Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China
Cervical cancer rates in China remain high, with only limited opportunistic screening in urban centers and large mostly unscreened rural areas. Cervical cytology practices in China have been changing over the last decade with introduction of The Bethesda System reporting terminology, liquid-based cy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC 2019-09, Vol.8 (5), p.250-257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 257 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 250 |
container_title | Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Tao, Xiang Austin, R. Marshall Kong, Lingfei Sun, Qing Lv, Qinjie Xu, Haimiao Meng, Gang Huang, Xianghua Hao, Min Zhou, Qiao Zhou, Xianrong Wang, Liantang Zhang, Yue Xu, Shuxia Shi, Qingfang Zhou, Qi Guo, Linchuan Zeng, Sien Wang, Yulan Zhou, Jianhua Nie, Xiu Tian, Lixiang Shen, Danhua Lei, Zi Liu, Yixin Mei, Jinhong Wong, Kam Weng Cheung, Annie A.Y. Li, Juan Zhu, Minghua Zhao, Chengquan |
description | Cervical cancer rates in China remain high, with only limited opportunistic screening in urban centers and large mostly unscreened rural areas. Cervical cytology practices in China have been changing over the last decade with introduction of The Bethesda System reporting terminology, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and programs for cervical cytology screening of underserved rural populations. An effort was undertaken for the first time to collect nationwide data on cervical cytology laboratory practices in China, a possible first step toward increased standardization and potential development of nationwide cytology quality benchmarks.
Data on cervical cytology practices from 1572 laboratories operating in 26 nationwide Provisional Level Administrative Divisions was collected in an online survey approved through the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai.
Over 90% of cervical cytology laboratories in China now solely use Bethesda System reporting terminology. LBC is now the most commonly utilized form of cervical cytology, with lower-cost Chinese-manufactured LBC formulations used in almost 70% of laboratories. Nationwide, significantly higher abnormal cytology rates were reported with LBC than with the conventional Papanicolaou smear (CPS); however, the CPS remains a useful low-cost alternative as China strives to extend cervical screening to large underserved rural areas.
Abnormal cytology rates were not significantly different when different levels of hospitals were compared. The survey identified nationwide opportunities for cytology quality improvement, including low rates of reporting of unsatisfactory cases and low rates for atypical glandular cells. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.02.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296117692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213294519300043</els_id><sourcerecordid>2296117692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-b1a919d550684f314e44d73389a1ce53cc030733d4be3dd96f00ac4b8ce3e4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9Ax4kRy-J-5W0C16kfkLRi56XzexEt6TZuptU8u9NaRVPzmVm4JkX5iHknNGMUVZcrbKViZBxylRGeUYpPyJjzplIuZL58Z95RKYxruhQakZ5Lk7JSLBcCs7lmNw-m9b55stZTGIXttgnvkoAw9aBqRPoW1_79z6pTemDaX3ok00w0DrAmLgmWXy4xpyRk8rUEaeHPiFv93evi8d0-fLwtLhZpsBnrE1LZhRTNs9pMZeVYBKltDMh5sowwFwAUEGH3coShbWqqCg1IMs5oECppJiQy33uJvjPDmOr1y4C1rVp0HdRc64KxmaF4gPK9ygEH2PASm-CW5vQa0b1TqBe6Z1AvROoKdeDwOHo4pDflWu0vyc_ugbgeg_g8OXWYdARHDaA1gWEVlvv_sv_BqCvgNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2296117692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tao, Xiang ; Austin, R. Marshall ; Kong, Lingfei ; Sun, Qing ; Lv, Qinjie ; Xu, Haimiao ; Meng, Gang ; Huang, Xianghua ; Hao, Min ; Zhou, Qiao ; Zhou, Xianrong ; Wang, Liantang ; Zhang, Yue ; Xu, Shuxia ; Shi, Qingfang ; Zhou, Qi ; Guo, Linchuan ; Zeng, Sien ; Wang, Yulan ; Zhou, Jianhua ; Nie, Xiu ; Tian, Lixiang ; Shen, Danhua ; Lei, Zi ; Liu, Yixin ; Mei, Jinhong ; Wong, Kam Weng ; Cheung, Annie A.Y. ; Li, Juan ; Zhu, Minghua ; Zhao, Chengquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tao, Xiang ; Austin, R. Marshall ; Kong, Lingfei ; Sun, Qing ; Lv, Qinjie ; Xu, Haimiao ; Meng, Gang ; Huang, Xianghua ; Hao, Min ; Zhou, Qiao ; Zhou, Xianrong ; Wang, Liantang ; Zhang, Yue ; Xu, Shuxia ; Shi, Qingfang ; Zhou, Qi ; Guo, Linchuan ; Zeng, Sien ; Wang, Yulan ; Zhou, Jianhua ; Nie, Xiu ; Tian, Lixiang ; Shen, Danhua ; Lei, Zi ; Liu, Yixin ; Mei, Jinhong ; Wong, Kam Weng ; Cheung, Annie A.Y. ; Li, Juan ; Zhu, Minghua ; Zhao, Chengquan</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical cancer rates in China remain high, with only limited opportunistic screening in urban centers and large mostly unscreened rural areas. Cervical cytology practices in China have been changing over the last decade with introduction of The Bethesda System reporting terminology, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and programs for cervical cytology screening of underserved rural populations. An effort was undertaken for the first time to collect nationwide data on cervical cytology laboratory practices in China, a possible first step toward increased standardization and potential development of nationwide cytology quality benchmarks.
