Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2020-03, Vol.29 (3), p.534-540
Hauptverfasser: Tashjian, Robert Z., Broschinsky, Kortnie, Stertz, Irene, Chalmers, Peter N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 540
container_issue 3
container_start_page 534
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 29
creator Tashjian, Robert Z.
Broschinsky, Kortnie
Stertz, Irene
Chalmers, Peter N.
description Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P = .002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P < .001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P < .001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P < .001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P < .001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274619305063</els_id><sourcerecordid>2292987211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-35ad807b5c19297644c6e8f5922d50c07389173abb4b11e84fee44699a7dbb823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qiF0oP6CXKsdeEsZOHCfqCa34klbiAPRqOfZk8cobb20HiX-PYSlHTjMaPe8rzUPITwoVBdqeb6ttxIoB7SsQFVD6jSwpr1nZcoDveQfelUw07YKcxLgFgL4BdkwWNeWs5S0syd_7FGad5qBcsXE4eWsK5ZzfBDWmIqD2U3wnrJ8KMwc7bfL1GUPEIvmUU_HJz85gKFRIT8HvnYrp5Qc5GpWLePYxT8nj1eXD6qZc313fri7Wpa55ncqaK9OBGLimPetF2zS6xW7kPWOGgwZRdz0VtRqGZqAUu2ZEbJq275Uww9Cx-pT8PvTug_83Y0xyZ6NG59SEfo6SsdzbCUZpRukB1cHHGHCU-2B3KrxICvJNp9zKrFO-6ZQgJLxnfn3Uz8MOzWfiv78M_DkAmJ98thhk1BYnjcZmd0kab7-ofwU_U4cD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292987211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tashjian, Robert Z. ; Broschinsky, Kortnie ; Stertz, Irene ; Chalmers, Peter N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tashjian, Robert Z. ; Broschinsky, Kortnie ; Stertz, Irene ; Chalmers, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><description>Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P = .002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P &lt; .001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P &lt; .001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P &lt; .001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P &lt; .001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31526560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>allograft ; bone grafting ; glenoid bone loss ; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ; shoulder arthroplasty ; shoulder replacement</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2020-03, Vol.29 (3), p.534-540</ispartof><rights>2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-35ad807b5c19297644c6e8f5922d50c07389173abb4b11e84fee44699a7dbb823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-35ad807b5c19297644c6e8f5922d50c07389173abb4b11e84fee44699a7dbb823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31526560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tashjian, Robert Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broschinsky, Kortnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stertz, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P = .002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P &lt; .001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P &lt; .001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P &lt; .001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P &lt; .001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity.</description><subject>allograft</subject><subject>bone grafting</subject><subject>glenoid bone loss</subject><subject>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>shoulder replacement</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qiF0oP6CXKsdeEsZOHCfqCa34klbiAPRqOfZk8cobb20HiX-PYSlHTjMaPe8rzUPITwoVBdqeb6ttxIoB7SsQFVD6jSwpr1nZcoDveQfelUw07YKcxLgFgL4BdkwWNeWs5S0syd_7FGad5qBcsXE4eWsK5ZzfBDWmIqD2U3wnrJ8KMwc7bfL1GUPEIvmUU_HJz85gKFRIT8HvnYrp5Qc5GpWLePYxT8nj1eXD6qZc313fri7Wpa55ncqaK9OBGLimPetF2zS6xW7kPWOGgwZRdz0VtRqGZqAUu2ZEbJq275Uww9Cx-pT8PvTug_83Y0xyZ6NG59SEfo6SsdzbCUZpRukB1cHHGHCU-2B3KrxICvJNp9zKrFO-6ZQgJLxnfn3Uz8MOzWfiv78M_DkAmJ98thhk1BYnjcZmd0kab7-ofwU_U4cD</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Tashjian, Robert Z.</creator><creator>Broschinsky, Kortnie</creator><creator>Stertz, Irene</creator><creator>Chalmers, Peter N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Tashjian, Robert Z. ; Broschinsky, Kortnie ; Stertz, Irene ; Chalmers, Peter N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-35ad807b5c19297644c6e8f5922d50c07389173abb4b11e84fee44699a7dbb823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>allograft</topic><topic>bone grafting</topic><topic>glenoid bone loss</topic><topic>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>shoulder replacement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tashjian, Robert Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broschinsky, Kortnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stertz, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Peter N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tashjian, Robert Z.</au><au>Broschinsky, Kortnie</au><au>Stertz, Irene</au><au>Chalmers, Peter N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>534-540</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P = .002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P &lt; .001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P &lt; .001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P &lt; .001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P &lt; .001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31526560</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2020-03, Vol.29 (3), p.534-540
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987211
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects allograft
bone grafting
glenoid bone loss
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
shoulder arthroplasty
shoulder replacement
title Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20glenoid%20allograft%20reconstruction%20during%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Tashjian,%20Robert%20Z.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=534-540&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292987211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292987211&rft_id=info:pmid/31526560&rft_els_id=S1058274619305063&rfr_iscdi=true