The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study
Purpose : To investigate the test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the isometric horizontal push test (IHPT), a newly designed test that selectively measures the horizontal component of maximal isometric force. Methods : Twenty-four active males with ≥3 years of resistance training exper...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sports physiology and performance 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.581-584 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 584 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 581 |
| container_title | International journal of sports physiology and performance |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Dello Iacono, Antonio Valentin, Stephanie Sanderson, Mark Halperin, Israel |
| description | Purpose
:
To investigate the test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the isometric horizontal push test (IHPT), a newly designed test that selectively measures the horizontal component of maximal isometric force.
Methods
:
Twenty-four active males with ≥3 years of resistance training experience performed 2 testing sessions of the IHPT, separated by 3 to 4 days of rest. In each session, subjects performed 3 maximal trials of the IHPT with 3 minutes of rest between them. The peak force outputs were collected simultaneously using a strain gauge and the criterion equipment consisting of a floor-embedded force plate.
Results
:
The test–retest reliability of peak force values was nearly perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient = ∼.99). Bland–Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between days with nearly no bias for strain gauge 1.2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], −3 to 6 N) and force plate 0.8 N (95% CI, −4 to 6 N). A nearly perfect correlation was observed between the strain gauge and force plate (
r
= .98,
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0357 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305029575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420186387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2da3771474ac9f3b7d5324abef2187bee0c8a0c24a349529b42f832b6b5919533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkLFOwzAQhi0EEqUws1piYUlr--w6YUMIaKVKoFJYLSdxVFdpHGxnKBPvwBvyJKQtYmC5-3X6dPr1IXRJyYhSBmO7Dm07YoRmCQEhj9CACiESwiQc_-WJOEVnIawJ4YILMkCL5crgWXAbE70t8NR5--GaqGv83IUVXpoQb_bz-_NrYWIf8MLUVue2tnGLdVPiN13bUkfrGvwSu3J7jk4qXQdz8buH6PXhfnk3TeZPj7O723lSAIeYsFKDlJRLrousglyWAhjXuakYTWVuDClSTYr-BDwTLMs5q1Jg-SQXGc0EwBBdH_623r13fTO1saEwda0b47qgGBBBWCak6NGrf-jadb7p2ynGe2XpBFLZU-MDVXgXgjeVar3daL9VlKidY7V3rHaO1c4x_ABMKnA3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420186387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study</title><source>Human Kinetics Journals</source><creator>Dello Iacono, Antonio ; Valentin, Stephanie ; Sanderson, Mark ; Halperin, Israel</creator><creatorcontrib>Dello Iacono, Antonio ; Valentin, Stephanie ; Sanderson, Mark ; Halperin, Israel</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
:
To investigate the test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the isometric horizontal push test (IHPT), a newly designed test that selectively measures the horizontal component of maximal isometric force.
Methods
:
Twenty-four active males with ≥3 years of resistance training experience performed 2 testing sessions of the IHPT, separated by 3 to 4 days of rest. In each session, subjects performed 3 maximal trials of the IHPT with 3 minutes of rest between them. The peak force outputs were collected simultaneously using a strain gauge and the criterion equipment consisting of a floor-embedded force plate.
Results
:
The test–retest reliability of peak force values was nearly perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient = ∼.99). Bland–Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between days with nearly no bias for strain gauge 1.2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], −3 to 6 N) and force plate 0.8 N (95% CI, −4 to 6 N). A nearly perfect correlation was observed between the strain gauge and force plate (
r
= .98,
P
< .001), with a small bias of 8 N (95% CI, 1.2 to 15 N) in favor of the force plate. The sensitivity of the IHPT was also good, with smallest worthwhile change greater than standard error of measurement for both the strain gauge (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 17 N; 95% CI, 14 to 20 N) and the force plate (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 18 N; 95% CI, 14 to 19 N) devices.
Conclusions
:
The high degree of validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the IHPT, coupled with its affordability, portability, ease of use, and time efficacy, point to the potential of the test for assessment and monitoring purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-0265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Human Kinetics</publisher><subject>Strain gauges</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.581-584</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2da3771474ac9f3b7d5324abef2187bee0c8a0c24a349529b42f832b6b5919533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2da3771474ac9f3b7d5324abef2187bee0c8a0c24a349529b42f832b6b5919533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dello Iacono, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Israel</creatorcontrib><title>The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study</title><title>International journal of sports physiology and performance</title><description>Purpose
:
To investigate the test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the isometric horizontal push test (IHPT), a newly designed test that selectively measures the horizontal component of maximal isometric force.
Methods
:
Twenty-four active males with ≥3 years of resistance training experience performed 2 testing sessions of the IHPT, separated by 3 to 4 days of rest. In each session, subjects performed 3 maximal trials of the IHPT with 3 minutes of rest between them. The peak force outputs were collected simultaneously using a strain gauge and the criterion equipment consisting of a floor-embedded force plate.
