The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance
Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2088 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2078 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Shi, Jiahao Li, Yongyun Jia, Renbing Fan, Xianqun |
description | Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.32662 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284553958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284553958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0ACbhScmsdkJuNO6htBFwruYnqT2JR51GSK9O-NrboQXN3FPRzuPQjtUzKkhLBTP4UhZ0XB1tCAkqrMCKNiHQ3SjmQl5cUW2o5xSgilguSbaIvTvKwEzQfo9WlisfPG1r5f4M5h0C3YgMHWdcS-xY8XL7jp0j6e4dFEBw29DT72HuIJbixMdOtjg3VrMNS-9aBrHP1b651fqnbRhtN1tHvfcwc9X10-jW6y-4fr29H5fQa5yFkmiRkLZogtnS6NpVVVWAfVWAJI50BSY3JZlFYU0hlNgQEbV6IkghPJJXF8Bx2tvLPQvc9t7FXj49cXurXdPCrGZC4Er4RM6OEfdNrNQ5uuU4yLkiYh44k6XlEQuhiDdWoWfKPDQlGivrKrlF0tsyf24Ns4HzfW_JI_nRNwugI-fG0X_5vU7d1opfwE7u2LOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357183823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><description>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31479514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cancer ; Cell culture ; Clinical significance ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods ; Drug screening ; Fidelity ; Genomic instability ; Heterografts - drug effects ; Humans ; Medical research ; Mice ; natural selection ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - pathology ; patient‐derived xenograft ; Phenotypes ; Precision medicine ; selection bias ; Transplantation ; Transplantation, Heterologous - methods ; tumor heterogeneity ; Tumors ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods ; Xenografts ; Zebrafish</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088</ispartof><rights>2019 UICC</rights><rights>2019 UICC.</rights><rights>2020 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.32662$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.32662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31479514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Renbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</subject><subject>Drug screening</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Genomic instability</subject><subject>Heterografts - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>natural selection</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>patient‐derived xenograft</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Precision medicine</subject><subject>selection bias</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - methods</subject><subject>tumor heterogeneity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</subject><subject>Xenografts</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0ACbhScmsdkJuNO6htBFwruYnqT2JR51GSK9O-NrboQXN3FPRzuPQjtUzKkhLBTP4UhZ0XB1tCAkqrMCKNiHQ3SjmQl5cUW2o5xSgilguSbaIvTvKwEzQfo9WlisfPG1r5f4M5h0C3YgMHWdcS-xY8XL7jp0j6e4dFEBw29DT72HuIJbixMdOtjg3VrMNS-9aBrHP1b651fqnbRhtN1tHvfcwc9X10-jW6y-4fr29H5fQa5yFkmiRkLZogtnS6NpVVVWAfVWAJI50BSY3JZlFYU0hlNgQEbV6IkghPJJXF8Bx2tvLPQvc9t7FXj49cXurXdPCrGZC4Er4RM6OEfdNrNQ5uuU4yLkiYh44k6XlEQuhiDdWoWfKPDQlGivrKrlF0tsyf24Ns4HzfW_JI_nRNwugI-fG0X_5vU7d1opfwE7u2LOw</recordid><startdate>20200415</startdate><enddate>20200415</enddate><creator>Shi, Jiahao</creator><creator>Li, Yongyun</creator><creator>Jia, Renbing</creator><creator>Fan, Xianqun</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200415</creationdate><title>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</title><author>Shi, Jiahao ; Li, Yongyun ; Jia, Renbing ; Fan, Xianqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4542-80db52d0e7fa7de1996efc9b8cc8ffc81dd4867e568fda1c2c2b95705308380f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</topic><topic>Drug screening</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Genomic instability</topic><topic>Heterografts - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>natural selection</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>patient‐derived xenograft</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Precision medicine</topic><topic>selection bias</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - methods</topic><topic>tumor heterogeneity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</topic><topic>Xenografts</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jiahao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Renbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Jiahao</au><au>Li, Yongyun</au><au>Jia, Renbing</au><au>Fan, Xianqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-04-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2078</spage><epage>2088</epage><pages>2078-2088</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used as preclinical cancer models and are considered better than cell culture models in recapitulating the histological features, molecular characteristics and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of human tumors. While the PDX model is commonly accepted for use in drug discovery and other translational studies, a growing body of evidence has suggested its limitations. Recently, the fidelity of cancer cells within a PDX has been questioned, which may impede the future application of these models. In this review, we will focus the variable phenotypes of xenograft tumors and the genomic instability and molecular inconsistency of PDX tumors after serial transplantation. Next, we will discuss the underlying mechanism of ITH and its clinical relevance. Stochastic selection bias in the sampling process and/or deterministic clonal dynamics due to murine selective pressure may have detrimental effects on the results of personalized medicine and drug screening studies. In addition, we aim to identify a possible solution for the issue of fidelity in current PDX models and to discuss emerging next‐generation preclinical models.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31479514</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.32662</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-2031</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2020-04, Vol.146 (8), p.2078-2088 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2284553958 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Cancer Cell culture Clinical significance Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods Drug screening Fidelity Genomic instability Heterografts - drug effects Humans Medical research Mice natural selection Neoplasms - drug therapy Neoplasms - pathology patient‐derived xenograft Phenotypes Precision medicine selection bias Transplantation Transplantation, Heterologous - methods tumor heterogeneity Tumors Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods Xenografts Zebrafish |
title | The fidelity of cancer cells in PDX models: Characteristics, mechanism and clinical significance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20fidelity%20of%20cancer%20cells%20in%20PDX%20models:%20Characteristics,%20mechanism%20and%20clinical%20significance&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Shi,%20Jiahao&rft.date=2020-04-15&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2078&rft.epage=2088&rft.pages=2078-2088&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.32662&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284553958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357183823&rft_id=info:pmid/31479514&rfr_iscdi=true |