Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial
Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide. National screening programmes and antibiotic treatment have failed to decrease incidence, and to date no vaccines against genital chlamydia have been tested in clinical trials. We aimed to assess the safety and immunoge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2019-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1091-1100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1091 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Abraham, Sonya Juel, Helene B Bang, Peter Cheeseman, Hannah M Dohn, Rebecca B Cole, Tom Kristiansen, Max P Korsholm, Karen S Lewis, David Olsen, Anja W McFarlane, Leon R Day, Suzanne Knudsen, Sara Moen, Kjersti Ruhwald, Morten Kromann, Ingrid Andersen, Peter Shattock, Robin J Follmann, Frank |
description | Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide. National screening programmes and antibiotic treatment have failed to decrease incidence, and to date no vaccines against genital chlamydia have been tested in clinical trials. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity, in humans, of a novel chlamydia vaccine based on a recombinant protein subunit (CTH522) in a prime–boost immunisation schedule.
This phase 1, first-in-human, double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done at Hammersmith Hospital in London, UK, in healthy women aged 19–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned (3:3:1) to three groups: CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes (CTH522:CAF01), CTH522 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide (CTH522:AH), or placebo (saline). Participants received three intramuscular injections of 85 μg vaccine (with adjuvant) or placebo to the deltoid region of the arm at 0, 1, and 4 months, followed by two intranasal administrations of 30 μg unadjuvanted vaccine or placebo (one in each nostril) at months 4·5 and 5·0. The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity (anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion). This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02787109.
Between Aug 15, 2016, and Feb 13, 2017, 35 women were randomly assigned (15 to CTH522:CAF01, 15 to CTH522:AH, and five to placebo). 32 (91%) received all five vaccinations and all participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. No related serious adverse reactions were reported, and the most frequent adverse events were mild local injection-site reactions, which were reported in all (15 [100%] of 15) participants in the two vaccine groups and in three (60%) of five participants in the placebo group (p=0·0526 for both comparisons). Intranasal vaccination was not associated with a higher frequency of related local reactions (reported in seven [47%] of 15 participants in the active treatment groups vs three [60%] of five in the placebo group; p=1·000). Both CTH522:CAF01 and CTH522:AH induced anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion in 15 (100%) of 15 participants after five immunisations, whereas no participants in the placebo group seroconverted. CTH522:CAF01 showed accelerated seroconversion, increased IgG titres, an enhanced mucosal antibody profile, and a more consistent cell-mediated immune response profile compared with CTH522:AH.
CTH522 adjuvanted with either CAF01 or aluminium hydroxide appears to |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30279-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275289399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309919302798</els_id><sourcerecordid>2297095511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-d059c65a0410b4a78cf57c44bb8e3e9fc5b30aaff30bdd744f09a039988ca9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEoqXwCSBLbIrUgJ04k7gbVI0oRarEorO3XuwX4pFjB9sZmE_kr_DMFBZsWNm-Ove-J9-ieM3oe0bZ6sMD421d1lSISybe1bRqRdk9Kc6zzEvOm_bp8X5CzooXMW4pZS2j_HlxVjPOVitRnRe_HmDAtCfgNDHTtDj_DZ1RJkt-IGlEokYL014bIDtQyrisZNhoSEjWm7umqgjo7bIDl1CTHyaNZH1zSxmxZvbRTxiJDwTsMhlnlomMex38T6PxmgAZTIipNK4clwncFQk52k8mor4i2i-9xbK3xuXXbEFh70vlXQre2gMxjxCRMJKCAfuyeDaAjfjq8bwoNrefNuu78v7r5y_rm_tScVGlUtNGqFUDlDPac2g7NTSt4rzvO6xRDKrpawowDDXttW45H6gAWgvRdQoE1BfF5Sl2Dv77gjHJvK5Ca8GhX6KsqrapOpENGX37D7r1S3B5uUyJloqmYSxTzYlSwccYcJBzMBOEvWRUHqqWx6rloUfJhDxWLbvse_OYvvQT6r-uP91m4OMJwPwbO4NBRmXQKdQmoEpSe_OfEb8B_5q7SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2297095511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Abraham, Sonya ; Juel, Helene B ; Bang, Peter ; Cheeseman, Hannah M ; Dohn, Rebecca B ; Cole, Tom ; Kristiansen, Max P ; Korsholm, Karen S ; Lewis, David ; Olsen, Anja W ; McFarlane, Leon R ; Day, Suzanne ; Knudsen, Sara ; Moen, Kjersti ; Ruhwald, Morten ; Kromann, Ingrid ; Andersen, Peter ; Shattock, Robin J ; Follmann, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sonya ; Juel, Helene B ; Bang, Peter ; Cheeseman, Hannah M ; Dohn, Rebecca B ; Cole, Tom ; Kristiansen, Max P ; Korsholm, Karen S ; Lewis, David ; Olsen, Anja W ; McFarlane, Leon R ; Day, Suzanne ; Knudsen, Sara ; Moen, Kjersti ; Ruhwald, Morten ; Kromann, Ingrid ; Andersen, Peter ; Shattock, Robin J ; Follmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide. National screening programmes and antibiotic treatment have failed to decrease incidence, and to date no vaccines against genital chlamydia have been tested in clinical trials. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity, in humans, of a novel chlamydia vaccine based on a recombinant protein subunit (CTH522) in a prime–boost immunisation schedule.
