Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is used to assess lymphedema by measuring limb fluid content as an electric current passes through cell membranes and tissues. There are two primary device modalities, through which BIS is used clinically: single-segment bioimpedance (SSB) and multi-segment bioimpedan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2020-02, Vol.73 (2), p.328-336
Hauptverfasser: Qin, Evelyn S., Bowen, Mindy J., James, Sheridan L., Chen, Wei F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 2
container_start_page 328
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 73
creator Qin, Evelyn S.
Bowen, Mindy J.
James, Sheridan L.
Chen, Wei F.
description Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is used to assess lymphedema by measuring limb fluid content as an electric current passes through cell membranes and tissues. There are two primary device modalities, through which BIS is used clinically: single-segment bioimpedance (SSB) and multi-segment bioimpedance (MSB), which differ in their mechanisms of gathering measurements. In this cross-sectional study, we study the difference between SSB and MSB in evaluating lymphedema by referencing the results with indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography. Patients with unilateral and bilateral lymphedema, presented to our department, were assessed with both SSB and MSB as part of a pre-lymphatic surgery evaluation between May 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Patients were imaged with ICG lymphography to confirm lymphedema presence. Standardized device measurement outputs from SSB and MSB were recorded and statistically analyzed. SSB was more sensitive (0.9) than MSB (0.75) for unilateral lymphedema. However, MSB had the added ability to assess patients with bilateral lymphedema with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.60. Furthermore, MSB had a stronger correlation with relative disease severity compared to SSB and quantified the differential extents of edema. In comparison, SSB provided a manipulated number, which was derived from a comparison of the abnormal to the normal limb. Medical staff reported MSB being easier to perform, and all patients reported the MSB measurement experience being more favorable. While both SSB and MSB provide diagnostic information on lymphedema, MSB is notably easier to perform, can detect bilateral disease states, and objectively quantifies limb fluid volume, allowing for disease tracking and assessment of surgical and rehabilitative treatment efficacy. On the basis of this study, our department has switched to universal MSB measurement.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290904902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681519303407</els_id><sourcerecordid>2290904902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1326d20a5f5e850da1265c24948363d7ae5162b2e8d7d4cbc552802a80625c983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqt_wIPs0cuuk2STzYIXKWqFihc9h2wytSn75War9N-b0upR5jAD88wL8xByRSGjQOXtOqvWfcgY0DIDmUFOj8gZVYVKQfDyOM5FrlKpqJiQ8xDWADmnuTglE05FrJKfkfnLph59GvCjwXZMKt_5pkdnWouJNW1iQsAQkt6MPu5D8u3HVaRqM-Jg6qTeNv0KHTbmgpwsTR3w8tCn5P3x4W02TxevT8-z-0VquZBjSjmTjoERS4FKgDOUSWFZXuaKS-4Kg4JKVjFUrnC5rawQTAEzCiQTtlR8Sm72uf3QfW4wjLrxwWJdmxa7TdCMlVBCXgKLKNujduhCGHCp-8E3ZthqCnpnUK_1zqDeGdQgdTQYj64P-ZuqQfd38qssAnd7AOOXXx4HHWx0Y9H5Ae2oXef_y_8BzAOBdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290904902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Qin, Evelyn S. ; Bowen, Mindy J. ; James, Sheridan L. ; Chen, Wei F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Evelyn S. ; Bowen, Mindy J. ; James, Sheridan L. ; Chen, Wei F.</creatorcontrib><description>Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is used to assess lymphedema by measuring limb fluid content as an electric current passes through cell membranes and tissues. There are two primary device modalities, through which BIS is used clinically: single-segment bioimpedance (SSB) and multi-segment bioimpedance (MSB), which differ in their mechanisms of gathering measurements. In this cross-sectional study, we study the difference between SSB and MSB in evaluating lymphedema by referencing the results with indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography. Patients with unilateral and bilateral lymphedema, presented to our department, were assessed with both SSB and MSB as part of a pre-lymphatic surgery evaluation between May 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Patients were imaged with ICG lymphography to confirm lymphedema presence. Standardized device measurement outputs from SSB and MSB were recorded and statistically analyzed. SSB was more sensitive (0.9) than MSB (0.75) for unilateral lymphedema. However, MSB had the added ability to assess patients with bilateral lymphedema with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.60. Furthermore, MSB had a stronger correlation with relative disease severity compared to SSB and quantified the differential extents of edema. In comparison, SSB provided a manipulated number, which was derived from a comparison of the abnormal to the normal limb. Medical staff reported MSB being easier to perform, and all patients reported the MSB measurement experience being more favorable. While both SSB and MSB provide diagnostic information on lymphedema, MSB is notably easier to perform, can detect bilateral disease states, and objectively quantifies limb fluid volume, allowing for disease tracking and assessment of surgical and rehabilitative treatment efficacy. On the basis of this study, our department has switched to universal MSB measurement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31515193</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bilateral lymphedema ; Bioimpedance ; Indocyanine green ; L-dex ; Lymphedema ; Lymphedema diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2020-02, Vol.73 (2), p.328-336</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1326d20a5f5e850da1265c24948363d7ae5162b2e8d7d4cbc552802a80625c983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1326d20a5f5e850da1265c24948363d7ae5162b2e8d7d4cbc552802a80625c983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3134-6576 ; 0000-0003-1046-9200 ; 0000-0001-9618-2766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31515193$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Evelyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Mindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Sheridan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei F.