Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives

ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2019-01, Vol.35 (5), p.393-400
Hauptverfasser: Csanádi, Marcell, Inotai, András, Oleshchuk, Oleksandra, Lebega, Oksana, Alexandra, Brodovskaya, Piniazhko, Oresta, Németh, Bertalan, Kaló, Zoltán
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 5
container_start_page 393
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 35
creator Csanádi, Marcell
Inotai, András
Oleshchuk, Oleksandra
Lebega, Oksana
Alexandra, Brodovskaya
Piniazhko, Oresta
Németh, Bertalan
Kaló, Zoltán
description ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462319000679
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301429918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2338502350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-310a5db717769804848fbf986e3cc3252c82b8eab941174e4f922be1049766ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVH-BtwYuX6OxHNrveSrG2UFBoezVs0olNTTZ1NxH6702oJz3NwPswDC8htwweGLDkcQVcKam4YAYAVGLOyIjJhEVKSH1ORkMcDfkluQphD8AEGBiR9znaqt3RNeY711TNx5FOQsAQanQtXdSHCofNtmXjaOno5tPb0uETnXbeD2TVZ12g1m3prGs7j_QNfThg3pbfGK7JRWGrgDe_c0w2s-f1dB4tX18W08kyygWoNhIMbLzNEpYkymiQWuoiK4xWKPJc8JjnmmcabWYkY4lEWRjOM2QgTaKU3YoxuT_dPfjmq8PQpnUZcqwq67DpQsoFMMmNYbqnd3_ovum867_rldAxcBFDr9hJ5b4JwWORHnxZW39MGaRD4-m_xsUPCQZynA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338502350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Csanádi, Marcell ; Inotai, András ; Oleshchuk, Oleksandra ; Lebega, Oksana ; Alexandra, Brodovskaya ; Piniazhko, Oresta ; Németh, Bertalan ; Kaló, Zoltán</creator><creatorcontrib>Csanádi, Marcell ; Inotai, András ; Oleshchuk, Oleksandra ; Lebega, Oksana ; Alexandra, Brodovskaya ; Piniazhko, Oresta ; Németh, Bertalan ; Kaló, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462319000679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Decision making ; Employment ; Expenditures ; Funding ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health technology assessment ; Organizational structure ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Reimbursement ; Technology assessment ; Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (5), p.393-400</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-310a5db717769804848fbf986e3cc3252c82b8eab941174e4f922be1049766ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-310a5db717769804848fbf986e3cc3252c82b8eab941174e4f922be1049766ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5724-639X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Csanádi, Marcell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inotai, András</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleshchuk, Oleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebega, Oksana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandra, Brodovskaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piniazhko, Oresta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Németh, Bertalan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaló, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><title>Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><description>ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVH-BtwYuX6OxHNrveSrG2UFBoezVs0olNTTZ1NxH6702oJz3NwPswDC8htwweGLDkcQVcKam4YAYAVGLOyIjJhEVKSH1ORkMcDfkluQphD8AEGBiR9znaqt3RNeY711TNx5FOQsAQanQtXdSHCofNtmXjaOno5tPb0uETnXbeD2TVZ12g1m3prGs7j_QNfThg3pbfGK7JRWGrgDe_c0w2s-f1dB4tX18W08kyygWoNhIMbLzNEpYkymiQWuoiK4xWKPJc8JjnmmcabWYkY4lEWRjOM2QgTaKU3YoxuT_dPfjmq8PQpnUZcqwq67DpQsoFMMmNYbqnd3_ovum867_rldAxcBFDr9hJ5b4JwWORHnxZW39MGaRD4-m_xsUPCQZynA</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Csanádi, Marcell</creator><creator>Inotai, András</creator><creator>Oleshchuk, Oleksandra</creator><creator>Lebega, Oksana</creator><creator>Alexandra, Brodovskaya</creator><creator>Piniazhko, Oresta</creator><creator>Németh, Bertalan</creator><creator>Kaló, Zoltán</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-639X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives</title><author>Csanádi, Marcell ; Inotai, András ; Oleshchuk, Oleksandra ; Lebega, Oksana ; Alexandra, Brodovskaya ; Piniazhko, Oresta ; Németh, Bertalan ; Kaló, Zoltán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-310a5db717769804848fbf986e3cc3252c82b8eab941174e4f922be1049766ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Csanádi, Marcell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inotai, András</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleshchuk, Oleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebega, Oksana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandra, Brodovskaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piniazhko, Oresta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Németh, Bertalan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaló, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Csanádi, Marcell</au><au>Inotai, András</au><au>Oleshchuk, Oleksandra</au><au>Lebega, Oksana</au><au>Alexandra, Brodovskaya</au><au>Piniazhko, Oresta</au><au>Németh, Bertalan</au><au>Kaló, Zoltán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>393-400</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesThe need for improving healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has been a top priority in Ukraine since 2016. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a survey using a questionnaire already applied in previous HTA research. We assessed the status of HTA when reforms were initiated in 2016 and examined perspectives on possible future developments among policy makers and representatives of pharmaceutical companies and patient organizations.ResultsThirty-two respondents answered the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents were not aware of HTA training in Ukraine, but 91 percent preferred having either a graduate or postgraduate training. Experts stated that funding for HTA research and for critical appraisal of HTA submissions was limited, but in the future, they would increase funding mainly from public sources. A public HTA agency with academic support was the most preferred organizational structure. Eighty-eight percent of respondents opted for full transparency, making the HTA agency's recommendations and the related appraisal reports publicly available. A great majority of participants preferred mandating the use of local data in certain categories and indicated the importance of evaluating the transferability of international evidence. Healthcare priority and cost-effectiveness were the most important criteria for decisions, applied with a soft explicit threshold.ConclusionsUkraine is in the early phase of implementing HTA and our study provides a clear vision of national stakeholders about the future directions. In addition, learning from the experiences of other countries may help the implementation process.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266462319000679</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-639X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (5), p.393-400
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2301429918
source Cambridge Journals
subjects Collaboration
Decision making
Employment
Expenditures
Funding
Health care
Health care industry
Health technology assessment
Organizational structure
Pharmaceutical industry
Polls & surveys
Reimbursement
Technology assessment
Training
title Health Technology Assessment Implementation in Ukraine: Current Status and Future Perspectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Technology%20Assessment%20Implementation%20in%20Ukraine:%20Current%20Status%20and%20Future%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Csan%C3%A1di,%20Marcell&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=393-400&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462319000679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2338502350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338502350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true