The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance

Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Jiahao, Li, Yongyun, Jia, Renbing, Fan, Xianqun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2088
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2078
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 146
creator Shi, Jiahao
Li, Yongyun
Jia, Renbing
Fan, Xianqun
description Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.32662
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284553958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284553958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0ACbhScmsdkJuNO6htBFwruYnqT2JR51GSK9O-NrboQXN3FPRzuPQjtUzKkhLBTP4UhZ0XB1tCAkqrMCKNiHQ3SjmQl5cUW2o5xSgilguSbaIvTvKwEzQfo9WlisfPG1r5f4M5h0C3YgMHWdcS-xY8XL7jp0j6e4dFEBw29DT72HuIJbixMdOtjg3VrMNS-9aBrHP1b651fqnbRhtN1tHvfcwc9X10-jW6y-4fr29H5fQa5yFkmiRkLZogtnS6NpVVVWAfVWAJI50BSY3JZlFYU0hlNgQEbV6IkghPJJXF8Bx2tvLPQvc9t7FXj49cXurXdPCrGZC4Er4RM6OEfdNrNQ5uuU4yLkiYh44k6XlEQuhiDdWoWfKPDQlGivrKrlF0tsyf24Ns4HzfW_JI_nRNwugI-fG0X_5vU7d1opfwE7u2LOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357183823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><description>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31479514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cancer ; Cell culture ; Clinical significance ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods ; Drug screening ; Fidelity ; Genomic instability ; Heterografts - drug effects ; Humans ; Medical research ; Mice ; natural selection ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - pathology ; patient‐derived xenograft ; Phenotypes ; Precision medicine ; selection bias ; Transplantation ; Transplantation, Heterologous - methods ; tumor heterogeneity ; Tumors ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods ; Xenografts ; Zebrafish</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088</ispartof><rights>2019 UICC</rights><rights>2019 UICC.</rights><rights>2020 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.32662$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.32662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31479514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Renbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</subject><subject>Drug screening</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Genomic instability</subject><subject>Heterografts - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>natural selection</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>patient‐derived xenograft</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Precision medicine</subject><subject>selection bias</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - methods</subject><subject>tumor heterogeneity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</subject><subject>Xenografts</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0ACbhScmsdkJuNO6htBFwruYnqT2JR51GSK9O-NrboQXN3FPRzuPQjtUzKkhLBTP4UhZ0XB1tCAkqrMCKNiHQ3SjmQl5cUW2o5xSgilguSbaIvTvKwEzQfo9WlisfPG1r5f4M5h0C3YgMHWdcS-xY8XL7jp0j6e4dFEBw29DT72HuIJbixMdOtjg3VrMNS-9aBrHP1b651fqnbRhtN1tHvfcwc9X10-jW6y-4fr29H5fQa5yFkmiRkLZogtnS6NpVVVWAfVWAJI50BSY3JZlFYU0hlNgQEbV6IkghPJJXF8Bx2tvLPQvc9t7FXj49cXurXdPCrGZC4Er4RM6OEfdNrNQ5uuU4yLkiYh44k6XlEQuhiDdWoWfKPDQlGivrKrlF0tsyf24Ns4HzfW_JI_nRNwugI-fG0X_5vU7d1opfwE7u2LOw</recordid><startdate>20200415</startdate><enddate>20200415</enddate><creator>Shi, Jiahao</creator><creator>Li, Yongyun</creator><creator>Jia, Renbing</creator><creator>Fan, Xianqun</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200415</creationdate><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><author>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</topic><topic>Drug screening</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Genomic instability</topic><topic>Heterografts - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>natural selection</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>patient‐derived xenograft</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Precision medicine</topic><topic>selection bias</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - methods</topic><topic>tumor heterogeneity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</topic><topic>Xenografts</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Renbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Jiahao</au><au>Li, Yongyun</au><au>Jia, Renbing</au><au>Fan, Xianqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-04-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2078</spage><epage>2088</epage><pages>2078-2088</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31479514</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.32662</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284553958
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Cancer
Cell culture
Clinical significance
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods
Drug screening
Fidelity
Genomic instability
Heterografts - drug effects
Humans
Medical research
Mice
natural selection
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Neoplasms - pathology
patient‐derived xenograft
Phenotypes
Precision medicine
selection bias
Transplantation
Transplantation, Heterologous - methods
tumor heterogeneity
Tumors
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods
Xenografts
Zebrafish
title The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20fidelity%20of%20cancer%20cells%20in%20PDX%20models:%20Characteristics,%20mechanism%20and%20clinical%20significance&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Shi,%20Jiahao&rft.date=2020-04-15&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2078&rft.epage=2088&rft.pages=2078-2088&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.32662&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284553958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357183823&rft_id=info:pmid/31479514&rfr_iscdi=true