Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy
To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall. Observational, cohort st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 2019-11, Vol.46 (6), p.820-828 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 828 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 820 |
container_title | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Visser, Emi MS Menke, Eveline S. van Loon, Johannes PAM |
description | To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall.
Observational, cohort study.
A total of 13 horses presenting with signs of abdominal pain/colic undergoing ventral midline coeliotomy and 10 healthy horses without an abdominal incision.
Measurements were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 postoperatively using a pressure algometer. Measurement sites were marked left and right, abaxial to the abdominal incision. Cranial to the incision, two control points were marked. Measurements were made by one observer, blinded to the recorded MNT values. To determine inter-observer reliability, five horses (surgical group n = 2; nonsurgical group n = 3) were measured by two observers in a randomized order.
Mean MNT values on days 5 and 7 were 9.61 Ncm−2 and 10.14 Ncm−2 in the operated group (p = 0.009 ; p = 0.005) respectively versus 13.00 Ncm−2 on day 1. Wound-associated points showed lower values than control points (p = 0.002). The nonsurgical group did not show a difference between control points and wound-associated points (p = 0.06). No significant differences were found between the surgical and the nonsurgical groups at the wound-associated points on any days measured. The inter-observer reliability was low (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.27).
Operated animals showed a reduction in MNT values on days 5 and 7 when compared with day 1 and lower values for the wound-associated points when compared with the control points. Inter-observer reliability was low. Pressure algometry could be a useful tool for assessing wound sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses, which may improve pain management postoperatively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299766826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S146729871930128X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2299766826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-24a3b748a1bb43d236e3dbf057e4eff235219199879d38d3f5753eeddb40203a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxAWyQl2wa_EjiRKwQ4iUhwQLWlhOPwZUTF9st6t_jqqVLVjManXulOQhdUFJQQuvrebFSqmCEtgXhBSHNAZrSshYz1rbV4X5vxASdxDgnhIq2IsdowmklCBPlFM3fAsS4DICV-_QDpLDGxgesYsz3AcaEvcGq036wo3L4RzmHI4zRJruyaY3tiL98yDBWJkHAqxwJGRysdnYE3Htw1ic_rM_QkVEuwvlunqKPh_v3u6fZy-vj893ty6znbZ1mrFS8E2WjaNeVXDNeA9edIZWAEoxhvGK0pW3-qtW80dxUouIAWnclYYQrfoqutr2L4L-XEJMcbOzBOTWCX0bJsh1R1w2rM0q3aB98jAGMXAQ7qLCWlMiNYjmXWbHcKJaEy6w4Zy539ctuAL1P_DnNwM0WgPzkykKQsbcw9qBtgD5J7e0_9b-y4I5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299766826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Visser, Emi MS ; Menke, Eveline S. ; van Loon, Johannes PAM</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Emi MS ; Menke, Eveline S. ; van Loon, Johannes PAM</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall.
Observational, cohort study.
A total of 13 horses presenting with signs of abdominal pain/colic undergoing ventral midline coeliotomy and 10 healthy horses without an abdominal incision.
Measurements were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 postoperatively using a pressure algometer. Measurement sites were marked left and right, abaxial to the abdominal incision. Cranial to the incision, two control points were marked. Measurements were made by one observer, blinded to the recorded MNT values. To determine inter-observer reliability, five horses (surgical group n = 2; nonsurgical group n = 3) were measured by two observers in a randomized order.
Mean MNT values on days 5 and 7 were 9.61 Ncm−2 and 10.14 Ncm−2 in the operated group (p = 0.009 ; p = 0.005) respectively versus 13.00 Ncm−2 on day 1. Wound-associated points showed lower values than control points (p = 0.002). The nonsurgical group did not show a difference between control points and wound-associated points (p = 0.06). No significant differences were found between the surgical and the nonsurgical groups at the wound-associated points on any days measured. The inter-observer reliability was low (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.27).
Operated animals showed a reduction in MNT values on days 5 and 7 when compared with day 1 and lower values for the wound-associated points when compared with the control points. Inter-observer reliability was low. Pressure algometry could be a useful tool for assessing wound sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses, which may improve pain management postoperatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31570274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Wall - surgery ; abdominal wall sensitivity ; Animals ; Cohort Studies ; Colic - surgery ; Colic - veterinary ; Female ; horse ; Horse Diseases - etiology ; Horse Diseases - surgery ; Horses ; Laparotomy - adverse effects ; Laparotomy - veterinary ; Male ; Observer Variation ; Pain Measurement - veterinary ; Pain Threshold ; Pressure ; pressure algometry</subject><ispartof>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2019-11, Vol.46 (6), p.820-828</ispartof><rights>2019 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-24a3b748a1bb43d236e3dbf057e4eff235219199879d38d3f5753eeddb40203a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-24a3b748a1bb43d236e3dbf057e4eff235219199879d38d3f5753eeddb40203a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31570274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Emi MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, Eveline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Johannes PAM</creatorcontrib><title>Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy</title><title>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><description>To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall.
Observational, cohort study.
A total of 13 horses presenting with signs of abdominal pain/colic undergoing ventral midline coeliotomy and 10 healthy horses without an abdominal incision.
Measurements were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 postoperatively using a pressure algometer. Measurement sites were marked left and right, abaxial to the abdominal incision. Cranial to the incision, two control points were marked. Measurements were made by one observer, blinded to the recorded MNT values. To determine inter-observer reliability, five horses (surgical group n = 2; nonsurgical group n = 3) were measured by two observers in a randomized order.
