Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data
Certain martian hydrated silica deposits have been hypothesized to represent ancient hot spring environments, but many environments can produce hydrated silica on Earth. This study compares the mineral assemblages produced in terrestrial hot springs to those observed in silica-producing volcanic fum...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Astrobiology 2020-04, Vol.20 (4), p.453-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 453 |
container_title | Astrobiology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sun, Vivian Z Milliken, Ralph E |
description | Certain martian hydrated silica deposits have been hypothesized to represent ancient hot spring environments, but many environments can produce hydrated silica on Earth. This study compares the mineral assemblages produced in terrestrial hot springs to those observed in silica-producing volcanic fumarolic environments to determine which diagnostic features of hot springs could be remotely sensed on Mars. We find that hot spring environments are more likely to produce geochemically mature silica (
, opal-CT and microcrystalline quartz) in addition to opal-A, whereas volcanic fumarolic environments tend to produce only opal-A, potentially reflecting differences in water-to-rock ratios. Neutral/alkaline hot springs contain few accessory minerals (typically calcite and Fe/Mg clays), while acidic hot springs commonly contain accessory kaolinite. By comparison, mineral assemblages at volcanic fumaroles contain protolith igneous minerals and a diversity of alteration minerals indicative of acidic conditions. Based on these terrestrial observations, the presence of opal-CT and/or microcrystalline quartz could be more diagnostic of a hot spring origin rather than a fumarolic origin, and accessory mineralogy could provide information on formation pH. On Mars, we observe that most orbital opal detections in outcrop are opal-A, sometimes accompanied by Fe/Mg clays, suggestive of neutral/alkaline conditions. However, these observations do not uniquely distinguish between hot springs and fumarolic environments, as opal-A can occur in both environments. Many martian silica detections occur in regionally extensive units, and sometimes in association with fluvial landforms suggesting a detrital or lower temperature authigenic origin. Thus, only a few martian opal detections may be mineralogically, spatially, and morphologically consistent with a hot spring origin. However, although it is difficult to unambiguously identify martian hot spring environments from orbital data sets, the orbital data are still valuable for identifying siliceous sites that are consistent with higher biosignature preservation potential, that is, sites with opal-A (not opal-CT), for future
investigations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/ast.2018.2003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296125200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2296125200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-895509b766046c891ce437f5ae8f00be62f40c29b82b3030af231b9fd88f92a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkT1v2zAQhokiRe24HbMGBLJ0kXskRYkaDcdtCsTw0HYmTjLpyJBIh6QDpL--FPIxdOFxePDe4XkJuWKwZKCabxjTkgNT-QHxgcyZlHWhoIaL6S9YwaAuZ-QyxiMAE7ypPpGZYLKUUFdzclg_YMAumdD_7d2BpgdDt70zAQe6itGM7YAHE6m39M4n-usUJmrjnvrg3WhcihTdnq5Op6HvMPXeRZo83WKIdBfaPuWcW0z4mXy0OETz5XUuyJ_vm9_ru-J-9-PnenVfoFAiFaqREpq2riooq041rDOlqK1EoyxAaypuS-h40yreChCAlgvWNnavlG04SrEgX19yT8E_nk1MeuxjZ4YBnfHnqHkWwLicZC3IzX_o0Z-Dy9dpLvLqqsr6MlW8UF3wMQZjdVYwYnjWDPTUgM4N6KkBPYVm_vo19dyOZv9OvykX_wB4poCJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389166531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sun, Vivian Z ; Milliken, Ralph E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Vivian Z ; Milliken, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><description>Certain martian hydrated silica deposits have been hypothesized to represent ancient hot spring environments, but many environments can produce hydrated silica on Earth. This study compares the mineral assemblages produced in terrestrial hot springs to those observed in silica-producing volcanic fumarolic environments to determine which diagnostic features of hot springs could be remotely sensed on Mars. We find that hot spring environments are more likely to produce geochemically mature silica (
