Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits simil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2020-02, Vol.36 (2), p.179-185
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Ju-Hyun, Shin, Eun-Seok, Her, Ae-Young, Lee, Joo Myung, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Nam, Chang-Wook, Koo, Bon-Kwon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
container_volume 36
creator Chung, Ju-Hyun
Shin, Eun-Seok
Her, Ae-Young
Lee, Joo Myung
Doh, Joon-Hyung
Nam, Chang-Wook
Koo, Bon-Kwon
description Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303745521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354613012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bad01641fd678601bdd52c0fb75b9ff339b3117759f326a388a46f77d40769ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFiEQx4nR2Bf9Ah4MiRcv6MyyLLvHplHbpIkXPRN2GZpt9oGnwLb220vdviQemkCYML_5w8yfsQ8IXxBAf80ISrUCcKhbgxbqFTtEpaUA3crX93E3CKWH9oAd5XwFAA008i07kKiGvkc8ZHQecrGhLopr5rf2hoRPRDzZMkdxuc6OHN_baZmL_UOLmKIt9Wa0yxJj4CWRLTsKhfuYuCMe4k3kU0wx2HTHF8pzDPkde-Ptkun9w3nMfn__9uv0TFz8_HF-enIhJqlVEaN1gF2L3nW67wBH51QzgR-1GgfvpRxGiai1GrxsOiv73rad19q1oLthInnMPm-6-xSvV8rF7OY80bJs7ZlGgtStUg1W9NN_6FVcU6i_q5RqO5SATaWajZpSzDmRN_s072pnBsHcm2A2E0w1wfwzwaha9PFBeh135J5KHqdeAbkBuabCJaXnt1-Q_Qv1eJKJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354613012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chung, Ju-Hyun ; Shin, Eun-Seok ; Her, Ae-Young ; Lee, Joo Myung ; Doh, Joon-Hyung ; Nam, Chang-Wook ; Koo, Bon-Kwon</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ju-Hyun ; Shin, Eun-Seok ; Her, Ae-Young ; Lee, Joo Myung ; Doh, Joon-Hyung ; Nam, Chang-Wook ; Koo, Bon-Kwon</creatorcontrib><description>Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31598811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adenosine ; Aged ; Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation ; Balloon treatment ; Blood vessels ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Cardiac Catheters ; Cardiac Imaging ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Cardiovascular Agents - adverse effects ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Restenosis - etiology ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology ; Coronary Stenosis - therapy ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ; Humans ; Imaging ; Implantation ; Implants ; Lesions ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Paclitaxel ; Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage ; Paclitaxel - adverse effects ; PCB ; PCB compounds ; Polychlorinated biphenyls ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiology ; Registries ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents ; Surgical implants ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020-02, Vol.36 (2), p.179-185</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bad01641fd678601bdd52c0fb75b9ff339b3117759f326a388a46f77d40769ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bad01641fd678601bdd52c0fb75b9ff339b3117759f326a388a46f77d40769ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9169-6968</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ju-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Eun-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Her, Ae-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doh, Joon-Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Chang-Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon-Kwon</creatorcontrib><title>Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions</title><title>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.</description><subject>Adenosine</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheters</subject><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Paclitaxel</subject><subject>Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Paclitaxel - adverse effects</subject><subject>PCB</subject><subject>PCB compounds</subject><subject>Polychlorinated biphenyls</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><issn>1875-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFiEQx4nR2Bf9Ah4MiRcv6MyyLLvHplHbpIkXPRN2GZpt9oGnwLb220vdviQemkCYML_5w8yfsQ8IXxBAf80ISrUCcKhbgxbqFTtEpaUA3crX93E3CKWH9oAd5XwFAA008i07kKiGvkc8ZHQecrGhLopr5rf2hoRPRDzZMkdxuc6OHN_baZmL_UOLmKIt9Wa0yxJj4CWRLTsKhfuYuCMe4k3kU0wx2HTHF8pzDPkde-Ptkun9w3nMfn__9uv0TFz8_HF-enIhJqlVEaN1gF2L3nW67wBH51QzgR-1GgfvpRxGiai1GrxsOiv73rad19q1oLthInnMPm-6-xSvV8rF7OY80bJs7ZlGgtStUg1W9NN_6FVcU6i_q5RqO5SATaWajZpSzDmRN_s072pnBsHcm2A2E0w1wfwzwaha9PFBeh135J5KHqdeAbkBuabCJaXnt1-Q_Qv1eJKJ</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Chung, Ju-Hyun</creator><creator>Shin, Eun-Seok</creator><creator>Her, Ae-Young</creator><creator>Lee, Joo Myung</creator><creator>Doh, Joon-Hyung</creator><creator>Nam, Chang-Wook</creator><creator>Koo, Bon-Kwon</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-6968</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions</title><author>Chung, Ju-Hyun ; Shin, Eun-Seok ; Her, Ae-Young ; Lee, Joo Myung ; Doh, Joon-Hyung ; Nam, Chang-Wook ; Koo, Bon-Kwon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bad01641fd678601bdd52c0fb75b9ff339b3117759f326a388a46f77d40769ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adenosine</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheters</topic><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Paclitaxel</topic><topic>Paclitaxel - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Paclitaxel - adverse effects</topic><topic>PCB</topic><topic>PCB compounds</topic><topic>Polychlorinated biphenyls</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ju-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Eun-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Her, Ae-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doh, Joon-Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Chang-Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon-Kwon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Ju-Hyun</au><au>Shin, Eun-Seok</au><au>Her, Ae-Young</au><au>Lee, Joo Myung</au><au>Doh, Joon-Hyung</au><au>Nam, Chang-Wook</au><au>Koo, Bon-Kwon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions</atitle><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle><stitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>179-185</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><eissn>1875-8312</eissn><abstract>Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31598811</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-6968</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020-02, Vol.36 (2), p.179-185
issn 1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303745521
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adenosine
Aged
Angioplasty
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation
Balloon treatment
Blood vessels
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiac Catheters
Cardiac Imaging
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Agents - administration & dosage
Cardiovascular Agents - adverse effects
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Restenosis - etiology
Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology
Coronary Stenosis - therapy
Equipment Design
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Imaging
Implantation
Implants
Lesions
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Paper
Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Paclitaxel - adverse effects
PCB
PCB compounds
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiology
Registries
Severity of Illness Index
Stents
Surgical implants
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A56%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instantaneous%20wave-free%20ratio-guided%20paclitaxel-coated%20balloon%20treatment%20for%20de%20novo%20coronary%20lesions&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Imaging&rft.au=Chung,%20Ju-Hyun&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=179-185&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1573-0743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10554-019-01707-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354613012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354613012&rft_id=info:pmid/31598811&rfr_iscdi=true