Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale
The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing patient needs in palliative care. The aim of this study was to provide a validated version of the patient and staff IPOS for French-speaking Switzerland (IPOS-Fr) and assess its psychometric properties. The valid...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2019-11, Vol.58 (5), p.886-890.e5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 890.e5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 886 |
| container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Sterie, Anca-Cristina Borasio, Gian Domenico Bernard, Mathieu |
| description | The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing patient needs in palliative care.
The aim of this study was to provide a validated version of the patient and staff IPOS for French-speaking Switzerland (IPOS-Fr) and assess its psychometric properties.
The validation took place in 12 palliative care units and mobile teams. At baseline (T1) and three days later (T2), patients' general health status, palliative care needs (IPOS-Fr), and quality of life (McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised) were assessed by patients and staff.
We included 173 patients (mean age: 68.8; 92 women; 85% oncologic disease). IPOS internal consistency was high for the total score (0.69 and 0.71). Staff-patient interrater agreement was good to moderate for 13 items (intraclass correlations >0.516). Results indicated strong correlations between IPOS-Fr and McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised for the total score (−0.623 at T1) and the psychological domain (Item 11: −0.601 at T1; Item 13: −0.633 at T2). Regarding sensitivity to change, there was a significant difference between T1 and T2 for patients with an improved health condition (z = −2.326; P = 0.020).
IPOS-Fr has fair to good validity, especially with regard to interrater agreement and construct validity, is sensitive to positive change, and has good interpretability and acceptability for patients and staff. IPOS-Fr is not optimal in terms of internal consistency and structure when using subscale scores, except for the emotional subscale. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2295486939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392419303859</els_id><sourcerecordid>2295486939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-4d8d4054f87fde9848613ac5ea7e2444dedfc2f55f7452a153b86d9f3fc7f2a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LHTEUhkNp0avtXyhTunEzYz4nyVIufoGg0NZtiMlJzTAf12RG8N-by1URV64OHJ73PYcHoV8ENwST9rhruo2NY34aBjs2FBPdYNlgQr-gFVGS1a0g7CtaYaVEzTTl--gg5w5jLFjL9tA-I4xhquQK3dzaPno7x2msplDN91CdJRjdfXULKb_bXo4z_E92Bl_d2L6PJfII1domqK6X2U0DVH-c7eE7-hZsn-HHyzxE_85O_64v6qvr88v1yVXtBKVzzb3yHAselAwetOKqJcw6AVYC5Zx78MHRIESQXFBLBLtTrdeBBScDtS07REe73k2aHhbIsxlidtD3doRpyYZSLUqpZrqgvz-g3bSksXxnKCNSSE3xltI7yqUp5wTBbFIcbHoyBJutdtOZd9rNVrvB0hTtJfvz5cJyN4B_S756LsB6B0BR8hghmexi0Qw-JnCz8VP8xJlnziiZJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2317579209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sterie, Anca-Cristina ; Borasio, Gian Domenico ; Bernard, Mathieu</creator><creatorcontrib>Sterie, Anca-Cristina ; Borasio, Gian Domenico ; Bernard, Mathieu ; the French IPOS Consortium ; French IPOS Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing patient needs in palliative care.
The aim of this study was to provide a validated version of the patient and staff IPOS for French-speaking Switzerland (IPOS-Fr) and assess its psychometric properties.
The validation took place in 12 palliative care units and mobile teams. At baseline (T1) and three days later (T2), patients' general health status, palliative care needs (IPOS-Fr), and quality of life (McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised) were assessed by patients and staff.
We included 173 patients (mean age: 68.8; 92 women; 85% oncologic disease). IPOS internal consistency was high for the total score (0.69 and 0.71). Staff-patient interrater agreement was good to moderate for 13 items (intraclass correlations >0.516). Results indicated strong correlations between IPOS-Fr and McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised for the total score (−0.623 at T1) and the psychological domain (Item 11: −0.601 at T1; Item 13: −0.633 at T2). Regarding sensitivity to change, there was a significant difference between T1 and T2 for patients with an improved health condition (z = −2.326; P = 0.020).
IPOS-Fr has fair to good validity, especially with regard to interrater agreement and construct validity, is sensitive to positive change, and has good interpretability and acceptability for patients and staff. IPOS-Fr is not optimal in terms of internal consistency and structure when using subscale scores, except for the emotional subscale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31330287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>end-of-life care ; French ; French language ; Health status ; Hospice care ; IPOS ; missing data ; Palliative care ; Patients ; psychometric validation ; Quality of life ; Quantitative psychology ; Teams ; Validity ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2019-11, Vol.58 (5), p.886-890.e5</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-4d8d4054f87fde9848613ac5ea7e2444dedfc2f55f7452a153b86d9f3fc7f2a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-4d8d4054f87fde9848613ac5ea7e2444dedfc2f55f7452a153b86d9f3fc7f2a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1607-5229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392419303859$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sterie, Anca-Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borasio, Gian Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French IPOS Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French IPOS Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing patient needs in palliative care.
The aim of this study was to provide a validated version of the patient and staff IPOS for French-speaking Switzerland (IPOS-Fr) and assess its psychometric properties.
