Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma
Premise Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1308 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo Sosenski, Paula Parra‐Tabla, Víctor |
description | Premise
Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied.
Methods
We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success.
Results
Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajb2.1361 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2297128512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307141094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjAIa3HTjYxt1JR_qgSHOBsTZwJ9Spxgu3dVd-Fh8XZXTggcbJm_OnzeH6MvQBxCULIK9y08hLUGh6xFVSqLiTo-jFbiXxZaJDyjJ3HuMmlLrV8ys4UVJWqRLViv75iShR85Og7Tn1PNkU-9fyecnuKM1nXO8vnaRjI8xTQx54CbyntKTfQc-d3GN2ODoa0n7jHtJTzgD7xg4HiW57uibtxnkJCb2l54uTEENwOB57cSDxNBzAm92PEZ-xJj0Ok56fzgn2_ff_t5mNx9-XDp5vru8KqpoECQAtFXddJRdhKq20jSqwUrNuy6ZpWlaiwkTWtS0uIlqS2FiuJpG2roFQX7PXRO4fp55ZiMqOLlob8AZq20Uipa5BNBTKjr_5BN9M2-DydkUrUUELecabeHCmbVxgD9WYObsTwYECYJTKzRGaWyDL78mTctiN1f8k_GWXg6gjs3UAP_zeZ68_v5EH5GwX7opk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307141094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><description>Premise
Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied.
Methods
We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success.
Results
Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31553505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Breeding success ; coastal dunes ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; heterospecific pollen ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Introduced Species ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Native species ; Nonnative species ; Plant communities ; Pollen ; Pollen Tube ; Pollen tubes ; Pollination ; pollination success ; Pollinators ; Reproduction ; Stigmas (botany) ; Success ; tolerance to heterospecific pollen ; Tubes</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315</ispartof><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5920-0881 ; 0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajb2.1361$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajb2.1361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31553505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosenski, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Premise
Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied.
Methods
We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success.
Results
Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</description><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>coastal dunes</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>heterospecific pollen</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollen Tube</subject><subject>Pollen tubes</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollination success</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Stigmas (botany)</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>tolerance to heterospecific pollen</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCgRdAlrjAIa3HTjYxt1JR_qgSHOBsTZwJ9Spxgu3dVd-Fh8XZXTggcbJm_OnzeH6MvQBxCULIK9y08hLUGh6xFVSqLiTo-jFbiXxZaJDyjJ3HuMmlLrV8ys4UVJWqRLViv75iShR85Og7Tn1PNkU-9fyecnuKM1nXO8vnaRjI8xTQx54CbyntKTfQc-d3GN2ODoa0n7jHtJTzgD7xg4HiW57uibtxnkJCb2l54uTEENwOB57cSDxNBzAm92PEZ-xJj0Ok56fzgn2_ff_t5mNx9-XDp5vru8KqpoECQAtFXddJRdhKq20jSqwUrNuy6ZpWlaiwkTWtS0uIlqS2FiuJpG2roFQX7PXRO4fp55ZiMqOLlob8AZq20Uipa5BNBTKjr_5BN9M2-DydkUrUUELecabeHCmbVxgD9WYObsTwYECYJTKzRGaWyDL78mTctiN1f8k_GWXg6gjs3UAP_zeZ68_v5EH5GwX7opk</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creator><creator>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creator><creator>Sosenski, Paula</creator><creator>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-0881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</title><author>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander ; Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo ; Sosenski, Paula ; Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-11903eddd23eab2c9c804a5316b48d8b34a3a827e64ceaace29cca52ae9cb3143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>coastal dunes</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>heterospecific pollen</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollen Tube</topic><topic>Pollen tubes</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollination success</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Stigmas (botany)</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>tolerance to heterospecific pollen</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosenski, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez‐Mariño, Alexander</au><au>Arceo‐Gómez, Gerardo</au><au>Sosenski, Paula</au><au>Parra‐Tabla, Víctor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1308</spage><epage>1315</epage><pages>1308-1315</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><abstract>Premise
Invasive plant species can integrate into native plant–pollinator communities, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Competitive interactions between invasive and native plants via heterospecific pollen (HP) and differential invasive HP effects depending on HP arrival time to the stigma may mediate invasion success, but these have been little studied.
Methods
We evaluated patterns and effects of HP receipt on pollen tube growth in two native and one invasive species in the field. We also used hand‐pollination experiments to evaluate the effect of invasive HP pollen and its arrival time on native reproductive success.
Results
Native species receive smaller and less‐diverse HP loads (5–7 species) compared to invasive species (10 species). The load size of HP had a negative effect on the proportion of pollen tubes in both native species but not in the invasive, suggesting higher HP tolerance in the latter. Invasive HP arrival time differentially affected pollen tube success in native species.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need to study reciprocal HP effects between invasive and native species and the factors that determine differential responses to HP receipt to fully understand the mechanisms facilitating invasive species integration into native plant–pollinator communities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>31553505</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajb2.1361</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-0881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3458-1600</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2019-10, Vol.106 (10), p.1308-1315 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2297128512 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Breeding success coastal dunes Flowers Flowers & plants heterospecific pollen Indigenous plants Indigenous species Introduced Species Invasive plants Invasive species Native species Nonnative species Plant communities Pollen Pollen Tube Pollen tubes Pollination pollination success Pollinators Reproduction Stigmas (botany) Success tolerance to heterospecific pollen Tubes |
title | Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20and%20effects%20of%20heterospecific%20pollen%20transfer%20between%20an%20invasive%20and%20two%20native%20plant%20species:%20the%20importance%20of%20pollen%20arrival%20time%20to%20the%20stigma&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez%E2%80%90Mari%C3%B1o,%20Alexander&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1308&rft.epage=1315&rft.pages=1308-1315&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajb2.1361&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307141094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307141094&rft_id=info:pmid/31553505&rfr_iscdi=true |