Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines
Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in ea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Skjøt-Arkil, H. Mogensen, C.B. Lassen, A.T. Johansen, I.S. Chen, M. Petersen, P. Andersen, K.V. Ellermann-Eriksen, S. Møller, J.M. Ludwig, M. Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. Nielsen, F.E. Petersen, D.B. Jensen, U.S. Rosenvinge, F.S. |
description | Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).
To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated.
This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated.
Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated.
The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287514238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670119303597</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287514238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIkPCBVggL9l040e7HxIblISHFIkF2VvVds2MR93uxnZHmh134C4ciJPEnUmyZPWXyn_9qvJHyDvOSs54_fFQHvbOl4LxrmRtyUT1gmy4kqIQnexekk1-UEXdMH5G3sR4YIzlvnpNziSvuoqLbkP-XmFCk9zk6bSlIyZn3DA4XwSMLibwif5MMO-Pw2QmY5ZIYQm4irfUQOhhRo8jRCzmMNnFOL-j1z5hmHowWRwYBKTO0yvwLu4pjhh26M2RWpwhpBF9ivTf7z8U72BY4GkX_1DBQKMJiH7N3S3OYl4O4wV5tYUh4ttHPSe3X65vL78VNz--fr_8fFOYirFUQNPZpjFKVTUTda8k58LIasuktapRALJpVd93PbK6Bw5SCF4xqJho6kYIeU4-nGLzbb8WjEmPLhocBvA4LVEL0TaKV0K22SpOVhOmGANu9RzcCOGoOdMrLn3QKy694tKs1RlXHnr_mL_0I9rnkSc-2fDpZMB85J3DoKNx-fPQupCxaTu5_-XfA_-brFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287514238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).
To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated.
This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated.
Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated.
The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31494129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CPE ; Emergency department ; Isolation ; MRSA ; Multi-resistant bacteria ; Screening tool</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670119303597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogensen, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, K.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, U.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).
To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated.
This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated.
Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated.
The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</description><subject>CPE</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Isolation</subject><subject>MRSA</subject><subject>Multi-resistant bacteria</subject><subject>Screening tool</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIkPCBVggL9l040e7HxIblISHFIkF2VvVds2MR93uxnZHmh134C4ciJPEnUmyZPWXyn_9qvJHyDvOSs54_fFQHvbOl4LxrmRtyUT1gmy4kqIQnexekk1-UEXdMH5G3sR4YIzlvnpNziSvuoqLbkP-XmFCk9zk6bSlIyZn3DA4XwSMLibwif5MMO-Pw2QmY5ZIYQm4irfUQOhhRo8jRCzmMNnFOL-j1z5hmHowWRwYBKTO0yvwLu4pjhh26M2RWpwhpBF9ivTf7z8U72BY4GkX_1DBQKMJiH7N3S3OYl4O4wV5tYUh4ttHPSe3X65vL78VNz--fr_8fFOYirFUQNPZpjFKVTUTda8k58LIasuktapRALJpVd93PbK6Bw5SCF4xqJho6kYIeU4-nGLzbb8WjEmPLhocBvA4LVEL0TaKV0K22SpOVhOmGANu9RzcCOGoOdMrLn3QKy694tKs1RlXHnr_mL_0I9rnkSc-2fDpZMB85J3DoKNx-fPQupCxaTu5_-XfA_-brFw</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creator><creator>Mogensen, C.B.</creator><creator>Lassen, A.T.</creator><creator>Johansen, I.S.</creator><creator>Chen, M.</creator><creator>Petersen, P.</creator><creator>Andersen, K.V.</creator><creator>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creator><creator>Møller, J.M.</creator><creator>Ludwig, M.</creator><creator>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creator><creator>Nielsen, F.E.</creator><creator>Petersen, D.B.</creator><creator>Jensen, U.S.</creator><creator>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><author>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>CPE</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Isolation</topic><topic>MRSA</topic><topic>Multi-resistant bacteria</topic><topic>Screening tool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogensen, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, K.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, U.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</au><au>Mogensen, C.B.</au><au>Lassen, A.T.</au><au>Johansen, I.S.</au><au>Chen, M.</au><au>Petersen, P.</au><au>Andersen, K.V.</au><au>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</au><au>Møller, J.M.</au><au>Ludwig, M.</au><au>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</au><au>Nielsen, F.E.</au><au>Petersen, D.B.</au><au>Jensen, U.S.</au><au>Rosenvinge, F.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>27-32</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).
To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated.
This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated.
Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated.
The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31494129</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287514238 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | CPE Emergency department Isolation MRSA Multi-resistant bacteria Screening tool |
title | Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20meticillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20carbapenemase-producing%20Enterobacteriaceae%20in%20Danish%20emergency%20departments%20%E2%80%93%20evaluation%20of%20national%20screening%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Skj%C3%B8t-Arkil,%20H.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=27-32&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287514238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287514238&rft_id=info:pmid/31494129&rft_els_id=S0195670119303597&rfr_iscdi=true |