Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study
Evaluating interventions that might lead to a reduction in tuberculosis in high-income countries with a low incidence of the disease is key to accelerate progress towards its elimination. In such countries, migrants are known to contribute a large proportion of tuberculosis cases to the burden. We a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1191-1201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1201 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1191 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C Harris, Ross Lalor, Maeve K Muzyamba, Morris C Were, John O'Connell, Anne-Marie Mirza, Adil Kon, Onn-Min Lalvani, Ajit Zenner, Dominik |
description | Evaluating interventions that might lead to a reduction in tuberculosis in high-income countries with a low incidence of the disease is key to accelerate progress towards its elimination. In such countries, migrants are known to contribute a large proportion of tuberculosis cases to the burden. We assessed the effectiveness of screening for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) post-entry for reduction of tuberculosis in new-entrant migrants to the UK. Additionally, we investigated the effect of access to primary care on tuberculosis incidence in this population.
We did a retrospective, population-based cohort study of migrants from 66 countries who were negative for active tuberculosis at pre-entry screening between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014, and eligible for LTBI screening. We used record linkage to track their first contact with primary care, uptake of LTBI screening, and development of active tuberculosis in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. To assess the effectiveness of the pre-entry screening programme, we identified a control group of migrants who were not screened for active tuberculosis using the specific code for new entrants to the UK registering in primary care within the National Health Service patient registration data system. Our primary outcome was development of active tuberculosis notified to the National Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance System.
Our cohort comprised 224 234 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and a control group of 118 738 migrants who were not. 103 990 (50%) migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis registered in primary care; all individuals in the control group were registered in primary care. 1828 tuberculosis cases were identified during the cohort time, of which 31 were prevalent. There were 26 incident active tuberculosis cases in migrants with no evidence of primary care registration, and 1771 cases in the entire cohort of migrants who registered in primary care (n=222 728), giving an incidence rate of 174 (95% CI 166–182) per 100 000 person-years. 672 (1%) of 103 990 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis went on to develop tuberculosis compared with 1099 (1%) of 118 738 not screened for active tuberculosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·33–1·67; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30260-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283107807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309919302609</els_id><sourcerecordid>2308009877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-5c5c151189be5eddbb6175c74f931dc725179fa101054aca06d82643e92a0d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEoj_wCCBLbIpEwBM7cdwNQlX5EZVYQNeWY0-oq1w72E7RfSDes743FyTYsPJo_M0Z-5yqegb0NVDo3nwFLljNqJRnIF8y2nS0lg-q49LmNeeteLivV-SoOknpllIQQPnj6oiVGwAGx9Wvy3FEk90dekyJhJHMEWv0OW6J3vdJXgaMZplCcolob8kcUj4gk86l-BtJJiJ6578T54nHn2SHap8TyYHkGyTXn8-JJhFzDGlel78qovNS1Fzw9aATWmLCTYiZpLzY7ZPq0ainhE8P52l1_f7y28XH-urLh08X765qwznNdWtaAy1ALwds0dph6EC0RvBRMrBGNC0IOeriH225Npp2tm86zlA2mtp-YKfV2ao7x_BjwZTVxiWD06Q9hiWppukZUNFTUdAX_6C3YYm-vE41jPaUyl7sqHalTPlrijiqObqNjlsFVO1yVPsc1S4kBVLtc1SyzD0_qC_DBu2fqd_BFeDtCmCx485hVMk49Aati8VSZYP7z4p7Qx6wIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2308009877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C ; Harris, Ross ; Lalor, Maeve K ; Muzyamba, Morris C ; Were, John ; O'Connell, Anne-Marie ; Mirza, Adil ; Kon, Onn-Min ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Zenner, Dominik</creator><creatorcontrib>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C ; Harris, Ross ; Lalor, Maeve K ; Muzyamba, Morris C ; Were, John ; O'Connell, Anne-Marie ; Mirza, Adil ; Kon, Onn-Min ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Zenner, Dominik</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating interventions that might lead to a reduction in tuberculosis in high-income countries with a low incidence of the disease is key to accelerate progress towards its elimination. In such countries, migrants are known to contribute a large proportion of tuberculosis cases to the burden. We assessed the effectiveness of screening for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) post-entry for reduction of tuberculosis in new-entrant migrants to the UK. Additionally, we investigated the effect of access to primary care on tuberculosis incidence in this population.
We did a retrospective, population-based cohort study of migrants from 66 countries who were negative for active tuberculosis at pre-entry screening between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014, and eligible for LTBI screening. We used record linkage to track their first contact with primary care, uptake of LTBI screening, and development of active tuberculosis in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. To assess the effectiveness of the pre-entry screening programme, we identified a control group of migrants who were not screened for active tuberculosis using the specific code for new entrants to the UK registering in primary care within the National Health Service patient registration data system. Our primary outcome was development of active tuberculosis notified to the National Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance System.
