Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data

•Surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk during running.•Data were collected from a wearable device during running trials on three surfaces.•Feature-based and deep-learning algorithms were developed to identify the surfaces.•The trained algorithms classifier the three su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2019-10, Vol.74, p.176-181
Hauptverfasser: Dixon, P.C., Schütte, K.H., Vanwanseele, B., Jacobs, J.V., Dennerlein, J.T., Schiffman, J.M., Fournier, P-A, Hu, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue
container_start_page 176
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 74
creator Dixon, P.C.
Schütte, K.H.
Vanwanseele, B.
Jacobs, J.V.
Dennerlein, J.T.
Schiffman, J.M.
Fournier, P-A
Hu, B.
description •Surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk during running.•Data were collected from a wearable device during running trials on three surfaces.•Feature-based and deep-learning algorithms were developed to identify the surfaces.•The trained algorithms classifier the three surfaces with high accuracy (> 91.4%).•Machine learning could help runners and coaches monitor training load by surface. Running is a popular physical activity that benefits health; however, running surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk. Machine learning algorithms could automatically identify running surface from wearable motion sensors to quantify running exposures, and perhaps loading and injury risk for a runner. (1) How accurately can machine learning algorithms identify surface type from three-dimensional accelerometer sensors? (2) Does the sensor count (single or two-sensor setup) affect model accuracy? Twenty-nine healthy adults (23.3 ± 3.6 years, 1.8 ± 0.1 m, and 63.6 ± 8.5 kg) participated in this study. Participants ran on three different surfaces (concrete, synthetic, woodchip) while fit with two three-dimensional accelerometers (lower-back and right tibia). Summary features (n = 208) were extracted from the accelerometer signals. Feature-based Gradient Boosting (GB) and signal-based deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were developed. Models were trained on 90% of the data and tested on the remaining 10%. The process was repeated five times, with data randomly shuffled between train-test splits, to quantify model performance variability. All models and configurations achieved greater than 90% average accuracy. The highest performing models were the two-sensor GB and tibia-sensor CNN (average accuracy of 97.0 ± 0.7 and 96.1 ± 2.6%, respectively). Machine learning algorithms trained on running data from a single- or dual-sensor accelerometer setup can accurately distinguish between surfaces types. Automatic identification of surfaces encountered during running activities could help runners and coaches better monitor training load, improve performance, and reduce injury rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2295488568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636219307064</els_id><sourcerecordid>2295488568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a1cf4d6bde3844b8930da2e7bd6db742c6799f1fda942b708b72c8428ebe3cdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8QuUjlxQviWPfQIhNAnGBs-XYk9ZVEhfbQerbk1LgijTSXP5l5kNoTsmCEiqu1oul8XkTUl4wQtWCTEOqAzSjslYFY1QdohlRQhSCC3aCTlNaE0JKLtkxOuG04qpWcobaF2NXfgDcgYmDH5bYdMsQfV71CVszYNuZlHy7xWHMLoSIM8Ro_IDzdgMJuzHuTHEcvs1j-o6wFjqIoYcct9iZbM7RUWu6BBc_-wy939-93T4Wz68PT7c3z4XlQubCUNuWTjQOuCzLRipOnGFQN064pi6ZFbVSLW2dUSVraiKbmllZMgkNcOtafoYu97mbGD5GSFn3Pk3HdGaAMCbNmKpKKSshJ6nYS20MKUVo9Sb63sStpkTvGOu1_mWsd4w1mYZUk3H-0zE2Pbg_2y_USXC9F8D06aeHqJP1MFhwPoLN2gX_X8cXCdiUng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295488568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dixon, P.C. ; Schütte, K.H. ; Vanwanseele, B. ; Jacobs, J.V. ; Dennerlein, J.T. ; Schiffman, J.M. ; Fournier, P-A ; Hu, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dixon, P.C. ; Schütte, K.H. ; Vanwanseele, B. ; Jacobs, J.V. ; Dennerlein, J.T. ; Schiffman, J.M. ; Fournier, P-A ; Hu, B.</creatorcontrib><description>•Surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk during running.•Data were collected from a wearable device during running trials on three surfaces.•Feature-based and deep-learning algorithms were developed to identify the surfaces.•The trained algorithms classifier the three surfaces with high accuracy (&gt; 91.4%).