Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma

Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315
Hauptverfasser: Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander, Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo, Sosenski, Paula, Parra‐Tabla, Víctor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1315
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1308
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 106
creator Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander
Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo
Sosenski, Paula
Parra‐Tabla, Víctor
description Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied. Methods We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success. Results Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajb2.1361
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2297128512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307141094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjAIa3HTjYxt1JR_qgSHOBsTZwJ9Spxgu3dVd-Fh8XZXTggcbJm_OnzeH6MvQBxCULIK9y08hLUGh6xFVSqLiTo-jFbiXxZaJDyjJ3HuMmlLrV8ys4UVJWqRLViv75iShR85Og7Tn1PNkU-9fyecnuKM1nXO8vnaRjI8xTQx54CbyntKTfQc-d3GN2ODoa0n7jHtJTzgD7xg4HiW57uibtxnkJCb2l54uTEENwOB57cSDxNBzAm92PEZ-xJj0Ok56fzgn2_ff_t5mNx9-XDp5vru8KqpoECQAtFXddJRdhKq20jSqwUrNuy6ZpWlaiwkTWtS0uIlqS2FiuJpG2roFQX7PXRO4fp55ZiMqOLlob8AZq20Uipa5BNBTKjr_5BN9M2-DydkUrUUELecabeHCmbVxgD9WYObsTwYECYJTKzRGaWyDL78mTctiN1f8k_GWXg6gjs3UAP_zeZ68_v5EH5GwX7opk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307141094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><description>Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied. Methods We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success. Results Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31553505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Breeding success ; coastal dunes ; Flowers ; Flowers &amp; plants ; heterospecific pollen ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Introduced Species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Native species ; Nonnative species ; Plant communities ; Pollen ; Pollen Tube ; Pollen tubes ; Pollination ; pollination success ; Pollinators ; Reproduction ; Stigmas (botany) ; Success ; tolerance to heterospecific pollen ; Tubes</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315</ispartof><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5920-0881 ; 0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajb2.1361$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajb2.1361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31553505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosenski, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied. Methods We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success. Results Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</description><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>coastal dunes</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>heterospecific pollen</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollen Tube</subject><subject>Pollen tubes</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollination success</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Stigmas (botany)</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>tolerance to heterospecific pollen</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjAIa3HTjYxt1JR_qgSHOBsTZwJ9Spxgu3dVd-Fh8XZXTggcbJm_OnzeH6MvQBxCULIK9y08hLUGh6xFVSqLiTo-jFbiXxZaJDyjJ3HuMmlLrV8ys4UVJWqRLViv75iShR85Og7Tn1PNkU-9fyecnuKM1nXO8vnaRjI8xTQx54CbyntKTfQc-d3GN2ODoa0n7jHtJTzgD7xg4HiW57uibtxnkJCb2l54uTEENwOB57cSDxNBzAm92PEZ-xJj0Ok56fzgn2_ff_t5mNx9-XDp5vru8KqpoECQAtFXddJRdhKq20jSqwUrNuy6ZpWlaiwkTWtS0uIlqS2FiuJpG2roFQX7PXRO4fp55ZiMqOLlob8AZq20Uipa5BNBTKjr_5BN9M2-DydkUrUUELecabeHCmbVxgD9WYObsTwYECYJTKzRGaWyDL78mTctiN1f8k_GWXg6gjs3UAP_zeZ68_v5EH5GwX7opk</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creator><creator>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creator><creator>Sosenski, Paula</creator><creator>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-0881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><author>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>coastal dunes</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>heterospecific pollen</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollen Tube</topic><topic>Pollen tubes</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollination success</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Stigmas (botany)</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>tolerance to heterospecific pollen</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosenski, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</au><au>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</au><au>Sosenski, Paula</au><au>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1308</spage><epage>1315</epage><pages>1308-1315</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><abstract>Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied. Methods We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success. Results Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>31553505</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajb2.1361</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-0881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2297128512
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Breeding success
coastal dunes
Flowers
Flowers & plants
heterospecific pollen
Indigenous plants
Indigenous species
Introduced Species
Invasive plants
Invasive species
Native species
Nonnative species
Plant communities
Pollen
Pollen Tube
Pollen tubes
Pollination
pollination success
Pollinators
Reproduction
Stigmas (botany)
Success
tolerance to heterospecific pollen
Tubes
title Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20and%20effects%20of%20heterospecific%20pollen%20transfer%20between%20an%20invasive%20and%20two%20native%20plant%20species:%20the%20importance%20of%20pollen%20arrival%20time%20to%20the%20stigma&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez%E2%80%90Mari%C3%B1o,%20Alexander&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1308&rft.epage=1315&rft.pages=1308-1315&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajb2.1361&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307141094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307141094&rft_id=info:pmid/31553505&rfr_iscdi=true