_gR291ILEYRLylSNkFiZ7ntauKhe9zY7qD5gPw3NdMhCxZZuVQ-Vde-l5DXnK054_r9du3dDqa1YLw9drh8Qk55Y8zKNPLH04da8BPyopQtY1pzrp6TE8k11qY9JXebUmKpEGiGKacw-xpvgVbwN7s0pJ976naB1hugOZZfNPV0ghBdzdFTlPeQP9ANndI0D67GtKOdK7is1Dkso46WPe4f8dajxm2EP8f-CNVh4YY96r8kz3o3FHh1f56R758_XV98XV1effl2sblcedmYulLgRTA9QOe70AlQWvtOdVz70LZeOS5dLzrRaCe1CjrIplG8NYGHcyNkUPKMvFv24ld_z1CqHWPxMAxoZJqLFZIpRNE2RN_-h27TnPG9B4o3WhjGzpGSC-VzKiVDb6ccR5f3ljN7yMRu7TEle0jJLinh1Jv73XM3QniY-RcLAh8XANAMtCzb4iOg2yFm8NWGFB8V-AslvaYx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2318627004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gilboa, Daniella ; Koren, Gideon ; Barer, Yael ; Katz, Rachel ; Rotem, Ram ; Lunenfeld, Eitan ; Shalev, Varda</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Daniella ; Koren, Gideon ; Barer, Yael ; Katz, Rachel ; Rotem, Ram ; Lunenfeld, Eitan ; Shalev, Varda</creatorcontrib><description>•A large cohort study did not show increased risk of pediatric cancer after ART.•Meta analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 450,183 women exposed to ART and 1, 912,192 unexposed controls did not reveal increased risk of pediatric cancers.•Based on large numbers of ART in general and IVF in particular are not associated with overall risk of pediatric cancer.
There is controversy whether exposure to assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with increased risk of pediatric cancer.
We aimed at calculating the overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART in a large cohort of exposed women; and to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of cohort studies examining overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART.
All children born in Israel who were members of Maccabi Health Services (MHS) between 1999 and 2016 after ART, were linked to the Israeli Registry of Childhood Cancer (IGS) to identify those with cancer diagnosed before 16 years of age. In parallel we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies with more than 5000 ART- exposed cases that measured pediatric cancer after ART.
In the cohort study, the risk ratio for pediatric cancer after ART in general was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76–1.19). The RR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.79–1.48) for IVF treatments. Meta- analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 750,138 women exposed to ART (with 1152 pediatric cancers) and 214,008,000 unexposed controls (with 30,458 pediatric cancers) did not reveal increased risk for pediatric cancers (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85–1.15).
Based on very large numbers, ART in general, and IVF in particular, are not associated with overall increased risk of pediatric cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-7821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-783X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31606679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Anxiety ; Assisted reproductive technology ; Cancer ; Children ; Cohort Studies ; Consent ; Embryos ; Epidemiology ; Ethics ; Exposure ; Female ; Gene expression ; Health risks ; Humans ; In vitro fertilization ; Medical diagnosis ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - etiology ; Pediatric cancer ; Pediatrics ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects ; Reproductive technologies ; Risk ; Sperm ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, 2019-12, Vol.63, p.101613-101613, Article 101613</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5ec2d7feebcbdb2e566cb5b16cd99c5a13af2b286a365d6d3885197d1d4723d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5ec2d7feebcbdb2e566cb5b16cd99c5a13af2b286a365d6d3885197d1d4723d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9234-0875</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782119301249$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barer, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotem, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunenfeld, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalev, Varda</creatorcontrib><title>Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis</title><title>Cancer epidemiology</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><description>•A large cohort study did not show increased risk of pediatric cancer after ART.•Meta analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 450,183 women exposed to ART and 1, 912,192 unexposed controls did not reveal increased risk of pediatric cancers.•Based on large numbers of ART in general and IVF in particular are not associated with overall risk of pediatric cancer.
There is controversy whether exposure to assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with increased risk of pediatric cancer.
We aimed at calculating the overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART in a large cohort of exposed women; and to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of cohort studies examining overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART.
All children born in Israel who were members of Maccabi Health Services (MHS) between 1999 and 2016 after ART, were linked to the Israeli Registry of Childhood Cancer (IGS) to identify those with cancer diagnosed before 16 years of age. In parallel we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies with more than 5000 ART- exposed cases that measured pediatric cancer after ART.
In the cohort study, the risk ratio for pediatric cancer after ART in general was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76–1.19). The RR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.79–1.48) for IVF treatments. Meta- analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 750,138 women exposed to ART (with 1152 pediatric cancers) and 214,008,000 unexposed controls (with 30,458 pediatric cancers) did not reveal increased risk for pediatric cancers (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85–1.15).