Our cohort comprised 224 234 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and a control group of 118 738 migrants who were not. 103 990 (50%) migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis registered in primary care; all individuals in the control group were registered in primary care. 1828 tuberculosis cases were identified during the cohort time, of which 31 were prevalent. There were 26 incident active tuberculosis cases in migrants with no evidence of primary care registration, and 1771 cases in the entire cohort of migrants who registered in primary care (n=222 728), giving an incidence rate of 174 (95% CI 166–182) per 100 000 person-years. 672 (1%) of 103 990 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis went on to develop tuberculosis compared with 1099 (1%) of 118 738 not screened for active tuberculosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·33–1·67; p<0·0001). 2451 (1%) of the 222 728 migrants registered in primary care were screened for LTBI, of whom 421 (17%) tested positive and 1961 (80%) tested negative; none developed active tuberculosis within the observed time period. Migrants settling in the least deprived areas had a decreased risk of developing tuberculosis (IRR 0·74, 95% CI 0·62–0·89; p=0·002), and time from UK arrival to primary care registration of 1 year or longer was associated with increased risk of active tuberculosis (2·96, 2·59–3·38; p<0·0001).
Pre-entry tuberculosis screening, early primary care registration, and LTBI screening are strongly and independently associated with a lower tuberculosis incidence in new-entrant migrants.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30260-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31471131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; Epidemiology ; Health care ; Health care access ; Incidence ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Migrants ; Multivariate analysis ; Population ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Primary care ; Public health ; Reduction ; Registration ; Screening ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1191-1201</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-5c5c151189be5eddbb6175c74f931dc725179fa101054aca06d82643e92a0d8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-5c5c151189be5eddbb6175c74f931dc725179fa101054aca06d82643e92a0d8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2308009877?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999,64389,64391,64393,72473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalor, Maeve K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzyamba, Morris C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Were, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirza, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenner, Dominik</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Evaluating interventions that might lead to a reduction in tuberculosis in high-income countries with a low incidence of the disease is key to accelerate progress towards its elimination. In such countries, migrants are known to contribute a large proportion of tuberculosis cases to the burden. We assessed the effectiveness of screening for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) post-entry for reduction of tuberculosis in new-entrant migrants to the UK. Additionally, we investigated the effect of access to primary care on tuberculosis incidence in this population.
We did a retrospective, population-based cohort study of migrants from 66 countries who were negative for active tuberculosis at pre-entry screening between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014, and eligible for LTBI screening. We used record linkage to track their first contact with primary care, uptake of LTBI screening, and development of active tuberculosis in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. To assess the effectiveness of the pre-entry screening programme, we identified a control group of migrants who were not screened for active tuberculosis using the specific code for new entrants to the UK registering in primary care within the National Health Service patient registration data system. Our primary outcome was development of active tuberculosis notified to the National Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance System.
Our cohort comprised 224 234 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and a control group of 118 738 migrants who were not. 103 990 (50%) migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis registered in primary care; all individuals in the control group were registered in primary care. 1828 tuberculosis cases were identified during the cohort time, of which 31 were prevalent. There were 26 incident active tuberculosis cases in migrants with no evidence of primary care registration, and 1771 cases in the entire cohort of migrants who registered in primary care (n=222 728), giving an incidence rate of 174 (95% CI 166–182) per 100 000 person-years. 672 (1%) of 103 990 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis went on to develop tuberculosis compared with 1099 (1%) of 118 738 not screened for active tuberculosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·33–1·67; p<0·0001). 2451 (1%) of the 222 728 migrants registered in primary care were screened for LTBI, of whom 421 (17%) tested positive and 1961 (80%) tested negative; none developed active tuberculosis within the observed time period. Migrants settling in the least deprived areas had a decreased risk of developing tuberculosis (IRR 0·74, 95% CI 0·62–0·89; p=0·002), and time from UK arrival to primary care registration of 1 year or longer was associated with increased risk of active tuberculosis (2·96, 2·59–3·38; p<0·0001).
