Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development

Assembling meaningful comparisons between species is a major limitation in studying the evolution of organismal form. To understand development in maize and sorghum, closely related species with architecturally distinct inflorescences, we collected RNA-seq profiles encompassing inflorescence body-pl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current biology 2019-10, Vol.29 (20), p.3410-3419.e3
Hauptverfasser: Leiboff, Samuel, Hake, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3419.e3
container_issue 20
container_start_page 3410
container_title Current biology
container_volume 29
creator Leiboff, Samuel
Hake, Sarah
description Assembling meaningful comparisons between species is a major limitation in studying the evolution of organismal form. To understand development in maize and sorghum, closely related species with architecturally distinct inflorescences, we collected RNA-seq profiles encompassing inflorescence body-plan specification in both species. We reconstructed molecular ontogenies from 40 B73 maize tassels and 47 BTx623 sorghum panicles and separated them into transcriptional stages. To discover new markers of inflorescence development, we used random forest machine learning to determine stage by RNA-seq. We used two descriptions of transcriptional conservation to identify hourglass-like stages during inflorescence development. Despite a relatively short 12 million years since their last common ancestor, we found maize and sorghum inflorescences are most different during their hourglass-like stages of development, following an inverse-hourglass model of development. We discuss whether agricultural selection may account for the rapid divergence signatures in these species and the observed separation of evolutionary pressure and developmental reprogramming. [Display omitted] •Transcript dynamics identify maize tassel and sorghum panicle developmental stages•Random forest predicts age by gene expression, providing markers and in silico staging•Maize and sorghum are most similar when committing stem cells to a determinate fate•Expression conservation identifies hourglass-like stage, but transcriptomes diverge To understand body-plan specification in maize and sorghum, related crops with distinct inflorescences, Leiboff and Hake collect expression profiles across development to reconstruct molecular ontogenies. When synchronized, many processes are shared between species, but signatures of selection suggest divergent hourglass-like developmental stages.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301880660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960982219310942</els_id><sourcerecordid>2301880660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3d79b1dfe6ba820ff811e1194426be5932f43332571b023d53d552e43b9e18893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQxoMouD7-AG85emnNo-0meBKfC4rg4xzSdLpm6SY1SRf05n9ulvUsDMwwfL9hvg-hM0pKSmhzsSrN1JaMUFkSUZKq2kMzKuayyGO9j2ZENqSQgrFDdBTjihDKhGxm6OcFjHcxhckk65Y4fQB-C9pFE-yYrHd6wM8u-SW4L-x7_KTtN2DtOvzqw_JjWuPXaRx9SDEv8cJtIETAD34Ky0HHiJ98B8MWXLh-8AGiAWcA38AGBj-uwaUTdNDrIcLpXz9G73e3b9cPxePz_eL66rEwFZep4N1ctrTroWm1YKTvBaVAqawq1rRQS876inPO6jltCeNdnatmUPFWAhVC8mN0vrs7Bv85QUxqbfM3w6Ad-CkqxknWkaYhWUp3UhN8jAF6NQa71uFLUaK2cauVynGrbdyKCJUzzszljoHsYWMhqGjs1mtnA5ikOm__oX8B2KWKEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2301880660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development</title><source>Cell Press Archives</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Leiboff, Samuel ; Hake, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Leiboff, Samuel ; Hake, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Assembling meaningful comparisons between species is a major limitation in studying the evolution of organismal form. To understand development in maize and sorghum, closely related species with architecturally distinct inflorescences, we collected RNA-seq profiles encompassing inflorescence body-plan specification in both species. We reconstructed molecular ontogenies from 40 B73 maize tassels and 47 BTx623 sorghum panicles and separated them into transcriptional stages. To discover new markers of inflorescence development, we used random forest machine learning to determine stage by RNA-seq. We used two descriptions of transcriptional conservation to identify hourglass-like stages during inflorescence development. Despite a relatively short 12 million years since their last common ancestor, we found maize and sorghum inflorescences are most different during their hourglass-like stages of development, following an inverse-hourglass model of development. We discuss whether agricultural selection may account for the rapid divergence signatures in these species and the observed separation of evolutionary pressure and developmental reprogramming. [Display omitted] •Transcript dynamics identify maize tassel and sorghum panicle developmental stages•Random forest predicts age by gene expression, providing markers and in silico staging•Maize and sorghum are most similar when committing stem cells to a determinate fate•Expression conservation identifies hourglass-like stage, but transcriptomes diverge To understand body-plan specification in maize and sorghum, related crops with distinct inflorescences, Leiboff and Hake collect expression profiles across development to reconstruct molecular ontogenies. When synchronized, many processes are shared between species, but signatures of selection suggest divergent hourglass-like developmental stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>comparative transcriptomics ; developmental hourglass ; evo-devo ; evolution of development ; maize genetics ; phylostratigraphy ; sorghum inflorescence</subject><ispartof>Current biology, 2019-10, Vol.29 (20), p.3410-3419.e3</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3d79b1dfe6ba820ff811e1194426be5932f43332571b023d53d552e43b9e18893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3d79b1dfe6ba820ff811e1194426be5932f43332571b023d53d552e43b9e18893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6953-1529 ; 0000-0002-6623-1181</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leiboff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development</title><title>Current biology</title><description>Assembling meaningful comparisons between species is a major limitation in studying the evolution of organismal form. To understand development in maize and sorghum, closely related species with architecturally distinct inflorescences, we collected RNA-seq profiles encompassing inflorescence