The validation took place in 12 palliative care units and mobile teams. At baseline (T1) and three days later (T2), patients' general health status, palliative care needs (IPOS-Fr), and quality of life (McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised) were assessed by patients and staff.
We included 173 patients (mean age: 68.8; 92 women; 85% oncologic disease). IPOS internal consistency was high for the total score (0.69 and 0.71). Staff-patient interrater agreement was good to moderate for 13 items (intraclass correlations >0.516). Results indicated strong correlations between IPOS-Fr and McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised for the total score (−0.623 at T1) and the psychological domain (Item 11: −0.601 at T1; Item 13: −0.633 at T2). Regarding sensitivity to change, there was a significant difference between T1 and T2 for patients with an improved health condition (z = −2.326; P = 0.020).
IPOS-Fr has fair to good validity, especially with regard to interrater agreement and construct validity, is sensitive to positive change, and has good interpretability and acceptability for patients and staff. IPOS-Fr is not optimal in terms of internal consistency and structure when using subscale scores, except for the emotional subscale.</description><subject>end-of-life care</subject><subject>French</subject><subject>French language</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>IPOS</subject><subject>missing data</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>psychometric validation</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LHTEUhkNp0avtXyhTunEzYz4nyVIufoGg0NZtiMlJzTAf12RG8N-by1URV64OHJ73PYcHoV8ENwST9rhruo2NY34aBjs2FBPdYNlgQr-gFVGS1a0g7CtaYaVEzTTl--gg5w5jLFjL9tA-I4xhquQK3dzaPno7x2msplDN91CdJRjdfXULKb_bXo4z_E92Bl_d2L6PJfII1domqK6X2U0DVH-c7eE7-hZsn-HHyzxE_85O_64v6qvr88v1yVXtBKVzzb3yHAselAwetOKqJcw6AVYC5Zx78MHRIESQXFBLBLtTrdeBBScDtS07REe73k2aHhbIsxlidtD3doRpyYZSLUqpZrqgvz-g3bSksXxnKCNSSE3xltI7yqUp5wTBbFIcbHoyBJutdtOZd9rNVrvB0hTtJfvz5cJyN4B_S756LsB6B0BR8hghmexi0Qw-JnCz8VP8xJlnziiZJA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Sterie, Anca-Cristina</creator><creator>Borasio, Gian Domenico</creator><creator>Bernard, Mathieu</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-5229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale</title><author>Sterie, Anca-Cristina ; Borasio, Gian Domenico ; Bernard, Mathieu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-4d8d4054f87fde9848613ac5ea7e2444dedfc2f55f7452a153b86d9f3fc7f2a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>end-of-life care</topic><topic>French</topic><topic>French language</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>IPOS</topic><topic>missing data</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>psychometric validation</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sterie, Anca-Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borasio, Gian Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the French IPOS Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French IPOS Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sterie, Anca-Cristina</au><au>Borasio, Gian Domenico</au><au>Bernard, Mathieu</au><aucorp>the French IPOS Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>French IPOS Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>886</spage><epage>890.e5</epage><pages>886-890.e5</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing patient needs in palliative care.
The aim of this study was to provide a validated version of the patient and staff IPOS for French-speaking Switzerland (IPOS-Fr) and assess its psychometric properties.
The validation took place in 12 palliative care units and mobile teams. At baseline (T1) and three days later (T2), patients' general health status, palliative care needs (IPOS-Fr), and quality of life (McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised) were assessed by patients and staff.
We included 173 patients (mean age: 68.8; 92 women; 85% oncologic disease). IPOS internal consistency was high for the total score (0.69 and 0.71). Staff-patient interrater agreement was good to moderate for 13 items (intraclass correlations >0.516). Results indicated strong correlations between IPOS-Fr and McGill Quality of Life Scale–Revised for the total score (−0.623 at T1) and the psychological domain (Item 11: −0.601 at T1; Item 13: −0.633 at T2). Regarding sensitivity to change, there was a significant difference between T1 and T2 for patients with an improved health condition (z = −2.326; P = 0.020).
IPOS-Fr has fair to good validity, especially with regard to interrater agreement and construct validity, is sensitive to positive change, and has good interpretability and acceptability for patients and staff. IPOS-Fr is not optimal in terms of internal consistency and structure when using subscale scores, except for the emotional subscale.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31330287</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.012</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-5229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
| ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2019-11, Vol.58 (5), p.886-890.e5 |
| issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2295486939 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | end-of-life care French French language Health status Hospice care IPOS missing data Palliative care Patients psychometric validation Quality of life Quantitative psychology Teams Validity Women |
| title | Validation of the French Version of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T09%3A13%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20French%20Version%20of%20the%20Integrated%20Palliative%20Care%20Outcome%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Sterie,%20Anca-Cristina&rft.aucorp=the%20French%20IPOS%20Consortium&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=886&rft.epage=890.e5&rft.pages=886-890.e5&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2295486939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2317579209&rft_id=info:pmid/31330287&rft_els_id=S0885392419303859&rfr_iscdi=true |