Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations
In this paper, I answer the following question: suppose that two individuals, C and D, have been in a long‐term committed relationship, and D now has dementia, while C is competent; if D agrees to have sex with C, is it permissible for C to have sex with D? Ultimately, I defend the view that, under...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioethics 2019-11, Vol.33 (9), p.1065-1071 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1071 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1065 |
container_title | Bioethics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Director, Samuel |
description | In this paper, I answer the following question: suppose that two individuals, C and D, have been in a long‐term committed relationship, and D now has dementia, while C is competent; if D agrees to have sex with C, is it permissible for C to have sex with D? Ultimately, I defend the view that, under certain conditions, D can give valid consent to sex with C, rendering sex between them permissible. Specifically, I argue that there is compelling reason to endorse the Prior Consent Thesis, which states the following: D, when competent, can give valid prior consent to sex with her competent partner (C) that will take place after she has dementia, assuming that D is the same person as she was when she gave prior consent, meaning that, if D, when competent, gave prior consent to sex with C, then C may permissibly have sex with D. In Section 2, I explain both the background and the existing literature on this issue. In Section 3, I outline relevant stipulations about the kinds of cases I will be examining. In Section 4, I defend the Prior Consent Thesis. And, in Section 5, I address objections to the Prior Consent Thesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bioe.12652 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2282508401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307055348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-3e468dfdf7973cf8d88429f57ef7ef35cb1c0a7001a6fdb3ae178191cfe25d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgipvTix9ACl5EqOalaRJvuk0dDHbRc0jzAh1tM5sV3c2v4dfzk5jZ6cGDD4FA-PEnzx-AUwSvUJzrovT2CuGc4j0wRFnOUk6R2AdDiHORCgbxAByFsIRxBKWHYECiIiLPh2Ay9k2wzfrz_SMkxtdlU_rmJpnYOj6WKlGNSVZt6dtE9zBZ-yTYt05VSWsrtY48HIMDp6pgT3b3CDzfT5_Gj-l88TAb385TTQTBKbFZzo0zjglGtOOG8wwLR5l18RCqC6ShYhAilTtTEGUR40gg7SymBhZkBC763FXrXzob1rIug7ZVpRrruyAx5phCnkEU6fkfuvRd28TfSUwgg5SSjEd12Svd-hBa62TctVbtRiIot93Kbbfyu9uIz3aRXVFb80t_yowA9eC1rOzmnyh5N1tM-9AvwPmEXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307055348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Director, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Director, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I answer the following question: suppose that two individuals, C and D, have been in a long‐term committed relationship, and D now has dementia, while C is competent; if D agrees to have sex with C, is it permissible for C to have sex with D? Ultimately, I defend the view that, under certain conditions, D can give valid consent to sex with C, rendering sex between them permissible. Specifically, I argue that there is compelling reason to endorse the Prior Consent Thesis, which states the following: D, when competent, can give valid prior consent to sex with her competent partner (C) that will take place after she has dementia, assuming that D is the same person as she was when she gave prior consent, meaning that, if D, when competent, gave prior consent to sex with C, then C may permissibly have sex with D. In Section 2, I explain both the background and the existing literature on this issue. In Section 3, I outline relevant stipulations about the kinds of cases I will be examining. In Section 4, I defend the Prior Consent Thesis. And, in Section 5, I address objections to the Prior Consent Thesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8519</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31463966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>advance directives ; Bioethics ; Competence ; Consent ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Meaning ; Mental competency ; prior consent ; Sex ; sexual advance directives ; Sexual behavior</subject><ispartof>Bioethics, 2019-11, Vol.33 (9), p.1065-1071</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-3e468dfdf7973cf8d88429f57ef7ef35cb1c0a7001a6fdb3ae178191cfe25d0b3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2632-3644</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbioe.12652$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbioe.12652$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31463966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Director, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations</title><title>Bioethics</title><addtitle>Bioethics</addtitle><description>In this paper, I answer the following question: suppose that two individuals, C and D, have been in a long‐term committed relationship, and D now has dementia, while C is