Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study
Objective To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research. Methods We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthritis care & research (2010) 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1505 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1497 |
container_title | Arthritis care & research (2010) |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Romão, Vasco C. Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim Barros, Rita Luís, Rita Vidal, Bruno Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa Vitorino, Emília Humby, Frances Kelly, Stephen Pitzalis, Costantino Saraiva, Fernando Fonseca, João Eurico |
description | Objective
To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research.
Methods
We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed.
Results
A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier.
Conclusion
US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acr.24050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275318025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2275318025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUh4MottQufAEJuFHwtvk3czPurpdahWK1teBuyCQnmJI7mSYzV2bnI7jz_XwSj721C8GzOQfOdz4SfoQ85eyIMyaOjc1HQrGKPSD7gld8oepKP7yf1Zc9cljKNcOSQmvZPCZ7kivBmVT75OeJ98EaO7-il8bDiN30DufNEIF-mkwM40yTp1dxzKakqXe_vv84nYIDpOY-bYOJ9AOAQ_xNSEOZaejpOoYetZF-zMaOwcKt9QIKmGy_vqYrXKQyAO62QM-7AnlrxpB6PLkcJzc_IY-8iQUO7_oBuXp78nn9bnF2fvp-vTpbWKk1W6jOmKVUTrJOySXrbC1d53XnagWGgezqpqq0AwFKCee5F44r6xrmGNO8EfKAvNh5h5xuJihjuwnFQoymhzSVVohlJblmokL0-T_odZoyvhgppWrdqFrWSL3cURY_WDL4dshhY_Lcctb-CazFwNrbwJB9dmecug24e_JvPAgc74BvIcL8f1O7Wl_slL8Bi7OghQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446894636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</creator><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research.
Methods
We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed.
Results
A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier.
Conclusion
US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.24050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31421034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects ; Biopsy, Needle - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observational studies ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Sampling ; Synovial Membrane - pathology ; Synovitis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data ; Ultrasound ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care & research (2010), 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505</ispartof><rights>2019, American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>2019, American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2020 American College of Rheumatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5603-9436 ; 0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.24050$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.24050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31421034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luís, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitorino, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humby, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzalis, Costantino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraiva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><title>Arthritis care & research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective
To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research.
Methods
We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed.
Results
A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier.
Conclusion
US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Synovial Membrane - pathology</subject><subject>Synovitis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qFTEUh4MottQufAEJuFHwtvk3czPurpdahWK1teBuyCQnmJI7mSYzV2bnI7jz_XwSj721C8GzOQfOdz4SfoQ85eyIMyaOjc1HQrGKPSD7gld8oepKP7yf1Zc9cljKNcOSQmvZPCZ7kivBmVT75OeJ98EaO7-il8bDiN30DufNEIF-mkwM40yTp1dxzKakqXe_vv84nYIDpOY-bYOJ9AOAQ_xNSEOZaejpOoYetZF-zMaOwcKt9QIKmGy_vqYrXKQyAO62QM-7AnlrxpB6PLkcJzc_IY-8iQUO7_oBuXp78nn9bnF2fvp-vTpbWKk1W6jOmKVUTrJOySXrbC1d53XnagWGgezqpqq0AwFKCee5F44r6xrmGNO8EfKAvNh5h5xuJihjuwnFQoymhzSVVohlJblmokL0-T_odZoyvhgppWrdqFrWSL3cURY_WDL4dshhY_Lcctb-CazFwNrbwJB9dmecug24e_JvPAgc74BvIcL8f1O7Wl_slL8Bi7OghQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Romão, Vasco C.</creator><creator>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creator><creator>Barros, Rita</creator><creator>Luís, Rita</creator><creator>Vidal, Bruno</creator><creator>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creator><creator>Vitorino, Emília</creator><creator>Humby, Frances</creator><creator>Kelly, Stephen</creator><creator>Pitzalis, Costantino</creator><creator>Saraiva, Fernando</creator><creator>Fonseca, João Eurico</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</title><author>Romão, Vasco C. ; Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim ; Barros, Rita ; Luís, Rita ; Vidal, Bruno ; Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa ; Vitorino, Emília ; Humby, Frances ; Kelly, Stephen ; Pitzalis, Costantino ; Saraiva, Fernando ; Fonseca, João Eurico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-4baa734d30b4370bc63dbf8bd64ea0e3b69558de2e442df1f2d14cd90d0081923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Synovial Membrane - pathology</topic><topic>Synovitis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romão, Vasco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luís, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitorino, Emília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humby, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzalis, Costantino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraiva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, João Eurico</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romão, Vasco C.</au><au>Polido‐Pereira, Joaquim</au><au>Barros, Rita</au><au>Luís, Rita</au><au>Vidal, Bruno</au><au>Vieira‐Sousa, Elsa</au><au>Vitorino, Emília</au><au>Humby, Frances</au><au>Kelly, Stephen</au><au>Pitzalis, Costantino</au><au>Saraiva, Fernando</au><au>Fonseca, João Eurico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1497</spage><epage>1505</epage><pages>1497-1505</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective
To study the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and sampling variation of ultrasound (US)–guided synovial biopsies performed in clinical practice and research.
Methods
We included all patients who had a US‐guided synovial needle biopsy from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients were evaluated for procedure safety and tolerability. Usefulness of synovial biopsy was considered based on contribution for achieving the proposed aims. We analyzed samples for presence and quality of synovial tissue, synovitis score/grade, and pathotype. Variation across patients, samples, section levels, and sampling order was assessed.
Results
A total of 64 US‐guided synovial biopsies were performed (n = 52 in clinical practice, n = 12 in research). Patient tolerability (70% no/mild discomfort) was remarkably high. There was no significant aggravation of symptoms or US synovitis in the biopsied joint. Procedures were overall safe, with few minor, 2 moderate, and no major adverse events. Usefulness of US‐guided synovial biopsies was high, both in clinical practice (37% direct diagnostic impact, 100% positive/95% negative predictive values for infection) and in research (92% success). Synovial tissue was retrieved in 88% of biopsies, with a median of 75% gradable samples. There was significant variation in sample quality and synovitis features across patients and samples, but not between different section levels. Samples collected later in the procedure had a lower frequency of synovial tissue and were poorly concordant in pathotype with those collected earlier.
Conclusion
US‐guided synovial needle biopsy is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated means to collect good quality synovial tissue for clinical and research purposes. Samples collected for different aims should be retrieved in parallel, rather than sequentially.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31421034</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.24050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-9133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2151-464X |
ispartof | Arthritis care & research (2010), 2020-10, Vol.72 (10), p.1497-1505 |
issn | 2151-464X 2151-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275318025 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged Biopsy Biopsy, Needle - adverse effects Biopsy, Needle - statistics & numerical data Clinical medicine Female Humans Male Middle Aged Observational studies Prospective Studies Safety Sampling Synovial Membrane - pathology Synovitis Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional - adverse effects Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data Ultrasound Variation |
title | Efficacy, Safety, and Sample Quality of Ultrasound‐Guided Synovial Needle Biopsy in Clinical Practice and Research: A Prospective Observational Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy,%20Safety,%20and%20Sample%20Quality%20of%20Ultrasound%E2%80%90Guided%20Synovial%20Needle%20Biopsy%20in%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Research:%20A%20Prospective%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Rom%C3%A3o,%20Vasco%20C.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1497&rft.epage=1505&rft.pages=1497-1505&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.24050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2275318025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446894636&rft_id=info:pmid/31421034&rfr_iscdi=true |