Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2020-01, Vol.214 (1), p.185-193
Hauptverfasser: Tao, Ashley T., Hruska, Carrie B., Conners, Amy L., Hunt, Katie N., Swanson, Tiffinee N., Tran, Thuy D., Manduca, Armando, Borges, Lucas, Maidment, Andrew D. A., Lake, David, Johnson, Matthew P., Carter, Rickey E., Rhodes, Deborah J., O'Connor, Michael K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 193
container_issue 1
container_start_page 185
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 214
creator Tao, Ashley T.
Hruska, Carrie B.
Conners, Amy L.
Hunt, Katie N.
Swanson, Tiffinee N.
Tran, Thuy D.
Manduca, Armando
Borges, Lucas
Maidment, Andrew D. A.
Lake, David
Johnson, Matthew P.
Carter, Rickey E.
Rhodes, Deborah J.
O'Connor, Michael K.
description OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300 MBq( 99m)Tc-sestamibi) of 50 subjects were analyzed. The images were acquired in dynamic mode and showed at least one breast lesion. Half-dose MBI examinations were simulated by summing one-half of the dynamic frames and were processed with the algorithm under study in both a default and a preferred filter mode. Two breast radiologists independently completed a set of two-alternative forced-choice tasks to compare lesion conspicuity on standard-dose images, half-dose images, and the algorithm-processed half-dose images in both modes. RESULTS. Relative to the standard-dose images, the half-dose images were preferred in 4, the default-filtered half-dose images in 50, and preferred-filtered half-dose images in 76 of 100 readings. Compared with standard-dose images, in terms of lesion conspicuity, the half-dose images were rated better in 2, equivalent in 6, and poorer in 92 of 100 readings. The default-filtered half-dose images were rated better, equivalent, or poorer in 13,73, and 14 of 100 readings. The preferred-filtered half-dose images were rated as better, equivalent, or poorer in 55,34, and 11 of 100 readings. CONCLUSION. Compared with that on standard-dose images, lesion conspicuity on images obtained with the algorithm and acquired at one-half the standard dose was equivalent or better without compromise of image quality. The algorithm can also be used to decrease imaging time with a resulting increase in patient comfort and throughput.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.19.21582
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303208806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2303208806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-54fed504e95dc1de1b4c9aecc48bd61aa03becebaba5a5d5c6632e02d47432a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0T1PwzAQgGELgWgpbMwoIxKk2D47TcZSvooKVBUItshxLiUoiYudqOLfk37QmcmW79ENrwk5ZbTPORNXw8dZn0V9zmTI90iXSRH4wATbJ10KAfNDCh8dcuTcF6V0EEaDQ9IBJiOQLOiS6Y1x6M0wbXSdm8rLK-_JFKibQlnv2qJytTcu1Tyv5t57Xn96ynvG5foJ_ak1Gp1bzYbF3Nh2Xh6Tg0wVDk-2Z4-83d2-jh78ycv9eDSc-JpHrPalyDCVVGAkU81SZInQkUKtRZikAVOKQoIaE5UoqWQqdRAAR8pTMRDAFUCPnG_2Lqz5btDVcZk7jUWhKjSNizlQ4DQMadDSyw3V1jhnMYsXNi-V_YkZjVcN47ZhzKJ43bDlZ9vNTVJiusN_0VpwsQFLTEzmdI6Vxh1rK0sKIYBsbzBodfh_PcprtfqHkWmqGn4B3-aNMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2303208806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tao, Ashley T. ; Hruska, Carrie B. ; Conners, Amy L. ; Hunt, Katie N. ; Swanson, Tiffinee N. ; Tran, Thuy D. ; Manduca, Armando ; Borges, Lucas ; Maidment, Andrew D. A. ; Lake, David ; Johnson, Matthew P. ; Carter, Rickey E. ; Rhodes, Deborah J. ; O'Connor, Michael K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tao, Ashley T. ; Hruska, Carrie B. ; Conners, Amy L. ; Hunt, Katie N. ; Swanson, Tiffinee N. ; Tran, Thuy D. ; Manduca, Armando ; Borges, Lucas ; Maidment, Andrew D. A. ; Lake, David ; Johnson, Matthew P. ; Carter, Rickey E. ; Rhodes, Deborah J. ; O'Connor, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300 MBq( 99m)Tc-sestamibi) of 50 subjects were analyzed. The images were acquired in dynamic mode and showed at least one breast lesion. Half-dose MBI examinations were simulated by summing one-half of the dynamic frames and were processed with the algorithm under study in both a default and a preferred filter mode. Two breast radiologists independently completed a set of two-alternative forced-choice tasks to compare lesion conspicuity on standard-dose images, half-dose images, and the algorithm-processed half-dose images in both modes. RESULTS. Relative to the standard-dose images, the half-dose images were preferred in 4, the default-filtered half-dose images in 50, and