The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players
ABSTRACTTiernan, C, Lyons, M, Comyns, T, Nevill, AM, and Warrington, G. The relationship between adductor squeeze strength, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 33(11)2926–2931, 2019—The adductor squeeze strength test has become a popular train...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.2926-2931 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2931 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 2926 |
| container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Tiernan, Caoimhe Lyons, Mark Comyns, Tom Nevill, Alan M Warrington, Giles |
| description | ABSTRACTTiernan, C, Lyons, M, Comyns, T, Nevill, AM, and Warrington, G. The relationship between adductor squeeze strength, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 33(11)2926–2931, 2019—The adductor squeeze strength test has become a popular training monitoring marker, particularly in team sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby Union players, because of limited research in this area. Nineteen elite male Rugby Union players completed daily monitoring markers (adductor squeeze strength and 5 selected subjective markers of recovery), over a 10-week preseason training period. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was collected to determine training load (session RPE; RPE × session duration) and to calculate weekly training load. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery, and weekly training load. The results found that where adductor squeeze scores decreased, both perceived fatigue levels (r = −0.335; R = 11.2%; p < 0.001) and muscle soreness (r = −0.277; R = 7.7%; p < 0.001) increased. A weak correlation was found between Monday adductor squeeze strength scores and the previous weekʼs training load (r = −0.235; R = 5.5%; p < 0.001) and Friday adductor squeeze strength scores and the same weekʼs training load (r = −0.211; R = 4.5%; p < 0.05). These results show that adductor squeeze strength may provide coaches with a time-efficient, low‐cost objective, player monitoring marker. Additionally, the combination of adductor strength squeeze, with subjective markers, perceived fatigue, and muscle soreness, and appropriately planned training load may help coaches to optimize training adaptations by determining a playerʼs training status. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003370 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283110994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2316410258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-6e11c6897c21636ac48dacdc3a07cbdedff69b663b5fcd55316a27c8edae5ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUha2qqC2Ff1AhS2xYkNaOEydZllF5aVARM3vLsW8mnnrswXY6GvjzGE2pUBf15nrxnXMfB6ELSi5pTburr4vZJfnvMdaQI3RGa8aKqmyb4_wnvCpaQukpehnjmpCyrmt2gk4ZrXjXcHKGfi9HwD_AymS8i6PZ4g-QdgAOX2s9qeQDXvycAH4BXqQAbpXG93gx9WtQydwD_ibDHYSI_ZBdlL-HsMfSabwM0jjjVnjupcbG4RtrUu40rfo9_m7lPoteoReDtBFeP9RztPx4s5x9Lua3n77MrueFqhghBQdKFW-7RpWUMy5V1WqptGKSNKrXoIeBdz3nrK8HpfOClMuyUS1oCTUM7By9O9hug8-rxCQ2JiqwVjrwUxRl2TJKSddVGX37BF37Kbg8nCizbUXzBdtMVQdKBR9jgEFsg9nIsBeUiL_ZiJyNeJpNlr15MJ_6DehH0b8wMtAegJ23Kd_nzk47CGIEadP4vPcfUgub2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316410258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Tiernan, Caoimhe ; Lyons, Mark ; Comyns, Tom ; Nevill, Alan M ; Warrington, Giles</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiernan, Caoimhe ; Lyons, Mark ; Comyns, Tom ; Nevill, Alan M ; Warrington, Giles</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTTiernan, C, Lyons, M, Comyns, T, Nevill, AM, and Warrington, G. The relationship between adductor squeeze strength, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 33(11)2926–2931, 2019—The adductor squeeze strength test has become a popular training monitoring marker, particularly in team sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby Union players, because of limited research in this area. Nineteen elite male Rugby Union players completed daily monitoring markers (adductor squeeze strength and 5 selected subjective markers of recovery), over a 10-week preseason training period. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was collected to determine training load (session RPE; RPE × session duration) and to calculate weekly training load. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery, and weekly training load. The results found that where adductor squeeze scores decreased, both perceived fatigue levels (r = −0.335; R = 11.2%; p < 0.001) and muscle soreness (r = −0.277; R = 7.7%; p < 0.001) increased. A weak correlation was found between Monday adductor squeeze strength scores and the previous weekʼs training load (r = −0.235; R = 5.5%; p < 0.001) and Friday adductor squeeze strength scores and the same weekʼs training load (r = −0.211; R = 4.5%; p < 0.05). These results show that adductor squeeze strength may provide coaches with a time-efficient, low‐cost objective, player monitoring marker. Additionally, the combination of adductor strength squeeze, with subjective markers, perceived fatigue, and muscle soreness, and appropriately planned training load may help coaches to optimize training adaptations by determining a playerʼs training status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003370</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31469760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adolescent ; Athletes ; Fatigue ; Football - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Myalgia ; Physical Conditioning, Human ; Physical fitness ; Recovery (Medical) ; Rugby ; Sphygmomanometers ; Sports training ; Strength training ; Team sports ; Thigh ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.2926-2931</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-6e11c6897c21636ac48dacdc3a07cbdedff69b663b5fcd55316a27c8edae5ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-6e11c6897c21636ac48dacdc3a07cbdedff69b663b5fcd55316a27c8edae5ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31469760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiernan, Caoimhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comyns, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevill, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, Giles</creatorcontrib><title>The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTTiernan, C, Lyons, M, Comyns, T, Nevill, AM, and Warrington, G. The relationship between adductor squeeze strength, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 33(11)2926–2931, 2019—The adductor squeeze strength test has become a popular training monitoring marker, particularly in team sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby Union players, because of limited research in this area. Nineteen elite male Rugby Union players completed daily monitoring markers (adductor squeeze strength and 5 selected subjective markers of recovery), over a 10-week preseason training period. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was collected to determine training load (session RPE; RPE × session duration) and to calculate weekly training load. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery, and weekly training load. The results found that where adductor squeeze scores decreased, both perceived fatigue levels (r = −0.335; R = 11.2%; p < 0.001) and muscle soreness (r = −0.277; R = 7.7%; p < 0.001) increased. A weak correlation was found between Monday adductor squeeze strength scores and the previous weekʼs training load (r = −0.235; R = 5.5%; p < 0.001) and Friday adductor squeeze strength scores and the same weekʼs training load (r = −0.211; R = 4.5%; p < 0.05). These results show that adductor squeeze strength may provide coaches with a time-efficient, low‐cost objective, player monitoring marker. Additionally, the combination of adductor strength squeeze, with subjective markers, perceived fatigue, and muscle soreness, and appropriately planned training load may help coaches to optimize training adaptations by determining a playerʼs training status.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Football - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Myalgia</subject><subject>Physical Conditioning, Human</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Rugby</subject><subject>Sphygmomanometers</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Team sports</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUha2qqC2Ff1AhS2xYkNaOEydZllF5aVARM3vLsW8mnnrswXY6GvjzGE2pUBf15nrxnXMfB6ELSi5pTburr4vZJfnvMdaQI3RGa8aKqmyb4_wnvCpaQukpehnjmpCyrmt2gk4ZrXjXcHKGfi9HwD_AymS8i6PZ4g-QdgAOX2s9qeQDXvycAH4BXqQAbpXG93gx9WtQydwD_ibDHYSI_ZBdlL-HsMfSabwM0jjjVnjupcbG4RtrUu40rfo9_m7lPoteoReDtBFeP9RztPx4s5x9Lua3n77MrueFqhghBQdKFW-7RpWUMy5V1WqptGKSNKrXoIeBdz3nrK8HpfOClMuyUS1oCTUM7By9O9hug8-rxCQ2JiqwVjrwUxRl2TJKSddVGX37BF37Kbg8nCizbUXzBdtMVQdKBR9jgEFsg9nIsBeUiL_ZiJyNeJpNlr15MJ_6DehH0b8wMtAegJ23Kd_nzk47CGIEadP4vPcfUgub2w</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Tiernan, Caoimhe</creator><creator>Lyons, Mark</creator><creator>Comyns, Tom</creator><creator>Nevill, Alan M</creator><creator>Warrington, Giles</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players</title><author>Tiernan, Caoimhe ; Lyons, Mark ; Comyns, Tom ; Nevill, Alan M ; Warrington, Giles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-6e11c6897c21636ac48dacdc3a07cbdedff69b663b5fcd55316a27c8edae5ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Football - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Myalgia</topic><topic>Physical Conditioning, Human</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Rugby</topic><topic>Sphygmomanometers</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Team sports</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiernan, Caoimhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comyns, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevill, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warrington, Giles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiernan, Caoimhe</au><au>Lyons, Mark</au><au>Comyns, Tom</au><au>Nevill, Alan M</au><au>Warrington, Giles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2926</spage><epage>2931</epage><pages>2926-2931</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTTiernan, C, Lyons, M, Comyns, T, Nevill, AM, and Warrington, G. The relationship between adductor squeeze strength, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 33(11)2926–2931, 2019—The adductor squeeze strength test has become a popular training monitoring marker, particularly in team sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery and training load in elite Rugby Union players, because of limited research in this area. Nineteen elite male Rugby Union players completed daily monitoring markers (adductor squeeze strength and 5 selected subjective markers of recovery), over a 10-week preseason training period. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was collected to determine training load (session RPE; RPE × session duration) and to calculate weekly training load. Spearman’s correlation was used to analyze the relationship between adductor squeeze strength scores, subjective markers of recovery, and weekly training load. The results found that where adductor squeeze scores decreased, both perceived fatigue levels (r = −0.335; R = 11.2%; p < 0.001) and muscle soreness (r = −0.277; R = 7.7%; p < 0.001) increased. A weak correlation was found between Monday adductor squeeze strength scores and the previous weekʼs training load (r = −0.235; R = 5.5%; p < 0.001) and Friday adductor squeeze strength scores and the same weekʼs training load (r = −0.211; R = 4.5%; p < 0.05). These results show that adductor squeeze strength may provide coaches with a time-efficient, low‐cost objective, player monitoring marker. Additionally, the combination of adductor strength squeeze, with subjective markers, perceived fatigue, and muscle soreness, and appropriately planned training load may help coaches to optimize training adaptations by determining a playerʼs training status.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>31469760</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003370</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
| ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.2926-2931 |
| issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283110994 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adaptation Adolescent Athletes Fatigue Football - physiology Humans Male Muscle Strength Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Myalgia Physical Conditioning, Human Physical fitness Recovery (Medical) Rugby Sphygmomanometers Sports training Strength training Team sports Thigh Young Adult |
| title | The Relationship Between Adductor Squeeze Strength, Subjective Markers of Recovery and Training Load in Elite Rugby Players |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relationship%20Between%20Adductor%20Squeeze%20Strength,%20Subjective%20Markers%20of%20Recovery%20and%20Training%20Load%20in%20Elite%20Rugby%20Players&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Tiernan,%20Caoimhe&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2926&rft.epage=2931&rft.pages=2926-2931&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2316410258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316410258&rft_id=info:pmid/31469760&rfr_iscdi=true |