Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks
Purpose The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) 2020, Vol.47 (1), p.91-96 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Okada, Kazunori Kaga, Sanae Araki, Minami Tsujita, Kosuke Yoshikawa, Ayaka Hara, Mizuki Sakamoto, Yoichi Masauzi, Nobuo Mikami, Taisei |
| description | Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography.
Methods
For 105 patients who underwent echocardiography, two- and four-chamber images with manually traced endocardial lines for LVEF measurement by MOD were stored. LV endocardial lengths at end-diastole and at end-systole were measured on both images to calculate the fractional length changes, which were averaged (GLS
MOD
). Speckle-tracking analysis was performed to measure global longitudinal strains in the apical two- and four-chamber and long-axis images, and the three values were averaged (GLS
STE
) according to the ASE and EACVI guidelines.
Results
There was no significant difference between GLS
MOD
and GLS
STE
. GLS
MOD
correlated well with GLS
STE
(
r
= 0.81,
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10396-019-00976-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290906403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714887584</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714887584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-ec853769a2959cb14fed63e9927cf6465b7473e27508397b36eb820d9f49fa583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks2OFCEUhStG44yjL-DCkLhxUyN_BcVyMvEv6cSNrisUdammpaAFykn7dD6atDVq4sKwAO79zs3JzWma5wRfE4zl60wwU6LFRLUYKynauwfNJRGEtZR2_GF9My5a3lF20TzJ-YAxZxzTx80FIx3pBJeXzY8d2IK-QSjJmdXrhGYfR-2Rj2F2ZZ1cqJ9cknYBGe3PTIEJ2RQXtOiwau9PqLZNLUKYotFpclUyxjRBQh7CXPYZrcV5992FGZU9ILfoGTKyMaEUaysAggOY4mKok_X2WEDnNcFSvaHxhEZ39LqCC5R9nFC0aHL5S37aPLLaZ3h2f181n9---XT7vt19fPfh9mbXGi5lacH0HZNCaao6ZUbCLUyCgVJUGiu46EbJJQMqO9wzJUcmYOwpnpTlyuquZ1fNq23uMcWvK-QyLC4b8GdPcc0DpQorLDhmFX35D3qIa6p7rJQiPel7qbpKXW_UrD0MLth43mI9EyzOxADW1fqNJLzyXc-rgG4Ck2LOCexwTHWR6TQQPJwDMWyBGGoghl-BGO6q6MW9l3VcYPoj-Z2ACrANyLUVZkh_zf5n7E_-98X7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918188795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Okada, Kazunori ; Kaga, Sanae ; Araki, Minami ; Tsujita, Kosuke ; Yoshikawa, Ayaka ; Hara, Mizuki ; Sakamoto, Yoichi ; Masauzi, Nobuo ; Mikami, Taisei</creator><creatorcontrib>Okada, Kazunori ; Kaga, Sanae ; Araki, Minami ; Tsujita, Kosuke ; Yoshikawa, Ayaka ; Hara, Mizuki ; Sakamoto, Yoichi ; Masauzi, Nobuo ; Mikami, Taisei</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography.
Methods
For 105 patients who underwent echocardiography, two- and four-chamber images with manually traced endocardial lines for LVEF measurement by MOD were stored. LV endocardial lengths at end-diastole and at end-systole were measured on both images to calculate the fractional length changes, which were averaged (GLS
MOD
). Speckle-tracking analysis was performed to measure global longitudinal strains in the apical two- and four-chamber and long-axis images, and the three values were averaged (GLS
STE
) according to the ASE and EACVI guidelines.
Results
There was no significant difference between GLS
MOD
and GLS
STE
. GLS
MOD
correlated well with GLS
STE
(
r
= 0.81,
p
< 0.001), and there was no fixed bias in the Bland–Altman analysis. The intraclass correlations for the intra- and inter-observer comparisons for GLS
STE
were excellent, and those for GLS
MOD
were adequate.
Conclusion
The fractional LV endocardial border length change, GLS
MOD
, showed sufficient agreement with GLS
STE
to justify its use as a substitute for the STE-derived global longitudinal strain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1346-4523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10396-019-00976-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31515647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiomyopathy ; Cardiovascular disease ; Chambers ; Diastole ; Disks ; Echocardiography ; Ejection fraction ; Flow velocity ; Health care industry ; Heart ; Imaging ; Ischemia ; Mathematical analysis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article—Cardiology ; Patients ; Radiology ; Statistical analysis ; Systole ; Tracking ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020, Vol.47 (1), p.91-96</ispartof><rights>The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-ec853769a2959cb14fed63e9927cf6465b7473e27508397b36eb820d9f49fa583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6180-661X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10396-019-00976-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918188795?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21368,21369,27903,27904,33509,33510,33723,33724,41467,42536,43638,43784,51297,64361,64363,64365,72215</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31515647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okada, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaga, Sanae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araki, Minami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujita, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masauzi, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Taisei</creatorcontrib><title>Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks</title><title>Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)</title><addtitle>J Med Ultrasonics</addtitle><addtitle>J Med Ultrason (2001)</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography.
Methods
For 105 patients who underwent echocardiography, two- and four-chamber images with manually traced endocardial lines for LVEF measurement by MOD were stored. LV endocardial lengths at end-diastole and at end-systole were measured on both images to calculate the fractional length changes, which were averaged (GLS
MOD
). Speckle-tracking analysis was performed to measure global longitudinal strains in the apical two- and four-chamber and long-axis images, and the three values were averaged (GLS
STE
) according to the ASE and EACVI guidelines.