Pre-entry tuberculosis screening, early primary care registration, and LTBI screening are strongly and independently associated with a lower tuberculosis incidence in new-entrant migrants.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEoj_wCCBLbIpEwBM7cdwNQlX5EZVYQNeWY0-oq1w72E7RfSDes743FyTYsPJo_M0Z-5yqegb0NVDo3nwFLljNqJRnIF8y2nS0lg-q49LmNeeteLivV-SoOknpllIQQPnj6oiVGwAGx9Wvy3FEk90dekyJhJHMEWv0OW6J3vdJXgaMZplCcolob8kcUj4gk86l-BtJJiJ6578T54nHn2SHap8TyYHkGyTXn8-JJhFzDGlel78qovNS1Fzw9aATWmLCTYiZpLzY7ZPq0ainhE8P52l1_f7y28XH-urLh08X765qwznNdWtaAy1ALwds0dph6EC0RvBRMrBGNC0IOeriH225Npp2tm86zlA2mtp-YKfV2ao7x_BjwZTVxiWD06Q9hiWppukZUNFTUdAX_6C3YYm-vE41jPaUyl7sqHalTPlrijiqObqNjlsFVO1yVPsc1S4kBVLtc1SyzD0_qC_DBu2fqd_BFeDtCmCx485hVMk49Aati8VSZYP7z4p7Qx6wIw</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C</creator><creator>Harris, Ross</creator><creator>Lalor, Maeve K</creator><creator>Muzyamba, Morris C</creator><creator>Were, John</creator><creator>O'Connell, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Mirza, Adil</creator><creator>Kon, Onn-Min</creator><creator>Lalvani, Ajit</creator><creator>Zenner, Dominik</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study</title><author>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C ; Harris, Ross ; Lalor, Maeve K ; Muzyamba, Morris C ; Were, John ; O'Connell, Anne-Marie ; Mirza, Adil ; Kon, Onn-Min ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Zenner, Dominik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-5c5c151189be5eddbb6175c74f931dc725179fa101054aca06d82643e92a0d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalor, Maeve K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzyamba, Morris C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Were, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirza, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenner, Dominik</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berrocal-Almanza, Luis C</au><au>Harris, Ross</au><au>Lalor, Maeve K</au><au>Muzyamba, Morris C</au><au>Were, John</au><au>O'Connell, Anne-Marie</au><au>Mirza, Adil</au><au>Kon, Onn-Min</au><au>Lalvani, Ajit</au><au>Zenner, Dominik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1201</epage><pages>1191-1201</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>Evaluating interventions that might lead to a reduction in tuberculosis in high-income countries with a low incidence of the disease is key to accelerate progress towards its elimination. In such countries, migrants are known to contribute a large proportion of tuberculosis cases to the burden. We assessed the effectiveness of screening for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) post-entry for reduction of tuberculosis in new-entrant migrants to the UK. Additionally, we investigated the effect of access to primary care on tuberculosis incidence in this population.
We did a retrospective, population-based cohort study of migrants from 66 countries who were negative for active tuberculosis at pre-entry screening between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2014, and eligible for LTBI screening. We used record linkage to track their first contact with primary care, uptake of LTBI screening, and development of active tuberculosis in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. To assess the effectiveness of the pre-entry screening programme, we identified a control group of migrants who were not screened for active tuberculosis using the specific code for new entrants to the UK registering in primary care within the National Health Service patient registration data system. Our primary outcome was development of active tuberculosis notified to the National Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance System.
Our cohort comprised 224 234 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis before entry to the UK and a control group of 118 738 migrants who were not. 103 990 (50%) migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis registered in primary care; all individuals in the control group were registered in primary care. 1828 tuberculosis cases were identified during the cohort time, of which 31 were prevalent. There were 26 incident active tuberculosis cases in migrants with no evidence of primary care registration, and 1771 cases in the entire cohort of migrants who registered in primary care (n=222 728), giving an incidence rate of 174 (95% CI 166–182) per 100 000 person-years. 672 (1%) of 103 990 migrants who were screened for active tuberculosis went on to develop tuberculosis compared with 1099 (1%) of 118 738 not screened for active tuberculosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·33–1·67; p<0·0001). 2451 (1%) of the 222 728 migrants registered in primary care were screened for LTBI, of whom 421 (17%) tested positive and 1961 (80%) tested negative; none developed active tuberculosis within the observed time period. Migrants settling in the least deprived areas had a decreased risk of developing tuberculosis (IRR 0·74, 95% CI 0·62–0·89; p=0·002), and time from UK arrival to primary care registration of 1 year or longer was associated with increased risk of active tuberculosis (2·96, 2·59–3·38; p<0·0001).
Pre-entry tuberculosis screening, early primary care registration, and LTBI screening are strongly and independently associated with a lower tuberculosis incidence in new-entrant migrants.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31471131</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30260-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.1191-1201 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2283107807 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Cohort analysis Epidemiology Health care Health care access Incidence Infections Infectious diseases Migrants Multivariate analysis Population Population studies Population-based studies Primary care Public health Reduction Registration Screening Tuberculosis |
title | Effectiveness of pre-entry active tuberculosis and post-entry latent tuberculosis screening in new entrants to the UK: a retrospective, population-based cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20pre-entry%20active%20tuberculosis%20and%20post-entry%20latent%20tuberculosis%20screening%20in%20new%20entrants%20to%20the%20UK:%20a%20retrospective,%20population-based%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Berrocal-Almanza,%20Luis%20C&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1201&rft.pages=1191-1201&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30260-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2308009877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2308009877&rft_id=info:pmid/31471131&rft_els_id=S1473309919302609&rfr_iscdi=true |