A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)

A randomized trial (the Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project) showed that a community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. We examined the short- and long-term cost of a pharmacist-led...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2019-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1128-1136
Hauptverfasser: Tam-Tham, Helen, Clement, Fiona, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R., Manns, Braden J., Klarenbach, Scott W., Tonelli, Marcello, Tsuyuki, Ross T., Al Hamarneh, Yazid N., Penko, Joanne, Weaver, Colin G.W., Au, Flora, Weaver, Robert G., Jones, Charlotte A., McBrien, Kerry A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1136
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1128
container_title Value in health
container_volume 22
creator Tam-Tham, Helen
Clement, Fiona
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
Manns, Braden J.
Klarenbach, Scott W.
Tonelli, Marcello
Tsuyuki, Ross T.
Al Hamarneh, Yazid N.
Penko, Joanne
Weaver, Colin G.W.
Au, Flora
Weaver, Robert G.
Jones, Charlotte A.
McBrien, Kerry A.
description A randomized trial (the Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project) showed that a community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. We examined the short- and long-term cost of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce CV risk compared to usual care. We conducted a trial-based cost analysis from the perspective of a publicly funded healthcare system. Over 3 and 12 months of follow-up, we examined specific intervention costs (pharmacy claims), related intervention costs (laboratory tests and medications), and ongoing healthcare costs (physician claims, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). We also used the validated CV Disease Policy Model–Canada to estimate the long-term effects. A total of 684 participants (mean age 62, 57% male) were included. Overall, there were no significant differences in healthcare costs at 3 or 12 months between the usual care and intervention groups (P = .127). The CV disease-related healthcare cost of managing a patient over a lifetime was estimated to be Can$45 530 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 45 460-45 580) and Can$40 750 (95% UI, 37 780-43 620) in usual care and intervention groups, respectively, an incremental cost savings of Can$4770 per patient (95% UI, 1900-7760). The intervention dominated usual care (better outcomes and lower costs) across 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar measured healthcare costs over 1 year, and lower extrapolated healthcare costs over a patient lifetime. This strategy could be broadly implemented to realize its benefits. •The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project, RxEACH, was a randomized trial in Alberta, Canada, which showed a clinical pathway-driven community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk.•Nevertheless, the cost of this strategy is unknown.•We found no significant difference in short-term healthcare cost between the intervention and usual care groups.•Over a lifetime, the clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention was estimated to save almost $5000 in CV disease-related healthcare costs per patient at high risk for CV disease.•This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299449820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301519322351</els_id><sourcerecordid>2309775674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3432-9fd5c1263e99ea172b05e1a53530a1fdda65c2b7c9b639c5d846321c7d99a3ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZlkeCfOLlGbKKo0EpXAl21bC3HnlCHJG7t5Iq76zv0gXgXngSnt_wIJCRLHs18c0Y6J0meE5wRTIrXXdZtVZ9RTESGeYYJfZAcEk7zNC8ZexhrLFYpw4QfJE9C6DDGBaP8cXLACF8qfph8q1DtwoSqUfW7YANSo7nrpBeT7e20-z1xLVJxNAzzuPQ_Xio_KG3D9P3mdg0GnY0T-C2Mk3Ujim8DZtZ2_Ixq5Y11WxX03CuPNjZ8eYPOLwFVfQN-UujTn6P93p3IP8di4V0HekLHm68nVX366mnyqFV9gGf3_1Fy8e7kvD5N1x_en9XVOtUsZzQVreGa0IKBEKBISRvMgSjOOMOKtMaogmvalFo0BROam1UeDSK6NEIoBpodJcd73SvvrmcIkxxs0ND3agQ3B0mpEHkuVhRH9OVfaOdmH12MFMOiLHlR5pGie0p7F4KHVl55Oyi_kwTLJV7ZySVeucQrMZcx3rj04l56bgYwv1Z-5hmBt3sAohdbC14GbWHUYKyPtknj7P_0fwByjbkB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309775674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tam-Tham, Helen ; Clement, Fiona ; Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. ; Manns, Braden J. ; Klarenbach, Scott W. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Tsuyuki, Ross T. ; Al Hamarneh, Yazid N. ; Penko, Joanne ; Weaver, Colin G.W. ; Au, Flora ; Weaver, Robert G. ; Jones, Charlotte A. ; McBrien, Kerry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tam-Tham, Helen ; Clement, Fiona ; Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. ; Manns, Braden J. ; Klarenbach, Scott W. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Tsuyuki, Ross T. ; Al Hamarneh, Yazid N. ; Penko, Joanne ; Weaver, Colin G.W. ; Au, Flora ; Weaver, Robert G. ; Jones, Charlotte A. ; McBrien, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><description>A randomized trial (the Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project) showed that a community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. We examined the short- and long-term cost of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce CV risk compared to usual care. We conducted a trial-based cost analysis from the perspective of a publicly funded healthcare system. Over 3 and 12 months of follow-up, we examined specific intervention costs (pharmacy claims), related intervention costs (laboratory tests and medications), and ongoing healthcare costs (physician claims, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). We also used the validated CV Disease Policy Model–Canada to estimate the long-term effects. A total of 684 participants (mean age 62, 57% male) were included. Overall, there were no significant differences in healthcare costs at 3 or 12 months between the usual care and intervention groups (P = .127). The CV disease-related healthcare cost of managing a patient over a lifetime was estimated to be Can$45 530 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 45 460-45 580) and Can$40 750 (95% UI, 37 780-43 620) in usual care and intervention groups, respectively, an incremental cost savings of Can$4770 per patient (95% UI, 1900-7760). The intervention dominated usual care (better outcomes and lower costs) across 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar measured healthcare costs over 1 year, and lower extrapolated healthcare costs over a patient lifetime. This strategy could be broadly implemented to realize its benefits. •The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project, RxEACH, was a randomized trial in Alberta, Canada, which showed a clinical pathway-driven community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk.