Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study

Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505
Hauptverfasser: Romão, Vasco C., Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim, Barros, Rita, Luís, Rita, Vidal, Bruno, Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa, Vitorino, Emília, Humby, Frances, Kelly, Stephen, Pitzalis, Costantino, Saraiva, Fernando, Fonseca, João Eurico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1505
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1497
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 72
creator Romão, Vasco C.
Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim
Barros, Rita
Luís, Rita
Vidal, Bruno
Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa
Vitorino, Emília
Humby, Frances
Kelly, Stephen
Pitzalis, Costantino
Saraiva, Fernando
Fonseca, João Eurico
description Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed. Results A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier. Conclusion US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.24050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275318025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2275318025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUh4MottQufAEJuFHwtvk3czPurpdahWK1teBuyCQnmJI7mSYzV2bnI7jz_XwSj721C8GzOQfOdz4SfoQ85eyIMyaOjc1HQrGKPSD7gld8oepKP7yf1Zc9cljKNcOSQmvZPCZ7kivBmVT75OeJ98EaO7-il8bDiN30DufNEIF-mkwM40yTp1dxzKakqXe_vv84nYIDpOY-bYOJ9AOAQ_xNSEOZaejpOoYetZF-zMaOwcKt9QIKmGy_vqYrXKQyAO62QM-7AnlrxpB6PLkcJzc_IY-8iQUO7_oBuXp78nn9bnF2fvp-vTpbWKk1W6jOmKVUTrJOySXrbC1d53XnagWGgezqpqq0AwFKCee5F44r6xrmGNO8EfKAvNh5h5xuJihjuwnFQoymhzSVVohlJblmokL0-T_odZoyvhgppWrdqFrWSL3cURY_WDL4dshhY_Lcctb-CazFwNrbwJB9dmecug24e_JvPAgc74BvIcL8f1O7Wl_slL8Bi7OghQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446894636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</creator><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed. Results A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier. Conclusion US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.24050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31421034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects ; Biopsy, Needle - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Clinical medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observational studies ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Sampling ; Synovial Membrane - pathology ; Synovitis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ultrasound ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505</ispartof><rights>2019, American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>2019, American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2020 American College of Rheumatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5603-9436 ; 0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.24050$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.24050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31421034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luís, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitorino, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humby, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzalis, Costantino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraiva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed. Results A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier. Conclusion US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Synovial Membrane - pathology</subject><subject>Synovitis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUh4MottQufAEJuFHwtvk3czPurpdahWK1teBuyCQnmJI7mSYzV2bnI7jz_XwSj721C8GzOQfOdz4SfoQ85eyIMyaOjc1HQrGKPSD7gld8oepKP7yf1Zc9cljKNcOSQmvZPCZ7kivBmVT75OeJ98EaO7-il8bDiN30DufNEIF-mkwM40yTp1dxzKakqXe_vv84nYIDpOY-bYOJ9AOAQ_xNSEOZaejpOoYetZF-zMaOwcKt9QIKmGy_vqYrXKQyAO62QM-7AnlrxpB6PLkcJzc_IY-8iQUO7_oBuXp78nn9bnF2fvp-vTpbWKk1W6jOmKVUTrJOySXrbC1d53XnagWGgezqpqq0AwFKCee5F44r6xrmGNO8EfKAvNh5h5xuJihjuwnFQoymhzSVVohlJblmokL0-T_odZoyvhgppWrdqFrWSL3cURY_WDL4dshhY_Lcctb-CazFwNrbwJB9dmecug24e_JvPAgc74BvIcL8f1O7Wl_slL8Bi7OghQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Romão, Vasco C.</creator><creator>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creator><creator>Barros, Rita</creator><creator>Luís, Rita</creator><creator>Vidal, Bruno</creator><creator>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creator><creator>Vitorino, Emília</creator><creator>Humby, Frances</creator><creator>Kelly, Stephen</creator><creator>Pitzalis, Costantino</creator><creator>Saraiva, Fernando</creator><creator>Fonseca, João Eurico</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><author>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Synovial Membrane - pathology</topic><topic>Synovitis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luís, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitorino, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humby, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzalis, Costantino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraiva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romão, Vasco C.</au><au>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</au><au>Barros, Rita</au><au>Luís, Rita</au><au>Vidal, Bruno</au><au>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</au><au>Vitorino, Emília</au><au>Humby, Frances</au><au>Kelly, Stephen</au><au>Pitzalis, Costantino</au><au>Saraiva, Fernando</au><au>Fonseca, João Eurico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1497</spage><epage>1505</epage><pages>1497-1505</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed. Results A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier. Conclusion US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31421034</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.24050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275318025
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy
Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects
Biopsy, Needle - statistics & numerical data
Clinical medicine
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observational studies
Prospective Studies
Safety
Sampling
Synovial Membrane - pathology
Synovitis
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects
Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data
Ultrasound
Variation
title Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy,%20Safety,%20and%20Sample%20Quality%20of%20Ultrasound%E2%80%90Guided%20Synovial%20Needle%20Biopsy%20in%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Research:%20A%20Prospective%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Rom%C3%A3o,%20Vasco%20C.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1497&rft.epage=1505&rft.pages=1497-1505&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.24050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2275318025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446894636&rft_id=info:pmid/31421034&rfr_iscdi=true