Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms

The pig industry is growing very fast in Argentina with an increasing need for replacement animals, feedstuff and transportation of animals. One of the main competitive advantages of the Argentinian pig industry is its being free of most major pig diseases. Within this context, applying measures aim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive veterinary medicine 2019-10, Vol.170, p.104637-104637, Article 104637
Hauptverfasser: Alarcón, L.V., Monterubbianesi, M., Perelman, S., Sanguinetti, H.R., Perfumo, C.J., Mateu, E., Allepuz, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104637
container_issue
container_start_page 104637
container_title Preventive veterinary medicine
container_volume 170
creator Alarcón, L.V.
Monterubbianesi, M.
Perelman, S.
Sanguinetti, H.R.
Perfumo, C.J.
Mateu, E.
Allepuz, A.
description The pig industry is growing very fast in Argentina with an increasing need for replacement animals, feedstuff and transportation of animals. One of the main competitive advantages of the Argentinian pig industry is its being free of most major pig diseases. Within this context, applying measures aimed to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of pathogens is critical. The aim of the present study was to assess the biosecurity of Argentinian pig farms. Two types of farms were assessed: firstly, all official suppliers of high-genetic-value (n = 110) and secondly, a sample from commercial farms (n = 192). Data on the external and internal biosecurity practices applied on the farms was collected with a questionnaire. Data was analysed using a correspondence analysis and a hierarchical clustering analysis, which allowed identification of types of farms with regard to the biosecurity measures applied. Key variables characterizing the clusters were identified through an indicator value analysis. In addition, the external biosecurity of the farms was evaluated by using risk assessment tools with respect to the potential introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Results made evident three clusters: the first one which, amongst other measures, applied several barriers to prevent the entry of people, trucks and other vehicles, and could be considered as a group of high biosecurity, and the two other groups which applied a lower number of external and internal biosecurity measures. The results of the risk assessment showed that the routes with the highest risk of disease introduction were: replacement animals, vehicles transporting feed or animals, and visitors. The assessment of the external biosecurity showed that most Argentinian farms were not prepared for the contingency of a pathogen such as porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Special efforts should be made in official suppliers of high-genetic-value farms with poor biosecurity scores since they are at the top of the pig production chain and can be key for the spread of diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275263832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167587718303696</els_id><sourcerecordid>2275263832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-82cf90916bd516d444ec5b1a92be995607a9985b915c6fb1c9b560e853bd0abf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF6BHLu3itEma40C8pElc4BwlqTtlWh8k3aT9ezpt48rJlv3Zlj9CHoBmQEHM11kfcIdDg1XGKKiMsowCuyBTKGWeggRxSaYjKVNeSjkhNzGuKaVClPyaTHIoGBSqnJL5k-8ium3wwz4xMWKMDbZD0tXJIqzGzLfetEnvV0ltQhNvyVVtNhHvTnFGvl9fvp7f0-Xn28fzYpm6XMKQlszViioQtuIgqqIo0HELRjGLSnFBpVGq5FYBd6K24JQdi1jy3FbU2Dqfkcfj3j50P1uMg258dLjZmBa7bdSMSc5EXuZsROURdaGLMWCt--AbE_YaqD7Y0mv9Z0sfbGnK9GhrnLw_HdnaQ-88d9YzAosjgOOrO49BR-exdVj5gG7QVef_PfILfRV_MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2275263832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alarcón, L.V. ; Monterubbianesi, M. ; Perelman, S. ; Sanguinetti, H.R. ; Perfumo, C.J. ; Mateu, E. ; Allepuz, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, L.V. ; Monterubbianesi, M. ; Perelman, S. ; Sanguinetti, H.R. ; Perfumo, C.J. ; Mateu, E. ; Allepuz, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The pig industry is growing very fast in Argentina with an increasing need for replacement animals, feedstuff and transportation of animals. One of the main competitive advantages of the Argentinian pig industry is its being free of most major pig diseases. Within this context, applying measures aimed to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of pathogens is critical. The aim of the present study was to assess the biosecurity of Argentinian pig farms. Two types of farms were assessed: firstly, all official suppliers of high-genetic-value (n = 110) and secondly, a sample from commercial farms (n = 192). Data on the external and internal biosecurity practices applied on the farms was collected with a questionnaire. Data was analysed using a correspondence analysis and a hierarchical clustering analysis, which allowed identification of types of farms with regard to the biosecurity measures applied. Key variables characterizing the clusters were identified through an indicator value analysis. In addition, the external biosecurity of the farms was evaluated by using risk assessment tools with respect to the potential introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Results made evident three clusters: the first one which, amongst other measures, applied several barriers to prevent the entry of people, trucks and other vehicles, and could be considered as a group of high biosecurity, and the two other groups which applied a lower number of external and internal biosecurity measures. The results of the risk assessment showed that the routes with the highest risk of disease introduction were: replacement animals, vehicles transporting feed or animals, and visitors. The assessment of the external biosecurity showed that most Argentinian farms were not prepared for the contingency of a pathogen such as porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Special efforts should be made in official suppliers of high-genetic-value farms with poor biosecurity scores since they are at the top of the pig production chain and can be key for the spread of diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31421498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - classification ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Argentina - epidemiology ; Biosecurity ; Cluster analysis ; Containment of Biohazards - methods ; Containment of Biohazards - veterinary ; Correspondence analysis ; Pigs ; Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus ; Prevalence ; Risk Assessment ; Sus scrofa ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2019-10, Vol.170, p.104637-104637, Article 104637</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-82cf90916bd516d444ec5b1a92be995607a9985b915c6fb1c9b560e853bd0abf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-82cf90916bd516d444ec5b1a92be995607a9985b915c6fb1c9b560e853bd0abf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587718303696$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31421498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, L.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monterubbianesi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perelman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguinetti, H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfumo, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateu, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allepuz, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>The pig industry is growing very fast in Argentina with an increasing need for replacement animals, feedstuff and transportation of animals. One of the main competitive advantages of the Argentinian pig industry is its being free of most major pig diseases. Within this context, applying measures aimed to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of pathogens is critical. The aim of the present study was to assess the biosecurity of Argentinian pig farms. Two types of farms were assessed: firstly, all official suppliers of high-genetic-value (n = 110) and secondly, a sample from commercial farms (n = 192). Data on the external and internal biosecurity practices applied on the farms was collected with a questionnaire. Data was analysed using a correspondence analysis and a hierarchical clustering analysis, which allowed identification of types of farms with regard to the biosecurity measures applied. Key variables characterizing the clusters were identified through an indicator value analysis. In addition, the external biosecurity of the farms was evaluated by using risk assessment tools with respect to the potential introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Results made evident three clusters: the first one which, amongst other measures, applied several barriers to prevent the entry of people, trucks and other vehicles, and could be considered as a group of high biosecurity, and the two other groups which applied a lower number of external and internal biosecurity measures. The results of the risk assessment showed that the routes with the highest risk of disease introduction were: replacement animals, vehicles transporting feed or animals, and visitors. The assessment of the external biosecurity showed that most Argentinian farms were not prepared for the contingency of a pathogen such as porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Special efforts should be made in official suppliers of high-genetic-value farms with poor biosecurity scores since they are at the top of the pig production chain and can be key for the spread of diseases.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - classification</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Argentina - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biosecurity</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Containment of Biohazards - methods</subject><subject>Containment of Biohazards - veterinary</subject><subject>Correspondence analysis</subject><subject>Pigs</subject><subject>Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAMgCMEYmPwF6BHLu3itEma40C8pElc4BwlqTtlWh8k3aT9ezpt48rJlv3Zlj9CHoBmQEHM11kfcIdDg1XGKKiMsowCuyBTKGWeggRxSaYjKVNeSjkhNzGuKaVClPyaTHIoGBSqnJL5k-8ium3wwz4xMWKMDbZD0tXJIqzGzLfetEnvV0ltQhNvyVVtNhHvTnFGvl9fvp7f0-Xn28fzYpm6XMKQlszViioQtuIgqqIo0HELRjGLSnFBpVGq5FYBd6K24JQdi1jy3FbU2Dqfkcfj3j50P1uMg258dLjZmBa7bdSMSc5EXuZsROURdaGLMWCt--AbE_YaqD7Y0mv9Z0sfbGnK9GhrnLw_HdnaQ-88d9YzAosjgOOrO49BR-exdVj5gG7QVef_PfILfRV_MQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Alarcón, L.V.