Data on cervical cytology practices from 1572 laboratories operating in 26 nationwide Provisional Level Administrative Divisions was collected in an online survey approved through the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai.
Over 90% of cervical cytology laboratories in China now solely use Bethesda System reporting terminology. LBC is now the most commonly utilized form of cervical cytology, with lower-cost Chinese-manufactured LBC formulations used in almost 70% of laboratories. Nationwide, significantly higher abnormal cytology rates were reported with LBC than with the conventional Papanicolaou smear (CPS); however, the CPS remains a useful low-cost alternative as China strives to extend cervical screening to large underserved rural areas.
Abnormal cytology rates were not significantly different when different levels of hospitals were compared. The survey identified nationwide opportunities for cytology quality improvement, including low rates of reporting of unsatisfactory cases and low rates for atypical glandular cells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-2945</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-2945</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.02.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31543224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cervical cancer screening ; China ; National survey ; Papanicolaou smear ; TBS report rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC, 2019-09, Vol.8 (5), p.250-257</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Cytopathology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-b1a919d550684f314e44d73389a1ce53cc030733d4be3dd96f00ac4b8ce3e4943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-b1a919d550684f314e44d73389a1ce53cc030733d4be3dd96f00ac4b8ce3e4943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, R. Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Lingfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haimiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liantang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shuxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qingfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Linchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Sien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Xiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Lixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Danhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Zi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Jinhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kam Weng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Annie A.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chengquan</creatorcontrib><title>Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Cervical cancer rates in China remain high, with only limited opportunistic screening in urban centers and large mostly unscreened rural areas. Cervical cytology practices in China have been changing over the last decade with introduction of The Bethesda System reporting terminology, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and programs for cervical cytology screening of underserved rural populations. An effort was undertaken for the first time to collect nationwide data on cervical cytology laboratory practices in China, a possible first step toward increased standardization and potential development of nationwide cytology quality benchmarks.
Data on cervical cytology practices from 1572 laboratories operating in 26 nationwide Provisional Level Administrative Divisions was collected in an online survey approved through the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai.
Over 90% of cervical cytology laboratories in China now solely use Bethesda System reporting terminology. LBC is now the most commonly utilized form of cervical cytology, with lower-cost Chinese-manufactured LBC formulations used in almost 70% of laboratories. Nationwide, significantly higher abnormal cytology rates were reported with LBC than with the conventional Papanicolaou smear (CPS); however, the CPS remains a useful low-cost alternative as China strives to extend cervical screening to large underserved rural areas.
Abnormal cytology rates were not significantly different when different levels of hospitals were compared. The survey identified nationwide opportunities for cytology quality improvement, including low rates of reporting of unsatisfactory cases and low rates for atypical glandular cells.</description><subject>Cervical cancer screening</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>National survey</subject><subject>Papanicolaou smear</subject><subject>TBS report rate</subject><issn>2213-2945</issn><issn>2213-2945</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9Ax4kRy-J-5W0C16kfkLRi56XzexEt6TZuptU8u9NaRVPzmVm4JkX5iHknNGMUVZcrbKViZBxylRGeUYpPyJjzplIuZL58Z95RKYxruhQakZ5Lk7JSLBcCs7lmNw-m9b55stZTGIXttgnvkoAw9aBqRPoW1_79z6pTemDaX3ok00w0DrAmLgmWXy4xpyRk8rUEaeHPiFv93evi8d0-fLwtLhZpsBnrE1LZhRTNs9pMZeVYBKltDMh5sowwFwAUEGH3coShbWqqCg1IMs5oECppJiQy33uJvjPDmOr1y4C1rVp0HdRc64KxmaF4gPK9ygEH2PASm-CW5vQa0b1TqBe6Z1AvROoKdeDwOHo4pDflWu0vyc_ugbgeg_g8OXWYdARHDaA1gWEVlvv_sv_BqCvgNo</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Tao, Xiang</creator><creator>Austin, R. Marshall</creator><creator>Kong, Lingfei</creator><creator>Sun, Qing</creator><creator>Lv, Qinjie</creator><creator>Xu, Haimiao</creator><creator>Meng, Gang</creator><creator>Huang, Xianghua</creator><creator>Hao, Min</creator><creator>Zhou, Qiao</creator><creator>Zhou, Xianrong</creator><creator>Wang, Liantang</creator><creator>Zhang, Yue</creator><creator>Xu, Shuxia</creator><creator>Shi, Qingfang</creator><creator>Zhou, Qi</creator><creator>Guo, Linchuan</creator><creator>Zeng, Sien</creator><creator>Wang, Yulan</creator><creator>Zhou, Jianhua</creator><creator>Nie, Xiu</creator><creator>Tian, Lixiang</creator><creator>Shen, Danhua</creator><creator>Lei, Zi</creator><creator>Liu, Yixin</creator><creator>Mei, Jinhong</creator><creator>Wong, Kam Weng</creator><creator>Cheung, Annie A.Y.