Mean MNT values on days 5 and 7 were 9.61 Ncm−2 and 10.14 Ncm−2 in the operated group (p = 0.009 ; p = 0.005) respectively versus 13.00 Ncm−2 on day 1. Wound-associated points showed lower values than control points (p = 0.002). The nonsurgical group did not show a difference between control points and wound-associated points (p = 0.06). No significant differences were found between the surgical and the nonsurgical groups at the wound-associated points on any days measured. The inter-observer reliability was low (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.27).
Operated animals showed a reduction in MNT values on days 5 and 7 when compared with day 1 and lower values for the wound-associated points when compared with the control points. Inter-observer reliability was low. Pressure algometry could be a useful tool for assessing wound sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses, which may improve pain management postoperatively.</description><subject>Abdominal Wall - surgery</subject><subject>abdominal wall sensitivity</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colic - surgery</subject><subject>Colic - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>horse</subject><subject>Horse Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Horse Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Laparotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparotomy - veterinary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - veterinary</subject><subject>Pain Threshold</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>pressure algometry</subject><issn>1467-2987</issn><issn>1467-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxAWyQl2wa_EjiRKwQ4iUhwQLWlhOPwZUTF9st6t_jqqVLVjManXulOQhdUFJQQuvrebFSqmCEtgXhBSHNAZrSshYz1rbV4X5vxASdxDgnhIq2IsdowmklCBPlFM3fAsS4DICV-_QDpLDGxgesYsz3AcaEvcGq036wo3L4RzmHI4zRJruyaY3tiL98yDBWJkHAqxwJGRysdnYE3Htw1ic_rM_QkVEuwvlunqKPh_v3u6fZy-vj893ty6znbZ1mrFS8E2WjaNeVXDNeA9edIZWAEoxhvGK0pW3-qtW80dxUouIAWnclYYQrfoqutr2L4L-XEJMcbOzBOTWCX0bJsh1R1w2rM0q3aB98jAGMXAQ7qLCWlMiNYjmXWbHcKJaEy6w4Zy539ctuAL1P_DnNwM0WgPzkykKQsbcw9qBtgD5J7e0_9b-y4I5k</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Visser, Emi MS</creator><creator>Menke, Eveline S.</creator><creator>van Loon, Johannes PAM</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy</title><author>Visser, Emi MS ; Menke, Eveline S. ; van Loon, Johannes PAM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-24a3b748a1bb43d236e3dbf057e4eff235219199879d38d3f5753eeddb40203a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Wall - surgery</topic><topic>abdominal wall sensitivity</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colic - surgery</topic><topic>Colic - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>horse</topic><topic>Horse Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Horse Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Laparotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparotomy - veterinary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - veterinary</topic><topic>Pain Threshold</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>pressure algometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Emi MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke, Eveline S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Johannes PAM</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Emi MS</au><au>Menke, Eveline S.</au><au>van Loon, Johannes PAM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>820</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>820-828</pages><issn>1467-2987</issn><eissn>1467-2995</eissn><abstract>To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall.
Observational, cohort study.
A total of 13 horses presenting with signs of abdominal pain/colic undergoing ventral midline coeliotomy and 10 healthy horses without an abdominal incision.
Measurements were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 postoperatively using a pressure algometer. Measurement sites were marked left and right, abaxial to the abdominal incision. Cranial to the incision, two control points were marked. Measurements were made by one observer, blinded to the recorded MNT values. To determine inter-observer reliability, five horses (surgical group n = 2; nonsurgical group n = 3) were measured by two observers in a randomized order.
Mean MNT values on days 5 and 7 were 9.61 Ncm−2 and 10.14 Ncm−2 in the operated group (p = 0.009 ; p = 0.005) respectively versus 13.00 Ncm−2 on day 1. Wound-associated points showed lower values than control points (p = 0.002). The nonsurgical group did not show a difference between control points and wound-associated points (p = 0.06). No significant differences were found between the surgical and the nonsurgical groups at the wound-associated points on any days measured. The inter-observer reliability was low (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.27).
Operated animals showed a reduction in MNT values on days 5 and 7 when compared with day 1 and lower values for the wound-associated points when compared with the control points. Inter-observer reliability was low. Pressure algometry could be a useful tool for assessing wound sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses, which may improve pain management postoperatively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31570274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2987 |
ispartof | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2019-11, Vol.46 (6), p.820-828 |
issn | 1467-2987 1467-2995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299766826 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Abdominal Wall - surgery abdominal wall sensitivity Animals Cohort Studies Colic - surgery Colic - veterinary Female horse Horse Diseases - etiology Horse Diseases - surgery Horses Laparotomy - adverse effects Laparotomy - veterinary Male Observer Variation Pain Measurement - veterinary Pain Threshold Pressure pressure algometry |
title | Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pressure%20algometry%20for%20assessment%20of%20abdominal%20wall%20sensitivity%20in%20horses%20after%20ventral%20midline%20coeliotomy&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20anaesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Visser,%20Emi%20MS&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=820&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=820-828&rft.issn=1467-2987&rft.eissn=1467-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299766826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299766826&rft_id=info:pmid/31570274&rft_els_id=S146729871930128X&rfr_iscdi=true |