•Nevertheless, the cost of this strategy is unknown.•We found no significant difference in short-term healthcare cost between the intervention and usual care groups.•Over a lifetime, the clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention was estimated to save almost $5000 in CV disease-related healthcare costs per patient at high risk for CV disease.•This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar short-term healthcare costs as usual care.•Health systems may consider implementing this model for high-risk patients to reduce CV risk with no additional short-term cost and potential cost savings over the longer term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31563255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Claims ; Clinical trials ; Community pharmacists ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Economic analysis ; economic evaluation ; Emergency services ; Health care expenditures ; Hospitalization ; Intervention ; Long term ; Long-term effects ; Patients ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacy ; Risk factors ; Risk reduction ; Savings ; Uncertainty ; Utility functions</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2019-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1128-1136</ispartof><rights>2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3432-9fd5c1263e99ea172b05e1a53530a1fdda65c2b7c9b639c5d846321c7d99a3ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3432-9fd5c1263e99ea172b05e1a53530a1fdda65c2b7c9b639c5d846321c7d99a3ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,30998,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31563255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tam-Tham, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarenbach, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyuki, Ross T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Hamarneh, Yazid N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penko, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Colin G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, Flora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Charlotte A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBrien, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>A randomized trial (the Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project) showed that a community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. We examined the short- and long-term cost of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce CV risk compared to usual care. We conducted a trial-based cost analysis from the perspective of a publicly funded healthcare system. Over 3 and 12 months of follow-up, we examined specific intervention costs (pharmacy claims), related intervention costs (laboratory tests and medications), and ongoing healthcare costs (physician claims, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). We also used the validated CV Disease Policy Model–Canada to estimate the long-term effects. A total of 684 participants (mean age 62, 57% male) were included. Overall, there were no significant differences in healthcare costs at 3 or 12 months between the usual care and intervention groups (P = .127). The CV disease-related healthcare cost of managing a patient over a lifetime was estimated to be Can$45 530 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 45 460-45 580) and Can$40 750 (95% UI, 37 780-43 620) in usual care and intervention groups, respectively, an incremental cost savings of Can$4770 per patient (95% UI, 1900-7760). The intervention dominated usual care (better outcomes and lower costs) across 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar measured healthcare costs over 1 year, and lower extrapolated healthcare costs over a patient lifetime. This strategy could be broadly implemented to realize its benefits. •The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project, RxEACH, was a randomized trial in Alberta, Canada, which showed a clinical pathway-driven community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk.•Nevertheless, the cost of this strategy is unknown.•We found no significant difference in short-term healthcare cost between the intervention and usual care groups.•Over a lifetime, the clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention was estimated to save almost $5000 in CV disease-related healthcare costs per patient at high risk for CV disease.•This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar short-term healthcare costs as usual care.•Health systems may consider implementing this model for high-risk patients to reduce CV risk with no additional short-term cost and potential cost savings over the longer term.</description><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Claims</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Community pharmacists</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>economic evaluation</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Long term</subject><subject>Long-term effects</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Savings</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZlkeCfOLlGbKKo0EpXAl21bC3HnlCHJG7t5Iq76zv0gXgXngSnt_wIJCRLHs18c0Y6J0meE5wRTIrXXdZtVZ9RTESGeYYJfZAcEk7zNC8ZexhrLFYpw4QfJE9C6DDGBaP8cXLACF8qfph8q1DtwoSqUfW7YANSo7nrpBeT7e20-z1xLVJxNAzzuPQ_Xio_KG3D9P3mdg0GnY0T-C2Mk3Ujim8DZtZ2_Ixq5Y11WxX03CuPNjZ8eYPOLwFVfQN-UujTn6P93p3IP8di4V0HekLHm68nVX366mnyqFV9gGf3_1Fy8e7kvD5N1x_en9XVOtUsZzQVreGa0IKBEKBISRvMgSjOOMOKtMaogmvalFo0BROam1UeDSK6NEIoBpodJcd73SvvrmcIkxxs0ND3agQ3B0mpEHkuVhRH9OVfaOdmH12MFMOiLHlR5pGie0p7F4KHVl55Oyi_kwTLJV7ZySVeucQrMZcx3rj04l56bgYwv1Z-5hmBt3sAohdbC14GbWHUYKyPtknj7P_0fwByjbkB</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Tam-Tham, Helen</creator><creator>Clement, Fiona</creator><creator>Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.</creator><creator>Manns, Braden J.</creator><creator>Klarenbach, Scott W.