Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines

Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32
Hauptverfasser: Skjøt-Arkil, H., Mogensen, C.B., Lassen, A.T., Johansen, I.S., Chen, M., Petersen, P., Andersen, K.V., Ellermann-Eriksen, S., Møller, J.M., Ludwig, M., Fuglsang-Damgaard, D., Nielsen, F.E., Petersen, D.B., Jensen, U.S., Rosenvinge, F.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 104
creator Skjøt-Arkil, H.
Mogensen, C.B.
Lassen, A.T.
Johansen, I.S.
Chen, M.
Petersen, P.
Andersen, K.V.
Ellermann-Eriksen, S.
Møller, J.M.
Ludwig, M.
Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.
Nielsen, F.E.
Petersen, D.B.
Jensen, U.S.
Rosenvinge, F.S.
description Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated. This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated. Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated. The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287514238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670119303597</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287514238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIkPCBVggL9l040e7HxIblISHFIkF2VvVds2MR93uxnZHmh134C4ciJPEnUmyZPWXyn_9qvJHyDvOSs54_fFQHvbOl4LxrmRtyUT1gmy4kqIQnexekk1-UEXdMH5G3sR4YIzlvnpNziSvuoqLbkP-XmFCk9zk6bSlIyZn3DA4XwSMLibwif5MMO-Pw2QmY5ZIYQm4irfUQOhhRo8jRCzmMNnFOL-j1z5hmHowWRwYBKTO0yvwLu4pjhh26M2RWpwhpBF9ivTf7z8U72BY4GkX_1DBQKMJiH7N3S3OYl4O4wV5tYUh4ttHPSe3X65vL78VNz--fr_8fFOYirFUQNPZpjFKVTUTda8k58LIasuktapRALJpVd93PbK6Bw5SCF4xqJho6kYIeU4-nGLzbb8WjEmPLhocBvA4LVEL0TaKV0K22SpOVhOmGANu9RzcCOGoOdMrLn3QKy694tKs1RlXHnr_mL_0I9rnkSc-2fDpZMB85J3DoKNx-fPQupCxaTu5_-XfA_-brFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287514238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated. This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated. Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated. The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31494129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CPE ; Emergency department ; Isolation ; MRSA ; Multi-resistant bacteria ; Screening tool</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670119303597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31494129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogensen, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, K.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, U.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated. This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated. Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated. The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</description><subject>CPE</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Isolation</subject><subject>MRSA</subject><subject>Multi-resistant bacteria</subject><subject>Screening tool</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIkPCBVggL9l040e7HxIblISHFIkF2VvVds2MR93uxnZHmh134C4ciJPEnUmyZPWXyn_9qvJHyDvOSs54_fFQHvbOl4LxrmRtyUT1gmy4kqIQnexekk1-UEXdMH5G3sR4YIzlvnpNziSvuoqLbkP-XmFCk9zk6bSlIyZn3DA4XwSMLibwif5MMO-Pw2QmY5ZIYQm4irfUQOhhRo8jRCzmMNnFOL-j1z5hmHowWRwYBKTO0yvwLu4pjhh26M2RWpwhpBF9ivTf7z8U72BY4GkX_1DBQKMJiH7N3S3OYl4O4wV5tYUh4ttHPSe3X65vL78VNz--fr_8fFOYirFUQNPZpjFKVTUTda8k58LIasuktapRALJpVd93PbK6Bw5SCF4xqJho6kYIeU4-nGLzbb8WjEmPLhocBvA4LVEL0TaKV0K22SpOVhOmGANu9RzcCOGoOdMrLn3QKy694tKs1RlXHnr_mL_0I9rnkSc-2fDpZMB85J3DoKNx-fPQupCxaTu5_-XfA_-brFw</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creator><creator>Mogensen, C.B.</creator><creator>Lassen, A.T.</creator><creator>Johansen, I.S.</creator><creator>Chen, M.</creator><creator>Petersen, P.</creator><creator>Andersen, K.V.</creator><creator>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creator><creator>Møller, J.M.</creator><creator>Ludwig, M.</creator><creator>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creator><creator>Nielsen, F.E.</creator><creator>Petersen, D.B.</creator><creator>Jensen, U.S.</creator><creator>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</title><author>Skjøt-Arkil, H. ; Mogensen, C.B. ; Lassen, A.T. ; Johansen, I.S. ; Chen, M. ; Petersen, P. ; Andersen, K.V. ; Ellermann-Eriksen, S. ; Møller, J.M. ; Ludwig, M. ; Fuglsang-Damgaard, D. ; Nielsen, F.E. ; Petersen, D.B. ; Jensen, U.S. ; Rosenvinge, F.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-a79d77c5546026b53112c34f03dd575aa3785bb9be06ba1a322140a402767223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>CPE</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Isolation</topic><topic>MRSA</topic><topic>Multi-resistant bacteria</topic><topic>Screening tool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogensen, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, K.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, U.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenvinge, F.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skjøt-Arkil, H.</au><au>Mogensen, C.B.</au><au>Lassen, A.T.</au><au>Johansen, I.S.</au><au>Chen, M.</au><au>Petersen, P.</au><au>Andersen, K.V.</au><au>Ellermann-Eriksen, S.</au><au>Møller, J.M.</au><au>Ludwig, M.</au><au>Fuglsang-Damgaard, D.</au><au>Nielsen, F.E.</au><au>Petersen, D.B.</au><au>Jensen, U.S.</au><au>Rosenvinge, F.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>27-32</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated. This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated. Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25–75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7–52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1–81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated. The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31494129</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-01, Vol.104 (1), p.27-32
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287514238
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects CPE
Emergency department
Isolation
MRSA
Multi-resistant bacteria
Screening tool
title Detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Danish emergency departments – evaluation of national screening guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20meticillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20carbapenemase-producing%20Enterobacteriaceae%20in%20Danish%20emergency%20departments%20%E2%80%93%20evaluation%20of%20national%20screening%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Skj%C3%B8t-Arkil,%20H.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=27-32&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2287514238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287514238&rft_id=info:pmid/31494129&rft_els_id=S0195670119303597&rfr_iscdi=true