A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978
Hauptverfasser: Miyashita, Tomohiro, Kato, Kei, Takaoka, Hiromitsu, Ataka, Hiromi, Tanno, Takaaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 978
container_issue 6
container_start_page 974
container_title Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
container_volume 24
creator Miyashita, Tomohiro
Kato, Kei
Takaoka, Hiromitsu
Ataka, Hiromi
Tanno, Takaaki
description Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine. Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD). Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws. Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely. Design: Clinical study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0949265819302702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2292987194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1P3TAYhS1UBBfKD-hSeeyS1HY-HIsJISiVkFjobDnOa-rIiVPbKb0rvxynFzp2Oss5j3QehD5RUlJC269jOfpYMkJFSboyxxHa0bpqC0ZY9QHtiKhFwdqmO0VnMY6EUN6I5gSdVrRhbVt3O_RyhaOdFgfY-DCtTm2JlwCD1cnOT3iwaoIEAXuDozLg9tjOEUKCAWsfktXK4d7PgFNQI-jkwx5HHeA5_kUZ-0cl6-dtn34Cdv45w9w69SrguNgZPqJjo1yEi7c8Rz9ubx6v74r7h2_fr6_uC11xngoDRhsgXd3TWjSEt41iXNSK6Zpx1jIjVP7bg1DccMWatiOK0mYglaG013V1jr4cuEvwv1aISU42anBOzeDXKBkTTHSciq1KD1UdfIwBjFyCnVTYS0rkpl6OMquXm3pJOpkjbz6_4dd-guHf4t11LlweCpBP_rYQZNQWZp1Vh-xNDt7-B_8KVk6WjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2292987194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><description>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine. Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD). Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws. Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely. Design: Clinical study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-2658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31526648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Screws ; Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Cortical Bone - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978</ispartof><rights>2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31526648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ataka, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><description>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine. Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD). Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws. Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely. Design: Clinical study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cortical Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0949-2658</issn><issn>1436-2023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1P3TAYhS1UBBfKD-hSeeyS1HY-HIsJISiVkFjobDnOa-rIiVPbKb0rvxynFzp2Oss5j3QehD5RUlJC269jOfpYMkJFSboyxxHa0bpqC0ZY9QHtiKhFwdqmO0VnMY6EUN6I5gSdVrRhbVt3O_RyhaOdFgfY-DCtTm2JlwCD1cnOT3iwaoIEAXuDozLg9tjOEUKCAWsfktXK4d7PgFNQI-jkwx5HHeA5_kUZ-0cl6-dtn34Cdv45w9w69SrguNgZPqJjo1yEi7c8Rz9ubx6v74r7h2_fr6_uC11xngoDRhsgXd3TWjSEt41iXNSK6Zpx1jIjVP7bg1DccMWatiOK0mYglaG013V1jr4cuEvwv1aISU42anBOzeDXKBkTTHSciq1KD1UdfIwBjFyCnVTYS0rkpl6OMquXm3pJOpkjbz6_4dd-guHf4t11LlweCpBP_rYQZNQWZp1Vh-xNDt7-B_8KVk6WjA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Kato, Kei</creator><creator>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Ataka, Hiromi</creator><creator>Tanno, Takaaki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</title><author>Miyashita, Tomohiro ; Kato, Kei ; Takaoka, Hiromitsu ; Ataka, Hiromi ; Tanno, Takaaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fefcfe084b14950765a2794a2c427262f9a094be9a7f7a25680a115d03f11bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cortical Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ataka, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanno, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyashita, Tomohiro</au><au>Kato, Kei</au><au>Takaoka, Hiromitsu</au><au>Ataka, Hiromi</au><au>Tanno, Takaaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>974</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>974-978</pages><issn>0949-2658</issn><eissn>1436-2023</eissn><abstract>Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws are popular for spinal fixation, but their ideal diameter has not been determined. Studies using postoperative computed tomography (CT) have revealed ample bone marrow space around 5.5-mm screws, which are commonly used. However, evidence indicates that a larger screw diameter provides a greater fixation strength. This study aimed to develop a generalizable formula for computing the diameter of CBT screws that could be inserted safely for fixation of the lower lumbar spine. Records of 44 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior fusion with CBT screws for single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. We estimated the maximum diameter for conventional pedicle screws by the minimum diameter of the pedicle using preoperative CT (PSD). We measured the minimum endosteal diameter of the pedicle on the reconstructed plane of the postoperative CT which passed through the cannula used for the screw and estimated the maximum diameter for the CBT screws that could be inserted within the bone marrow space of the pedicle (CBTD). Among the 176 pedicles measured, there were 151 (85.8%) with a PSD of 8.5 mm and 13, 7.5 mm. Because of a slight pedicle wall breach, 13 screws were excluded from the sample. There were 64 (39.3%) screws with a CBTD of 8.5 mm; 45, 7.5 mm; and 40, 6.5 mm. Of 163 screws, 156 (95.7%) had PSD minus CBTD ≤2 mm for each pedicle. PSD minus the minimum outer cortical diameter was ≤1 mm for each pedicle in 155 (95.1%) screws. Our results show that CBT screws with a diameter 1 mm smaller than the endosteal diameter of the pedicle were inserted safely. Design: Clinical study.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31526648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-3039</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-2658
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-11, Vol.24 (6), p.974-978
issn 0949-2658
1436-2023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2292987194
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Screws
Cortical Bone - diagnostic imaging
Cortical Bone - surgery
Female
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fusion - instrumentation
Spinal Fusion - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title A simple formula for predicting diameter of safely inserted cortical bone trajectory screws for fixation of the lower lumbar spine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20simple%20formula%20for%20predicting%20diameter%20of%20safely%20inserted%20cortical%20bone%20trajectory%20screws%20for%20fixation%20of%20the%20lower%20lumbar%20spine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20science%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Japanese%20Orthopaedic%20Association&rft.au=Miyashita,%20Tomohiro&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=974&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=974-978&rft.issn=0949-2658&rft.eissn=1436-2023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2292987194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2292987194&rft_id=info:pmid/31526648&rft_els_id=S0949265819302702&rfr_iscdi=true