Glymphatic imaging using MRI
In recent years, the existence of a mass transport system in the brain via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or interstitial fluid (ISF) has been suggested by many studies. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be a waste clearance system of the CSF through the perivascular and interstitial spaces in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2020-01, Vol.51 (1), p.11-24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 24 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Taoka, Toshiaki Naganawa, Shinji |
description | In recent years, the existence of a mass transport system in the brain via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or interstitial fluid (ISF) has been suggested by many studies. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be a waste clearance system of the CSF through the perivascular and interstitial spaces in the brain. Tracer studies have primarily been used to visualize or evaluate the waste clearance system in the brain, and evidence for this system has accumulated. The initial study that identified the glymphatic system was an in vivo tracer study in mice. In that study, fluorescent tracers were injected into the cisterna magna and visualized by two‐photon microscopy. MRI has also been used to evaluate glymphatic function primarily with gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) as tracers. A number of GBCA studies evaluating glymphatic function have been conducted using either intrathecal or intravenous injections. Stable isotopes, such as 17O‐labeled water, may also be used as tracers since they can be detected by MRI. In addition to tracer studies, several other approaches have been used to evaluate ISF dynamics within the brain, including diffusion imaging. Phase contrast evaluation is a powerful method for visualizing flow within the CSF space. In order to evaluate the movement of water within tissue, diffusion‐weighted MRI represents another promising technique, and several studies have utilized diffusion techniques for the evaluation of the glymphatic system. This review will discuss the findings of these diffusion studies.
Level of Evidence: 5
Technical Efficacy: Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:11–24. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.26892 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275947755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2275947755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5032-55e854dfe11355ef724bffa3295bb13f7d034c65019ce067d30c21316114cd673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMobk4vnkUGXkTofC8_mvY4hs7JRBA9hzZNZke7zmRF9t-b2enBgwSSd_j4yPsIOUcYIQC9XdauHNE4SekB6aOgNKIiiQ_DDIJFmIDskRPvlwCQplwckx5DTplE6JOLabWt1-_ZptTDss4W5WoxbP3ufnqZnZIjm1XenO3fAXm7v3udPETz5-lsMp5HWgCjkRAmEbywBpGF2UrKc2szRlOR58isLIBxHQvAVBuIZcFAU2QYI3JdxJINyHXnXbvmozV-o-rSa1NV2co0rVeUSpFyKYUI6NUfdNm0bhV-pygLR_IkqAfkpqO0a7x3xqq1C9u5rUJQu2Zq10x9Nwvw5V7Z5rUpftGfSAHADvgsK7P9R6UeQ7RO-gUyTXLP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323274821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glymphatic imaging using MRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Taoka, Toshiaki ; Naganawa, Shinji</creator><creatorcontrib>Taoka, Toshiaki ; Naganawa, Shinji</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the existence of a mass transport system in the brain via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or interstitial fluid (ISF) has been suggested by many studies. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be a waste clearance system of the CSF through the perivascular and interstitial spaces in the brain. Tracer studies have primarily been used to visualize or evaluate the waste clearance system in the brain, and evidence for this system has accumulated. The initial study that identified the glymphatic system was an in vivo tracer study in mice. In that study, fluorescent tracers were injected into the cisterna magna and visualized by two‐photon microscopy. MRI has also been used to evaluate glymphatic function primarily with gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) as tracers. A number of GBCA studies evaluating glymphatic function have been conducted using either intrathecal or intravenous injections. Stable isotopes, such as 17O‐labeled water, may also be used as tracers since they can be detected by MRI. In addition to tracer studies, several other approaches have been used to evaluate ISF dynamics within the brain, including diffusion imaging. Phase contrast evaluation is a powerful method for visualizing flow within the CSF space. In order to evaluate the movement of water within tissue, diffusion‐weighted MRI represents another promising technique, and several studies have utilized diffusion techniques for the evaluation of the glymphatic system. This review will discuss the findings of these diffusion studies.