, opal-CT and microcrystalline quartz) in addition to opal-A, whereas volcanic fumarolic environments tend to produce only opal-A, potentially reflecting differences in water-to-rock ratios. Neutral/alkaline hot springs contain few accessory minerals (typically calcite and Fe/Mg clays), while acidic hot springs commonly contain accessory kaolinite. By comparison, mineral assemblages at volcanic fumaroles contain protolith igneous minerals and a diversity of alteration minerals indicative of acidic conditions. Based on these terrestrial observations, the presence of opal-CT and/or microcrystalline quartz could be more diagnostic of a hot spring origin rather than a fumarolic origin, and accessory mineralogy could provide information on formation pH. On Mars, we observe that most orbital opal detections in outcrop are opal-A, sometimes accompanied by Fe/Mg clays, suggestive of neutral/alkaline conditions. However, these observations do not uniquely distinguish between hot springs and fumarolic environments, as opal-A can occur in both environments. Many martian silica detections occur in regionally extensive units, and sometimes in association with fluvial landforms suggesting a detrital or lower temperature authigenic origin. Thus, only a few martian opal detections may be mineralogically, spatially, and morphologically consistent with a hot spring origin. However, although it is difficult to unambiguously identify martian hot spring environments from orbital data sets, the orbital data are still valuable for identifying siliceous sites that are consistent with higher biosignature preservation potential, that is, sites with opal-A (not opal-CT), for future
investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-1074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.2003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31545076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Calcite ; Clay ; Diagnostic systems ; Fumaroles ; Hot springs ; Iron ; Kaolinite ; Landforms ; Magnesium ; Mars ; Mineral assemblages ; Mineralogy ; Minerals ; Opal ; Outcrops ; Preservation ; Quartz ; Ratios ; Remote sensing ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Spring ; Terrestrial environments ; Water springs</subject><ispartof>Astrobiology, 2020-04, Vol.20 (4), p.453-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-895509b766046c891ce437f5ae8f00be62f40c29b82b3030af231b9fd88f92a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-895509b766046c891ce437f5ae8f00be62f40c29b82b3030af231b9fd88f92a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Vivian Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milliken, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data</title><title>Astrobiology</title><addtitle>Astrobiology</addtitle><description>Certain martian hydrated silica deposits have been hypothesized to represent ancient hot spring environments, but many environments can produce hydrated silica on Earth. This study compares the mineral assemblages produced in terrestrial hot springs to those observed in silica-producing volcanic fumarolic environments to determine which diagnostic features of hot springs could be remotely sensed on Mars. We find that hot spring environments are more likely to produce geochemically mature silica (
, opal-CT and microcrystalline quartz) in addition to opal-A, whereas volcanic fumarolic environments tend to produce only opal-A, potentially reflecting differences in water-to-rock ratios. Neutral/alkaline hot springs contain few accessory minerals (typically calcite and Fe/Mg clays), while acidic hot springs commonly contain accessory kaolinite. By comparison, mineral assemblages at volcanic fumaroles contain protolith igneous minerals and a diversity of alteration minerals indicative of acidic conditions. Based on these terrestrial observations, the presence of opal-CT and/or microcrystalline quartz could be more diagnostic of a hot spring origin rather than a fumarolic origin, and accessory mineralogy could provide information on formation pH. On Mars, we observe that most orbital opal detections in outcrop are opal-A, sometimes accompanied by Fe/Mg clays, suggestive of neutral/alkaline conditions. However, these observations do not uniquely distinguish between hot springs and fumarolic environments, as opal-A can occur in both environments. Many martian silica detections occur in regionally extensive units, and sometimes in association with fluvial landforms suggesting a detrital or lower temperature authigenic origin. Thus, only a few martian opal detections may be mineralogically, spatially, and morphologically consistent with a hot spring origin. However, although it is difficult to unambiguously identify martian hot spring environments from orbital data sets, the orbital data are still valuable for identifying siliceous sites that are consistent with higher biosignature preservation potential, that is, sites with opal-A (not opal-CT), for future
