A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial
Background The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated. Aim To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD). Me...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2020-07, Vol.34 (7), p.3037-3042 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3042 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 3037 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Gómez-Reyes, Elisa Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra Cano-Manrique, Gregorio Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J. Mora-Bulnes, Stefany Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo Grajales-Figueroa, Guido Ruiz-Romero, Daniel Téllez-Ávila, Félix I. |
description | Background
The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated.
Aim
To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD).
Methods
We performed a randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to CLD or LRD the day before of elective colonoscopy. All subjects received a 4-L preparation of single-dose PEG beginning 16 h prior to colonoscopy. The Boston bowel preparation scale was used to evaluate bowel cleansing; an adequate-quality preparation was defined as a score ≥ 2 per segment.
Results
A total of 205 subjects were included with a mean age (SD) of 55.6 (12.6) years; 133 (64.9%) of them were female. A total of 105 subjects were randomized to receive CLD and 100 to LRD. No significant differences in bowel preparation quality were observed between groups according to the section of colon: right colon (70% vs. 73%,
p
= 0.08), transverse colon (82% vs. 79%,
p
= 0.062), or left colon (80% vs. 78.7%,
p
= 0.28). There was a tendency toward less-frequent nausea (
p
= 0.08) and vomiting (
p
= 0.07) in patients with LRD. No differences between groups regarding ADR (12% vs. 10%) were noted.
Conclusions
An LRD before colonoscopy resulted in a tendency toward improved tolerability by patients, with no differences in the quality of bowel preparation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284563488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283693970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8be78a3311121975ee49ff71e5fc4f36d47d5c34d0d39c982d3064109626e8d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uFSEYhonR2GP1BlwYEjdusPwNDO6axr-kSTe6njDDh9LMwBQYm-NFeM3leKomLrqCwPO-H-RB6CWjbxml-qxQKpUklBlCdTsh6hHaMSk44Zz1j9GOGkEJ10aeoGelXNPGG9Y9RSeCyZ4LRXfo1zme0y3JUILbALsAFY_gUwY8pTnFVKa07nGF6AquCYdlzekHtO0M2Y5hDnWPxz1ebQ0Qa8G3oX7HMbUm7yFDnKDgEPGaYbW5QSnim80eYu-wxdlGl5bwExyuOdj5OXri7Vzgxf16ir5-eP_l4hO5vPr4-eL8kkxCd5X0I-jeCsEY48zoDkAa7zWDzk_SC-Wkdt0kpKNOmMn03AmqJKNGcQW9k-IUvTn2tt_cbFDqsIQywTzbCGkrA-e97JSQfd_Q1_-h12nLsb3uQAllhNG0UfxITTmVksEPaw6LzfuB0eFgazjaGpqt4betQbXQq_vqbVzA_Y380dMAcQRKu4rfIP-b_UDtHW37oWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283693970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa ; Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra ; Cano-Manrique, Gregorio ; Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J. ; Mora-Bulnes, Stefany ; Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto ; Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo ; Grajales-Figueroa, Guido ; Ruiz-Romero, Daniel ; Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa ; Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra ; Cano-Manrique, Gregorio ; Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J. ; Mora-Bulnes, Stefany ; Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto ; Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo ; Grajales-Figueroa, Guido ; Ruiz-Romero, Daniel ; Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated.
Aim
To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD).
Methods
We performed a randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to CLD or LRD the day before of elective colonoscopy. All subjects received a 4-L preparation of single-dose PEG beginning 16 h prior to colonoscopy. The Boston bowel preparation scale was used to evaluate bowel cleansing; an adequate-quality preparation was defined as a score ≥ 2 per segment.
Results
A total of 205 subjects were included with a mean age (SD) of 55.6 (12.6) years; 133 (64.9%) of them were female. A total of 105 subjects were randomized to receive CLD and 100 to LRD. No significant differences in bowel preparation quality were observed between groups according to the section of colon: right colon (70% vs. 73%,
p
= 0.08), transverse colon (82% vs. 79%,
p
= 0.062), or left colon (80% vs. 78.7%,
p
= 0.28). There was a tendency toward less-frequent nausea (
p
= 0.08) and vomiting (
p
= 0.07) in patients with LRD. No differences between groups regarding ADR (12% vs. 10%) were noted.
Conclusions
An LRD before colonoscopy resulted in a tendency toward improved tolerability by patients, with no differences in the quality of bowel preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31482360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Colon ; Colon - diagnostic imaging ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - adverse effects ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colorectal cancer ; Diet - methods ; Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage ; Energy Intake ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage ; Preoperative Care - adverse effects ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Proctology ; Quality ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2020-07, Vol.34 (7), p.3037-3042</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8be78a3311121975ee49ff71e5fc4f36d47d5c34d0d39c982d3064109626e8d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8be78a3311121975ee49ff71e5fc4f36d47d5c34d0d39c982d3064109626e8d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7812-2003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano-Manrique, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora-Bulnes, Stefany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grajales-Figueroa, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Romero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</creatorcontrib><title>A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated.
Aim
To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD).
Methods
We performed a randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to CLD or LRD the day before of elective colonoscopy. All subjects received a 4-L preparation of single-dose PEG beginning 16 h prior to colonoscopy. The Boston bowel preparation scale was used to evaluate bowel cleansing; an adequate-quality preparation was defined as a score ≥ 2 per segment.
