The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens

The present article was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens. For this reason, 300 fertile eggs were used in a completely randomized design with three experimental treatments. The experimental groups...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.178-185
Hauptverfasser: Omidi, Somayeh, Ebrahimi, Marziyeh, Janmohammadi, Hossein, Moghaddam, Gholamali, Rajabi, Zolfaghar, Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 1
container_start_page 178
container_title Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition
container_volume 104
creator Omidi, Somayeh
Ebrahimi, Marziyeh
Janmohammadi, Hossein
Moghaddam, Gholamali
Rajabi, Zolfaghar
Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak
description The present article was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens. For this reason, 300 fertile eggs were used in a completely randomized design with three experimental treatments. The experimental groups included: 1%–0.5% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 2%–1% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 3‐ control [included both sham control (injection of distilled water; 50 eggs) and control (no injection; 50 eggs)], which were injected on d 14 of incubation. After hatching, chicks of each experimental group (0.5% l‐arginine, 1% l‐arginine, and control groups) were randomly divided into four equal groups (as replicates) and reared for 30 days. Weight and feeding of chickens were recorded. Next, blood samples of chickens were collected on day 30 to evaluate antibody titre. Also, chickens were slaughtered on 24 and 30 days of the experiment to evaluate immune system organs and caecum microflora. Based on the results, in ovo injection of l‐arginine had no significant effect on hatchability, body weight, antibody titre, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and thymus weight (p > .05). On the other hand, treatments significantly affected feed intake and feed conversion ratio (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpn.13222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301890473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2341385831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-2a23a6189698c243ea70bf74197e294bba63fed383d55d0de4ff12ab326bcc593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZeWAy-ALHEBqWltT_75WFUtUFXAoT1HjjNhvST2YidUe-MR-ox9ks52Sw9I-DLST9988sww9laKY0nvZLX2xxKUUi_YQuagMwG6fMkWQoPMFAX77HVKKyFkVYjyFdsHWdQVlHrBbq-XyN24NnbioefO8_A7UFmhnVzw22y4_3Nn4g_nnUdO0dJMdmlaN7hpc0S940x52qQJR258x61BO498dDaGfgjRbCVtDG7AyO3S2Z_o0yHb682Q8M1TPWA3F-fXZ5-zq2-fvpydXmUWClCZMgpMKWtd6trSJGgq0fZVLnWFSudta0rosYMauqLoRId530tlWlBla22h4YB92HnXMfyaMU3N6JLFYTAew5waBYLsIq-A0Pf_oKswR0-_IyqXUBc1SKI-7iiaLqWIfbOObjRx00jRbK_R0DWax2sQ--7JOLcjds_k3_UTcLIDbmk5m_-bmsvvX3fKB_G3lQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2341385831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Omidi, Somayeh ; Ebrahimi, Marziyeh ; Janmohammadi, Hossein ; Moghaddam, Gholamali ; Rajabi, Zolfaghar ; Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</creator><creatorcontrib>Omidi, Somayeh ; Ebrahimi, Marziyeh ; Janmohammadi, Hossein ; Moghaddam, Gholamali ; Rajabi, Zolfaghar ; Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</creatorcontrib><description>The present article was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens. For this reason, 300 fertile eggs were used in a completely randomized design with three experimental treatments. The experimental groups included: 1%–0.5% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 2%–1% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 3‐ control [included both sham control (injection of distilled water; 50 eggs) and control (no injection; 50 eggs)], which were injected on d 14 of incubation. After hatching, chicks of each experimental group (0.5% l‐arginine, 1% l‐arginine, and control groups) were randomly divided into four equal groups (as replicates) and reared for 30 days. Weight and feeding of chickens were recorded. Next, blood samples of chickens were collected on day 30 to evaluate antibody titre. Also, chickens were slaughtered on 24 and 30 days of the experiment to evaluate immune system organs and caecum microflora. Based on the results, in ovo injection of l‐arginine had no significant effect on hatchability, body weight, antibody titre, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and thymus weight (p &gt; .05). On the other hand, treatments significantly affected feed intake and feed conversion ratio (p &lt; .05). As a novel finding, in ovo injection of l‐arginine increased caecal Lactobacillus (p &lt; .01), while decreasing Coliform and Escherichia Coli bacteria (p &lt; .01). However, treatments did not influence caecal Enterococcus (p &gt; .05). The overall results indicated that in ovo injection of 0.5% l‐arginine had a better improving effect on caecal microflora and then considered as a recommended level of the present experiment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31587369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Arginine ; Body weight ; broiler chicken ; Bursa of Fabricius ; caecum microflora ; Chickens ; Chicks ; Coliforms ; Conversion ratio ; Distilled water ; E coli ; Eggs ; Feed conversion ; Hatchability ; Hatching ; Immune system ; in ovo injection ; Incubation ; Injection ; l‐arginine ; Microflora ; Organs ; Poultry ; Spleen</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.178-185</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-2a23a6189698c243ea70bf74197e294bba63fed383d55d0de4ff12ab326bcc593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-2a23a6189698c243ea70bf74197e294bba63fed383d55d0de4ff12ab326bcc593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9126-480X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpn.13222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpn.13222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31587369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omidi, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Marziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janmohammadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghaddam, Gholamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajabi, Zolfaghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens</title><title>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</title><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><description>The present article was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens. For this reason, 300 fertile eggs were used in a completely randomized design with three experimental treatments. The experimental groups included: 1%–0.5% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 2%–1% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 3‐ control [included both sham control (injection of distilled water; 50 eggs) and control (no injection; 50 eggs)], which were injected on d 14 of incubation. After hatching, chicks of each experimental group (0.5% l‐arginine, 1% l‐arginine, and control groups) were randomly divided into four equal groups (as replicates) and reared for 30 days. Weight and feeding of chickens were recorded. Next, blood samples of chickens were collected on day 30 to evaluate antibody titre. Also, chickens were slaughtered on 24 and 30 days of the experiment to evaluate immune system organs and caecum microflora. Based on the results, in ovo injection of l‐arginine had no significant effect on hatchability, body weight, antibody titre, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and thymus weight (p &gt; .05). On the other hand, treatments significantly affected feed intake and feed conversion ratio (p &lt; .05). As a novel finding, in ovo injection of l‐arginine increased caecal Lactobacillus (p &lt; .01), while decreasing Coliform and Escherichia Coli bacteria (p &lt; .01). However, treatments did not influence caecal Enterococcus (p &gt; .05). The overall results indicated that in ovo injection of 0.5% l‐arginine had a better improving effect on caecal microflora and then considered as a recommended level of the present experiment.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Arginine</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>broiler chicken</subject><subject>Bursa of Fabricius</subject><subject>caecum microflora</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Conversion ratio</subject><subject>Distilled water</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Hatchability</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>in ovo injection</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>l‐arginine</subject><subject>Microflora</subject><subject>Organs</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><issn>0931-2439</issn><issn>1439-0396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZeWAy-ALHEBqWltT_75WFUtUFXAoT1HjjNhvST2YidUe-MR-ox9ks52Sw9I-DLST9988sww9laKY0nvZLX2xxKUUi_YQuagMwG6fMkWQoPMFAX77HVKKyFkVYjyFdsHWdQVlHrBbq-XyN24NnbioefO8_A7UFmhnVzw22y4_3Nn4g_nnUdO0dJMdmlaN7hpc0S940x52qQJR258x61BO498dDaGfgjRbCVtDG7AyO3S2Z_o0yHb682Q8M1TPWA3F-fXZ5-zq2-fvpydXmUWClCZMgpMKWtd6trSJGgq0fZVLnWFSudta0rosYMauqLoRId530tlWlBla22h4YB92HnXMfyaMU3N6JLFYTAew5waBYLsIq-A0Pf_oKswR0-_IyqXUBc1SKI-7iiaLqWIfbOObjRx00jRbK_R0DWax2sQ--7JOLcjds_k3_UTcLIDbmk5m_-bmsvvX3fKB_G3lQA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Omidi, Somayeh</creator><creator>Ebrahimi, Marziyeh</creator><creator>Janmohammadi, Hossein</creator><creator>Moghaddam, Gholamali</creator><creator>Rajabi, Zolfaghar</creator><creator>Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-480X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens</title><author>Omidi, Somayeh ; Ebrahimi, Marziyeh ; Janmohammadi, Hossein ; Moghaddam, Gholamali ; Rajabi, Zolfaghar ; Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-2a23a6189698c243ea70bf74197e294bba63fed383d55d0de4ff12ab326bcc593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Arginine</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>broiler chicken</topic><topic>Bursa of Fabricius</topic><topic>caecum microflora</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Conversion ratio</topic><topic>Distilled water</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Hatchability</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>in ovo injection</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>l‐arginine</topic><topic>Microflora</topic><topic>Organs</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omidi, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Marziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janmohammadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghaddam, Gholamali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajabi, Zolfaghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omidi, Somayeh</au><au>Ebrahimi, Marziyeh</au><au>Janmohammadi, Hossein</au><au>Moghaddam, Gholamali</au><au>Rajabi, Zolfaghar</au><au>Hosseintabar‐Ghasemabad, Babak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>178-185</pages><issn>0931-2439</issn><eissn>1439-0396</eissn><abstract>The present article was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens. For this reason, 300 fertile eggs were used in a completely randomized design with three experimental treatments. The experimental groups included: 1%–0.5% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 2%–1% l‐arginine (100 eggs), 3‐ control [included both sham control (injection of distilled water; 50 eggs) and control (no injection; 50 eggs)], which were injected on d 14 of incubation. After hatching, chicks of each experimental group (0.5% l‐arginine, 1% l‐arginine, and control groups) were randomly divided into four equal groups (as replicates) and reared for 30 days. Weight and feeding of chickens were recorded. Next, blood samples of chickens were collected on day 30 to evaluate antibody titre. Also, chickens were slaughtered on 24 and 30 days of the experiment to evaluate immune system organs and caecum microflora. Based on the results, in ovo injection of l‐arginine had no significant effect on hatchability, body weight, antibody titre, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and thymus weight (p &gt; .05). On the other hand, treatments significantly affected feed intake and feed conversion ratio (p &lt; .05). As a novel finding, in ovo injection of l‐arginine increased caecal Lactobacillus (p &lt; .01), while decreasing Coliform and Escherichia Coli bacteria (p &lt; .01). However, treatments did not influence caecal Enterococcus (p &gt; .05). The overall results indicated that in ovo injection of 0.5% l‐arginine had a better improving effect on caecal microflora and then considered as a recommended level of the present experiment.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31587369</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpn.13222</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-480X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-2439
ispartof Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.178-185
issn 0931-2439
1439-0396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301890473
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Antibodies
Arginine
Body weight
broiler chicken
Bursa of Fabricius
caecum microflora
Chickens
Chicks
Coliforms
Conversion ratio
Distilled water
E coli
Eggs
Feed conversion
Hatchability
Hatching
Immune system
in ovo injection
Incubation
Injection
l‐arginine
Microflora
Organs
Poultry
Spleen
title The impact of in ovo injection of l‐arginine on hatchability, immune system and caecum microflora of broiler chickens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20in%20ovo%20injection%20of%20l%E2%80%90arginine%20on%20hatchability,%20immune%20system%20and%20caecum%20microflora%20of%20broiler%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20physiology%20and%20animal%20nutrition&rft.au=Omidi,%20Somayeh&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=178-185&rft.issn=0931-2439&rft.eissn=1439-0396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpn.13222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2341385831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2341385831&rft_id=info:pmid/31587369&rfr_iscdi=true