Results
:
The test–retest reliability of peak force values was nearly perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient = ∼.99). Bland–Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between days with nearly no bias for strain gauge 1.2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], −3 to 6 N) and force plate 0.8 N (95% CI, −4 to 6 N). A nearly perfect correlation was observed between the strain gauge and force plate (
r
= .98,
P
< .001), with a small bias of 8 N (95% CI, 1.2 to 15 N) in favor of the force plate. The sensitivity of the IHPT was also good, with smallest worthwhile change greater than standard error of measurement for both the strain gauge (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 17 N; 95% CI, 14 to 20 N) and the force plate (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 18 N; 95% CI, 14 to 19 N) devices.
Conclusions
:
The high degree of validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the IHPT, coupled with its affordability, portability, ease of use, and time efficacy, point to the potential of the test for assessment and monitoring purposes.</description><subject>Strain gauges</subject><issn>1555-0265</issn><issn>1555-0273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkLFOwzAQhi0EEqUws1piYUlr--w6YUMIaKVKoFJYLSdxVFdpHGxnKBPvwBvyJKQtYmC5-3X6dPr1IXRJyYhSBmO7Dm07YoRmCQEhj9CACiESwiQc_-WJOEVnIawJ4YILMkCL5crgWXAbE70t8NR5--GaqGv83IUVXpoQb_bz-_NrYWIf8MLUVue2tnGLdVPiN13bUkfrGvwSu3J7jk4qXQdz8buH6PXhfnk3TeZPj7O723lSAIeYsFKDlJRLrousglyWAhjXuakYTWVuDClSTYr-BDwTLMs5q1Jg-SQXGc0EwBBdH_623r13fTO1saEwda0b47qgGBBBWCak6NGrf-jadb7p2ynGe2XpBFLZU-MDVXgXgjeVar3daL9VlKidY7V3rHaO1c4x_ABMKnA3</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Dello Iacono, Antonio</creator><creator>Valentin, Stephanie</creator><creator>Sanderson, Mark</creator><creator>Halperin, Israel</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study</title><author>Dello Iacono, Antonio ; Valentin, Stephanie ; Sanderson, Mark ; Halperin, Israel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2da3771474ac9f3b7d5324abef2187bee0c8a0c24a349529b42f832b6b5919533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Strain gauges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dello Iacono, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Israel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports physiology and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dello Iacono, Antonio</au><au>Valentin, Stephanie</au><au>Sanderson, Mark</au><au>Halperin, Israel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports physiology and performance</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>581-584</pages><issn>1555-0265</issn><eissn>1555-0273</eissn><abstract>Purpose
:
To investigate the test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the isometric horizontal push test (IHPT), a newly designed test that selectively measures the horizontal component of maximal isometric force.
Methods
:
Twenty-four active males with ≥3 years of resistance training experience performed 2 testing sessions of the IHPT, separated by 3 to 4 days of rest. In each session, subjects performed 3 maximal trials of the IHPT with 3 minutes of rest between them. The peak force outputs were collected simultaneously using a strain gauge and the criterion equipment consisting of a floor-embedded force plate.
Results
:
The test–retest reliability of peak force values was nearly perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient = ∼.99). Bland–Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between days with nearly no bias for strain gauge 1.2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], −3 to 6 N) and force plate 0.8 N (95% CI, −4 to 6 N). A nearly perfect correlation was observed between the strain gauge and force plate (
r
= .98,
P
< .001), with a small bias of 8 N (95% CI, 1.2 to 15 N) in favor of the force plate. The sensitivity of the IHPT was also good, with smallest worthwhile change greater than standard error of measurement for both the strain gauge (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 17 N; 95% CI, 14 to 20 N) and the force plate (smallest worthwhile change: 29 N; standard error of measurement: 18 N; 95% CI, 14 to 19 N) devices.
Conclusions
:
The high degree of validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the IHPT, coupled with its affordability, portability, ease of use, and time efficacy, point to the potential of the test for assessment and monitoring purposes.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><doi>10.1123/ijspp.2019-0357</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1555-0265 |
| ispartof | International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.581-584 |
| issn | 1555-0265 1555-0273 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2305029575 |
| source | Human Kinetics Journals |
| subjects | Strain gauges |
| title | The Isometric Horizontal Push Test: Test–Retest Reliability and Validation Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Isometric%20Horizontal%20Push%20Test:%20Test%E2%80%93Retest%20Reliability%20and%20Validation%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20physiology%20and%20performance&rft.au=Dello%20Iacono,%20Antonio&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=581-584&rft.issn=1555-0265&rft.eissn=1555-0273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420186387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420186387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |