Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques

Background: With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing "childhood apraxia of speech" (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics--erro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2019-08, Vol.62 (8), p.2999-3032
Hauptverfasser: Terband, Hayo, Namasivayam, Aravind, Maas, Edwin, van Brenk, Frits, Mailend, Marja-Liisa, Diepeveen, Sanne, van Lieshout, Pascal, Maassen, Ben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3032
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2999
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 62
creator Terband, Hayo
Namasivayam, Aravind
Maas, Edwin
van Brenk, Frits
Mailend, Marja-Liisa
Diepeveen, Sanne
van Lieshout, Pascal
Maassen, Ben
description Background: With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing "childhood apraxia of speech" (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics--error inconsistency, lengthened and disrupted coarticulation, and inappropriate prosody--have gained wide acceptance in the literature for purposes of participant selection. However, little research has sought to empirically test the diagnostic validity of these features. One major obstacle to such empirical study is the fact that none of these features is stated in operationalized terms. Purpose: This tutorial provides a structured overview of perceptual, acoustic, and articulatory measurement procedures that have been used or could be used to operationalize and assess these 3 core characteristics. Methodological details are reviewed for each procedure, along with a short overview of research results reported in the literature. Conclusion: The 3 types of measurement procedures should be seen as complementary. Some characteristics are better suited to be described at the perceptual level (especially phonemic errors and prosody), others at the acoustic level (especially phonetic distortions, coarticulation, and prosody), and still others at the kinematic level (especially coarticulation, stability, and gestural coordination). The type of data collected determines, to a large extent, the interpretation that can be given regarding the underlying deficit. Comprehensive studies are needed that include more than 1 diagnostic feature and more than 1 type of measurement procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-19-0214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283115785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A600787396</galeid><ericid>EJ1226863</ericid><sourcerecordid>A600787396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e4d5058de8df700d0a7ae959e542be2c67e959f20622bcca67baa5db8096f81e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCKAIJMQlre3YsdNbFBVKtVWlZjkbx5k0XiXxYicF3h6nW1qK1nMYe-b7x5b1R9F7jI4xovSEIJzLi2p1fp1USVldljzBeYIIps-iQ8yYSHKMyPOwRzlJaCrEQfTK-w0KC9PsZXSQhsQ4oofR98J78H6AcYptG5ed6ZvO2iYutk79MmopVlsA3Z3GRXwNtwZ-nqznyTqj-qV5VW9AT-YW4ktQfnZwN2odBKP5MYN_Hb1oVe_hzX0-ir59PluX58nq6svXslglmjE-JUAbhphoQDQtR6hBiivIWQ6MkhqIzvhyagnKCKm1VhmvlWJNLVCetQJDehR92s3dOrvcO8nBeA19r0aws5eEiBRjxgUL6If_0I2d3Rhet1A0z2iIR-pG9SDN2NrJKb0MlUWGEBc8zRcq2UPdwAhO9XaE1oTyE_54Dx-igcHovYKP_wg6UP3UedvPk7Gjfwqe7kDtrPcOWrl1ZlDut8RILr6Rj76RlbzzjQyFxTdB_O7-S-Z6gOZB-tcoAXi7A8AZ_dA-u8CEZCJL0z9wIMaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284964646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Terband, Hayo ; Namasivayam, Aravind ; Maas, Edwin ; van Brenk, Frits ; Mailend, Marja-Liisa ; Diepeveen, Sanne ; van Lieshout, Pascal ; Maassen, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Terband, Hayo ; Namasivayam, Aravind ; Maas, Edwin ; van Brenk, Frits ; Mailend, Marja-Liisa ; Diepeveen, Sanne ; van Lieshout, Pascal ; Maassen, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Background: With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing "childhood apraxia of speech" (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics--error inconsistency, lengthened and disrupted coarticulation, and inappropriate prosody--have gained wide acceptance in the literature for purposes of participant selection. However, little research has sought to empirically test the diagnostic validity of these features. One major obstacle to such empirical study is the fact that none of these features is stated in operationalized terms. Purpose: This tutorial provides a structured overview of perceptual, acoustic, and articulatory measurement procedures that have been used or could be used to operationalize and assess these 3 core characteristics. Methodological details are reviewed for each procedure, along with a short overview of research results reported in the literature. Conclusion: The 3 types of measurement procedures should be seen as complementary. Some characteristics