Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions
Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian occupational therapy journal 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 699 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 690 |
container_title | Australian occupational therapy journal |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Man, David W.K. Tsang, Walter S.F. Lu, Erin Yiqing Tsang, Hector W.H. |
description | Introduction
High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science.
Method
On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions.
Results
Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25.
Conclusion
Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1440-1630.12608 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303201450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2303201450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1Z4sIl7PgjcXJcKr6kSr206tHy2hPWVTYOdtIqP4d_irPblqoXfLFn_Mw7Hr-EvGfwmeW1ZlJCwSqRQ15B_YKsHjMvyQpAlgWoqjohb1K6AWBlU_LX5EQsh5I3K_Lni992PuxxjN7SNE5upqGlEROaaHd0iMFNdvS3fpyp72mwdhrM6ENvOjruMJphpqZ3dNjNydt_yfUhER6QXNqGKdJrTCPGntow9bklpkNx62-RbpI3Ty7WEX_lNuktedWaLuG7-_2UXH37enn2ozi_-P7zbHNeWMl4XbhW1qKsFDQNOinAKXC1QttC3TKwEgXjCrBSopSG8aYG3MLWOABsuaqEOCWfjrp55N9Tfqbe-2Sx60yPYUqaCxAcmCwhox-foTd5tvwjCyWEUiBkman1kbIxpBSx1UP0exNnzUAv7unFK714pQ_u5YoP97rTdo_ukX-wKwPlEbjzHc7_09Obi8uj8F-93Kca</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333770345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science.
Method
On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions.
Results
Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25.
Conclusion
Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-0766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12608</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31595529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Author productivity ; benchmarking ; bibliometric ; Bibliometrics ; College professors ; h‐index ; Medical research ; Occupational therapy ; Physical therapy ; Physiotherapy ; Productivity ; Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Australian occupational therapy journal, 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699</ispartof><rights>2019 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><rights>2019 Occupational Therapy Australia.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1440-1630.12608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1440-1630.12608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><title>Australian occupational therapy journal</title><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><description>Introduction
High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science.
Method
On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions.
Results
Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25.
Conclusion
Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>benchmarking</subject><subject>bibliometric</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>h‐index</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><issn>0045-0766</issn><issn>1440-1630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1Z4sIl7PgjcXJcKr6kSr206tHy2hPWVTYOdtIqP4d_irPblqoXfLFn_Mw7Hr-EvGfwmeW1ZlJCwSqRQ15B_YKsHjMvyQpAlgWoqjohb1K6AWBlU_LX5EQsh5I3K_Lni992PuxxjN7SNE5upqGlEROaaHd0iMFNdvS3fpyp72mwdhrM6ENvOjruMJphpqZ3dNjNydt_yfUhER6QXNqGKdJrTCPGntow9bklpkNx62-RbpI3Ty7WEX_lNuktedWaLuG7-_2UXH37enn2ozi_-P7zbHNeWMl4XbhW1qKsFDQNOinAKXC1QttC3TKwEgXjCrBSopSG8aYG3MLWOABsuaqEOCWfjrp55N9Tfqbe-2Sx60yPYUqaCxAcmCwhox-foTd5tvwjCyWEUiBkman1kbIxpBSx1UP0exNnzUAv7unFK714pQ_u5YoP97rTdo_ukX-wKwPlEbjzHc7_09Obi8uj8F-93Kca</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Man, David W.K.</creator><creator>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creator><creator>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creator><creator>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><author>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>benchmarking</topic><topic>bibliometric</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>h‐index</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Man, David W.K.</au><au>Tsang, Walter S.F.</au><au>Lu, Erin Yiqing</au><au>Tsang, Hector W.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</atitle><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>690-699</pages><issn>0045-0766</issn><eissn>1440-1630</eissn><abstract>Introduction
High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science.
Method
On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions.
Results
Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25.
Conclusion
Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31595529</pmid><doi>10.1111/1440-1630.12608</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-0766 |
ispartof | Australian occupational therapy journal, 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699 |
issn | 0045-0766 1440-1630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303201450 |
source | Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Achievement Author productivity benchmarking bibliometric Bibliometrics College professors h‐index Medical research Occupational therapy Physical therapy Physiotherapy Productivity Rehabilitation |
title | Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bibliometric%20study%20of%20research%20productivity%20in%20occupational%20therapy%20and%20physical%20therapy/physiotherapy%20in%20four%20Western%20countries%20and%20five%20Asian%20countries/regions&rft.jtitle=Australian%20occupational%20therapy%20journal&rft.au=Man,%20David%20W.K.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=690-699&rft.issn=0045-0766&rft.eissn=1440-1630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2303201450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333770345&rft_id=info:pmid/31595529&rfr_iscdi=true |