body-plan specification in both species. We reconstructed molecular ontogenies from 40 B73 maize tassels and 47 BTx623 sorghum panicles and separated them into transcriptional stages. To discover new markers of inflorescence development, we used random forest machine learning to determine stage by RNA-seq. We used two descriptions of transcriptional conservation to identify hourglass-like stages during inflorescence development. Despite a relatively short 12 million years since their last common ancestor, we found maize and sorghum inflorescences are most different during their hourglass-like stages of development, following an inverse-hourglass model of development. We discuss whether agricultural selection may account for the rapid divergence signatures in these species and the observed separation of evolutionary pressure and developmental reprogramming. [Display omitted] •Transcript dynamics identify maize tassel and sorghum panicle developmental stages•Random forest predicts age by gene expression, providing markers and in silico staging•Maize and sorghum are most similar when committing stem cells to a determinate fate•Expression conservation identifies hourglass-like stage, but transcriptomes diverge To understand body-plan specification in maize and sorghum, related crops with distinct inflorescences, Leiboff and Hake collect expression profiles across development to reconstruct molecular ontogenies. When synchronized, many processes are shared between species, but signatures of selection suggest divergent hourglass-like developmental stages.</description><subject>comparative transcriptomics</subject><subject>developmental hourglass</subject><subject>evo-devo</subject><subject>evolution of development</subject><subject>maize genetics</subject><subject>phylostratigraphy</subject><subject>sorghum inflorescence</subject><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQxoMouD7-AG85emnNo-0meBKfC4rg4xzSdLpm6SY1SRf05n9ulvUsDMwwfL9hvg-hM0pKSmhzsSrN1JaMUFkSUZKq2kMzKuayyGO9j2ZENqSQgrFDdBTjihDKhGxm6OcFjHcxhckk65Y4fQB-C9pFE-yYrHd6wM8u-SW4L-x7_KTtN2DtOvzqw_JjWuPXaRx9SDEv8cJtIETAD34Ky0HHiJ98B8MWXLh-8AGiAWcA38AGBj-uwaUTdNDrIcLpXz9G73e3b9cPxePz_eL66rEwFZep4N1ctrTroWm1YKTvBaVAqawq1rRQS876inPO6jltCeNdnatmUPFWAhVC8mN0vrs7Bv85QUxqbfM3w6Ad-CkqxknWkaYhWUp3UhN8jAF6NQa71uFLUaK2cauVynGrbdyKCJUzzszljoHsYWMhqGjs1mtnA5ikOm__oX8B2KWKEA</recordid><startdate>20191021</startdate><enddate>20191021</enddate><creator>Leiboff, Samuel</creator><creator>Hake, Sarah</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-1181</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191021</creationdate><title>Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development</title><author>Leiboff, Samuel ; Hake, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3d79b1dfe6ba820ff811e1194426be5932f43332571b023d53d552e43b9e18893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>comparative transcriptomics</topic><topic>developmental hourglass</topic><topic>evo-devo</topic><topic>evolution of development</topic><topic>maize genetics</topic><topic>phylostratigraphy</topic><topic>sorghum inflorescence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leiboff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leiboff, Samuel</au><au>Hake, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><date>2019-10-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>3410</spage><epage>3419.e3</epage><pages>3410-3419.e3</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>Assembling meaningful comparisons between species is a major limitation in studying the evolution of organismal form. To understand development in maize and sorghum, closely related species with architecturally distinct inflorescences, we collected RNA-seq profiles encompassing inflorescence body-plan specification in both species. We reconstructed molecular ontogenies from 40 B73 maize tassels and 47 BTx623 sorghum panicles and separated them into transcriptional stages. To discover new markers of inflorescence development, we used random forest machine learning to determine stage by RNA-seq. We used two descriptions of transcriptional conservation to identify hourglass-like stages during inflorescence development. Despite a relatively short 12 million years since their last common ancestor, we found maize and sorghum inflorescences are most different during their hourglass-like stages of development, following an inverse-hourglass model of development. We discuss whether agricultural selection may account for the rapid divergence signatures in these species and the observed separation of evolutionary pressure and developmental reprogramming. [Display omitted] •Transcript dynamics identify maize tassel and sorghum panicle developmental stages•Random forest predicts age by gene expression, providing markers and in silico staging•Maize and sorghum are most similar when committing stem cells to a determinate fate•Expression conservation identifies hourglass-like stage, but transcriptomes diverge To understand body-plan specification in maize and sorghum, related crops with distinct inflorescences, Leiboff and Hake collect expression profiles across development to reconstruct molecular ontogenies. When synchronized, many processes are shared between species, but signatures of selection suggest divergent hourglass-like developmental stages.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.044</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-1181</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9822
ispartof Current biology, 2019-10, Vol.29 (20), p.3410-3419.e3
issn 0960-9822
1879-0445
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301880660
source Cell Press Archives; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects comparative transcriptomics
developmental hourglass
evo-devo
evolution of development
maize genetics
phylostratigraphy
sorghum inflorescence
title Reconstructing the Transcriptional Ontogeny of Maize and Sorghum Supports an Inverse Hourglass Model of Inflorescence Development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructing%20the%20Transcriptional%20Ontogeny%20of%20Maize%20and%20Sorghum%20Supports%20an%20Inverse%20Hourglass%20Model%20of%20Inflorescence%20Development&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Leiboff,%20Samuel&rft.date=2019-10-21&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=3410&rft.epage=3419.e3&rft.pages=3410-3419.e3&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2301880660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2301880660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960982219310942&rfr_iscdi=true