are better suited to be described at the perceptual level (especially phonemic errors and prosody), others at the acoustic level (especially phonetic distortions, coarticulation, and prosody), and still others at the kinematic level (especially coarticulation, stability, and gestural coordination). The type of data collected determines, to a large extent, the interpretation that can be given regarding the underlying deficit. Comprehensive studies are needed that include more than 1 diagnostic feature and more than 1 type of measurement procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-19-0214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31465704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Apraxia ; Articulation ; Articulation (Speech) ; Audio Equipment ; Book publishing ; Childhood ; Childhood communication disorders ; Children ; Measurement ; Measurement Techniques ; Methods ; Neurological Impairments ; Perceptions ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Programming ; Research Needs ; Research Reports ; Speech Impairments ; Statistical Data ; Suprasegmentals ; Tutorial Programs ; Validity ; Vowels</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-08, Vol.62 (8), p.2999-3032</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e4d5058de8df700d0a7ae959e542be2c67e959f20622bcca67baa5db8096f81e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e4d5058de8df700d0a7ae959e542be2c67e959f20622bcca67baa5db8096f81e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1226863$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31465704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terband, Hayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namasivayam, Aravind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brenk, Frits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mailend, Marja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diepeveen, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lieshout, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Background: With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing "childhood apraxia of speech" (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics--error inconsistency, lengthened and disrupted coarticulation, and inappropriate prosody--have gained wide acceptance in the literature for purposes of participant selection. However, little research has sought to empirically test the diagnostic validity of these features. One major obstacle to such empirical study is the fact that none of these features is stated in operationalized terms. Purpose: This tutorial provides a structured overview of perceptual, acoustic, and articulatory measurement procedures that have been used or could be used to operationalize and assess these 3 core characteristics. Methodological details are reviewed for each procedure, along with a short overview of research results reported in the literature. Conclusion: The 3 types of measurement procedures should be seen as complementary. Some characteristics are better suited to be described at the perceptual level (especially phonemic errors and prosody), others at the acoustic level (especially phonetic distortions, coarticulation, and prosody), and still others at the kinematic level (especially coarticulation, stability, and gestural coordination). The type of data collected determines, to a large extent, the interpretation that can be given regarding the underlying deficit. Comprehensive studies are needed that include more than 1 diagnostic feature and more than 1 type of measurement procedure.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Apraxia</subject><subject>Articulation</subject><subject>Articulation (Speech)</subject><subject>Audio Equipment</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Childhood communication disorders</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Speech Impairments</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Tutorial Programs</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vowels</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCKAIJMQlre3YsdNbFBVKtVWlZjkbx5k0XiXxYicF3h6nW1qK1nMYe-b7x5b1R9F7jI4xovSEIJzLi2p1fp1USVldljzBeYIIps-iQ8yYSHKMyPOwRzlJaCrEQfTK-w0KC9PsZXSQhsQ4oofR98J78H6AcYptG5ed6ZvO2iYutk79MmopVlsA3Z3GRXwNtwZ-nqznyTqj-qV5VW9AT-YW4ktQfnZwN2odBKP5MYN_Hb1oVe_hzX0-ir59PluX58nq6svXslglmjE-JUAbhphoQDQtR6hBiivIWQ6MkhqIzvhyagnKCKm1VhmvlWJNLVCetQJDehR92s3dOrvcO8nBeA19r0aws5eEiBRjxgUL6If_0I2d3Rhet1A0z2iIR-pG9SDN2NrJKb0MlUWGEBc8zRcq2UPdwAhO9XaE1oTyE_54Dx-igcHovYKP_wg6UP3UedvPk7Gjfwqe7kDtrPcOWrl1ZlDut8RILr6Rj76RlbzzjQyFxTdB_O7-S-Z6gOZB-tcoAXi7A8AZ_dA-u8CEZCJL0z9wIMaQ</recordid><startdate>20190829</startdate><enddate>20190829</enddate><creator>Terband, Hayo</creator><creator>Namasivayam, Aravind</creator><creator>Maas, Edwin</creator><creator>van