•Machine learning could help runners and coaches monitor training load by surface. Running is a popular physical activity that benefits health; however, running surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk. Machine learning algorithms could automatically identify running surface from wearable motion sensors to quantify running exposures, and perhaps loading and injury risk for a runner. (1) How accurately can machine learning algorithms identify surface type from three-dimensional accelerometer sensors? (2) Does the sensor count (single or two-sensor setup) affect model accuracy? Twenty-nine healthy adults (23.3 ± 3.6 years, 1.8 ± 0.1 m, and 63.6 ± 8.5 kg) participated in this study. Participants ran on three different surfaces (concrete, synthetic, woodchip) while fit with two three-dimensional accelerometers (lower-back and right tibia). Summary features (n = 208) were extracted from the accelerometer signals. Feature-based Gradient Boosting (GB) and signal-based deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were developed. Models were trained on 90% of the data and tested on the remaining 10%. The process was repeated five times, with data randomly shuffled between train-test splits, to quantify model performance variability. All models and configurations achieved greater than 90% average accuracy. The highest performing models were the two-sensor GB and tibia-sensor CNN (average accuracy of 97.0 ± 0.7 and 96.1 ± 2.6%, respectively). Machine learning algorithms trained on running data from a single- or dual-sensor accelerometer setup can accurately distinguish between surfaces types. Automatic identification of surfaces encountered during running activities could help runners and coaches better monitor training load, improve performance, and reduce injury rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31539798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accelerometer ; Accelerometry - methods ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Automatic classification ; Convolutional neural network ; Deep learning ; Exercise ; Female ; Gradient boosting ; Humans ; Inertial measurement unit ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Running - physiology ; Uneven surface ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2019-10, Vol.74, p.176-181</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a1cf4d6bde3844b8930da2e7bd6db742c6799f1fda942b708b72c8428ebe3cdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a1cf4d6bde3844b8930da2e7bd6db742c6799f1fda942b708b72c8428ebe3cdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636219307064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dixon, P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütte, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwanseele, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, J.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennerlein, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, P-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>•Surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk during running.•Data were collected from a wearable device during running trials on three surfaces.•Feature-based and deep-learning algorithms were developed to identify the surfaces.•The trained algorithms classifier the three surfaces with high accuracy (&gt; 91.4%).•Machine learning could help runners and coaches monitor training load by surface. Running is a popular physical activity that benefits health; however, running surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk. Machine learning algorithms could automatically identify running surface from wearable motion sensors to quantify running exposures, and perhaps loading and injury risk for a runner. (1) How accurately can machine learning algorithms identify surface type from three-dimensional accelerometer sensors? (2) Does the sensor count (single or two-sensor setup) affect model accuracy? Twenty-nine healthy adults (23.3 ± 3.6 years, 1.8 ± 0.1 m, and 63.6 ± 8.5 kg) participated in this study. Participants ran on three different surfaces (concrete, synthetic, woodchip) while fit with two three-dimensional accelerometers (lower-back and right tibia). Summary features (n = 208) were extracted from the accelerometer signals. Feature-based Gradient Boosting (GB) and signal-based deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were developed. Models were trained on 90% of the data and tested on the remaining 10%. The process was repeated five times, with data randomly shuffled between train-test splits, to quantify model performance variability. All models and configurations achieved greater than 90% average accuracy. The highest performing models were the two-sensor GB and tibia-sensor CNN (average accuracy of 97.0 ± 0.7 and 96.1 ± 2.6%, respectively). Machine learning algorithms trained on running data from a single- or dual-sensor accelerometer setup can accurately distinguish between surfaces types. Automatic identification of surfaces encountered during running activities could help runners and coaches better monitor training load, improve performance, and reduce injury rates.</description><subject>Accelerometer</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Automatic classification</subject><subject>Convolutional neural network</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gradient boosting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inertial measurement unit</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Uneven surface</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8QuUjlxQviWPfQIhNAnGBs-XYk9ZVEhfbQerbk1LgijTSXP5l5kNoTsmCEiqu1oul8XkTUl4wQtWCTEOqAzSjslYFY1QdohlRQhSCC3aCTlNaE0JKLtkxOuG04qpWcobaF2NXfgDcgYmDH5bYdMsQfV71CVszYNuZlHy7xWHMLoSIM8Ro_IDzdgMJuzHuTHEcvs1j-o6wFjqIoYcct9iZbM7RUWu6BBc_-wy939-93T4Wz68PT7c3z4XlQubCUNuWTjQOuCzLRipOnGFQN064pi6ZFbVSLW2dUSVraiKbmllZMgkNcOtafoYu97mbGD5GSFn3Pk3HdGaAMCbNmKpKKSshJ6nYS20MKUVo9Sb63sStpkTvGOu1_mWsd4w1mYZUk3H-0zE2Pbg_2y_USXC9F8D06aeHqJP1MFhwPoLN2gX_X8cXCdiUng</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Dixon, P.C.