This phase 1, first-in-human, double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done at Hammersmith Hospital in London, UK, in healthy women aged 19–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned (3:3:1) to three groups: CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes (CTH522:CAF01), CTH522 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide (CTH522:AH), or placebo (saline). Participants received three intramuscular injections of 85 μg vaccine (with adjuvant) or placebo to the deltoid region of the arm at 0, 1, and 4 months, followed by two intranasal administrations of 30 μg unadjuvanted vaccine or placebo (one in each nostril) at months 4·5 and 5·0. The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity (anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion). This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02787109.
Between Aug 15, 2016, and Feb 13, 2017, 35 women were randomly assigned (15 to CTH522:CAF01, 15 to CTH522:AH, and five to placebo). 32 (91%) received all five vaccinations and all participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. No related serious adverse reactions were reported, and the most frequent adverse events were mild local injection-site reactions, which were reported in all (15 [100%] of 15) participants in the two vaccine groups and in three (60%) of five participants in the placebo group (p=0·0526 for both comparisons). Intranasal vaccination was not associated with a higher frequency of related local reactions (reported in seven [47%] of 15 participants in the active treatment groups vs three [60%] of five in the placebo group; p=1·000). Both CTH522:CAF01 and CTH522:AH induced anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion in 15 (100%) of 15 participants after five immunisations, whereas no participants in the placebo group seroconverted. CTH522:CAF01 showed accelerated seroconversion, increased IgG titres, an enhanced mucosal antibody profile, and a more consistent cell-mediated immune response profile compared with CTH522:AH.
CTH522 adjuvanted with either CAF01 or aluminium hydroxide appears to be safe and well tolerated. Both vaccines were immunogenic, although CTH522:CAF01 had a better immunogenicity profile, holding promise for further clinical development.
European Commission and The Innovation Fund Denmark.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30279-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31416692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Antibiotics ; Antibodies ; Bacterial diseases ; Chlamydia ; Clinical trials ; Condoms ; Double-blind studies ; Gonorrhea ; Hepatitis ; Immune response ; Immune response (cell-mediated) ; Immune system ; Immunization ; Immunogenicity ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Inflammatory diseases ; Laboratories ; Liposomes ; Mucosa ; Pain ; R&D ; Randomization ; Research & development ; Safety ; Schedules ; Seroconversion ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Studies ; Syphilis ; Vaccines ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1091-1100</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-d059c65a0410b4a78cf57c44bb8e3e9fc5b30aaff30bdd744f09a039988ca9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-d059c65a0410b4a78cf57c44bb8e3e9fc5b30aaff30bdd744f09a039988ca9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2297095511?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juel, Helene B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, Hannah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohn, Rebecca B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Max P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsholm, Karen S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Anja W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarlane, Leon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Kjersti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhwald, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromann, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shattock, Robin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide. National screening programmes and antibiotic treatment have failed to decrease incidence, and to date no vaccines against genital chlamydia have been tested in clinical trials. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity, in humans, of a novel chlamydia vaccine based on a recombinant protein subunit (CTH522) in a prime–boost immunisation schedule.