Results
There was no significant difference between GLS
MOD
and GLS
STE
. GLS
MOD
correlated well with GLS
STE
(
r
= 0.81,
p
< 0.001), and there was no fixed bias in the Bland–Altman analysis. The intraclass correlations for the intra- and inter-observer comparisons for GLS
STE
were excellent, and those for GLS
MOD
were adequate.
Conclusion
The fractional LV endocardial border length change, GLS
MOD
, showed sufficient agreement with GLS
STE
to justify its use as a substitute for the STE-derived global longitudinal strain.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Diastole</subject><subject>Disks</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article—Cardiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Systole</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1346-4523</issn><issn>1613-2254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks2OFCEUhStG44yjL-DCkLhxUyN_BcVyMvEv6cSNrisUdammpaAFykn7dD6atDVq4sKwAO79zs3JzWma5wRfE4zl60wwU6LFRLUYKynauwfNJRGEtZR2_GF9My5a3lF20TzJ-YAxZxzTx80FIx3pBJeXzY8d2IK-QSjJmdXrhGYfR-2Rj2F2ZZ1cqJ9cknYBGe3PTIEJ2RQXtOiwau9PqLZNLUKYotFpclUyxjRBQh7CXPYZrcV5992FGZU9ILfoGTKyMaEUaysAggOY4mKok_X2WEDnNcFSvaHxhEZ39LqCC5R9nFC0aHL5S37aPLLaZ3h2f181n9---XT7vt19fPfh9mbXGi5lacH0HZNCaao6ZUbCLUyCgVJUGiu46EbJJQMqO9wzJUcmYOwpnpTlyuquZ1fNq23uMcWvK-QyLC4b8GdPcc0DpQorLDhmFX35D3qIa6p7rJQiPel7qbpKXW_UrD0MLth43mI9EyzOxADW1fqNJLzyXc-rgG4Ck2LOCexwTHWR6TQQPJwDMWyBGGoghl-BGO6q6MW9l3VcYPoj-Z2ACrANyLUVZkh_zf5n7E_-98X7</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Okada, Kazunori</creator><creator>Kaga, Sanae</creator><creator>Araki, Minami</creator><creator>Tsujita, Kosuke</creator><creator>Yoshikawa, Ayaka</creator><creator>Hara, Mizuki</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Yoichi</creator><creator>Masauzi, Nobuo</creator><creator>Mikami, Taisei</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-661X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks</title><author>Okada, Kazunori ; Kaga, Sanae ; Araki, Minami ; Tsujita, Kosuke ; Yoshikawa, Ayaka ; Hara, Mizuki ; Sakamoto, Yoichi ; Masauzi, Nobuo ; Mikami, Taisei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-ec853769a2959cb14fed63e9927cf6465b7473e27508397b36eb820d9f49fa583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Diastole</topic><topic>Disks</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article—Cardiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Systole</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okada, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaga, Sanae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araki, Minami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujita, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masauzi, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Taisei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okada, Kazunori</au><au>Kaga, Sanae</au><au>Araki, Minami</au><au>Tsujita, Kosuke</au><au>Yoshikawa, Ayaka</au><au>Hara, Mizuki</au><au>Sakamoto, Yoichi</au><au>Masauzi, Nobuo</au><au>Mikami, Taisei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)</jtitle><stitle>J Med Ultrasonics</stitle><addtitle>J Med Ultrason (2001)</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>91-96</pages><issn>1346-4523</issn><eissn>1613-2254</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography.
Methods
For 105 patients who underwent echocardiography, two- and four-chamber images with manually traced endocardial lines for LVEF measurement by MOD were stored. LV endocardial lengths at end-diastole and at end-systole were measured on both images to calculate the fractional length changes, which were averaged (GLS
MOD
). Speckle-tracking analysis was performed to measure global longitudinal strains in the apical two- and four-chamber and long-axis images, and the three values were averaged (GLS
STE
) according to the ASE and EACVI guidelines.
Results
There was no significant difference between GLS
MOD
and GLS
STE
. GLS
MOD
correlated well with GLS
STE
(
r
= 0.81,
p
< 0.001), and there was no fixed bias in the Bland–Altman analysis. The intraclass correlations for the intra- and inter-observer comparisons for GLS
STE
were excellent, and those for GLS
MOD
were adequate.
Conclusion
The fractional LV endocardial border length change, GLS
MOD
, showed sufficient agreement with GLS
STE
to justify its use as a substitute for the STE-derived global longitudinal strain.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>31515647</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10396-019-00976-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-661X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1346-4523 |
| ispartof | Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020, Vol.47 (1), p.91-96 |
| issn | 1346-4523 1613-2254 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290906403 |
| source | ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Blood pressure Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiomyopathy Cardiovascular disease Chambers Diastole Disks Echocardiography Ejection fraction Flow velocity Health care industry Heart Imaging Ischemia Mathematical analysis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article—Cardiology Patients Radiology Statistical analysis Systole Tracking Ultrasound |
| title | Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A29%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Left%20ventricular%20global%20longitudinal%20strain%20calculated%20from%20manually%20traced%20endocardial%20border%20lengths%20utilizing%20the%20images%20for%20routine%20ejection%20fraction%20measurement%20by%20biplane%20method%20of%20disks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ultrasonics%20(2001)&rft.au=Okada,%20Kazunori&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=91-96&rft.issn=1346-4523&rft.eissn=1613-2254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10396-019-00976-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714887584%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918188795&rft_id=info:pmid/31515647&rft_galeid=A714887584&rfr_iscdi=true |