competent; if D agrees to have sex with C, is it permissible for C to have sex with D? Ultimately, I defend the view that, under certain conditions, D can give valid consent to sex with C, rendering sex between them permissible. Specifically, I argue that there is compelling reason to endorse the Prior Consent Thesis, which states the following: D, when competent, can give valid prior consent to sex with her competent partner (C) that will take place after she has dementia, assuming that D is the same person as she was when she gave prior consent, meaning that, if D, when competent, gave prior consent to sex with C, then C may permissibly have sex with D. In Section 2, I explain both the background and the existing literature on this issue. In Section 3, I outline relevant stipulations about the kinds of cases I will be examining. In Section 4, I defend the Prior Consent Thesis. And, in Section 5, I address objections to the Prior Consent Thesis.</description><subject>advance directives</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Mental competency</subject><subject>prior consent</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>sexual advance directives</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><issn>0269-9702</issn><issn>1467-8519</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgipvTix9ACl5EqOalaRJvuk0dDHbRc0jzAh1tM5sV3c2v4dfzk5jZ6cGDD4FA-PEnzx-AUwSvUJzrovT2CuGc4j0wRFnOUk6R2AdDiHORCgbxAByFsIRxBKWHYECiIiLPh2Ay9k2wzfrz_SMkxtdlU_rmJpnYOj6WKlGNSVZt6dtE9zBZ-yTYt05VSWsrtY48HIMDp6pgT3b3CDzfT5_Gj-l88TAb385TTQTBKbFZzo0zjglGtOOG8wwLR5l18RCqC6ShYhAilTtTEGUR40gg7SymBhZkBC763FXrXzob1rIug7ZVpRrruyAx5phCnkEU6fkfuvRd28TfSUwgg5SSjEd12Svd-hBa62TctVbtRiIot93Kbbfyu9uIz3aRXVFb80t_yowA9eC1rOzmnyh5N1tM-9AvwPmEXw</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Director, Samuel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-3644</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations</title><author>Director, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-3e468dfdf7973cf8d88429f57ef7ef35cb1c0a7001a6fdb3ae178191cfe25d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>advance directives</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Mental competency</topic><topic>prior consent</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>sexual advance directives</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Director, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Director, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations</atitle><jtitle>Bioethics</jtitle><addtitle>Bioethics</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1065</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1065-1071</pages><issn>0269-9702</issn><eissn>1467-8519</eissn><abstract>In this paper, I answer the following question: suppose that two individuals, C and D, have been in a long‐term committed relationship, and D now has dementia, while C is competent; if D agrees to have sex with C, is it permissible for C to have sex with D? Ultimately, I defend the view that, under certain conditions, D can give valid consent to sex with C, rendering sex between them permissible. Specifically, I argue that there is compelling reason to endorse the Prior Consent Thesis, which states the following: D, when competent, can give valid prior consent to sex with her competent partner (C) that will take place after she has dementia, assuming that D is the same person as she was when she gave prior consent, meaning that, if D, when competent, gave prior consent to sex with C, then C may permissibly have sex with D. In Section 2, I explain both the background and the existing literature on this issue. In Section 3, I outline relevant stipulations about the kinds of cases I will be examining. In Section 4, I defend the Prior Consent Thesis. And, in Section 5, I address objections to the Prior Consent Thesis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31463966</pmid><doi>10.1111/bioe.12652</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-3644</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-9702 |
ispartof | Bioethics, 2019-11, Vol.33 (9), p.1065-1071 |
issn | 0269-9702 1467-8519 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2282508401 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | advance directives Bioethics Competence Consent Dementia Dementia disorders Meaning Mental competency prior consent Sex sexual advance directives Sexual behavior |
title | Consent’s dominion: Dementia and prior consent to sexual relations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consent%E2%80%99s%20dominion:%20Dementia%20and%20prior%20consent%20to%20sexual%20relations&rft.jtitle=Bioethics&rft.au=Director,%20Samuel&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1065&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1065-1071&rft.issn=0269-9702&rft.eissn=1467-8519&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bioe.12652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307055348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307055348&rft_id=info:pmid/31463966&rfr_iscdi=true |