Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX

To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX ® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Calcified tissue international 2019-09, Vol.105 (3), p.263-270
Hauptverfasser: Martin-Sanchez, Mario, Comas, Mercè, Posso, Margarita, Louro, Javier, Domingo, Laia, Tebé, Cristian, Castells, Xavier, Espallargues, Mireia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 3
container_start_page 263
container_title Calcified tissue international
container_volume 105
creator Martin-Sanchez, Mario
Comas, Mercè
Posso, Margarita
Louro, Javier
Domingo, Laia
Tebé, Cristian
Castells, Xavier
Espallargues, Mireia
description To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX ® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX ® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX ® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX ® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX ® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273766199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2235979477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-751f2cdb933cdfdc4963c6f625e3e47b610b9865f22551f0558542af88c466fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun78AQ9S8OIlmo8maY6y7KogKOqCt9DNTtZIt12TVvDfm9pVwYOXDMk8805mXoSOKTmnhKiLSAhjHBOqMSFCEay30IjmnGFSMLWNRoQqirVUz3toP8ZXQmgupdxFe5xSlUrpCFXjJrZ44hzY1r9DDTFmjcvaF8gebQCofb3MXBO-Xu6DX5XhI0VIaOubumenoVz6yrcf2bVf9zfbdgEyX2eP6zKds9hrTB8unw_RjiurCEebeIBm08nT-Brf3l3djC9vseVKtFgJ6phdzDXnduEWNteSW-kkE8AhV3NJyVwXUjjGREKJEIXIWemKwqb5nOUH6GzQXYfmrYPYmpWPFqqqrKHpomFMcSUl1Tqhp3_Q16YLdfpdorjQSudKJYoNlA1NjAGcWQ-rMJSY3gszeGGSF-bLC9NLn2yku_kKFj8l38tPAB-AmFL1EsJv739kPwH9gpMz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2235979477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Martin-Sanchez, Mario ; Comas, Mercè ; Posso, Margarita ; Louro, Javier ; Domingo, Laia ; Tebé, Cristian ; Castells, Xavier ; Espallargues, Mireia</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin-Sanchez, Mario ; Comas, Mercè ; Posso, Margarita ; Louro, Javier ; Domingo, Laia ; Tebé, Cristian ; Castells, Xavier ; Espallargues, Mireia</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX ® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX ® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX ® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX ® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX ® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-967X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31172231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alendronic acid ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bisphosphonates ; Bone mineral density ; Cell Biology ; Cost analysis ; Endocrinology ; Fractures ; Hip ; Life Sciences ; Original Research ; Orthopedics ; Osteoporosis ; Risk assessment ; Risk groups ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>Calcified tissue international, 2019-09, Vol.105 (3), p.263-270</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Calcified Tissue International is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-751f2cdb933cdfdc4963c6f625e3e47b610b9865f22551f0558542af88c466fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-751f2cdb933cdfdc4963c6f625e3e47b610b9865f22551f0558542af88c466fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1926-2740</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin-Sanchez, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comas, Mercè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louro, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebé, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espallargues, Mireia</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX</title><title>Calcified tissue international</title><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX ® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX ® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX ® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX ® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX ® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.</description><subject>Alendronic acid</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>0171-967X</issn><issn>1432-0827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun78AQ9S8OIlmo8maY6y7KogKOqCt9DNTtZIt12TVvDfm9pVwYOXDMk8805mXoSOKTmnhKiLSAhjHBOqMSFCEay30IjmnGFSMLWNRoQqirVUz3toP8ZXQmgupdxFe5xSlUrpCFXjJrZ44hzY1r9DDTFmjcvaF8gebQCofb3MXBO-Xu6DX5XhI0VIaOubumenoVz6yrcf2bVf9zfbdgEyX2eP6zKds9hrTB8unw_RjiurCEebeIBm08nT-Brf3l3djC9vseVKtFgJ6phdzDXnduEWNteSW-kkE8AhV3NJyVwXUjjGREKJEIXIWemKwqb5nOUH6GzQXYfmrYPYmpWPFqqqrKHpomFMcSUl1Tqhp3_Q16YLdfpdorjQSudKJYoNlA1NjAGcWQ-rMJSY3gszeGGSF-bLC9NLn2yku_kKFj8l38tPAB-AmFL1EsJv739kPwH9gpMz</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Martin-Sanchez, Mario</creator><creator>Comas, Mercè</creator><creator>Posso, Margarita</creator><creator>Louro, Javier</creator><creator>Domingo, Laia</creator><creator>Tebé, Cristian</creator><creator>Castells, Xavier</creator><creator>Espallargues, Mireia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-2740</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX</title><author>Martin-Sanchez, Mario ; Comas, Mercè ; Posso, Margarita ; Louro, Javier ; Domingo, Laia ; Tebé, Cristian ; Castells, Xavier ; Espallargues, Mireia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-751f2cdb933cdfdc4963c6f625e3e47b610b9865f22551f0558542af88c466fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alendronic acid</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin-Sanchez, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comas, Mercè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louro, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebé, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espallargues, Mireia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin-Sanchez, Mario</au><au>Comas, Mercè</au><au>Posso, Margarita</au><au>Louro, Javier</au><au>Domingo, Laia</au><au>Tebé, Cristian</au><au>Castells, Xavier</au><au>Espallargues, Mireia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX</atitle><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle><stitle>Calcif Tissue Int</stitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>263-270</pages><issn>0171-967X</issn><eissn>1432-0827</eissn><abstract>To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX ® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX ® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX ® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX ® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX ® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31172231</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-2740</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-967X
ispartof Calcified tissue international, 2019-09, Vol.105 (3), p.263-270
issn 0171-967X
1432-0827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273766199
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Alendronic acid
Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Bisphosphonates
Bone mineral density
Cell Biology
Cost analysis
Endocrinology
Fractures
Hip
Life Sciences
Original Research
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Risk assessment
Risk groups
Sensitivity analysis
title Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20of%20the%20Screening%20for%20the%20Primary%20Prevention%20of%20Fragility%20Hip%20Fracture%20in%20Spain%20Using%20FRAX&rft.jtitle=Calcified%20tissue%20international&rft.au=Martin-Sanchez,%20Mario&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=263-270&rft.issn=0171-967X&rft.eissn=1432-0827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2235979477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2235979477&rft_id=info:pmid/31172231&rfr_iscdi=true