Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&D

Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&D

Evidence shows that mergers and acquisitions do not hurt R&D intensity, the best measure of spending. The study considers variables such as R&D spending in prior periods, technological opportunity, cash flow and capital costs.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harvard business review 1990-01, Vol.68 (1), p.211
Hauptverfasser: Bolster, Paul J, Welch, Jonathan B
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Acquisitions & mergers
Capital costs
R&D
Research & development
Research & development expenditures
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 211
container_title Harvard business review
container_volume 68
creator Bolster, Paul J
Welch, Jonathan B
description Evidence shows that mergers and acquisitions do not hurt R&D intensity, the best measure of spending. The study considers variables such as R&D spending in prior periods, technological opportunity, cash flow and capital costs.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_227841053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1933224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2278410533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA017UwMDTiYOAqLs4yAAIzcwtOBpnwjEqFkMTs1Pyy1KJiBZf8PPUSBY_SohKFIDUXHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoO7mGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-bWZycmpOTmJeaX1ocb2RkbmFiaGBqbEy8SgDolC18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>227841053</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&amp;D</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bolster, Paul J ; Welch, Jonathan B</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Paul J ; Welch, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence shows that mergers and acquisitions do not hurt R&amp;D intensity, the best measure of spending. The study considers variables such as R&amp;D spending in prior periods, technological opportunity, cash flow and capital costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Harvard Business Review</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Capital costs ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research &amp; development expenditures</subject><ispartof>Harvard business review, 1990-01, Vol.68 (1), p.211</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard Business Review Jan/Feb 1990</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><title>Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&amp;D</title><title>Harvard business review</title><description>Evidence shows that mergers and acquisitions do not hurt R&amp;D intensity, the best measure of spending. The study considers variables such as R&amp;D spending in prior periods, technological opportunity, cash flow and capital costs.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research &amp; development expenditures</subject><issn>0017-8012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA017UwMDTiYOAqLs4yAAIzcwtOBpnwjEqFkMTs1Pyy1KJiBZf8PPUSBY_SohKFIDUXHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoO7mGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-bWZycmpOTmJeaX1ocb2RkbmFiaGBqbEy8SgDolC18</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Bolster, Paul J</creator><creator>Welch, Jonathan B</creator><general>Harvard Business Review</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&amp;D</title><author>Bolster, Paul J ; Welch, Jonathan B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2278410533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research &amp; development expenditures</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolster, Paul J</au><au>Welch, Jonathan B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&amp;D</atitle><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>211</spage><pages>211-</pages><issn>0017-8012</issn><abstract>Evidence shows that mergers and acquisitions do not hurt R&amp;D intensity, the best measure of spending. The study considers variables such as R&amp;D spending in prior periods, technological opportunity, cash flow and capital costs.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Harvard Business Review</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-8012
ispartof Harvard business review, 1990-01, Vol.68 (1), p.211
issn 0017-8012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_227841053
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Capital costs
R&D
Research & development
Research & development expenditures
title Why Takeovers Don't Hurt R&D
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Takeovers%20Don't%20Hurt%20R&D&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20business%20review&rft.au=Bolster,%20Paul%20J&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=211&rft.pages=211-&rft.issn=0017-8012&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1933224%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227841053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true