Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of rectal cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced 3D VIBE sequence

Purpose To compare conventional 3D volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (C-VIBE) sequence image quality to that of golden-angle radial stack-of stars acquisition scheme (R-VIBE) in rectal cancer patients. Methods Seventy-eight patients had undergone pre-contrast C-VIBE, followed by DCE-MR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2020-02, Vol.45 (2), p.322-331
Hauptverfasser: Li, Yuming, Xia, Chunchao, Peng, Wanlin, Gao, Yue, Hu, Sixian, Zhang, Kai, Zhao, Fei, Benkert, Thomas, Zhou, Xiaoyue, Zhang, Huapeng, Li, Zhenlin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare conventional 3D volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (C-VIBE) sequence image quality to that of golden-angle radial stack-of stars acquisition scheme (R-VIBE) in rectal cancer patients. Methods Seventy-eight patients had undergone pre-contrast C-VIBE, followed by DCE-MRI with R-VIBE and post-contrast C-VIBE in the visualization of rectal cancer. The first phase and the last phase of R-VIBE sequence were compared with pre-contrast and post-contrast C-VIBE sequences, respectively. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of rectal neoplasms, gluteus maximus, and subcutaneous fat were compared between the two different sequences. A further qualitative score system (graded 1–5) was used to evaluate the overall image. Quantitative and qualitative parameters from the two sequences were compared. Results In all patients, R-VIBE achieved the same SNR and CNR ratings in pre- and post-contrast (all P  > 0.05), with the exception of a higher SNR of fat in pre-contrast images ( P  = 0.037). In addition, there were no significant differences in scores of overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and rectal wall boundary (all P  > 0.05). There was an improved score in artifacts of post-contrast R-VIBE sequence ( P  = 0.005). Conclusion R-VIBE sequence can provide comparable image quality and less motion artifacts to that of C-VIBE sequence and is feasible for imaging of rectal cancer.
ISSN:2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-02225-7