This phase 1, first-in-human, double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done at Hammersmith Hospital in London, UK, in healthy women aged 19–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned (3:3:1) to three groups: CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes (CTH522:CAF01), CTH522 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide (CTH522:AH), or placebo (saline). Participants received three intramuscular injections of 85 μg vaccine (with adjuvant) or placebo to the deltoid region of the arm at 0, 1, and 4 months, followed by two intranasal administrations of 30 μg unadjuvanted vaccine or placebo (one in each nostril) at months 4·5 and 5·0. The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity (anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion). This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02787109.
Between Aug 15, 2016, and Feb 13, 2017, 35 women were randomly assigned (15 to CTH522:CAF01, 15 to CTH522:AH, and five to placebo). 32 (91%) received all five vaccinations and all participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. No related serious adverse reactions were reported, and the most frequent adverse events were mild local injection-site reactions, which were reported in all (15 [100%] of 15) participants in the two vaccine groups and in three (60%) of five participants in the placebo group (p=0·0526 for both comparisons). Intranasal vaccination was not associated with a higher frequency of related local reactions (reported in seven [47%] of 15 participants in the active treatment groups vs three [60%] of five in the placebo group; p=1·000). Both CTH522:CAF01 and CTH522:AH induced anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion in 15 (100%) of 15 participants after five immunisations, whereas no participants in the placebo group seroconverted. CTH522:CAF01 showed accelerated seroconversion, increased IgG titres, an enhanced mucosal antibody profile, and a more consistent cell-mediated immune response profile compared with CTH522:AH.
CTH522 adjuvanted with either CAF01 or aluminium hydroxide appears to be safe and well tolerated. Both vaccines were immunogenic, although CTH522:CAF01 had a better immunogenicity profile, holding promise for further clinical development.
European Commission and The Innovation Fund Denmark.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Gonorrhea</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune response (cell-mediated)</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inflammatory diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Liposomes</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Seroconversion</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syphilis</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEoqXwCSBLbIrUgJ04k7gbVI0oRarEorO3XuwX4pFjB9sZmE_kr_DMFBZsWNm-Ove-J9-ieM3oe0bZ6sMD421d1lSISybe1bRqRdk9Kc6zzEvOm_bp8X5CzooXMW4pZS2j_HlxVjPOVitRnRe_HmDAtCfgNDHTtDj_DZ1RJkt-IGlEokYL014bIDtQyrisZNhoSEjWm7umqgjo7bIDl1CTHyaNZH1zSxmxZvbRTxiJDwTsMhlnlomMex38T6PxmgAZTIipNK4clwncFQk52k8mor4i2i-9xbK3xuXXbEFh70vlXQre2gMxjxCRMJKCAfuyeDaAjfjq8bwoNrefNuu78v7r5y_rm_tScVGlUtNGqFUDlDPac2g7NTSt4rzvO6xRDKrpawowDDXttW45H6gAWgvRdQoE1BfF5Sl2Dv77gjHJvK5Ca8GhX6KsqrapOpENGX37D7r1S3B5uUyJloqmYSxTzYlSwccYcJBzMBOEvWRUHqqWx6rloUfJhDxWLbvse_OYvvQT6r-uP91m4OMJwPwbO4NBRmXQKdQmoEpSe_OfEb8B_5q7SQ</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Abraham, Sonya</creator><creator>Juel, Helene B</creator><creator>Bang, Peter</creator><creator>Cheeseman, Hannah M</creator><creator>Dohn, Rebecca B</creator><creator>Cole, Tom</creator><creator>Kristiansen, Max P</creator><creator>Korsholm, Karen S</creator><creator>Lewis, David</creator><creator>Olsen, Anja W</creator><creator>McFarlane, Leon R</creator><creator>Day, Suzanne</creator><creator>Knudsen, Sara</creator><creator>Moen, Kjersti</creator><creator>Ruhwald, Morten</creator><creator>Kromann, Ingrid</creator><creator>Andersen, Peter</creator><creator>Shattock, Robin J</creator><creator>Follmann, Frank</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial</title><author>Abraham, Sonya ; Juel, Helene B ; Bang, Peter ; Cheeseman, Hannah M ; Dohn, Rebecca B ; Cole, Tom ; Kristiansen, Max P ; Korsholm, Karen S ; Lewis, David ; Olsen, Anja W ; McFarlane, Leon R ; Day, Suzanne ; Knudsen, Sara ; Moen, Kjersti ; Ruhwald, Morten ; Kromann, Ingrid ; Andersen, Peter ; Shattock, Robin J ; Follmann, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-d059c65a0410b4a78cf57c44bb8e3e9fc5b30aaff30bdd744f09a039988ca9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Gonorrhea</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune response (cell-mediated)</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inflammatory diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Liposomes</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Seroconversion</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syphilis</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juel, Helene B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, Hannah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohn, Rebecca B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Max P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsholm, Karen S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Anja