Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research

ABSTRACT There is clinical evidence that patient‐specific comorbidities like osteoporosis, concomitant tissue injury, and ischemia may strongly interfere with bone regeneration. However, underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To study these mechanisms in detail, appropriate animal models are neede...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2019-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2491-2498
Hauptverfasser: Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie, Hankenson, Kurt D., Ignatius, Anita, Pfeifer, Roman, Khader, Basel A., Hildebrand, Frank, Griensven, Martijn, Pape, Hans‐Christoph, Lehmicke, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2498
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2491
container_title Journal of orthopaedic research
container_volume 37
creator Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie
Hankenson, Kurt D.
Ignatius, Anita
Pfeifer, Roman
Khader, Basel A.
Hildebrand, Frank
Griensven, Martijn
Pape, Hans‐Christoph
Lehmicke, Michael
description ABSTRACT There is clinical evidence that patient‐specific comorbidities like osteoporosis, concomitant tissue injury, and ischemia may strongly interfere with bone regeneration. However, underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To study these mechanisms in detail, appropriate animal models are needed. For decades, bone healing has been studied in large animals, including dogs, rabbits, pigs, or sheep. However, large animal models display a limited ability to study molecular pathways and cellular functions. Therefore in recent years, mice and rats have become increasingly popular as a model organism for fracture healing research due to the availability of molecular analysis tools and transgenic models. Both large and small animals can be used to study comorbidities and risk factors, modelling the human clinical situation. However, attention has to be paid when choosing an appropriate model due to species differences between large animals, rodents, and humans. This review focuses on large and small animal models for the common comorbidities ischemic injury/reduced vascularization, osteoporosis, and polytrauma, and critically discusses the translational and molecular aspects of these models. Here, we review material which was presented at the workshop “Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture Healing Research” at the 2019 ORS Annual Meeting in Austin Texas. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2491–2498, 2019
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jor.24454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283976833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2283976833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-fb335f8a5ea9d54483705b8e967828fd66597a7ef4eef6b5b0d79ae320dae1593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQgBdRbK0efAHJUQ9pN_ufYym2VSqFouAtbJJZ3ZI0dbex9OYj-Iw-iamp3jwNDB8fMx9ClxHuRxiTwbJyfcIYZ0eoG3HOQk7k8zHqYklFiIkQHXTm_RJjLCOiTlGHRowxhUUXTRbwbmEbVCYYrmypi-ChyqHw-8WoKiuX2txuLPjAroKx09mmdvD18TkFXdjVS7AAD9plr-foxOjCw8Vh9tDT-PZxNA1n88ndaDgLMyowC01KKTdKc9BxzpsbqMQ8VRALqYgyuRA8llqCYQBGpDzFuYw1UIJzDRGPaQ9dt961q95q8JuktD6DotArqGqfEKJoLIWitEFvWjRzlfcOTLJ2zYdul0Q42XdLmm7JT7eGvTpo67SE_I_8DdUAgxbY2gJ2_5uS-_miVX4DNf53iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283976833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie ; Hankenson, Kurt D. ; Ignatius, Anita ; Pfeifer, Roman ; Khader, Basel A. ; Hildebrand, Frank ; Griensven, Martijn ; Pape, Hans‐Christoph ; Lehmicke, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie ; Hankenson, Kurt D. ; Ignatius, Anita ; Pfeifer, Roman ; Khader, Basel A. ; Hildebrand, Frank ; Griensven, Martijn ; Pape, Hans‐Christoph ; Lehmicke, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT There is clinical evidence that patient‐specific comorbidities like osteoporosis, concomitant tissue injury, and ischemia may strongly interfere with bone regeneration. However, underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To study these mechanisms in detail, appropriate animal models are needed. For decades, bone healing has been studied in large animals, including dogs, rabbits, pigs, or sheep. However, large animal models display a limited ability to study molecular pathways and cellular functions. Therefore in recent years, mice and rats have become increasingly popular as a model organism for fracture healing research due to the availability of molecular analysis tools and transgenic models. Both large and small animals can be used to study comorbidities and risk factors, modelling the human clinical situation. However, attention has to be paid when choosing an appropriate model due to species differences between large animals, rodents, and humans. This review focuses on large and small animal models for the common comorbidities ischemic injury/reduced vascularization, osteoporosis, and polytrauma, and critically discusses the translational and molecular aspects of these models. Here, we review material which was presented at the workshop “Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture Healing Research” at the 2019 ORS Annual Meeting in Austin Texas. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2491–2498, 2019</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.24454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31444806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>animal models ; Animals ; bone regeneration ; Comorbidity ; Disease Models, Animal ; fracture healing ; Fracture Healing - physiology ; Humans ; Multiple Trauma - physiopathology ; osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; polytrauma</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2019-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2491-2498</ispartof><rights>2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-fb335f8a5ea9d54483705b8e967828fd66597a7ef4eef6b5b0d79ae320dae1593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-fb335f8a5ea9d54483705b8e967828fd66597a7ef4eef6b5b0d79ae320dae1593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1632-4002 ; 0000-0002-3333-2613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjor.24454$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjor.24454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hankenson, Kurt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignatius, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khader, Basel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrand, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griensven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pape, Hans‐Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmicke, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT There is clinical evidence that patient‐specific comorbidities like osteoporosis, concomitant tissue injury, and ischemia may