Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions

Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian occupational therapy journal 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699
Hauptverfasser: Man, David W.K., Tsang, Walter S.F., Lu, Erin Yiqing, Tsang, Hector W.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 699
container_issue 6
container_start_page 690
container_title Australian occupational therapy journal
container_volume 66
creator Man, David W.K.
Tsang, Walter S.F.
Lu, Erin Yiqing
Tsang, Hector W.H.
description Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science. Method On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions. Results Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25. Conclusion Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1440-1630.12608
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303201450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2303201450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1Z4sIl7PgjcXJcKr6kSr206tHy2hPWVTYOdtIqP4d_irPblqoXfLFn_Mw7Hr-EvGfwmeW1ZlJCwSqRQ15B_YKsHjMvyQpAlgWoqjohb1K6AWBlU_LX5EQsh5I3K_Lni992PuxxjN7SNE5upqGlEROaaHd0iMFNdvS3fpyp72mwdhrM6ENvOjruMJphpqZ3dNjNydt_yfUhER6QXNqGKdJrTCPGntow9bklpkNx62-RbpI3Ty7WEX_lNuktedWaLuG7-_2UXH37enn2ozi_-P7zbHNeWMl4XbhW1qKsFDQNOinAKXC1QttC3TKwEgXjCrBSopSG8aYG3MLWOABsuaqEOCWfjrp55N9Tfqbe-2Sx60yPYUqaCxAcmCwhox-foTd5tvwjCyWEUiBkman1kbIxpBSx1UP0exNnzUAv7unFK714pQ_u5YoP97rTdo_ukX-wKwPlEbjzHc7_09Obi8uj8F-93Kca</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333770345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science. Method On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions. Results Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25. Conclusion Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-0766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12608</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31595529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Author productivity ; benchmarking ; bibliometric ; Bibliometrics ; College professors ; h‐index ; Medical research ; Occupational therapy ; Physical therapy ; Physiotherapy ; Productivity ; Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Australian occupational therapy journal, 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699</ispartof><rights>2019 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><rights>2019 Occupational Therapy Australia.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1440-1630.12608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1440-1630.12608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><title>Australian occupational therapy journal</title><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><description>Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science. Method On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions. Results Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25. Conclusion Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>benchmarking</subject><subject>bibliometric</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>h‐index</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><issn>0045-0766</issn><issn>1440-1630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzA1Z4sIl7PgjcXJcKr6kSr206tHy2hPWVTYOdtIqP4d_irPblqoXfLFn_Mw7Hr-EvGfwmeW1ZlJCwSqRQ15B_YKsHjMvyQpAlgWoqjohb1K6AWBlU_LX5EQsh5I3K_Lni992PuxxjN7SNE5upqGlEROaaHd0iMFNdvS3fpyp72mwdhrM6ENvOjruMJphpqZ3dNjNydt_yfUhER6QXNqGKdJrTCPGntow9bklpkNx62-RbpI3Ty7WEX_lNuktedWaLuG7-_2UXH37enn2ozi_-P7zbHNeWMl4XbhW1qKsFDQNOinAKXC1QttC3TKwEgXjCrBSopSG8aYG3MLWOABsuaqEOCWfjrp55N9Tfqbe-2Sx60yPYUqaCxAcmCwhox-foTd5tvwjCyWEUiBkman1kbIxpBSx1UP0exNnzUAv7unFK714pQ_u5YoP97rTdo_ukX-wKwPlEbjzHc7_09Obi8uj8F-93Kca</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Man, David W.K.</creator><creator>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creator><creator>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creator><creator>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</title><author>Man, David W.K. ; Tsang, Walter S.F. ; Lu, Erin Yiqing ; Tsang, Hector W.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4128-df483567099ed430d70d87ecf08f10c4e31270e67354a12980eb0bad00ef27633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>benchmarking</topic><topic>bibliometric</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>h‐index</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Man, David W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Walter S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Erin Yiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Hector W.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Man, David W.K.</au><au>Tsang, Walter S.F.</au><au>Lu, Erin Yiqing</au><au>Tsang, Hector W.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions</atitle><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>690-699</pages><issn>0045-0766</issn><eissn>1440-1630</eissn><abstract>Introduction High‐quality research is the foundation of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. A bibliometric study on the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars in different Western and Asian countries/regions could provide a snapshot of current research achievement in rehabilitation science. Method On the basis of an understanding of the leading role of rehabilitation research in Western countries and a recognition of achievements made by Asian occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy scholars, the current bibliometric study examined the research productivity of occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy professors and associate professors from four Western countries (Australia, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom) and five Asian countries/regions (Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea). The h‐indices of these scholars were retrieved online and aggregated to quantify the research productivity of institutions and countries/regions. Results Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States were identified as countries/regions with higher research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy. The institutions were ranked on the basis of the median h‐indices of their professors and associate professors; the top 20 productive institutions with occupational therapy programmes had a median h‐index of 17.5 or higher, whereas the benchmark of the top 20 institutions with physical therapy/physiotherapy programmes was 25. Conclusion Professors and associate professors in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and the United States are productive in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy research. The number of faculty members and university connections are regarded as important for research achievement. Recommendations for various levels of collaboration are provided.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31595529</pmid><doi>10.1111/1440-1630.12608</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8598</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-0766
ispartof Australian occupational therapy journal, 2019-12, Vol.66 (6), p.690-699
issn 0045-0766
1440-1630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2303201450
source Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Achievement
Author productivity
benchmarking
bibliometric
Bibliometrics
College professors
h‐index
Medical research
Occupational therapy
Physical therapy
Physiotherapy
Productivity
Rehabilitation
title Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bibliometric%20study%20of%20research%20productivity%20in%20occupational%20therapy%20and%20physical%20therapy/physiotherapy%20in%20four%20Western%20countries%20and%20five%20Asian%20countries/regions&rft.jtitle=Australian%20occupational%20therapy%20journal&rft.au=Man,%20David%20W.K.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=690-699&rft.issn=0045-0766&rft.eissn=1440-1630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2303201450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333770345&rft_id=info:pmid/31595529&rfr_iscdi=true