Level of Evidence: 5
Technical Efficacy: Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:11–24.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26892</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31423710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Brain ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Contrast agents ; Contrast Media ; Diffusion ; diffusion imaging ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescent indicators ; Gadolinium ; glymphatic system ; Glymphatic System - diagnostic imaging ; Glymphatic System - physiology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; In vivo methods and tests ; interstitial fluid ; Intravenous administration ; Isotopes ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mass transport ; Medical imaging ; Mice ; Neuroimaging ; Phase contrast ; Stable isotopes ; Studies ; Tracers ; Transportation systems</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2020-01, Vol.51 (1), p.11-24</ispartof><rights>2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5032-55e854dfe11355ef724bffa3295bb13f7d034c65019ce067d30c21316114cd673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5032-55e854dfe11355ef724bffa3295bb13f7d034c65019ce067d30c21316114cd673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9227-0240</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.26892$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.26892$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taoka, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naganawa, Shinji</creatorcontrib><title>Glymphatic imaging using MRI</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>In recent years, the existence of a mass transport system in the brain via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or interstitial fluid (ISF) has been suggested by many studies. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be a waste clearance system of the CSF through the perivascular and interstitial spaces in the brain. Tracer studies have primarily been used to visualize or evaluate the waste clearance system in the brain, and evidence for this system has accumulated. The initial study that identified the glymphatic system was an in vivo tracer study in mice. In that study, fluorescent tracers were injected into the cisterna magna and visualized by two‐photon microscopy. MRI has also been used to evaluate glymphatic function primarily with gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) as tracers. A number of GBCA studies evaluating glymphatic function have been conducted using either intrathecal or intravenous injections. Stable isotopes, such as 17O‐labeled water, may also be used as tracers since they can be detected by MRI. In addition to tracer studies, several other approaches have been used to evaluate ISF dynamics within the brain, including diffusion imaging. Phase contrast evaluation is a powerful method for visualizing flow within the CSF space. In order to evaluate the movement of water within tissue, diffusion‐weighted MRI represents another promising technique, and several studies have utilized diffusion techniques for the evaluation of the glymphatic system. This review will discuss the findings of these diffusion studies.
Level of Evidence: 5
Technical Efficacy: Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:11–24.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>diffusion imaging</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescent indicators</subject><subject>Gadolinium</subject><subject>glymphatic system</subject><subject>Glymphatic System - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glymphatic System - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>interstitial fluid</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mass transport</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Phase contrast</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Transportation systems</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMobk4vnkUGXkTofC8_mvY4hs7JRBA9hzZNZke7zmRF9t-b2enBgwSSd_j4yPsIOUcYIQC9XdauHNE4SekB6aOgNKIiiQ_DDIJFmIDskRPvlwCQplwckx5DTplE6JOLabWt1-_ZptTDss4W5WoxbP3ufnqZnZIjm1XenO3fAXm7v3udPETz5-lsMp5HWgCjkRAmEbywBpGF2UrKc2szRlOR58isLIBxHQvAVBuIZcFAU2QYI3JdxJINyHXnXbvmozV-o-rSa1NV2co0rVeUSpFyKYUI6NUfdNm0bhV-pygLR_IkqAfkpqO0a7x3xqq1C9u5rUJQu2Zq10x9Nwvw5V7Z5rUpftGfSAHADvgsK7P9R6UeQ7RO-gUyTXLP</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Taoka, Toshiaki</creator><creator>Naganawa, Shinji</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-0240</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Glymphatic imaging using MRI</title><author>Taoka, Toshiaki ; Naganawa, Shinji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5032-55e854dfe11355ef724bffa3295bb13f7d034c65019ce067d30c21316114cd673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>diffusion imaging</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescent indicators</topic><topic>Gadolinium</topic><topic>glymphatic system</topic><topic>Glymphatic System - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glymphatic System - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>interstitial fluid</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mass transport</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Phase contrast</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Transportation systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taoka, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naganawa, Shinji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taoka, Toshiaki</au><au>Naganawa, Shinji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glymphatic imaging using MRI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>11-24</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the existence of a mass transport system in the brain via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or interstitial fluid (ISF) has been suggested by many studies. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be a waste clearance system of the CSF through the perivascular and interstitial spaces in the brain. Tracer studies have primarily been used to visualize or evaluate the waste clearance system in the brain, and evidence for this system has accumulated. The initial study that identified the glymphatic system was an in vivo tracer study in mice. In that study, fluorescent tracers were injected into the cisterna magna and visualized by two‐photon microscopy. MRI has also been used to evaluate glymphatic function primarily with gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) as tracers. A number of GBCA studies evaluating glymphatic function have been conducted using either intrathecal or intravenous injections. Stable isotopes, such as 17O‐labeled water, may also be used as tracers since they can be detected by MRI. In addition to tracer studies, several other approaches have been used to evaluate ISF dynamics within the brain, including diffusion imaging. Phase contrast evaluation is a powerful method for visualizing flow within the CSF space. In order to evaluate the movement of water within tissue, diffusion‐weighted MRI represents another promising technique, and several studies have utilized diffusion techniques for the evaluation of the glymphatic system. This review will discuss the findings of these diffusion studies.
Level of Evidence: 5
Technical Efficacy: Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:11–24.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31423710</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.26892</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-0240</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2020-01, Vol.51 (1), p.11-24 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275947755 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals Brain Cerebrospinal fluid Contrast agents Contrast Media Diffusion diffusion imaging Fluorescence Fluorescent indicators Gadolinium glymphatic system Glymphatic System - diagnostic imaging Glymphatic System - physiology Humans Image Enhancement - methods In vivo methods and tests interstitial fluid Intravenous administration Isotopes Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mass transport Medical imaging Mice Neuroimaging Phase contrast Stable isotopes Studies Tracers Transportation systems |
title | Glymphatic imaging using MRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glymphatic%20imaging%20using%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Taoka,%20Toshiaki&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=11-24&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.26892&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2275947755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323274821&rft_id=info:pmid/31423710&rfr_iscdi=true |