strongly interfere with bone regeneration. However, underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To study these mechanisms in detail, appropriate animal models are needed. For decades, bone healing has been studied in large animals, including dogs, rabbits, pigs, or sheep. However, large animal models display a limited ability to study molecular pathways and cellular functions. Therefore in recent years, mice and rats have become increasingly popular as a model organism for fracture healing research due to the availability of molecular analysis tools and transgenic models. Both large and small animals can be used to study comorbidities and risk factors, modelling the human clinical situation. However, attention has to be paid when choosing an appropriate model due to species differences between large animals, rodents, and humans. This review focuses on large and small animal models for the common comorbidities ischemic injury/reduced vascularization, osteoporosis, and polytrauma, and critically discusses the translational and molecular aspects of these models. Here, we review material which was presented at the workshop “Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture Healing Research” at the 2019 ORS Annual Meeting in Austin Texas. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2491–2498, 2019</description><subject>animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>fracture healing</subject><subject>Fracture Healing - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - physiopathology</subject><subject>osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>polytrauma</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQgBdRbK0efAHJUQ9pN_ufYym2VSqFouAtbJJZ3ZI0dbex9OYj-Iw-iamp3jwNDB8fMx9ClxHuRxiTwbJyfcIYZ0eoG3HOQk7k8zHqYklFiIkQHXTm_RJjLCOiTlGHRowxhUUXTRbwbmEbVCYYrmypi-ChyqHw-8WoKiuX2txuLPjAroKx09mmdvD18TkFXdjVS7AAD9plr-foxOjCw8Vh9tDT-PZxNA1n88ndaDgLMyowC01KKTdKc9BxzpsbqMQ8VRALqYgyuRA8llqCYQBGpDzFuYw1UIJzDRGPaQ9dt961q95q8JuktD6DotArqGqfEKJoLIWitEFvWjRzlfcOTLJ2zYdul0Q42XdLmm7JT7eGvTpo67SE_I_8DdUAgxbY2gJ2_5uS-_miVX4DNf53iw</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie</creator><creator>Hankenson, Kurt D.</creator><creator>Ignatius, Anita</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Roman</creator><creator>Khader, Basel A.</creator><creator>Hildebrand, Frank</creator><creator>Griensven, Martijn</creator><creator>Pape, Hans‐Christoph</creator><creator>Lehmicke, Michael</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-4002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-2613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research</title><author>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie ; Hankenson, Kurt D. ; Ignatius, Anita ; Pfeifer, Roman ; Khader, Basel A. ; Hildebrand, Frank ; Griensven, Martijn ; Pape, Hans‐Christoph ; Lehmicke, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-fb335f8a5ea9d54483705b8e967828fd66597a7ef4eef6b5b0d79ae320dae1593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>fracture healing</topic><topic>Fracture Healing - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - physiopathology</topic><topic>osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>polytrauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hankenson, Kurt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignatius, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khader, Basel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrand, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griensven, Martijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pape, Hans‐Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmicke, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haffner‐Luntzer, Melanie</au><au>Hankenson, Kurt D.</au><au>Ignatius, Anita</au><au>Pfeifer, Roman</au><au>Khader, Basel A.</au><au>Hildebrand, Frank</au><au>Griensven, Martijn</au><au>Pape, Hans‐Christoph</au><au>Lehmicke, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2491</spage><epage>2498</epage><pages>2491-2498</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT There is clinical evidence that patient‐specific comorbidities like osteoporosis, concomitant tissue injury, and ischemia may strongly interfere with bone regeneration. However, underlying mechanisms are still unclear. To study these mechanisms in detail, appropriate animal models are needed. For decades, bone healing has been studied in large animals, including dogs, rabbits, pigs, or sheep. However, large animal models display a limited ability to study molecular pathways and cellular functions. Therefore in recent years, mice and rats have become increasingly popular as a model organism for fracture healing research due to the availability of molecular analysis tools and transgenic models. Both large and small animals can be used to study comorbidities and risk factors, modelling the human clinical situation. However, attention has to be paid when choosing an appropriate model due to species differences between large animals, rodents, and humans. This review focuses on large and small animal models for the common comorbidities ischemic injury/reduced vascularization, osteoporosis, and polytrauma, and critically discusses the translational and molecular aspects of these models. Here, we review material which was presented at the workshop “Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture Healing Research” at the 2019 ORS Annual Meeting in Austin Texas. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2491–2498, 2019</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31444806</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.24454</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-4002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-2613</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0266
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic research, 2019-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2491-2498
issn 0736-0266
1554-527X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283976833
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects animal models
Animals
bone regeneration
Comorbidity
Disease Models, Animal
fracture healing
Fracture Healing - physiology
Humans
Multiple Trauma - physiopathology
osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - physiopathology
polytrauma
title Review of Animal Models of Comorbidities in Fracture‐Healing Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Animal%20Models%20of%20Comorbidities%20in%20Fracture%E2%80%90Healing%20Research&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Haffner%E2%80%90Luntzer,%20Melanie&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2491&rft.epage=2498&rft.pages=2491-2498&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.24454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283976833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283976833&rft_id=info:pmid/31444806&rfr_iscdi=true