Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017)
Marine fauna in the California Current System is susceptible to entanglement in anthropogenic debris. We examined beach survey data from six California counties to describe trends of entangled marine birds and mammals (1997–2017). Surveyors reported 357 cases of entanglements among 65,604 carcasses....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2019-12, Vol.149, p.110557-110557, Article 110557 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 110557 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 110557 |
| container_title | Marine pollution bulletin |
| container_volume | 149 |
| creator | Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L. Nevins, Hannahrose M. Harvey, James T. |
| description | Marine fauna in the California Current System is susceptible to entanglement in anthropogenic debris. We examined beach survey data from six California counties to describe trends of entangled marine birds and mammals (1997–2017). Surveyors reported 357 cases of entanglements among 65,604 carcasses. Monterey County had the greatest average entanglement rate (0.007) of surveyed counties, however, was not statistically different from Santa Cruz (p > 0.05). Twenty-six seabird species (97%) and three marine mammal species (3%), and three non-marine birds were affected. Numerically, Common Murre (23%), Brandt's Cormorant (13%), Western Gull (9.6%), Sooty Shearwater (8%) and Brown Pelican (7%) were the most affected due to abundance, but their entanglement rates were not statistically different (p > 0.05). The most vulnerable species were those frequently documented as entanglement despite low deposition numbers (Merganser spp. 25%). Entangling material consisted primarily of monofilament line (some hooks/lures), but other entanglement items were reported.
•We report 354 entanglements between 1997 and 2017.•Seabirds accounted for 97% of all entanglements.•Five seabird species comprised 61.3% of total entanglements.•Seabirds were entangled primarily in monofilament fishing line.•Average annual entanglement rates between counites were not statistically different. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110557 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296137347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X19307015</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327320526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-ce34a77ce3aa3c663edfdc657a63db5a8e5439e6462c53d917c9fb78d71ff18d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1qHDEUhUVwiDdOXsEWuHGK2ehnJI1Kszg_YEiTQDqhke4YLTPSWpox2JXfwW-YJ4nMrl2kSXUKfefocg5CZ5SsKaHy83Y92bxLY7-Ma0aoXlNKhFBv0Ip2SjecS36EVoQw0XAmfx-j96VsCSGKKfoOHXMqWiZ0t0LxKs423ozgcQHbh-yxjR7X9BChyjTZEWfYpTwXPOQ0YRfm8AARFxcgOsBlyXdw__KYbJmrY2PHMKQcg8UXVGv15_Gpnqk-fUBvBzsW-HjQE_Try9XPzbfm-sfX75vL68ZxrefGAW-tUlWs5U5KDn7wTgplJfe9sB2IlmuQrWROcK-pcnroVecVHQbaeX6CLva5u5xuFyizmUJxMI42QlqKYUxLyhVvVUXP_0G3acmxXmcYZ4ozIpislNpTLqdSMgxml0Nt6d5QYp4nMVvzOol5nsTsJ6nO00P-0k_gX30vG1Tgcg9ALeQuQDaHan3I4GbjU_jvJ38B8UOiJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327320526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L. ; Nevins, Hannahrose M. ; Harvey, James T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L. ; Nevins, Hannahrose M. ; Harvey, James T.</creatorcontrib><description>Marine fauna in the California Current System is susceptible to entanglement in anthropogenic debris. We examined beach survey data from six California counties to describe trends of entangled marine birds and mammals (1997–2017). Surveyors reported 357 cases of entanglements among 65,604 carcasses. Monterey County had the greatest average entanglement rate (0.007) of surveyed counties, however, was not statistically different from Santa Cruz (p > 0.05). Twenty-six seabird species (97%) and three marine mammal species (3%), and three non-marine birds were affected. Numerically, Common Murre (23%), Brandt's Cormorant (13%), Western Gull (9.6%), Sooty Shearwater (8%) and Brown Pelican (7%) were the most affected due to abundance, but their entanglement rates were not statistically different (p > 0.05). The most vulnerable species were those frequently documented as entanglement despite low deposition numbers (Merganser spp. 25%). Entangling material consisted primarily of monofilament line (some hooks/lures), but other entanglement items were reported.
•We report 354 entanglements between 1997 and 2017.•Seabirds accounted for 97% of all entanglements.•Five seabird species comprised 61.3% of total entanglements.•Seabirds were entangled primarily in monofilament fishing line.•Average annual entanglement rates between counites were not statistically different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31542598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic birds ; Aquatic mammals ; Aquatic Organisms ; Beach survey ; Birds ; California ; Caniformia ; Carcasses ; Charadriiformes ; Citizen Science ; Dolphins ; Entangled ; Entanglement ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Hooks ; Mammals ; Marine animals ; Marine fauna ; Marine mammals ; Phoca ; Polls & surveys ; Rare species ; Sea Lions ; Seabirds ; Small mammals ; Species ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Threatened species ; Vulnerable species ; Waste Products - analysis</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2019-12, Vol.149, p.110557-110557, Article 110557</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-ce34a77ce3aa3c663edfdc657a63db5a8e5439e6462c53d917c9fb78d71ff18d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-ce34a77ce3aa3c663edfdc657a63db5a8e5439e6462c53d917c9fb78d71ff18d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevins, Hannahrose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, James T.</creatorcontrib><title>Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017)</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><description>Marine fauna in the California Current System is susceptible to entanglement in anthropogenic debris. We examined beach survey data from six California counties to describe trends of entangled marine birds and mammals (1997–2017). Surveyors reported 357 cases of entanglements among 65,604 carcasses. Monterey County had the greatest average entanglement rate (0.007) of surveyed counties, however, was not statistically different from Santa Cruz (p > 0.05). Twenty-six seabird species (97%) and three marine mammal species (3%), and three non-marine birds were affected. Numerically, Common Murre (23%), Brandt's Cormorant (13%), Western Gull (9.6%), Sooty Shearwater (8%) and Brown Pelican (7%) were the most affected due to abundance, but their entanglement rates were not statistically different (p > 0.05). The most vulnerable species were those frequently documented as entanglement despite low deposition numbers (Merganser spp. 25%). Entangling material consisted primarily of monofilament line (some hooks/lures), but other entanglement items were reported.