</creator><creator>Li, Juan</creator><creator>Zhu, Minghua</creator><creator>Zhao, Chengquan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China</title><author>Tao, Xiang ; Austin, R. Marshall ; Kong, Lingfei ; Sun, Qing ; Lv, Qinjie ; Xu, Haimiao ; Meng, Gang ; Huang, Xianghua ; Hao, Min ; Zhou, Qiao ; Zhou, Xianrong ; Wang, Liantang ; Zhang, Yue ; Xu, Shuxia ; Shi, Qingfang ; Zhou, Qi ; Guo, Linchuan ; Zeng, Sien ; Wang, Yulan ; Zhou, Jianhua ; Nie, Xiu ; Tian, Lixiang ; Shen, Danhua ; Lei, Zi ; Liu, Yixin ; Mei, Jinhong ; Wong, Kam Weng ; Cheung, Annie A.Y. ; Li, Juan ; Zhu, Minghua ; Zhao, Chengquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-b1a919d550684f314e44d73389a1ce53cc030733d4be3dd96f00ac4b8ce3e4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cervical cancer screening</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>National survey</topic><topic>Papanicolaou smear</topic><topic>TBS report rate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tao, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, R. Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Lingfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haimiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liantang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shuxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qingfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Linchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Sien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Xiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Lixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Danhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Zi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Jinhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kam Weng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Annie A.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Chengquan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tao, Xiang</au><au>Austin, R. Marshall</au><au>Kong, Lingfei</au><au>Sun, Qing</au><au>Lv, Qinjie</au><au>Xu, Haimiao</au><au>Meng, Gang</au><au>Huang, Xianghua</au><au>Hao, Min</au><au>Zhou, Qiao</au><au>Zhou, Xianrong</au><au>Wang, Liantang</au><au>Zhang, Yue</au><au>Xu, Shuxia</au><au>Shi, Qingfang</au><au>Zhou, Qi</au><au>Guo, Linchuan</au><au>Zeng, Sien</au><au>Wang, Yulan</au><au>Zhou, Jianhua</au><au>Nie, Xiu</au><au>Tian, Lixiang</au><au>Shen, Danhua</au><au>Lei, Zi</au><au>Liu, Yixin</au><au>Mei, Jinhong</au><au>Wong, Kam Weng</au><au>Cheung, Annie A.Y.</au><au>Li, Juan</au><au>Zhu, Minghua</au><au>Zhao, Chengquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>2213-2945</issn><eissn>2213-2945</eissn><abstract>Cervical cancer rates in China remain high, with only limited opportunistic screening in urban centers and large mostly unscreened rural areas. Cervical cytology practices in China have been changing over the last decade with introduction of The Bethesda System reporting terminology, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and programs for cervical cytology screening of underserved rural populations. An effort was undertaken for the first time to collect nationwide data on cervical cytology laboratory practices in China, a possible first step toward increased standardization and potential development of nationwide cytology quality benchmarks.
Data on cervical cytology practices from 1572 laboratories operating in 26 nationwide Provisional Level Administrative Divisions was collected in an online survey approved through the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai.
Over 90% of cervical cytology laboratories in China now solely use Bethesda System reporting terminology. LBC is now the most commonly utilized form of cervical cytology, with lower-cost Chinese-manufactured LBC formulations used in almost 70% of laboratories. Nationwide, significantly higher abnormal cytology rates were reported with LBC than with the conventional Papanicolaou smear (CPS); however, the CPS remains a useful low-cost alternative as China strives to extend cervical screening to large underserved rural areas.
Abnormal cytology rates were not significantly different when different levels of hospitals were compared. The survey identified nationwide opportunities for cytology quality improvement, including low rates of reporting of unsatisfactory cases and low rates for atypical glandular cells.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31543224</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jasc.2019.02.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2213-2945 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology JASC, 2019-09, Vol.8 (5), p.250-257 |
issn | 2213-2945 2213-2945 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2296117692 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cervical cancer screening China National survey Papanicolaou smear TBS report rate |
title | Nationwide survey of cervical cytology laboratory practices in China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A36%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nationwide%20survey%20of%20cervical%20cytology%20laboratory%20practices%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Cytopathology%20JASC&rft.au=Tao,%20Xiang&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=2213-2945&rft.eissn=2213-2945&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jasc.2019.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2296117692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2296117692&rft_id=info:pmid/31543224&rft_els_id=S2213294519300043&rfr_iscdi=true |