An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction

BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2020-01, Vol.102 (2), p.128-136
Hauptverfasser: Christiansen, Janus D., Ejaz, Ashir, Nielsen, Poul T., Laursen, Mogens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 2
container_start_page 128
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 102
creator Christiansen, Janus D.
Ejaz, Ashir
Nielsen, Poul T.
Laursen, Mogens
description BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant. METHODS:Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery. RESULTS:The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p < 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of −4.9% (95% CI, –7.4% to –2.4%; p = 0.0003) and −8.9% (95% CI, −11.5% to –6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p < 0.05, R = 26%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.19.00104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303746876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2303746876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-311744f4ce3979afe4264f7971021398a24bfbd2f2f69c0cdc2167911fe1effb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEokNhyRZ5ycaD_-JM2IXC0FZVqTpUglXkJNfE1IlTOyHKG_GYeDqFHV1Zuj73u9J3kuQ1JWtGiXx3_uF8t6b5mhBKxJNkRVOeYso38mmyIoRRnPM0PUpehPCTECIEyZ4nR5ymucxyuUp-Fz26saNXeNc6P6ItdM4riy6hvsVXHgL4X6b_gU7NgK68C2MLwYT3qEAMfwfl0dZZ62Y8DWg3Ts2CZjO26Fo1JrLgwXUwelOjold2iZtI9Q36OMUL3_C1WlBRBeeH0dxzCzI9UjEIhtkEQGf96F0z1fG7f5k808oGePXwHic3209fT07xxZfPZyfFBa45lwJzSjMhtKiB51muNAgmhc7yjMYueL5RTFS6aphmWuY1qZua0dgEpRooaF3x4-TtIXfw7m6CMJadCTVYq3pwUygZJzwTcpPJiOIDWsdiggddDt50yi8lJeVeTrmXU9K8vJcT-TcP0VPVQfOP_msjAvQAzM7G8sKtnWbwZQvKju1_Q8UjO2TvXDKOGWGRpynB-1HK_wDmYaur</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2303746876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Christiansen, Janus D. ; Ejaz, Ashir ; Nielsen, Poul T. ; Laursen, Mogens</creator><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Janus D. ; Ejaz, Ashir ; Nielsen, Poul T. ; Laursen, Mogens</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant. METHODS:Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery. RESULTS:The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p &lt; 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of −4.9% (95% CI, –7.4% to –2.4%; p = 0.0003) and −8.9% (95% CI, −11.5% to –6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p &lt; 0.05, R = 26%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31596796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Remodeling - physiology ; Female ; Femur Neck - physiology ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiostereometric Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2020-01, Vol.102 (2), p.128-136</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-311744f4ce3979afe4264f7971021398a24bfbd2f2f69c0cdc2167911fe1effb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3471-6037 ; 0000-0002-2791-3921 ; 0000-0002-4406-5055 ; 0000-0002-0337-3078</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Janus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejaz, Ashir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Poul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laursen, Mogens</creatorcontrib><title>An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant. METHODS:Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery. RESULTS:The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p &lt; 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of −4.9% (95% CI, –7.4% to –2.4%; p = 0.0003) and −8.9% (95% CI, −11.5% to –6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p &lt; 0.05, R = 26%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Neck - physiology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiostereometric Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEokNhyRZ5ycaD_-JM2IXC0FZVqTpUglXkJNfE1IlTOyHKG_GYeDqFHV1Zuj73u9J3kuQ1JWtGiXx3_uF8t6b5mhBKxJNkRVOeYso38mmyIoRRnPM0PUpehPCTECIEyZ4nR5ymucxyuUp-Fz26saNXeNc6P6ItdM4riy6hvsVXHgL4X6b_gU7NgK68C2MLwYT3qEAMfwfl0dZZ62Y8DWg3Ts2CZjO26Fo1JrLgwXUwelOjold2iZtI9Q36OMUL3_C1WlBRBeeH0dxzCzI9UjEIhtkEQGf96F0z1fG7f5k808oGePXwHic3209fT07xxZfPZyfFBa45lwJzSjMhtKiB51muNAgmhc7yjMYueL5RTFS6aphmWuY1qZua0dgEpRooaF3x4-TtIXfw7m6CMJadCTVYq3pwUygZJzwTcpPJiOIDWsdiggddDt50yi8lJeVeTrmXU9K8vJcT-TcP0VPVQfOP_msjAvQAzM7G8sKtnWbwZQvKju1_Q8UjO2TvXDKOGWGRpynB-1HK_wDmYaur</recordid><startdate>20200115</startdate><enddate>20200115</enddate><creator>Christiansen, Janus D.</creator><creator>Ejaz, Ashir</creator><creator>Nielsen, Poul T.</creator><creator>Laursen, Mogens</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3471-6037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-3921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-5055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-3078</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200115</creationdate><title>An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction</title><author>Christiansen, Janus D. ; Ejaz, Ashir ; Nielsen, Poul T. ; Laursen, Mogens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-311744f4ce3979afe4264f7971021398a24bfbd2f2f69c0cdc2167911fe1effb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Neck - physiology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiostereometric Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Janus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejaz, Ashir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Poul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laursen, Mogens</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christiansen, Janus D.</au><au>Ejaz, Ashir</au><au>Nielsen, Poul T.</au><au>Laursen, Mogens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2020-01-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>128-136</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diaphyseal stem may risk bone loss. In order to save proximal bone stock in young patients with a high activity level and a long life expectancy, the interest in short stems has evolved. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to evaluate the fixation of, and bone remodeling around, the Primoris femoral neck-preserving hip implant. METHODS:Fifty younger patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were managed with the Primoris hip implant. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and implant migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). A region-of-interest (ROI) protocol for 4 ROIs was applied to assess BMD. The association between BMD and migration was evaluated to determine the fixation of the Primoris implant and bone remodeling in the proximal part of the femur. Follow-up evaluation was performed at regular intervals from day 1 (baseline) until 24 months after surgery. RESULTS:The major stem migrations were subsidence (Y axis; mean, 0.38 mm) at 6 weeks and varus tilt (rotation) (Z axis; mean, 0.93°) at 6 to 12 months. In ROI4 (the calcar area), a significant gain in bone was found with a mean difference of 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8% to 7.4%; p &lt; 0.02) at 24 months postoperatively. Significant bone loss was found in ROI1 and ROI2, with a mean difference of −4.9% (95% CI, –7.4% to –2.4%; p = 0.0003) and −8.9% (95% CI, −11.5% to –6.2%; p = 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression and multivariate regression analysis showed a significant negative association between maximal total point motion and BMD (p = 0.02, R = 15%; and p &lt; 0.05, R = 26%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The Primoris component showed satisfactory primary stability with promising results at the 24-month follow-up. DXA scans showed limited stress-shielding with the proximal loading pattern of the Primoris. Better bone quality was associated with less implant migration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>31596796</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.19.00104</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3471-6037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-3921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-5055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-3078</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2020-01, Vol.102 (2), p.128-136
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303746876
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Remodeling - physiology
Female
Femur Neck - physiology
Femur Neck - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Radiostereometric Analysis
Young Adult
title An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Ultra-Short%20Femoral%20Neck-Preserving%20Hip%20Prosthesis:%20A%202-Year%20Follow-up%20Study%20with%20Radiostereometric%20Analysis%20and%20Dual%20X-Ray%20Absorptiometry%20in%20a%20Stepwise%20Introduction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Christiansen,%20Janus%20D.&rft.date=2020-01-15&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=128-136&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.19.00104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2303746876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2303746876&rft_id=info:pmid/31596796&rfr_iscdi=true