preferred-filtered half-dose images in 76 of 100 readings. Compared with standard-dose images, in terms of lesion conspicuity, the half-dose images were rated better in 2, equivalent in 6, and poorer in 92 of 100 readings. The default-filtered half-dose images were rated better, equivalent, or poorer in 13,73, and 14 of 100 readings. The preferred-filtered half-dose images were rated as better, equivalent, or poorer in 55,34, and 11 of 100 readings. CONCLUSION. Compared with that on standard-dose images, lesion conspicuity on images obtained with the algorithm and acquired at one-half the standard dose was equivalent or better without compromise of image quality. The algorithm can also be used to decrease imaging time with a resulting increase in patient comfort and throughput.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31593516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LEESBURG: Amer Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Imaging - methods ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2020-01, Vol.214 (1), p.185-193</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>26</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000503833500037</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-54fed504e95dc1de1b4c9aecc48bd61aa03becebaba5a5d5c6632e02d47432a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-54fed504e95dc1de1b4c9aecc48bd61aa03becebaba5a5d5c6632e02d47432a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8297-4981</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4121,27929,27930,28253</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31593516$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tao, Ashley T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conners, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Katie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Tiffinee N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Thuy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manduca, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maidment, Andrew D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Rickey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><title>Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AM J ROENTGENOL</addtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300 MBq( 99m)Tc-sestamibi) of 50 subjects were analyzed. The images were acquired in dynamic mode and showed at least one breast lesion. Half-dose MBI examinations were simulated by summing one-half of the dynamic frames and were processed with the algorithm under study in both a default and a preferred filter mode. Two breast radiologists independently completed a set of two-alternative forced-choice tasks to compare lesion conspicuity on standard-dose images, half-dose images, and the algorithm-processed half-dose images in both modes. RESULTS. Relative to the standard-dose images, the half-dose images were preferred in 4, the default-filtered half-dose images in 50, and preferred-filtered half-dose images in 76 of 100 readings. Compared with standard-dose images, in terms of lesion conspicuity, the half-dose images were rated better in 2, equivalent in 6, and poorer in 92 of 100 readings. The default-filtered half-dose images were rated better, equivalent, or poorer in 13,73, and 14 of 100 readings. The preferred-filtered half-dose images were rated as better, equivalent, or poorer in 55,34, and 11 of 100 readings. CONCLUSION. Compared with that on standard-dose images, lesion conspicuity on images obtained with the algorithm and acquired at one-half the standard dose was equivalent or better without compromise of image quality. The algorithm can also be used to decrease imaging time with a resulting increase in patient comfort and throughput.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0T1PwzAQgGELgWgpbMwoIxKk2D47TcZSvooKVBUItshxLiUoiYudqOLfk37QmcmW79ENrwk5ZbTPORNXw8dZn0V9zmTI90iXSRH4wATbJ10KAfNDCh8dcuTcF6V0EEaDQ9IBJiOQLOiS6Y1x6M0wbXSdm8rLK-_JFKibQlnv2qJytTcu1Tyv5t57Xn96ynvG5foJ_ak1Gp1bzYbF3Nh2Xh6Tg0wVDk-2Z4-83d2-jh78ycv9eDSc-JpHrPalyDCVVGAkU81SZInQkUKtRZikAVOKQoIaE5UoqWQqdRAAR8pTMRDAFUCPnG_2Lqz5btDVcZk7jUWhKjSNizlQ4DQMadDSyw3V1jhnMYsXNi-V_YkZjVcN47ZhzKJ43bDlZ9vNTVJiusN_0VpwsQFLTEzmdI6Vxh1rK0sKIYBsbzBodfh_PcprtfqHkWmqGn4B3-aNMg</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Tao, Ashley T.</creator><creator>Hruska, Carrie B.</creator><creator>Conners, Amy L.</creator><creator>Hunt, Katie N.</creator><creator>Swanson, Tiffinee N.</creator><creator>Tran, Thuy D.