Results
A total of 205 subjects were included with a mean age (SD) of 55.6 (12.6) years; 133 (64.9%) of them were female. A total of 105 subjects were randomized to receive CLD and 100 to LRD. No significant differences in bowel preparation quality were observed between groups according to the section of colon: right colon (70% vs. 73%,
p
= 0.08), transverse colon (82% vs. 79%,
p
= 0.062), or left colon (80% vs. 78.7%,
p
= 0.28). There was a tendency toward less-frequent nausea (
p
= 0.08) and vomiting (
p
= 0.07) in patients with LRD. No differences between groups regarding ADR (12% vs. 10%) were noted.
Conclusions
An LRD before colonoscopy resulted in a tendency toward improved tolerability by patients, with no differences in the quality of bowel preparation.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colon - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Diet - methods</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - adverse effects</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uFSEYhonR2GP1BlwYEjdusPwNDO6axr-kSTe6njDDh9LMwBQYm-NFeM3leKomLrqCwPO-H-RB6CWjbxml-qxQKpUklBlCdTsh6hHaMSk44Zz1j9GOGkEJ10aeoGelXNPGG9Y9RSeCyZ4LRXfo1zme0y3JUILbALsAFY_gUwY8pTnFVKa07nGF6AquCYdlzekHtO0M2Y5hDnWPxz1ebQ0Qa8G3oX7HMbUm7yFDnKDgEPGaYbW5QSnim80eYu-wxdlGl5bwExyuOdj5OXri7Vzgxf16ir5-eP_l4hO5vPr4-eL8kkxCd5X0I-jeCsEY48zoDkAa7zWDzk_SC-Wkdt0kpKNOmMn03AmqJKNGcQW9k-IUvTn2tt_cbFDqsIQywTzbCGkrA-e97JSQfd_Q1_-h12nLsb3uQAllhNG0UfxITTmVksEPaw6LzfuB0eFgazjaGpqt4betQbXQq_vqbVzA_Y380dMAcQRKu4rfIP-b_UDtHW37oWg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa</creator><creator>Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra</creator><creator>Cano-Manrique, Gregorio</creator><creator>Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J.</creator><creator>Mora-Bulnes, Stefany</creator><creator>Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto</creator><creator>Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo</creator><creator>Grajales-Figueroa, Guido</creator><creator>Ruiz-Romero, Daniel</creator><creator>Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-2003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial</title><author>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa ; Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra ; Cano-Manrique, Gregorio ; Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J. ; Mora-Bulnes, Stefany ; Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto ; Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo ; Grajales-Figueroa, Guido ; Ruiz-Romero, Daniel ; Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8be78a3311121975ee49ff71e5fc4f36d47d5c34d0d39c982d3064109626e8d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colon - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Diet - methods</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - adverse effects</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano-Manrique, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora-Bulnes, Stefany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grajales-Figueroa, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Romero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez-Reyes, Elisa</au><au>Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra</au><au>Cano-Manrique, Gregorio</au><au>Vilchis-Valadez, Natalia J.</au><au>Mora-Bulnes, Stefany</au><au>Medrano-Duarte, Gilberto</au><au>Chaires-Garza, Luis Gerardo</au><au>Grajales-Figueroa, Guido</au><au>Ruiz-Romero, Daniel</au><au>Téllez-Ávila, Félix I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3037</spage><epage>3042</epage><pages>3037-3042</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated.
Aim
To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD).
Methods
We performed a randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to CLD or LRD the day before of elective colonoscopy. All subjects received a 4-L preparation of single-dose PEG beginning 16 h prior to colonoscopy. The Boston bowel preparation scale was used to evaluate bowel cleansing; an adequate-quality preparation was defined as a score ≥ 2 per segment.
Results
A total of 205 subjects were included with a mean age (SD) of 55.6 (12.6) years; 133 (64.9%) of them were female. A total of 105 subjects were randomized to receive CLD and 100 to LRD. No significant differences in bowel preparation quality were observed between groups according to the section of colon: right colon (70% vs. 73%,
p
= 0.08), transverse colon (82% vs. 79%,
p
= 0.062), or left colon (80% vs. 78.7%,
p
= 0.28). There was a tendency toward less-frequent nausea (
p
= 0.08) and vomiting (
p
= 0.07) in patients with LRD. No differences between groups regarding ADR (12% vs. 10%) were noted.
Conclusions
An LRD before colonoscopy resulted in a tendency toward improved tolerability by patients, with no differences in the quality of bowel preparation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31482360</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-2003</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2020-07, Vol.34 (7), p.3037-3042 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284563488 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Aged Colon Colon - diagnostic imaging Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - adverse effects Colonoscopy - methods Colorectal cancer Diet - methods Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage Energy Intake Female Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage Preoperative Care - adverse effects Preoperative Care - methods Proctology Quality Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20low-residue%20diet%20before%20colonoscopy%20tends%20to%20improve%20tolerability%20by%20patients%20with%20no%20differences%20in%20preparation%20quality:%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez-Reyes,%20Elisa&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3037&rft.epage=3042&rft.pages=3037-3042&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283693970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283693970&rft_id=info:pmid/31482360&rfr_iscdi=true |