Based on very large numbers, ART in general, and IVF in particular, are not associated with overall increased risk of pediatric cancer.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Pediatric cancer</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1877-7821</issn><issn>1877-783X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIiHwBUjIEhs2M_gR291ILEYRLylSNkFiZ7ntauKhe9zY7qD5gPw3NdMhCxZZuVQ-Vde-l5DXnK054_r9du3dDqa1YLw9drh8Qk55Y8zKNPLH04da8BPyopQtY1pzrp6TE8k11qY9JXebUmKpEGiGKacw-xpvgVbwN7s0pJ976naB1hugOZZfNPV0ghBdzdFTlPeQP9ANndI0D67GtKOdK7is1Dkso46WPe4f8dajxm2EP8f-CNVh4YY96r8kz3o3FHh1f56R758_XV98XV1effl2sblcedmYulLgRTA9QOe70AlQWvtOdVz70LZeOS5dLzrRaCe1CjrIplG8NYGHcyNkUPKMvFv24ld_z1CqHWPxMAxoZJqLFZIpRNE2RN_-h27TnPG9B4o3WhjGzpGSC-VzKiVDb6ccR5f3ljN7yMRu7TEle0jJLinh1Jv73XM3QniY-RcLAh8XANAMtCzb4iOg2yFm8NWGFB8V-AslvaYx</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Gilboa, Daniella</creator><creator>Koren, Gideon</creator><creator>Barer, Yael</creator><creator>Katz, Rachel</creator><creator>Rotem, Ram</creator><creator>Lunenfeld, Eitan</creator><creator>Shalev, Varda</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-0875</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis</title><author>Gilboa, Daniella ; Koren, Gideon ; Barer, Yael ; Katz, Rachel ; Rotem, Ram ; Lunenfeld, Eitan ; Shalev, Varda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5ec2d7feebcbdb2e566cb5b16cd99c5a13af2b286a365d6d3885197d1d4723d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Pediatric cancer</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barer, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotem, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunenfeld, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalev, Varda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilboa, Daniella</au><au>Koren, Gideon</au><au>Barer, Yael</au><au>Katz, Rachel</au><au>Rotem, Ram</au><au>Lunenfeld, Eitan</au><au>Shalev, Varda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><spage>101613</spage><epage>101613</epage><pages>101613-101613</pages><artnum>101613</artnum><issn>1877-7821</issn><eissn>1877-783X</eissn><abstract>•A large cohort study did not show increased risk of pediatric cancer after ART.•Meta analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 450,183 women exposed to ART and 1, 912,192 unexposed controls did not reveal increased risk of pediatric cancers.•Based on large numbers of ART in general and IVF in particular are not associated with overall risk of pediatric cancer.
There is controversy whether exposure to assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with increased risk of pediatric cancer.
We aimed at calculating the overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART in a large cohort of exposed women; and to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of cohort studies examining overall risk of pediatric cancers after ART.
All children born in Israel who were members of Maccabi Health Services (MHS) between 1999 and 2016 after ART, were linked to the Israeli Registry of Childhood Cancer (IGS) to identify those with cancer diagnosed before 16 years of age. In parallel we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies with more than 5000 ART- exposed cases that measured pediatric cancer after ART.
In the cohort study, the risk ratio for pediatric cancer after ART in general was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76–1.19). The RR was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.79–1.48) for IVF treatments. Meta- analysis of 13 cohort studies with a total of 750,138 women exposed to ART (with 1152 pediatric cancers) and 214,008,000 unexposed controls (with 30,458 pediatric cancers) did not reveal increased risk for pediatric cancers (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85–1.15).
Based on very large numbers, ART in general, and IVF in particular, are not associated with overall increased risk of pediatric cancer.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31606679</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canep.2019.101613</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-0875</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1877-7821 |
| ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, 2019-12, Vol.63, p.101613-101613, Article 101613 |
| issn | 1877-7821 1877-783X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305472877 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Anxiety Assisted reproductive technology Cancer Children Cohort Studies Consent Embryos Epidemiology Ethics Exposure Female Gene expression Health risks Humans In vitro fertilization Medical diagnosis Meta-analysis Middle Aged Neoplasms - epidemiology Neoplasms - etiology Pediatric cancer Pediatrics Population studies Population-based studies Pregnancy Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects Reproductive technologies Risk Sperm Systematic review Technology Womens health Young Adult |
| title | Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pediatric cancer: A population based study and a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A39%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20and%20the%20risk%20of%20pediatric%20cancer:%20A%20population%20based%20study%20and%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology&rft.au=Gilboa,%20Daniella&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=101613&rft.epage=101613&rft.pages=101613-101613&rft.artnum=101613&rft.issn=1877-7821&rft.eissn=1877-783X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canep.2019.101613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2318627004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2318627004&rft_id=info:pmid/31606679&rft_els_id=S1877782119301249&rfr_iscdi=true |