•We report 354 entanglements between 1997 and 2017.•Seabirds accounted for 97% of all entanglements.•Five seabird species comprised 61.3% of total entanglements.•Seabirds were entangled primarily in monofilament fishing line.•Average annual entanglement rates between counites were not statistically different.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Aquatic Organisms</subject><subject>Beach survey</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Caniformia</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Charadriiformes</subject><subject>Citizen Science</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Entangled</subject><subject>Entanglement</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Hooks</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Marine animals</subject><subject>Marine fauna</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Phoca</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Sea Lions</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Vulnerable species</subject><subject>Waste Products - analysis</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1qHDEUhUVwiDdOXsEWuHGK2ehnJI1Kszg_YEiTQDqhke4YLTPSWpox2JXfwW-YJ4nMrl2kSXUKfefocg5CZ5SsKaHy83Y92bxLY7-Ma0aoXlNKhFBv0Ip2SjecS36EVoQw0XAmfx-j96VsCSGKKfoOHXMqWiZ0t0LxKs423ozgcQHbh-yxjR7X9BChyjTZEWfYpTwXPOQ0YRfm8AARFxcgOsBlyXdw__KYbJmrY2PHMKQcg8UXVGv15_Gpnqk-fUBvBzsW-HjQE_Try9XPzbfm-sfX75vL68ZxrefGAW-tUlWs5U5KDn7wTgplJfe9sB2IlmuQrWROcK-pcnroVecVHQbaeX6CLva5u5xuFyizmUJxMI42QlqKYUxLyhVvVUXP_0G3acmxXmcYZ4ozIpislNpTLqdSMgxml0Nt6d5QYp4nMVvzOol5nsTsJ6nO00P-0k_gX30vG1Tgcg9ALeQuQDaHan3I4GbjU_jvJ38B8UOiJw</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L.</creator><creator>Nevins, Hannahrose M.</creator><creator>Harvey, James T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017)</title><author>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L. ; Nevins, Hannahrose M. ; Harvey, James T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-ce34a77ce3aa3c663edfdc657a63db5a8e5439e6462c53d917c9fb78d71ff18d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Aquatic Organisms</topic><topic>Beach survey</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Caniformia</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Charadriiformes</topic><topic>Citizen Science</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Entangled</topic><topic>Entanglement</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Hooks</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Marine animals</topic><topic>Marine fauna</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Phoca</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Sea Lions</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Vulnerable species</topic><topic>Waste Products - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevins, Hannahrose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harvey, James T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donnelly-Greenan, Erica L.</au><au>Nevins, Hannahrose M.</au><au>Harvey, James T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017)</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>110557</spage><epage>110557</epage><pages>110557-110557</pages><artnum>110557</artnum><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><abstract>Marine fauna in the California Current System is susceptible to entanglement in anthropogenic debris. We examined beach survey data from six California counties to describe trends of entangled marine birds and mammals (1997–2017). Surveyors reported 357 cases of entanglements among 65,604 carcasses. Monterey County had the greatest average entanglement rate (0.007) of surveyed counties, however, was not statistically different from Santa Cruz (p > 0.05). Twenty-six seabird species (97%) and three marine mammal species (3%), and three non-marine birds were affected. Numerically, Common Murre (23%), Brandt's Cormorant (13%), Western Gull (9.6%), Sooty Shearwater (8%) and Brown Pelican (7%) were the most affected due to abundance, but their entanglement rates were not statistically different (p > 0.05). The most vulnerable species were those frequently documented as entanglement despite low deposition numbers (Merganser spp. 25%). Entangling material consisted primarily of monofilament line (some hooks/lures), but other entanglement items were reported.
•We report 354 entanglements between 1997 and 2017.•Seabirds accounted for 97% of all entanglements.•Five seabird species comprised 61.3% of total entanglements.•Seabirds were entangled primarily in monofilament fishing line.•Average annual entanglement rates between counites were not statistically different.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31542598</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110557</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-326X |
| ispartof | Marine pollution bulletin, 2019-12, Vol.149, p.110557-110557, Article 110557 |
| issn | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296137347 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Animals Anthropogenic factors Aquatic birds Aquatic mammals Aquatic Organisms Beach survey Birds California Caniformia Carcasses Charadriiformes Citizen Science Dolphins Entangled Entanglement Environmental Monitoring - methods Hooks Mammals Marine animals Marine fauna Marine mammals Phoca Polls & surveys Rare species Sea Lions Seabirds Small mammals Species Surveying Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Threatened species Vulnerable species Waste Products - analysis |
| title | Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997–2017) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T05%3A40%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Entangled%20seabird%20and%20marine%20mammal%20reports%20from%20citizen%20science%20surveys%20from%20coastal%20California%20(1997%E2%80%932017)&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Donnelly-Greenan,%20Erica%20L.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=110557&rft.epage=110557&rft.pages=110557-110557&rft.artnum=110557&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327320526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327320526&rft_id=info:pmid/31542598&rft_els_id=S0025326X19307015&rfr_iscdi=true |