Injecting and removing suspicious features in breast imaging with CycleGAN: A pilot study of automated adversarial attacks using neural networks on small images
•GANs can learn what makes a mammographic image look suspicious and modify the images accordingly.•GANs’ ability to modify medical images in a targeted way can be of great use in certain teaching or research settings.•With increasing memory and computing availability, GANs could potentially be used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2019-11, Vol.120, p.108649-108649, Article 108649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •GANs can learn what makes a mammographic image look suspicious and modify the images accordingly.•GANs’ ability to modify medical images in a targeted way can be of great use in certain teaching or research settings.•With increasing memory and computing availability, GANs could potentially be used as a cyber-weapon in the near future.
To train a CycleGAN on downscaled versions of mammographic data to artificially inject or remove suspicious features, and to determine whether these AI-mediated attacks can be detected by radiologists.
From two publicly available datasets, BCDR and INbreast, we selected 680 images with and without lesions as training data. An internal dataset (n = 302 cancers, n = 590 controls) served as test data. We ran two experiments (256 × 256 px and 512 × 408 px) and applied the trained model to the test data. Three radiologists read a set of images (modified and originals) and rated the presence of suspicious lesions on a scale from 1 to 5 and the likelihood of the image being manipulated. The readout was evaluated by multiple reader multiple case receiver operating characteristics (MRMC-ROC) analysis using the area under the curve (AUC).
At the lower resolution, the overall performance was not affected by the CycleGAN modifications (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.76, p = 0.67). However, one radiologist exhibited lower detection of cancer (0.85 vs 0.63, p = 0.06). The radiologists could not discriminate between original and modified images (0.55, p = 0.45). At the higher resolution, all radiologists showed significantly lower detection rate of cancer in the modified images (0.80 vs. 0.37, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108649 |