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is used to assess lymphedema by measuring limb fluid content as an electric current passes through cell membranes and tissues. There are two primary device modalities, through which BIS is used clinically: single-segment bioimpedance (SSB) and multi-segment bioimpedance (MSB), which differ in their mechanisms of gathering measurements. In this cross-sectional study, we study the difference between SSB and MSB in evaluating lymphedema by referencing the results with indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography. Patients with unilateral and bilateral lymphedema, presented to our department, were assessed with both SSB and MSB as part of a pre-lymphatic surgery evaluation between May 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Patients were imaged with ICG lymphography to confirm lymphedema presence. Standardized device measurement outputs from SSB and MSB were recorded and statistically analyzed. SSB was more sensitive (0.9) than MSB (0.75) for unilateral lymphedema. However, MSB had the added ability to assess patients with bilateral lymphedema with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.60. Furthermore, MSB had a stronger correlation with relative disease severity compared to SSB and quantified the differential extents of edema. In comparison, SSB provided a manipulated number, which was derived from a comparison of the abnormal to the normal limb. Medical staff reported MSB being easier to perform, and all patients reported the MSB measurement experience being more favorable. While both SSB and MSB provide diagnostic information on lymphedema, MSB is notably easier to perform, can detect bilateral disease states, and objectively quantifies limb fluid volume, allowing for disease tracking and assessment of surgical and rehabilitative treatment efficacy. On the basis of this study, our department has switched to universal MSB measurement.</description><subject>Bilateral lymphedema</subject><subject>Bioimpedance</subject><subject>Indocyanine green</subject><subject>L-dex</subject><subject>Lymphedema</subject><subject>Lymphedema diagnosis</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqt_wIPs0cuuk2STzYIXKWqFihc9h2wytSn75War9N-b0upR5jAD88wL8xByRSGjQOXtOqvWfcgY0DIDmUFOj8gZVYVKQfDyOM5FrlKpqJiQ8xDWADmnuTglE05FrJKfkfnLph59GvCjwXZMKt_5pkdnWouJNW1iQsAQkt6MPu5D8u3HVaRqM-Jg6qTeNv0KHTbmgpwsTR3w8tCn5P3x4W02TxevT8-z-0VquZBjSjmTjoERS4FKgDOUSWFZXuaKS-4Kg4JKVjFUrnC5rawQTAEzCiQTtlR8Sm72uf3QfW4wjLrxwWJdmxa7TdCMlVBCXgKLKNujduhCGHCp-8E3ZthqCnpnUK_1zqDeGdQgdTQYj64P-ZuqQfd38qssAnd7AOOXXx4HHWx0Y9H5Ae2oXef_y_8BzAOBdw</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Qin, Evelyn S.</creator><creator>Bowen, Mindy J.</creator><creator>James, Sheridan L.</creator><creator>Chen, Wei F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-6576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1046-9200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema</title><author>Qin, Evelyn S. ; Bowen, Mindy J. ; James, Sheridan L. ; Chen, Wei F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1326d20a5f5e850da1265c24948363d7ae5162b2e8d7d4cbc552802a80625c983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bilateral lymphedema</topic><topic>Bioimpedance</topic><topic>Indocyanine green</topic><topic>L-dex</topic><topic>Lymphedema</topic><topic>Lymphedema diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Evelyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Mindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Sheridan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Evelyn S.</au><au>Bowen, Mindy J.</au><au>James, Sheridan L.</au><au>Chen, Wei F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>328-336</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is used to assess lymphedema by measuring limb fluid content as an electric current passes through cell membranes and tissues. There are two primary device modalities, through which BIS is used clinically: single-segment bioimpedance (SSB) and multi-segment bioimpedance (MSB), which differ in their mechanisms of gathering measurements. In this cross-sectional study, we study the difference between SSB and MSB in evaluating lymphedema by referencing the results with indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography. Patients with unilateral and bilateral lymphedema, presented to our department, were assessed with both SSB and MSB as part of a pre-lymphatic surgery evaluation between May 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Patients were imaged with ICG lymphography to confirm lymphedema presence. Standardized device measurement outputs from SSB and MSB were recorded and statistically analyzed. SSB was more sensitive (0.9) than MSB (0.75) for unilateral lymphedema. However, MSB had the added ability to assess patients with bilateral lymphedema with a sensitivity of 0.56 and specificity of 0.60. Furthermore, MSB had a stronger correlation with relative disease severity compared to SSB and quantified the differential extents of edema. In comparison, SSB provided a manipulated number, which was derived from a comparison of the abnormal to the normal limb. Medical staff reported MSB being easier to perform, and all patients reported the MSB measurement experience being more favorable. While both SSB and MSB provide diagnostic information on lymphedema, MSB is notably easier to perform, can detect bilateral disease states, and objectively quantifies limb fluid volume, allowing for disease tracking and assessment of surgical and rehabilitative treatment efficacy. On the basis of this study, our department has switched to universal MSB measurement.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31515193</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.041</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-6576</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1046-9200</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2766</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2020-02, Vol.73 (2), p.328-336
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2290904902
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bilateral lymphedema
Bioimpedance
Indocyanine green
L-dex
Lymphedema
Lymphedema diagnosis
title Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-segment%20bioimpedance%20can%20assess%20patients%20with%20bilateral%20lymphedema&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Qin,%20Evelyn%20S.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=328-336&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2290904902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290904902&rft_id=info:pmid/31515193&rft_els_id=S1748681519303407&rfr_iscdi=true