A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine
Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 978 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 974 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Miyashita, Tomohiro Kato, Kei Takaoka, Hiromitsu Ataka, Hiromi Tanno, Takaaki |
description | Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine.
Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD).
Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws.
Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely.
Design: Clinical study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0949265819302702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2292987194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1P3TAYhS1UBBfKD-hSeeyS1HY-HIsJISiVkFjobDnOa-rIiVPbKb0rvxynFzp2Oss5j3QehD5RUlJC269jOfpYMkJFSboyxxHa0bpqC0ZY9QHtiKhFwdqmO0VnMY6EUN6I5gSdVrRhbVt3O_RyhaOdFgfY-DCtTm2JlwCD1cnOT3iwaoIEAXuDozLg9tjOEUKCAWsfktXK4d7PgFNQI-jkwx5HHeA5_kUZ-0cl6-dtn34Cdv45w9w69SrguNgZPqJjo1yEi7c8Rz9ubx6v74r7h2_fr6_uC11xngoDRhsgXd3TWjSEt41iXNSK6Zpx1jIjVP7bg1DccMWatiOK0mYglaG013V1jr4cuEvwv1aISU42anBOzeDXKBkTTHSciq1KD1UdfIwBjFyCnVTYS0rkpl6OMquXm3pJOpkjbz6_4dd-guHf4t11LlweCpBP_rYQZNQWZp1Vh-xNDt7-B_8KVk6WjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292987194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><description>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine.
Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD).
Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws.
Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely.
Design: Clinical study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-2658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31526648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Screws ; Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Cortical Bone - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978</ispartof><rights>2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31526648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ataka, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><description>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine.
Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD).
Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws.
Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely.
Design: Clinical study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cortical Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0949-2658</issn><issn>1436-2023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1P3TAYhS1UBBfKD-hSeeyS1HY-HIsJISiVkFjobDnOa-rIiVPbKb0rvxynFzp2Oss5j3QehD5RUlJC269jOfpYMkJFSboyxxHa0bpqC0ZY9QHtiKhFwdqmO0VnMY6EUN6I5gSdVrRhbVt3O_RyhaOdFgfY-DCtTm2JlwCD1cnOT3iwaoIEAXuDozLg9tjOEUKCAWsfktXK4d7PgFNQI-jkwx5HHeA5_kUZ-0cl6-dtn34Cdv45w9w69SrguNgZPqJjo1yEi7c8Rz9ubx6v74r7h2_fr6_uC11xngoDRhsgXd3TWjSEt41iXNSK6Zpx1jIjVP7bg1DccMWatiOK0mYglaG013V1jr4cuEvwv1aISU42anBOzeDXKBkTTHSciq1KD1UdfIwBjFyCnVTYS0rkpl6OMquXm3pJOpkjbz6_4dd-guHf4t11LlweCpBP_rYQZNQWZp1Vh-xNDt7-B_8KVk6WjA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Kato, Kei</creator><creator>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Ataka, Hiromi</creator><creator>Tanno, Takaaki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><author>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cortical Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ataka, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyashita, Tomohiro</au><au>Kato, Kei</au><au>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</au><au>Ataka, Hiromi</au><au>Tanno, Takaaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>974</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>974-978</pages><issn>0949-2658</issn><eissn>1436-2023</eissn><abstract>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine.
Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD).
Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws.
Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely.
Design: Clinical study.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31526648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0949-2658 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978 |
issn | 0949-2658 1436-2023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987194 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone Screws Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging Cortical Bone - surgery Female Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20simple%20formula%20for%20predicting%20diameter%20of%20safely%20inserted%20cortical%20bone%20trajectory%20screws%20for%20fixation%20of%20the%20lower%20lumbar%20spine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20science%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Japanese%20Orthopaedic%20Association&rft.au=Miyashita,%20Tomohiro&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=974&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=974-978&rft.issn=0949-2658&rft.eissn=1436-2023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292987194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292987194&rft_id=info:pmid/31526648&rft_els_id=S0949265819302702&rfr_iscdi=true |