</creator><creator>Tonelli, Marcello</creator><creator>Tsuyuki, Ross T.</creator><creator>Al Hamarneh, Yazid N.</creator><creator>Penko, Joanne</creator><creator>Weaver, Colin G.W.</creator><creator>Au, Flora</creator><creator>Weaver, Robert G.</creator><creator>Jones, Charlotte A.</creator><creator>McBrien, Kerry A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)</title><author>Tam-Tham, Helen ; Clement, Fiona ; Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. ; Manns, Braden J. ; Klarenbach, Scott W. ; Tonelli, Marcello ; Tsuyuki, Ross T. ; Al Hamarneh, Yazid N. ; Penko, Joanne ; Weaver, Colin G.W. ; Au, Flora ; Weaver, Robert G. ; Jones, Charlotte A. ; McBrien, Kerry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3432-9fd5c1263e99ea172b05e1a53530a1fdda65c2b7c9b639c5d846321c7d99a3ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Claims</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Community pharmacists</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>economic evaluation</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Long term</topic><topic>Long-term effects</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Savings</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tam-Tham, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klarenbach, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyuki, Ross T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Hamarneh, Yazid N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penko, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Colin G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, Flora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Charlotte A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBrien, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tam-Tham, Helen</au><au>Clement, Fiona</au><au>Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.</au><au>Manns, Braden J.</au><au>Klarenbach, Scott W.</au><au>Tonelli, Marcello</au><au>Tsuyuki, Ross T.</au><au>Al Hamarneh, Yazid N.</au><au>Penko, Joanne</au><au>Weaver, Colin G.W.</au><au>Au, Flora</au><au>Weaver, Robert G.</au><au>Jones, Charlotte A.</au><au>McBrien, Kerry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1128</spage><epage>1136</epage><pages>1128-1136</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>A randomized trial (the Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project) showed that a community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the cost of this strategy is unknown. We examined the short- and long-term cost of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce CV risk compared to usual care. We conducted a trial-based cost analysis from the perspective of a publicly funded healthcare system. Over 3 and 12 months of follow-up, we examined specific intervention costs (pharmacy claims), related intervention costs (laboratory tests and medications), and ongoing healthcare costs (physician claims, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). We also used the validated CV Disease Policy Model–Canada to estimate the long-term effects. A total of 684 participants (mean age 62, 57% male) were included. Overall, there were no significant differences in healthcare costs at 3 or 12 months between the usual care and intervention groups (P = .127). The CV disease-related healthcare cost of managing a patient over a lifetime was estimated to be Can$45 530 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 45 460-45 580) and Can$40 750 (95% UI, 37 780-43 620) in usual care and intervention groups, respectively, an incremental cost savings of Can$4770 per patient (95% UI, 1900-7760). The intervention dominated usual care (better outcomes and lower costs) across 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar measured healthcare costs over 1 year, and lower extrapolated healthcare costs over a patient lifetime. This strategy could be broadly implemented to realize its benefits. •The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project, RxEACH, was a randomized trial in Alberta, Canada, which showed a clinical pathway-driven community pharmacist-led intervention was efficacious for reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk.•Nevertheless, the cost of this strategy is unknown.•We found no significant difference in short-term healthcare cost between the intervention and usual care groups.•Over a lifetime, the clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention was estimated to save almost $5000 in CV disease-related healthcare costs per patient at high risk for CV disease.•This economic analysis suggests that a clinical pathway-driven pharmacist-led intervention (previously shown to reduce CV risk) was associated with similar short-term healthcare costs as usual care.•Health systems may consider implementing this model for high-risk patients to reduce CV risk with no additional short-term cost and potential cost savings over the longer term.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31563255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2019-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1128-1136
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2299449820
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Claims
Clinical trials
Community pharmacists
Cost analysis
Cost control
Economic analysis
economic evaluation
Emergency services
Health care expenditures
Hospitalization
Intervention
Long term
Long-term effects
Patients
Pharmacists
Pharmacy
Risk factors
Risk reduction
Savings
Uncertainty
Utility functions
title A Cost Analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Community Pharmacist–Led Intervention on Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project (RxEACH)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cost%20Analysis%20and%20Cost-Utility%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Community%20Pharmacist%E2%80%93Led%20Intervention%20on%20Reducing%20Cardiovascular%20Risk:%20The%20Alberta%20Vascular%20Risk%20Reduction%20Community%20Pharmacy%20Project%20(RxEACH)&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Tam-Tham,%20Helen&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1128&rft.epage=1136&rft.pages=1128-1136&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309775674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309775674&rft_id=info:pmid/31563255&rft_els_id=S1098301519322351&rfr_iscdi=true