Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry
Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4754 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4749 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Sarkar, Biplab Munshi, Anusheel Ganesh, Tharmarnadar Manikandan, Arjunan Krishnankutty, Saneg Chitral, Latika Pradhan, Anirudh Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu |
description | Purpose
The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Methods
Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions.
Results
The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°.
CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively.
Conclusion
CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mp.13810 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287534894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287534894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi1ERIaAxAmQl2w6lF893dlFUXhIISAU1i23XZ0YddvG9gjNLkfIRbgUJ8HJDGHFqlyuT19Z_gl5xeCYAfC3SzxmomPwhKy4XItGcuifkhVALxsuQR2S5zl_B4BWKHhGDgWTveoFW5FfV2huvDN6ppeh4An9GoouLvh6EUN2-yOmFBI1ISU0BS11viQ9JW3u5zRj-X17t4l00ena-VzHNBdMWF2VMDRp60K5waTj9oSe0hzrjqrVOWPOC_pCpwd_nLXXiWpvqQ_-sb_GsGBJ2xfkYNJzxpf7ekS-vTu_OvvQXHx-__Hs9KIxgjNosFO9AQ4I7Tgyrka0nTRW9q22slN8gk4IyxQATsgnzkeulW0NKg6Gr1txRN7svDGFHxvMZVhcNjjX12DY5IHzbq2E7Hr5DzUp5JxwGmJy9R-2A4PhPpxhicNDOBV9vbduxgXtI_g3jQo0O-Cnm3H7X9Hw6ctO-Ac5352N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287534894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Methods
Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions.
Results
The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°.
CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively.
Conclusion
CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.13810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31495931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; coplanar setup margin ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Humans ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; noncoplanar set‐up margin ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Setup Errors ; Rotation ; SRS/SRT</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754</ispartof><rights>2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.13810$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.13810$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31495931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munshi, Anusheel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikandan, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Latika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Methods
Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions.
Results
The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°.
CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively.
Conclusion
CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</description><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>coplanar setup margin</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>noncoplanar set‐up margin</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Setup Errors</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>SRS/SRT</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi1ERIaAxAmQl2w6lF893dlFUXhIISAU1i23XZ0YddvG9gjNLkfIRbgUJ8HJDGHFqlyuT19Z_gl5xeCYAfC3SzxmomPwhKy4XItGcuifkhVALxsuQR2S5zl_B4BWKHhGDgWTveoFW5FfV2huvDN6ppeh4An9GoouLvh6EUN2-yOmFBI1ISU0BS11viQ9JW3u5zRj-X17t4l00ena-VzHNBdMWF2VMDRp60K5waTj9oSe0hzrjqrVOWPOC_pCpwd_nLXXiWpvqQ_-sb_GsGBJ2xfkYNJzxpf7ekS-vTu_OvvQXHx-__Hs9KIxgjNosFO9AQ4I7Tgyrka0nTRW9q22slN8gk4IyxQATsgnzkeulW0NKg6Gr1txRN7svDGFHxvMZVhcNjjX12DY5IHzbq2E7Hr5DzUp5JxwGmJy9R-2A4PhPpxhicNDOBV9vbduxgXtI_g3jQo0O-Cnm3H7X9Hw6ctO-Ac5352N</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Sarkar, Biplab</creator><creator>Munshi, Anusheel</creator><creator>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creator><creator>Manikandan, Arjunan</creator><creator>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creator><creator>Chitral, Latika</creator><creator>Pradhan, Anirudh</creator><creator>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><author>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>coplanar setup margin</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>noncoplanar set‐up margin</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Setup Errors</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>SRS/SRT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munshi, Anusheel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikandan, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Latika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarkar, Biplab</au><au>Munshi, Anusheel</au><au>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</au><au>Manikandan, Arjunan</au><au>Krishnankutty, Saneg</au><au>Chitral, Latika</au><au>Pradhan, Anirudh</au><au>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4749</spage><epage>4754</epage><pages>4749-4754</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Methods
Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions.
Results
The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°.
CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively.
Conclusion
CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31495931</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.13810</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287534894 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography coplanar setup margin Dose Fractionation, Radiation Humans Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Neoplasms - radiotherapy noncoplanar set‐up margin Radiosurgery - methods Radiotherapy Setup Errors Rotation SRS/SRT |
title | Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20Note:%20Rotational%20positional%20error%20corrected%20intrafraction%20set%E2%80%90up%20margins%20in%20stereotactic%20radiotherapy:%20A%20spatial%20assessment%20for%20coplanar%20and%20noncoplanar%20geometry&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sarkar,%20Biplab&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4749&rft.epage=4754&rft.pages=4749-4754&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.13810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287534894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287534894&rft_id=info:pmid/31495931&rfr_iscdi=true |