investigations.</description><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Fumaroles</subject><subject>Hot springs</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Kaolinite</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mineral assemblages</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Opal</subject><subject>Outcrops</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Water springs</subject><issn>1531-1074</issn><issn>1557-8070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkT1v2zAQhokiRe24HbMGBLJ0kXskRYkaDcdtCsTw0HYmTjLpyJBIh6QDpL--FPIxdOFxePDe4XkJuWKwZKCabxjTkgNT-QHxgcyZlHWhoIaL6S9YwaAuZ-QyxiMAE7ypPpGZYLKUUFdzclg_YMAumdD_7d2BpgdDt70zAQe6itGM7YAHE6m39M4n-usUJmrjnvrg3WhcihTdnq5Op6HvMPXeRZo83WKIdBfaPuWcW0z4mXy0OETz5XUuyJ_vm9_ru-J-9-PnenVfoFAiFaqREpq2riooq041rDOlqK1EoyxAaypuS-h40yreChCAlgvWNnavlG04SrEgX19yT8E_nk1MeuxjZ4YBnfHnqHkWwLicZC3IzX_o0Z-Dy9dpLvLqqsr6MlW8UF3wMQZjdVYwYnjWDPTUgM4N6KkBPYVm_vo19dyOZv9OvykX_wB4poCJ</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Sun, Vivian Z</creator><creator>Milliken, Ralph E</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data</title><author>Sun, Vivian Z ; Milliken, Ralph E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-895509b766046c891ce437f5ae8f00be62f40c29b82b3030af231b9fd88f92a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Fumaroles</topic><topic>Hot springs</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Kaolinite</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mineral assemblages</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Opal</topic><topic>Outcrops</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Water springs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Vivian Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milliken, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Astrobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Vivian Z</au><au>Milliken, Ralph E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data</atitle><jtitle>Astrobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Astrobiology</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>453-474</pages><issn>1531-1074</issn><eissn>1557-8070</eissn><abstract>Certain martian hydrated silica deposits have been hypothesized to represent ancient hot spring environments, but many environments can produce hydrated silica on Earth. This study compares the mineral assemblages produced in terrestrial hot springs to those observed in silica-producing volcanic fumarolic environments to determine which diagnostic features of hot springs could be remotely sensed on Mars. We find that hot spring environments are more likely to produce geochemically mature silica (
, opal-CT and microcrystalline quartz) in addition to opal-A, whereas volcanic fumarolic environments tend to produce only opal-A, potentially reflecting differences in water-to-rock ratios. Neutral/alkaline hot springs contain few accessory minerals (typically calcite and Fe/Mg clays), while acidic hot springs commonly contain accessory kaolinite. By comparison, mineral assemblages at volcanic fumaroles contain protolith igneous minerals and a diversity of alteration minerals indicative of acidic conditions. Based on these terrestrial observations, the presence of opal-CT and/or microcrystalline quartz could be more diagnostic of a hot spring origin rather than a fumarolic origin, and accessory mineralogy could provide information on formation pH. On Mars, we observe that most orbital opal detections in outcrop are opal-A, sometimes accompanied by Fe/Mg clays, suggestive of neutral/alkaline conditions. However, these observations do not uniquely distinguish between hot springs and fumarolic environments, as opal-A can occur in both environments. Many martian silica detections occur in regionally extensive units, and sometimes in association with fluvial landforms suggesting a detrital or lower temperature authigenic origin. Thus, only a few martian opal detections may be mineralogically, spatially, and morphologically consistent with a hot spring origin. However, although it is difficult to unambiguously identify martian hot spring environments from orbital data sets, the orbital data are still valuable for identifying siliceous sites that are consistent with higher biosignature preservation potential, that is, sites with opal-A (not opal-CT), for future
investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>31545076</pmid><doi>10.1089/ast.2018.2003</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-1074 |
ispartof | Astrobiology, 2020-04, Vol.20 (4), p.453-474 |
issn | 1531-1074 1557-8070 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296125200 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Calcite Clay Diagnostic systems Fumaroles Hot springs Iron Kaolinite Landforms Magnesium Mars Mineral assemblages Mineralogy Minerals Opal Outcrops Preservation Quartz Ratios Remote sensing Silica Silicon dioxide Spring Terrestrial environments Water springs |
title | Characterizing the Mineral Assemblages of Hot Spring Environments and Applications to Mars Orbital Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20the%20Mineral%20Assemblages%20of%20Hot%20Spring%20Environments%20and%20Applications%20to%20Mars%20Orbital%20Data&rft.jtitle=Astrobiology&rft.au=Sun,%20Vivian%20Z&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=453-474&rft.issn=1531-1074&rft.eissn=1557-8070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/ast.2018.2003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2296125200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389166531&rft_id=info:pmid/31545076&rfr_iscdi=true |