Brenk, Frits</creator><creator>Mailend, Marja-Liisa</creator><creator>Diepeveen, Sanne</creator><creator>van Lieshout, Pascal</creator><creator>Maassen, Ben</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190829</creationdate><title>Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques</title><author>Terband, Hayo ; Namasivayam, Aravind ; Maas, Edwin ; van Brenk, Frits ; Mailend, Marja-Liisa ; Diepeveen, Sanne ; van Lieshout, Pascal ; Maassen, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e4d5058de8df700d0a7ae959e542be2c67e959f20622bcca67baa5db8096f81e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Apraxia</topic><topic>Articulation</topic><topic>Articulation (Speech)</topic><topic>Audio Equipment</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Childhood communication disorders</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Speech Impairments</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Tutorial Programs</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vowels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terband, Hayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namasivayam, Aravind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brenk, Frits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mailend, Marja-Liisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diepeveen, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lieshout, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terband, Hayo</au><au>Namasivayam, Aravind</au><au>Maas, Edwin</au><au>van Brenk, Frits</au><au>Mailend, Marja-Liisa</au><au>Diepeveen, Sanne</au><au>van Lieshout, Pascal</au><au>Maassen, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1226863</ericid><atitle>Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2019-08-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2999</spage><epage>3032</epage><pages>2999-3032</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Background: With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing "childhood apraxia of speech" (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics--error inconsistency, lengthened and disrupted coarticulation, and inappropriate prosody--have gained wide acceptance in the literature for purposes of participant selection. However, little research has sought to empirically test the diagnostic validity of these features. One major obstacle to such empirical study is the fact that none of these features is stated in operationalized terms. Purpose: This tutorial provides a structured overview of perceptual, acoustic, and articulatory measurement procedures that have been used or could be used to operationalize and assess these 3 core characteristics. Methodological details are reviewed for each procedure, along with a short overview of research results reported in the literature. Conclusion: The 3 types of measurement procedures should be seen as complementary. Some characteristics are better suited to be described at the perceptual level (especially phonemic errors and prosody), others at the acoustic level (especially phonetic distortions, coarticulation, and prosody), and still others at the kinematic level (especially coarticulation, stability, and gestural coordination). The type of data collected determines, to a large extent, the interpretation that can be given regarding the underlying deficit. Comprehensive studies are needed that include more than 1 diagnostic feature and more than 1 type of measurement procedure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>31465704</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-19-0214</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-08, Vol.62 (8), p.2999-3032
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283115785
source EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustics
Apraxia
Articulation
Articulation (Speech)
Audio Equipment
Book publishing
Childhood
Childhood communication disorders
Children
Measurement
Measurement Techniques
Methods
Neurological Impairments
Perceptions
Phonetics
Phonology
Programming
Research Needs
Research Reports
Speech Impairments
Statistical Data
Suprasegmentals
Tutorial Programs
Validity
Vowels
title Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Childhood%20Apraxia%20of%20Speech:%20A%20Review/Tutorial%20of%20Objective%20Measurement%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Terband,%20Hayo&rft.date=2019-08-29&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2999&rft.epage=3032&rft.pages=2999-3032&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-CSMC7-19-0214&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA600787396%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284964646&rft_id=info:pmid/31465704&rft_galeid=A600787396&rft_ericid=EJ1226863&rfr_iscdi=true