Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry

Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754
Hauptverfasser: Sarkar, Biplab, Munshi, Anusheel, Ganesh, Tharmarnadar, Manikandan, Arjunan, Krishnankutty, Saneg, Chitral, Latika, Pradhan, Anirudh, Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4754
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4749
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 46
creator Sarkar, Biplab
Munshi, Anusheel
Ganesh, Tharmarnadar
Manikandan, Arjunan
Krishnankutty, Saneg
Chitral, Latika
Pradhan, Anirudh
Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu
description Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions. Results The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°. CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively. Conclusion CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.13810
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287534894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287534894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi1ERIaAxAmQl2w6lF893dlFUXhIISAU1i23XZ0YddvG9gjNLkfIRbgUJ8HJDGHFqlyuT19Z_gl5xeCYAfC3SzxmomPwhKy4XItGcuifkhVALxsuQR2S5zl_B4BWKHhGDgWTveoFW5FfV2huvDN6ppeh4An9GoouLvh6EUN2-yOmFBI1ISU0BS11viQ9JW3u5zRj-X17t4l00ena-VzHNBdMWF2VMDRp60K5waTj9oSe0hzrjqrVOWPOC_pCpwd_nLXXiWpvqQ_-sb_GsGBJ2xfkYNJzxpf7ekS-vTu_OvvQXHx-__Hs9KIxgjNosFO9AQ4I7Tgyrka0nTRW9q22slN8gk4IyxQATsgnzkeulW0NKg6Gr1txRN7svDGFHxvMZVhcNjjX12DY5IHzbq2E7Hr5DzUp5JxwGmJy9R-2A4PhPpxhicNDOBV9vbduxgXtI_g3jQo0O-Cnm3H7X9Hw6ctO-Ac5352N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287534894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions. Results The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°. CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively. Conclusion CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.13810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31495931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; coplanar setup margin ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Humans ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; noncoplanar set‐up margin ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Setup Errors ; Rotation ; SRS/SRT</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754</ispartof><rights>2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.13810$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.13810$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31495931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munshi, Anusheel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikandan, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Latika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions. Results The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°. CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively. Conclusion CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</description><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>coplanar setup margin</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>noncoplanar set‐up margin</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Setup Errors</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>SRS/SRT</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi1ERIaAxAmQl2w6lF893dlFUXhIISAU1i23XZ0YddvG9gjNLkfIRbgUJ8HJDGHFqlyuT19Z_gl5xeCYAfC3SzxmomPwhKy4XItGcuifkhVALxsuQR2S5zl_B4BWKHhGDgWTveoFW5FfV2huvDN6ppeh4An9GoouLvh6EUN2-yOmFBI1ISU0BS11viQ9JW3u5zRj-X17t4l00ena-VzHNBdMWF2VMDRp60K5waTj9oSe0hzrjqrVOWPOC_pCpwd_nLXXiWpvqQ_-sb_GsGBJ2xfkYNJzxpf7ekS-vTu_OvvQXHx-__Hs9KIxgjNosFO9AQ4I7Tgyrka0nTRW9q22slN8gk4IyxQATsgnzkeulW0NKg6Gr1txRN7svDGFHxvMZVhcNjjX12DY5IHzbq2E7Hr5DzUp5JxwGmJy9R-2A4PhPpxhicNDOBV9vbduxgXtI_g3jQo0O-Cnm3H7X9Hw6ctO-Ac5352N</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Sarkar, Biplab</creator><creator>Munshi, Anusheel</creator><creator>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creator><creator>Manikandan, Arjunan</creator><creator>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creator><creator>Chitral, Latika</creator><creator>Pradhan, Anirudh</creator><creator>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</title><author>Sarkar, Biplab ; Munshi, Anusheel ; Ganesh, Tharmarnadar ; Manikandan, Arjunan ; Krishnankutty, Saneg ; Chitral, Latika ; Pradhan, Anirudh ; Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3210-e859c020e06bb125bed84cd496ad4852f0833d1500efe2f22b2a5d6ce520c2763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>coplanar setup margin</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>noncoplanar set‐up margin</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Setup Errors</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>SRS/SRT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Biplab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munshi, Anusheel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manikandan, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnankutty, Saneg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Latika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Anirudh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarkar, Biplab</au><au>Munshi, Anusheel</au><au>Ganesh, Tharmarnadar</au><au>Manikandan, Arjunan</au><au>Krishnankutty, Saneg</au><au>Chitral, Latika</au><au>Pradhan, Anirudh</au><au>Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4749</spage><epage>4754</epage><pages>4749-4754</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of this study is to calculate setup margin based on six‐dimensional (6D) corrected residual positional errors from kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and from intrafraction projection kV imaging in coplanar and in noncoplanar couch positions in stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods Six dimensional positional corrections were carried out before patient treatments, using a robotic couch and CBCT matching. A CBCT and stereoscopic ExacTrac image were acquired post‐table position correction. Further, a series of intrafraction ExacTrac images were obtained for the variable couch position. Translational and rotational errors were identified as lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z); roll (Ɵ°), pitch (Φ°) and yaw (Ψ°). A total of 699 intrafraction image sets (361 coplanar and 338 noncoplanar) for 51 SRS/SRT patients were analysed. Rotational errors were corrected in terms of translational coordinates. Residual set‐up margins were calculated from CBCT shifts. ExacTrac shifts give residual + intrafraction setup margins as a function of coplanar and noncoplanar couch positions. Results The average residual positional error obtained from CBCT in X, Y, Z, Ɵ, Φ, Ψ were 0.1 ± 0.4 mm, 0.0 ± 0.6 mm, 0.0 ± 0.5 mm, 0.2 ± 0.8°, 0.1 ± 0.6° and −0.1 ± 0.7° respectively. For ExacTrac, the shits were −0.5 ± 0.9 mm, −0.0 ± 1mm, −0.6 ± 1.0mm, 0.4 ± 0.9°, −0.2 ± 0.6°, and −0.0 ± 0.8°. CBCT calculated linear setup margins in X, Y, Z direction were 0.5, 1.2, and 1 mm respectively. ExacTrac yielded coplanar and noncoplanar linear setup margins were 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.4, 1.5, and 2.1 mm respectively. Conclusion CBCT‐based gross residual set‐up margin is equal to 1 mm. ExacTrac calculated residual plus intrafraction setup margin falls within a 2 mm range; attributed to intrafraction patient movement, table position inaccuracies, and poor image fusion in noncoplanar geometry. There could be variations in the required additional margin between centers and between machines, which require further studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31495931</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.13810</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.4749-4754
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287534894
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
coplanar setup margin
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Humans
Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
noncoplanar set‐up margin
Radiosurgery - methods
Radiotherapy Setup Errors
Rotation
SRS/SRT
title Technical Note: Rotational positional error corrected intrafraction set‐up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy: A spatial assessment for coplanar and noncoplanar geometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20Note:%20Rotational%20positional%20error%20corrected%20intrafraction%20set%E2%80%90up%20margins%20in%20stereotactic%20radiotherapy:%20A%20spatial%20assessment%20for%20coplanar%20and%20noncoplanar%20geometry&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sarkar,%20Biplab&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4749&rft.epage=4754&rft.pages=4749-4754&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.13810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287534894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287534894&rft_id=info:pmid/31495931&rfr_iscdi=true