W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarlane, Leon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Kjersti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhwald, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromann, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shattock, Robin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abraham, Sonya</au><au>Juel, Helene B</au><au>Bang, Peter</au><au>Cheeseman, Hannah M</au><au>Dohn, Rebecca B</au><au>Cole, Tom</au><au>Kristiansen, Max P</au><au>Korsholm, Karen S</au><au>Lewis, David</au><au>Olsen, Anja W</au><au>McFarlane, Leon R</au><au>Day, Suzanne</au><au>Knudsen, Sara</au><au>Moen, Kjersti</au><au>Ruhwald, Morten</au><au>Kromann, Ingrid</au><au>Andersen, Peter</au><au>Shattock, Robin J</au><au>Follmann, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1100</epage><pages>1091-1100</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>Chlamydia is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide. National screening programmes and antibiotic treatment have failed to decrease incidence, and to date no vaccines against genital chlamydia have been tested in clinical trials. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity, in humans, of a novel chlamydia vaccine based on a recombinant protein subunit (CTH522) in a prime–boost immunisation schedule.
This phase 1, first-in-human, double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done at Hammersmith Hospital in London, UK, in healthy women aged 19–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned (3:3:1) to three groups: CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes (CTH522:CAF01), CTH522 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide (CTH522:AH), or placebo (saline). Participants received three intramuscular injections of 85 μg vaccine (with adjuvant) or placebo to the deltoid region of the arm at 0, 1, and 4 months, followed by two intranasal administrations of 30 μg unadjuvanted vaccine or placebo (one in each nostril) at months 4·5 and 5·0. The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity (anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion). This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02787109.
Between Aug 15, 2016, and Feb 13, 2017, 35 women were randomly assigned (15 to CTH522:CAF01, 15 to CTH522:AH, and five to placebo). 32 (91%) received all five vaccinations and all participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. No related serious adverse reactions were reported, and the most frequent adverse events were mild local injection-site reactions, which were reported in all (15 [100%] of 15) participants in the two vaccine groups and in three (60%) of five participants in the placebo group (p=0·0526 for both comparisons). Intranasal vaccination was not associated with a higher frequency of related local reactions (reported in seven [47%] of 15 participants in the active treatment groups vs three [60%] of five in the placebo group; p=1·000). Both CTH522:CAF01 and CTH522:AH induced anti-CTH522 IgG seroconversion in 15 (100%) of 15 participants after five immunisations, whereas no participants in the placebo group seroconverted. CTH522:CAF01 showed accelerated seroconversion, increased IgG titres, an enhanced mucosal antibody profile, and a more consistent cell-mediated immune response profile compared with CTH522:AH.
CTH522 adjuvanted with either CAF01 or aluminium hydroxide appears to be safe and well tolerated. Both vaccines were immunogenic, although CTH522:CAF01 had a better immunogenicity profile, holding promise for further clinical development.
European Commission and The Innovation Fund Denmark.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31416692</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30279-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2019-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1091-1100 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275289399 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Aluminum Antibiotics Antibodies Bacterial diseases Chlamydia Clinical trials Condoms Double-blind studies Gonorrhea Hepatitis Immune response Immune response (cell-mediated) Immune system Immunization Immunogenicity Immunoglobulin G Immunoglobulins Infections Infectious diseases Inflammatory diseases Laboratories Liposomes Mucosa Pain R&D Randomization Research & development Safety Schedules Seroconversion Sexually transmitted diseases STD Studies Syphilis Vaccines Womens health |
title | Safety and immunogenicity of the chlamydia vaccine candidate CTH522 adjuvanted with CAF01 liposomes or aluminium hydroxide: a first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T15%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20immunogenicity%20of%20the%20chlamydia%20vaccine%20candidate%20CTH522%20adjuvanted%20with%20CAF01%20liposomes%20or%20aluminium%20hydroxide:%20a%20first-in-human,%20randomised,%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled,%20phase%201%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Abraham,%20Sonya&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1100&rft.pages=1091-1100&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30279-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2297095511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2297095511&rft_id=info:pmid/31416692&rft_els_id=S1473309919302798&rfr_iscdi=true |