</creator><creator>Manduca, Armando</creator><creator>Borges, Lucas</creator><creator>Maidment, Andrew D. A.</creator><creator>Lake, David</creator><creator>Johnson, Matthew P.</creator><creator>Carter, Rickey E.</creator><creator>Rhodes, Deborah J.</creator><creator>O'Connor, Michael K.</creator><general>Amer Roentgen Ray Soc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-4981</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm</title><author>Tao, Ashley T. ; Hruska, Carrie B. ; Conners, Amy L. ; Hunt, Katie N. ; Swanson, Tiffinee N. ; Tran, Thuy D. ; Manduca, Armando ; Borges, Lucas ; Maidment, Andrew D. A. ; Lake, David ; Johnson, Matthew P. ; Carter, Rickey E. ; Rhodes, Deborah J. ; O'Connor, Michael K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-54fed504e95dc1de1b4c9aecc48bd61aa03becebaba5a5d5c6632e02d47432a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tao, Ashley T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conners, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Katie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Tiffinee N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Thuy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manduca, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maidment, Andrew D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Rickey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tao, Ashley T.</au><au>Hruska, Carrie B.</au><au>Conners, Amy L.</au><au>Hunt, Katie N.</au><au>Swanson, Tiffinee N.</au><au>Tran, Thuy D.</au><au>Manduca, Armando</au><au>Borges, Lucas</au><au>Maidment, Andrew D. A.</au><au>Lake, David</au><au>Johnson, Matthew P.</au><au>Carter, Rickey E.</au><au>Rhodes, Deborah J.</au><au>O'Connor, Michael K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><stitle>AM J ROENTGENOL</stitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>185-193</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300 MBq( 99m)Tc-sestamibi) of 50 subjects were analyzed. The images were acquired in dynamic mode and showed at least one breast lesion. Half-dose MBI examinations were simulated by summing one-half of the dynamic frames and were processed with the algorithm under study in both a default and a preferred filter mode. Two breast radiologists independently completed a set of two-alternative forced-choice tasks to compare lesion conspicuity on standard-dose images, half-dose images, and the algorithm-processed half-dose images in both modes. RESULTS. Relative to the standard-dose images, the half-dose images were preferred in 4, the default-filtered half-dose images in 50, and preferred-filtered half-dose images in 76 of 100 readings. Compared with standard-dose images, in terms of lesion conspicuity, the half-dose images were rated better in 2, equivalent in 6, and poorer in 92 of 100 readings. The default-filtered half-dose images were rated better, equivalent, or poorer in 13,73, and 14 of 100 readings. The preferred-filtered half-dose images were rated as better, equivalent, or poorer in 55,34, and 11 of 100 readings. CONCLUSION. Compared with that on standard-dose images, lesion conspicuity on images obtained with the algorithm and acquired at one-half the standard dose was equivalent or better without compromise of image quality. The algorithm can also be used to decrease imaging time with a resulting increase in patient comfort and throughput.</abstract><cop>LEESBURG</cop><pub>Amer Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>31593516</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.19.21582</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-4981</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2020-01, Vol.214 (1), p.185-193
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303208806
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Middle Aged
Molecular Imaging - methods
Radiation Dosage
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Radionuclide Imaging
Science & Technology
title Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T23%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20Reduction%20in%20Molecular%20Breast%20Imaging%20With%20a%20New%20Image-Processing%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Tao,%20Ashley%20T.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=185-193&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.19.21582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2303208806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2303208806&rft_id=info:pmid/31593516&rfr_iscdi=true