</creator><creator>Schütte, K.H.</creator><creator>Vanwanseele, B.</creator><creator>Jacobs, J.V.</creator><creator>Dennerlein, J.T.</creator><creator>Schiffman, J.M.</creator><creator>Fournier, P-A</creator><creator>Hu, B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data</title><author>Dixon, P.C. ; Schütte, K.H. ; Vanwanseele, B. ; Jacobs, J.V. ; Dennerlein, J.T. ; Schiffman, J.M. ; Fournier, P-A ; Hu, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a1cf4d6bde3844b8930da2e7bd6db742c6799f1fda942b708b72c8428ebe3cdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerometer</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Automatic classification</topic><topic>Convolutional neural network</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gradient boosting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inertial measurement unit</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Uneven surface</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dixon, P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütte, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwanseele, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, J.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennerlein, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, P-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dixon, P.C.</au><au>Schütte, K.H.</au><au>Vanwanseele, B.</au><au>Jacobs, J.V.</au><au>Dennerlein, J.T.</au><au>Schiffman, J.M.</au><au>Fournier, P-A</au><au>Hu, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><spage>176</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>176-181</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>•Surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk during running.•Data were collected from a wearable device during running trials on three surfaces.•Feature-based and deep-learning algorithms were developed to identify the surfaces.•The trained algorithms classifier the three surfaces with high accuracy (&gt; 91.4%).•Machine learning could help runners and coaches monitor training load by surface. Running is a popular physical activity that benefits health; however, running surface characteristics may influence loading impact and injury risk. Machine learning algorithms could automatically identify running surface from wearable motion sensors to quantify running exposures, and perhaps loading and injury risk for a runner. (1) How accurately can machine learning algorithms identify surface type from three-dimensional accelerometer sensors? (2) Does the sensor count (single or two-sensor setup) affect model accuracy? Twenty-nine healthy adults (23.3 ± 3.6 years, 1.8 ± 0.1 m, and 63.6 ± 8.5 kg) participated in this study. Participants ran on three different surfaces (concrete, synthetic, woodchip) while fit with two three-dimensional accelerometers (lower-back and right tibia). Summary features (n = 208) were extracted from the accelerometer signals. Feature-based Gradient Boosting (GB) and signal-based deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models were developed. Models were trained on 90% of the data and tested on the remaining 10%. The process was repeated five times, with data randomly shuffled between train-test splits, to quantify model performance variability. All models and configurations achieved greater than 90% average accuracy. The highest performing models were the two-sensor GB and tibia-sensor CNN (average accuracy of 97.0 ± 0.7 and 96.1 ± 2.6%, respectively). Machine learning algorithms trained on running data from a single- or dual-sensor accelerometer setup can accurately distinguish between surfaces types. Automatic identification of surfaces encountered during running activities could help runners and coaches better monitor training load, improve performance, and reduce injury rates.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31539798</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2019-10, Vol.74, p.176-181
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2295488568
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Accelerometer
Accelerometry - methods
Adult
Algorithms
Automatic classification
Convolutional neural network
Deep learning
Exercise
Female
Gradient boosting
Humans
Inertial measurement unit
Machine Learning
Male
Neural Networks, Computer
Running - physiology
Uneven surface
Young Adult
title Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20algorithms%20can%20classify%20outdoor%20terrain%20types%20during%20running%20using%20accelerometry%20data&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Dixon,%20P.C.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=74&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=176-181&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2295488568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295488568&rft_id=info:pmid/31539798&rft_els_id=S0966636219307064&rfr_iscdi=true