</creator><creator>Monterubbianesi, M.</creator><creator>Perelman, S.</creator><creator>Sanguinetti, H.R.</creator><creator>Perfumo, C.J.</creator><creator>Mateu, E.</creator><creator>Allepuz, A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms</title><author>Alarcón, L.V. ; Monterubbianesi, M. ; Perelman, S. ; Sanguinetti, H.R. ; Perfumo, C.J. ; Mateu, E. ; Allepuz, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-82cf90916bd516d444ec5b1a92be995607a9985b915c6fb1c9b560e853bd0abf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - classification</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Argentina - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biosecurity</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Containment of Biohazards - methods</topic><topic>Containment of Biohazards - veterinary</topic><topic>Correspondence analysis</topic><topic>Pigs</topic><topic>Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, L.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monterubbianesi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perelman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanguinetti, H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfumo, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateu, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allepuz, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alarcón, L.V.</au><au>Monterubbianesi, M.</au><au>Perelman, S.</au><au>Sanguinetti, H.R.</au><au>Perfumo, C.J.</au><au>Mateu, E.</au><au>Allepuz, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>104637</spage><epage>104637</epage><pages>104637-104637</pages><artnum>104637</artnum><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>The pig industry is growing very fast in Argentina with an increasing need for replacement animals, feedstuff and transportation of animals. One of the main competitive advantages of the Argentinian pig industry is its being free of most major pig diseases. Within this context, applying measures aimed to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of pathogens is critical. The aim of the present study was to assess the biosecurity of Argentinian pig farms. Two types of farms were assessed: firstly, all official suppliers of high-genetic-value (n = 110) and secondly, a sample from commercial farms (n = 192). Data on the external and internal biosecurity practices applied on the farms was collected with a questionnaire. Data was analysed using a correspondence analysis and a hierarchical clustering analysis, which allowed identification of types of farms with regard to the biosecurity measures applied. Key variables characterizing the clusters were identified through an indicator value analysis. In addition, the external biosecurity of the farms was evaluated by using risk assessment tools with respect to the potential introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Results made evident three clusters: the first one which, amongst other measures, applied several barriers to prevent the entry of people, trucks and other vehicles, and could be considered as a group of high biosecurity, and the two other groups which applied a lower number of external and internal biosecurity measures. The results of the risk assessment showed that the routes with the highest risk of disease introduction were: replacement animals, vehicles transporting feed or animals, and visitors. The assessment of the external biosecurity showed that most Argentinian farms were not prepared for the contingency of a pathogen such as porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. Special efforts should be made in official suppliers of high-genetic-value farms with poor biosecurity scores since they are at the top of the pig production chain and can be key for the spread of diseases.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31421498</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.012</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5877
ispartof Preventive veterinary medicine, 2019-10, Vol.170, p.104637-104637, Article 104637
issn 0167-5877
1873-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2275263832
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal Husbandry - classification
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
Argentina - epidemiology
Biosecurity
Cluster analysis
Containment of Biohazards - methods
Containment of Biohazards - veterinary
Correspondence analysis
Pigs
Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus
Prevalence
Risk Assessment
Sus scrofa
Swine
Swine Diseases - epidemiology
title Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biosecurity%20assessment%20of%20Argentinian%20pig%20farms&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Alarc%C3%B3n,%20L.V.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=104637&rft.epage=104637&rft.pages=104637-104637&rft.artnum=104637&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2275263832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2275263832&rft_id=info:pmid/31421498&rft_els_id=S0167587718303696&rfr_iscdi=true